How strong is the Syrian army today?

Bleipriester

Freedom!
Nov 14, 2012
32,497
4,350
1,140
Doucheland
This question was raised by incidents that are not appropriate to raise this question. A sudden storm on Idlib from Turkey for example has nothing to do with the strength of the Syrian military. We all hope, that President Assad will remain in office and the jihadi terrorists will get 80 years old virgins with big rolling pins.

While some eager drooling pseudo-journalists and terror cheerleaders are talking about a collapsing of the army, the world knows, that this is not the case, as the army resists the terrorists although the times became harder during the past months.

However, it is hard to estimate the number of soldiers fighting in the Syrian army and the losses they suffered.

SOHR says that of the 220.000 thousands people killed in the war, 40.000 were Syrian soldiers. SOHR estimates that the frontline personnel numbers 200.000. Other estimations shunt between 178.000 and 220.000. Of this number, 110.000 belong to the army. However, the same figure applies for 2013 according to globalsecurity. The rest is the airforce. The personnel of the reserve is estimated at 570.000.

In addition to the army, other forces that fight alongside the army number 80.000 - 100.000. (Some sources include those fighters in the number above, some don´t. It is very probably an addition.)

Syrian Armed Forces - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Syria Military Strength

The number of tanks in 2015 is estimated at 4850 of which 1600 are T-72. If correct, the army has received some tanks from Russia during the war. In addition, there are some thousands of IFV and APC among others.

Syria - Army Equipment

The number of Mig 21 and 23 may be around 300, who knows.
Syrian Arab Air Force - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


Statements:

Late 2014:

“Defections, desertions and attrition after three years of civil war saw Syria’s total manpower decline from a high of 325,000 in 2011 to 295,000 in 2012 to an estimated 178,000 in 2013 and 2014,” he told AFP.

But the remaining “100,000 to 150,000 loyal troops tested in battle over more than two years of fighting are arguably more lethal than a 300,000-strong Syrian military in 2010, complacent after some 30 years of sitting idle.”

An official source in the army, meanwhile, played down the need for reinforcements, insisting losses in personnel and materiel were being quickly replaced. “The power of the army has increased qualitatively and quantitatively,” he said.

“For the near to mid-term future, Assad is very unlikely to be able to destroy the insurgency and retake all the areas now controlled by rebels,” according to Stephen Biddle, a defense policy expert at the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations.

“Wars of this kind typically last seven to 10 years, and some last a generation or more.”

Syria army adapts to guerrilla war News Middle East THE DAILY STAR

2015:

Weakened by years of war, Syria's government appears ready for the country's de facto partition, defending strategically important areas and leaving much of the country to rebels and jihadists, experts and diplomats say.

The strategy was in evidence last week with the army's retreat from the ancient central city of Palmyra after an advance by the Islamic State group.

"It is quite understandable that the Syrian army withdraws to protect large cities where much of the population is located," said Waddah Abded Rabbo, director of Syria's Al-Watan newspaper, which is close to the regime.

"On the surface, the regime appears to have accepted that it must secure, hold and defend its core area of control ... with its current mix of forces," he said.

People close to the regime talk about a government retreat to "useful Syria."

But the new strategy does not indicate regime collapse, and could even work in its favor, Nerguizian said.

"Militarily, the regime probably still has the means to hold the southeastern half of the country long-term, but further losses could weaken it from within."

Syria Regime To Accept De Facto Partition of Country
 
Last edited:
All Nazi armies are strong------but contain the seeds of their own destruction. In ancient times--- The Persian army, the greek army, the roman army In contemporary times----the German army, the Italian army, the Japanese army, Idi Amin's army, saddam Hussein's army, Assad's army. what else is new,
captain blei ????????
 
All Nazi armies are strong------but contain the seeds of their own destruction. In ancient times--- The Persian army, the greek army, the roman army In contemporary times----the German army, the Italian army, the Japanese army, Idi Amin's army, saddam Hussein's army, Assad's army. what else is new,
captain blei ????????
What the heck is a Nazi army?
 
All Nazi armies are strong------but contain the seeds of their own destruction. In ancient times--- The Persian army, the greek army, the roman army In contemporary times----the German army, the Italian army, the Japanese army, Idi Amin's army, saddam Hussein's army, Assad's army. what else is new,
captain blei ????????
What the heck is a Nazi army?

the armies associated with Utopian Totalitarian ideologies.
A good example in the ancient world was the Roman army--- The Greek Army was borderline. It is a quirk of mine to term totatalitarian ideologies as "Nazi"------there is
a logical basis
 
All Nazi armies are strong------but contain the seeds of their own destruction. In ancient times--- The Persian army, the greek army, the roman army In contemporary times----the German army, the Italian army, the Japanese army, Idi Amin's army, saddam Hussein's army, Assad's army. what else is new,
captain blei ????????
What the heck is a Nazi army?

the armies associated with Utopian Totalitarian ideologies.
A good example in the ancient world was the Roman army--- The Greek Army was borderline. It is a quirk of mine to term totatalitarian ideologies as "Nazi"------there is
a logical basis
The roman army was a mercenary army. The Syrian army isn´t what you label "nazi army", as well.
 
All Nazi armies are strong------but contain the seeds of their own destruction. In ancient times--- The Persian army, the greek army, the roman army In contemporary times----the German army, the Italian army, the Japanese army, Idi Amin's army, saddam Hussein's army, Assad's army. what else is new,
captain blei ????????
What the heck is a Nazi army?

the armies associated with Utopian Totalitarian ideologies.
A good example in the ancient world was the Roman army--- The Greek Army was borderline. It is a quirk of mine to term totatalitarian ideologies as "Nazi"------there is
a logical basis
The roman army was a mercenary army. The Syrian army isn´t what you label "nazi army", as well.

wrong again----the ROMAN ARMY was entirely like the
Medieval European (holy roman empire) army-----an
endeavor for NOBLES and those seeking societal advancement PLUS mercenary elements. ----similar to the BRITISH ARMY----in fact not much different from most of the
armies of European countries until very recently-----in fact----even a bit similar to the United States military---even today
 
Oh---sorry----I missed the next point---THE SYRIAN ARMY is----indeed a NAZI ARMY-------the army of NATIONAL SOCIALISM OF BAATHISM------national arabism
 
All Nazi armies are strong------but contain the seeds of their own destruction. In ancient times--- The Persian army, the greek army, the roman army In contemporary times----the German army, the Italian army, the Japanese army, Idi Amin's army, saddam Hussein's army, Assad's army. what else is new,
captain blei ????????
What the heck is a Nazi army?

the armies associated with Utopian Totalitarian ideologies.
A good example in the ancient world was the Roman army--- The Greek Army was borderline. It is a quirk of mine to term totatalitarian ideologies as "Nazi"------there is
a logical basis
The roman army was a mercenary army. The Syrian army isn´t what you label "nazi army", as well.

wrong again----the ROMAN ARMY was entirely like the
Medieval European (holy roman empire) army-----an
endeavor for NOBLES and those seeking societal advancement PLUS mercenary elements. ----similar to the BRITISH ARMY----in fact not much different from most of the
armies of European countries until very recently-----in fact----even a bit similar to the United States military---even today
So I am right and you are wrong as the roman army was not driven by ideology but by pay.

The Syrian army, on the other hand, is also not a "Nazi army" (army that spreads any ideology according to you).
The Syrian army does not spread any ideology but defends the Syrian homeland.

Not even the Wehrmacht was nazi army. NSDAP big shots were called "the others" among the soldiers. Read here: The Invisible Flag by Peter Bamm Reviews Discussion Bookclubs Lists
 
All Nazi armies are strong------but contain the seeds of their own destruction. In ancient times--- The Persian army, the greek army, the roman army In contemporary times----the German army, the Italian army, the Japanese army, Idi Amin's army, saddam Hussein's army, Assad's army. what else is new,
captain blei ????????
What the heck is a Nazi army?

the armies associated with Utopian Totalitarian ideologies.
A good example in the ancient world was the Roman army--- The Greek Army was borderline. It is a quirk of mine to term totatalitarian ideologies as "Nazi"------there is
a logical basis
The roman army was a mercenary army. The Syrian army isn´t what you label "nazi army", as well.

wrong again----the ROMAN ARMY was entirely like the
Medieval European (holy roman empire) army-----an
endeavor for NOBLES and those seeking societal advancement PLUS mercenary elements. ----similar to the BRITISH ARMY----in fact not much different from most of the
armies of European countries until very recently-----in fact----even a bit similar to the United States military---even today
So I am right and you are wrong as the roman army was not driven by ideology but by pay.

The Syrian army, on the other hand, is also not a "Nazi army" (army that spreads any ideology according to you).
The Syrian does not spread any ideology but defends the Syrian homeland.

Not even the Wehrmacht was nazi army. NSDAP big shots were called "the others" among the soldiers. Read here: The Invisible Flag by Peter Bamm Reviews Discussion Bookclubs Lists

stupid answer------the ROMAN ARMY was controlled by ROMAN IDEOLOGUES-----even the german soldiers were
not entirely all NAZI PIGS as are you. In ancient rome-----foot soldiers were like foot soldiers in Syria------UNDER ORDERS of the -----higher ups. The SUCCESSFUL german soldiers were your colleagues -------OFFICERS OF THE S.S. In fact that roman army was just as rigidly controlled as was the Nazi army and your the shipmates on
THE BOUNTY-----captain blei
 
What the heck is a Nazi army?

the armies associated with Utopian Totalitarian ideologies.
A good example in the ancient world was the Roman army--- The Greek Army was borderline. It is a quirk of mine to term totatalitarian ideologies as "Nazi"------there is
a logical basis
The roman army was a mercenary army. The Syrian army isn´t what you label "nazi army", as well.

wrong again----the ROMAN ARMY was entirely like the
Medieval European (holy roman empire) army-----an
endeavor for NOBLES and those seeking societal advancement PLUS mercenary elements. ----similar to the BRITISH ARMY----in fact not much different from most of the
armies of European countries until very recently-----in fact----even a bit similar to the United States military---even today
So I am right and you are wrong as the roman army was not driven by ideology but by pay.

The Syrian army, on the other hand, is also not a "Nazi army" (army that spreads any ideology according to you).
The Syrian does not spread any ideology but defends the Syrian homeland.

Not even the Wehrmacht was nazi army. NSDAP big shots were called "the others" among the soldiers. Read here: The Invisible Flag by Peter Bamm Reviews Discussion Bookclubs Lists

stupid answer------the ROMAN ARMY was controlled by ROMAN IDEOLOGUES-----even the german soldiers were
not entirely all NAZI PIGS as are you. In ancient rome-----foot soldiers were like foot soldiers in Syria------UNDER ORDERS of the -----higher ups. The SUCCESSFUL german soldiers were your colleagues -------OFFICERS OF THE S.S. In fact that roman army was just as rigidly controlled as was the Nazi army and your the shipmates on
THE BOUNTY-----captain blei
You mean that I am a Nazi? Very funny. You probably will increase your Nazi accusations after this statement:
Effectively every army, including the IDF, bases on orders and their execution :)

A "non-nazi army" (army, that operates without orders and whose soldiers can do what they want during a battle, enjoy icecream e.g., according to you) hardly can defeat an enemy.
 
the armies associated with Utopian Totalitarian ideologies.
A good example in the ancient world was the Roman army--- The Greek Army was borderline. It is a quirk of mine to term totatalitarian ideologies as "Nazi"------there is
a logical basis
The roman army was a mercenary army. The Syrian army isn´t what you label "nazi army", as well.

wrong again----the ROMAN ARMY was entirely like the
Medieval European (holy roman empire) army-----an
endeavor for NOBLES and those seeking societal advancement PLUS mercenary elements. ----similar to the BRITISH ARMY----in fact not much different from most of the
armies of European countries until very recently-----in fact----even a bit similar to the United States military---even today
So I am right and you are wrong as the roman army was not driven by ideology but by pay.

The Syrian army, on the other hand, is also not a "Nazi army" (army that spreads any ideology according to you).
The Syrian does not spread any ideology but defends the Syrian homeland.

Not even the Wehrmacht was nazi army. NSDAP big shots were called "the others" among the soldiers. Read here: The Invisible Flag by Peter Bamm Reviews Discussion Bookclubs Lists

stupid answer------the ROMAN ARMY was controlled by ROMAN IDEOLOGUES-----even the german soldiers were
not entirely all NAZI PIGS as are you. In ancient rome-----foot soldiers were like foot soldiers in Syria------UNDER ORDERS of the -----higher ups. The SUCCESSFUL german soldiers were your colleagues -------OFFICERS OF THE S.S. In fact that roman army was just as rigidly controlled as was the Nazi army and your the shipmates on
THE BOUNTY-----captain blei
You mean that I am a Nazi? Very funny. You probably will increase your Nazi accusations after this statement:
Effectively every army, including the IDF, bases on orders and their execution :)

A "non-nazi army" (army, that operates without orders and whose soldiers can do what they want during a battle, enjoy icecream e.g., according to you) hardly can defeat an enemy.

you are not a Nazi based on military service-----you are a Nazi based on BAATHIST IDEOLOGY-------national socialist Arabism . son of "grand" mufti, al husseini, uar pig gamal abdel Nasser, mass murderer saddam hussein
 
The roman army was a mercenary army. The Syrian army isn´t what you label "nazi army", as well.

wrong again----the ROMAN ARMY was entirely like the
Medieval European (holy roman empire) army-----an
endeavor for NOBLES and those seeking societal advancement PLUS mercenary elements. ----similar to the BRITISH ARMY----in fact not much different from most of the
armies of European countries until very recently-----in fact----even a bit similar to the United States military---even today
So I am right and you are wrong as the roman army was not driven by ideology but by pay.

The Syrian army, on the other hand, is also not a "Nazi army" (army that spreads any ideology according to you).
The Syrian does not spread any ideology but defends the Syrian homeland.

Not even the Wehrmacht was nazi army. NSDAP big shots were called "the others" among the soldiers. Read here: The Invisible Flag by Peter Bamm Reviews Discussion Bookclubs Lists

stupid answer------the ROMAN ARMY was controlled by ROMAN IDEOLOGUES-----even the german soldiers were
not entirely all NAZI PIGS as are you. In ancient rome-----foot soldiers were like foot soldiers in Syria------UNDER ORDERS of the -----higher ups. The SUCCESSFUL german soldiers were your colleagues -------OFFICERS OF THE S.S. In fact that roman army was just as rigidly controlled as was the Nazi army and your the shipmates on
THE BOUNTY-----captain blei
You mean that I am a Nazi? Very funny. You probably will increase your Nazi accusations after this statement:
Effectively every army, including the IDF, bases on orders and their execution :)

A "non-nazi army" (army, that operates without orders and whose soldiers can do what they want during a battle, enjoy icecream e.g., according to you) hardly can defeat an enemy.

you are not a Nazi based on military service-----you are a Nazi based on BAATHIST IDEOLOGY-------national socialist Arabism . son of "grand" mufti, al husseini, uar pig gamal abdel Nasser, mass murderer saddam hussein
I am not a Nazi and Baathism has nothing to do with Nazism. Baathism includes no kind of racism or religious being-chosen-conceit.
 
wrong again----the ROMAN ARMY was entirely like the
Medieval European (holy roman empire) army-----an
endeavor for NOBLES and those seeking societal advancement PLUS mercenary elements. ----similar to the BRITISH ARMY----in fact not much different from most of the
armies of European countries until very recently-----in fact----even a bit similar to the United States military---even today
So I am right and you are wrong as the roman army was not driven by ideology but by pay.

The Syrian army, on the other hand, is also not a "Nazi army" (army that spreads any ideology according to you).
The Syrian does not spread any ideology but defends the Syrian homeland.

Not even the Wehrmacht was nazi army. NSDAP big shots were called "the others" among the soldiers. Read here: The Invisible Flag by Peter Bamm Reviews Discussion Bookclubs Lists

stupid answer------the ROMAN ARMY was controlled by ROMAN IDEOLOGUES-----even the german soldiers were
not entirely all NAZI PIGS as are you. In ancient rome-----foot soldiers were like foot soldiers in Syria------UNDER ORDERS of the -----higher ups. The SUCCESSFUL german soldiers were your colleagues -------OFFICERS OF THE S.S. In fact that roman army was just as rigidly controlled as was the Nazi army and your the shipmates on
THE BOUNTY-----captain blei
You mean that I am a Nazi? Very funny. You probably will increase your Nazi accusations after this statement:
Effectively every army, including the IDF, bases on orders and their execution :)

A "non-nazi army" (army, that operates without orders and whose soldiers can do what they want during a battle, enjoy icecream e.g., according to you) hardly can defeat an enemy.

you are not a Nazi based on military service-----you are a Nazi based on BAATHIST IDEOLOGY-------national socialist Arabism . son of "grand" mufti, al husseini, uar pig gamal abdel Nasser, mass murderer saddam hussein
I am not a Nazi and Baathism has nothing to do with Nazism. Baathism includes no kind of racism or religious being-chosen-conceit.

Baathism is ARAB NATIONALISM NAZI SHIT just as the german program is ARYAN NATIONALISM NAZI SHIT----

Nazi shit like you USE the term CHOSEN----as a racist fart.
The entire theme of the first book of the bible is ----"CHOICE"------and refers to man's ability to CHOOSE to avoid shit like you-------it's a sublime writing ----you should read it some day. FREE CHOICE----unlike the Nazi shit --------to which you ascribe-------fatalism------DA WILL OF SHMALLAH THE PIG. For your interest-----the concept of
FREE CHOICE vs fatalism is also a major theme of the Odyssey. scum like you always miss the important stuff as you goosestep into the hell of your own making (Syria today---Jonah was right----that shit hole is not worth saving)
 
So I am right and you are wrong as the roman army was not driven by ideology but by pay.

The Syrian army, on the other hand, is also not a "Nazi army" (army that spreads any ideology according to you).
The Syrian does not spread any ideology but defends the Syrian homeland.

Not even the Wehrmacht was nazi army. NSDAP big shots were called "the others" among the soldiers. Read here: The Invisible Flag by Peter Bamm Reviews Discussion Bookclubs Lists

stupid answer------the ROMAN ARMY was controlled by ROMAN IDEOLOGUES-----even the german soldiers were
not entirely all NAZI PIGS as are you. In ancient rome-----foot soldiers were like foot soldiers in Syria------UNDER ORDERS of the -----higher ups. The SUCCESSFUL german soldiers were your colleagues -------OFFICERS OF THE S.S. In fact that roman army was just as rigidly controlled as was the Nazi army and your the shipmates on
THE BOUNTY-----captain blei
You mean that I am a Nazi? Very funny. You probably will increase your Nazi accusations after this statement:
Effectively every army, including the IDF, bases on orders and their execution :)

A "non-nazi army" (army, that operates without orders and whose soldiers can do what they want during a battle, enjoy icecream e.g., according to you) hardly can defeat an enemy.

you are not a Nazi based on military service-----you are a Nazi based on BAATHIST IDEOLOGY-------national socialist Arabism . son of "grand" mufti, al husseini, uar pig gamal abdel Nasser, mass murderer saddam hussein
I am not a Nazi and Baathism has nothing to do with Nazism. Baathism includes no kind of racism or religious being-chosen-conceit.

Baathism is ARAB NATIONALISM NAZI SHIT just as the german program is ARYAN NATIONALISM NAZI SHIT----

Nazi shit like you USE the term CHOSEN----as a racist fart.
The entire theme of the first book of the bible is ----"CHOICE"------and refers to man's ability to CHOOSE to avoid shit like you-------it's a sublime writing ----you should read it some day. FREE CHOICE----unlike the Nazi shit --------to which you ascribe-------fatalism------DA WILL OF SHMALLAH THE PIG. For your interest-----the concept of
FREE CHOICE vs fatalism is also a major theme of the Odyssey. scum like you always miss the important stuff as you goosestep into the hell of your own making (Syria today---Jonah was right----that shit hole is not worth saving)
You are diminishing. Time for your meds.
 

Forum List

Back
Top