How the Republicans could have gotten a one year delay in Obamacare

How the Republicans could have gotten a one year delay in Obamacare

Prevent the parasites or any one who receives government handouts from voting.

.

Unconstitutional

Try again

I fully understand that since the parasites vote early and often that taxing "A" to support "B" is "constitutional" (wink, wink).

So disenfranchising the taxpayers is copacetic; disenfranchising the parasites is not.

Go fig.

.
 
What do you say Republicans?

Delay Obamacare or we will shut down the Government didn't work out for you. How about offering something in return?

Possible GOP concessions

Jobs bill
immigration reform
Background checks

What else ya got?
 
What do you say Republicans?

Delay Obamacare or we will shut down the Government didn't work out for you. How about offering something in return?

Possible GOP concessions

Jobs bill
immigration reform
Background checks

What else ya got?
No need to offer a damn thing. It's gonna get delayed by YOUR SAVIOR anyways. All we have to do is sit back and watch this law self destruct
 
What do you say Republicans?

Delay Obamacare or we will shut down the Government didn't work out for you. How about offering something in return?

Possible GOP concessions

Jobs bill
immigration reform
Background checks

What else ya got?
No need to offer a damn thing. It's gonna get delayed by YOUR SAVIOR anyways. All we have to do is sit back and watch this law self destruct

Lol, you loons and your predictions. Thanks for the laugh nutter.
 
What do you say Republicans?

Delay Obamacare or we will shut down the Government didn't work out for you. How about offering something in return?

Possible GOP concessions

Jobs bill
immigration reform
Background checks

What else ya got?
No need to offer a damn thing. It's gonna get delayed by YOUR SAVIOR anyways. All we have to do is sit back and watch this law self destruct

Then what are you worried about?

Why shut down Government and threaten defaul over a program that is going to self destruct anyway?

Not too bright
 
What do you say Republicans?

Delay Obamacare or we will shut down the Government didn't work out for you. How about offering something in return?

Possible GOP concessions

Jobs bill
immigration reform
Background checks

What else ya got?
No need to offer a damn thing. It's gonna get delayed by YOUR SAVIOR anyways. All we have to do is sit back and watch this law self destruct

Then what are you worried about?

Why shut down Government and threaten defaul over a program that is going to self destruct anyway?

Not too bright

I didn't shut down the government jackass. Obama & Reid did. All to avoid a delay they will now promote. Know why? Because they like you are hacks
 
What do you say Republicans?

Delay Obamacare or we will shut down the Government didn't work out for you. How about offering something in return?

Possible GOP concessions

Jobs bill
immigration reform
Background checks

What else ya got?

How about 100% Lead?

bullet.gif


.
 
What do you say Republicans?

Delay Obamacare or we will shut down the Government didn't work out for you. How about offering something in return?

Possible GOP concessions

Jobs bill
immigration reform
Background checks

What else ya got?
No need to offer a damn thing. It's gonna get delayed by YOUR SAVIOR anyways. All we have to do is sit back and watch this law self destruct

Lol, you loons and your predictions. Thanks for the laugh nutter.
80% chance it gets delayed. Bank on it.

Oh, and I don't usually make predictions. I didn't predict the election but this is different
 
Given this Presidents history of my or the highway attitude why should we believe he would have accepted such a proposal? When he is offered a deal he either rejects it outright or ask for more while offering less or nothing in return.
 
Where does the Constitution say that?

Where does it say it doesn't? Thus federal law and the 14th Amendment and judicial review decide that. Tuff that.
Comrade Starkiev , a proud member of the left wing of the Socialist Party. So you know that he is really a left winger. .

Conty thinks I am a left winger because I believe in the Rule of Law and not the Rule of Man, which rather messes up Conty's desires. His problem, and I hope I can continue here on the Board to make that the norm for him.
 
No need to offer a damn thing. It's gonna get delayed by YOUR SAVIOR anyways. All we have to do is sit back and watch this law self destruct

Then what are you worried about?

Why shut down Government and threaten defaul over a program that is going to self destruct anyway?

Not too bright

I didn't shut down the government jackass. Obama & Reid did. All to avoid a delay they will now promote. Know why? Because they like you are hacks

Nice spin, but nobody outside of FoxNation is buying it

Republican DEMANDS to defund and delay Obamacare failed as expected. If Republicans really want to accomplish anything, they need to bring something to the table
Temper tantrums do not make good diplomacy
 
Mr President, we understand the ACA (not Obamacare) is important to your administration. However, we feel that a one year delay is warranted in order to be properly implemented.

In return, we will agree to stop passing bills to repeal the ACA. We will also agree to bring your jobs bill to a vote as well as participate in meaningful immigration reform discussions



The way things USED to be done in Washington

Obama: Good. Pass my jobs bill and we can talk about about delaying the mandate, later. Like 2014. Maybe. If I feel like it. And while you're at it, bring me a coffee.
 
Unconstitutional

Try again

Where does the Constitution say that?

Where does it say it doesn't? Thus federal law and the 14th Amendment and judicial review decide that. Tuff that.

The Constitution doesn't say the things that it doesn't say. You're showing definite signs of brain damage, Fakey. Your arguments are not just wrong, they're utterly incoherent.

Whatever Federal law says can be changed. The SC has never ruled that the states or Congress cannot place restrictions on who can vote. The Constitution already places such restrictions, as do the states.
 
Where does the Constitution say that?

Where does it say it doesn't? Thus federal law and the 14th Amendment and judicial review decide that. Tuff that.

Comrade Starkiev , a proud member of the left wing of the Socialist Party.

So you know that he is really a left winger.

.

Fakey isn't just a left-winger. He's a communist. I caught him posting propaganda published by the official propaganda organs of the communist government of Cuba.

He's also terminally senile. He shouldn't last longer than a few more months. We can all be glad of that.
 
Where does the Constitution say that?

Where does it say it doesn't? Thus federal law and the 14th Amendment and judicial review decide that. Tuff that.

The Constitution doesn't say the things that it doesn't say. You're showing definite signs of brain damage, Fakey. Your arguments are not just wrong, they're utterly incoherent.

Whatever Federal law says can be changed. The SC has never ruled that the states or Congress cannot place restrictions on who can vote. The Constitution already places such restrictions, as do the states.

Read the 14th amendment
 

Forum List

Back
Top