How much trash does Hillary carry?

It is possible that Hillary Clinton has more trash on her than any other politician in History. This thread is to be about her and those around her misdeeds as many of those things have been forgotten by most.

I will start off with her brother that lived in the White House much of the time with Bill, her, and occasionally Monica. Do we remember him taking money from an individual convicted of a crime to obtain a pardon from the President at the end of his presidency?

:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin: She is scaring you loons to death,isn't she? Funny!

She does scare me. With all the damage Obama and his administration has caused I really feel she would be even worse. There are many of us Americans that have invested a tremendous amount to making this country and the thought of turning it over to someone so evil as Hillary and her group does scare us.
 
How much trash does Hillary carry?

You're kidding, right? I'm willing to bet she hasn't had her hand on a trash bag in at least 25 to 30 years.

Perhaps she used them in packing up White House collectables when her husband, her brother and she left the white house.
 
It is possible that Hillary Clinton has more trash on her than any other politician in History.

Don't worry. The media will bury all of it. She'll look like Cinderella during the campaign.

There will never be one mention of

Saul Alinsky (she wrote her college thesis on him)
Getting kicked off the Watergate committee for ethical violations
Whitewater Development Company
Billy Dale and the White House Travel Office
Bimbo Eruptions Unit
Hillarycare 1993
Cursing out the Secret Service to their faces
Throwing ashtrays
Stealing the White House furniture when she left
Unconstitutional co-Presidents
Vince Foster
Narcissistic Loony Tunes
Webb Hubbell
Rose Law Firm billing records
Not responsible for every undercapitalized business
Magical cattle futures trading
Knowing nothing before Congressional investigators
Vast right-wing conspiracy

Fear not. Her secret(s)(s)(s) are safe with them.

Back then, Democrats stonewalled, evaded, refused to comply with subpoenas, concealed evidence, and lied till they were blue in the face to conceal what they had done.

Now, if/when any of these things are brought up, they will reply, "These things were discussed long ago, and all the facts were brought out then. It's old news, we need to move on."

(Sound familiar?)
Lest you forget early on in her 'career':

Politics: Watergate-era Judiciary chief of staff: Hillary Clinton fired for lies, unethical behavior | Best of Cain

As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.


The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of top Democrats, up to and including then-House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel. Zeifman says that Hillary, along with Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar, was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon. And in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.

The brief involved precedent for representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding. When Hillary endeavored to write a legal brief arguing there is no right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding, Zeifman says, he told Hillary about the case of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who faced an impeachment attempt in 1970.

“As soon as the impeachment resolutions were introduced by (then-House Minority Leader Gerald) Ford, and they were referred to the House Judiciary Committee, the first thing Douglas did was hire himself a lawyer,” Zeifman said.

The Judiciary Committee allowed Douglas to keep counsel, thus establishing the precedent. Zeifman says he told Hillary that all the documents establishing this fact were in the Judiciary Committee’s public files. So what did Hillary do?

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.
The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.
 

Forum List

Back
Top