How to prove its a spending problem; not a revenue or low taxing problem

[EdwardBaiamonte]

39, 37, 64

39%= inflation and population increase last 10 years

37%= increase in revenue last 10 years

64%= increase in spending last 10 years

 

[hortysir]

but.......

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

but.......

typical liberal without IQ for substance

 

[DaGoose]

39, 37, 64

39%= inflation and population increase last 10 years

37%= increase in revenue last 10 years

64%= increase in spending last 10 years

We need to do something about our massive amount of defense spending.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

39, 37, 64

39%= inflation and population increase last 10 years

37%= increase in revenue last 10 years

64%= increase in spending last 10 years

We need to do something about our massive amount of defense spending.

actually as the policeman to the world we need massive spending, but don't have it at all. We spend less of GDP on defense than any time after WW2.

Do you want the girl scouts to handle Iran N Korea Iran China?????

 

[bendog]

Setting aside the above, if the sequester cuts are realtively painless, I gotta wonder what'd happen if they cut a full percentage pt off and tested that.

Still, I suspect McCain and Graham will support revenue going to the military, and Obama does love his drones ....

 

[hortysir]

but.......

typical liberal without IQ for substance

 

[The2ndAmendment]

This is how you prove it:

The United States dollar (and the entire world's reserve currency) is GUARANTEED to crash. When it crashes, government will only be able to take care of absolute necessities, if government itself even survives the chaos.

 

[RDD_1210]

39, 37, 64

39%= inflation and population increase last 10 years

37%= increase in revenue last 10 years

64%= increase in spending last 10 years

We need to do something about our massive amount of defense spending.

actually as the policeman to the world we need massive spending, but don't have it at all. We spend less of GDP on defense than any time after WW2.

Do you want the girl scouts to handle Iran N Korea Iran China?????

So then you really don't think spending is a problem, just the spending you don't like. Got it.

 

[tooAlive]

39, 37, 64

39%= inflation and population increase last 10 years

37%= increase in revenue last 10 years

64%= increase in spending last 10 years

We need to do something about our massive amount of defense spending.

Lets cut all military spending.

And guess what? We'd still need to cut into your precious entitlement spending.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

We need to do something about our massive amount of defense spending.

actually as the policeman to the world we need massive spending, but don't have it at all. We spend less of GDP on defense than any time after WW2.

Do you want the girl scouts to handle Iran N Korea Iran China?????

So then you really don't think spending is a problem, just the spending you don't like. Got it.

yes when spending goes up 64% while revenue only goes up 37% you have a huge liberal spending problem

 

[tooAlive]

actually as the policeman to the world we need massive spending, but don't have it at all. We spend less of GDP on defense than any time after WW2.

Do you want the girl scouts to handle Iran N Korea Iran China?????

So then you really don't think spending is a problem, just the spending you don't like. Got it.

yes when spending goes up 64% while revenue only goes up 37% you have a huge liberal spending problem

To be fair, the Right has some fault in the matter as well.

The problem is that neither side wants to cut their own programs.

 

[rdean]

39, 37, 64

39%= inflation and population increase last 10 years

37%= increase in revenue last 10 years

64%= increase in spending last 10 years

spending on what? be specific.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

39, 37, 64

39%= inflation and population increase last 10 years

37%= increase in revenue last 10 years

64%= increase in spending last 10 years

spending on what? be specific.

too stupid!! 64% is increase in total Federal spending over last 10 years