How Ukrainian leaders sacrifice Ukrainians

[Sonc]

In this video, an adviser to the President of Ukraine says that in 1991 the coalition gathered 2,500 aircraft to bomb Iraq. The air operation lasted 1 month. The air defense of Ukraine is 5 times more powerful than the air defense of Iraq, and the Russian army is weak.

Airplanes do not fly, pilots drink vodka, rockets fly past, ships themselves sink, etc.
We will destroy the Russian aircraft in 1 week.


After 3 weeks of war

"Mr. President. Help us. We need air defense. Normal air defense, not small missiles".


The same clown who promised to destroy Russian aviation in 1 week.
Responds to the call of the Nazis in Mariupol for help.


"We do not have a military solution to the situation in Mariupol.

The nearest units are fighting with the advancing Russian army.

There are no free powers. If they were, they would not be able to travel more than 100 km on roads. They would be destroyed by Russian aviation.
There is no military solution in Mariupol"

Now let's think. Question for the smart ones.
Who benefits from keeping civilians in Mariupol? Russia or Ukraine?

The Russian army continues the Baghdadization of the Nazis in Ukraine

 

[Baron]

Who benefits from keeping civilians in Mariupol? Russia or Ukraine?

In this video, an adviser to the President of Ukraine says that in 1991 the coalition gathered 2,500 aircraft to bomb Iraq. The air operation lasted 1 month. The air defense of Ukraine is 5 times more powerful than the air defense of Iraq, and the Russian army is weak.

Airplanes do not fly, pilots drink vodka, rockets fly past, ships themselves sink, etc.
We will destroy the Russian aircraft in 1 week.


After 3 weeks of war

"Mr. President. Help us. We need air defense. Normal air defense, not small missiles".


The same clown who promised to destroy Russian aviation in 1 week.
Responds to the call of the Nazis in Mariupol for help.


"We do not have a military solution to the situation in Mariupol.

The nearest units are fighting with the advancing Russian army.

There are no free powers. If they were, they would not be able to travel more than 100 km on roads. They would be destroyed by Russian aviation.
There is no military solution in Mariupol"

Now let's think. Question for the smart ones.
Who benefits from keeping civilians in Mariupol? Russia or Ukraine?

The Russian army continues the Baghdadization of the Nazis in Ukraine

To get some idea of the current situation in Ukraine, we should study the leading Ukrainian oligarchs, starting with Igor Kolomoisky, and some Russian oligarchs, such as Mikhail Fridman. They are all Jews, all have Israeli citizenship, and all have Ukrainian/Russian citizenship.
It's very simple, it's all about money - Ukraine was the richest and most industrialized of the Soviet republics. It had some world class industries. Such as the large Kharkov railroad plant, the Antonov aviation plant near Kiev, the iron ore and aluminum plants. Donbass, agriculture in the southern grain belt, and more.

Now Ukraine is the 2nd largest country in Europe (after Russia), but the 2nd poorest country (after Moldova), and all industries have disappeared, assets looted and bankrupted by oligarchs. Ukraine sees its GDP remain stagnant for 2 decades, unemployment is endemic. Millions have gone to work abroad. Little has been built or repaired since the collapse of the USSR. It is a country backward in many ways, blindly robbed by a handful of Jewish oligarchs.
The Nazis in Germany, in present-day Ukraine, in the U.S., and everywhere else, were and are the offspring of the Jewish moneyed elite. Even Stroessner in Paraguay, Peron in Argentina and Pinochet in Chile, third-rate Hitler wannabes, were their creations.

And back to your question.
Only Jewish oligarchs and politicians benefit from the war and they will continue to fight against Russia until the last Ukrainian dies