How you can tell "Global Warming" (aka: Climate Change, Climate Disruption) is a scam

[BULLDOG]

Why do you think I should know that? I already told you I'm not a climate scientist, and I doubt they would be able to be that specific..

You said the science was settled and there was a consensus.. Well -- what IS the "consensus" on the temperature anomaly in 2050.. And what WAS IT -- when this circus hit the road in 1980?

Simple questions.. Probably a 5th grader could find those answers..

Who has an interest in pushing a false theory? Of course it's easy to see why oil companies would be interested in burying such a theory.

Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam.

OK.Why is the government doing that. What is the purpose?

I just told you. What part of "Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam" didn't you understand?

I understand the words. It's your logic that is screwed up.

 

[jc456]

You said the science was settled and there was a consensus.. Well -- what IS the "consensus" on the temperature anomaly in 2050.. And what WAS IT -- when this circus hit the road in 1980?

Simple questions.. Probably a 5th grader could find those answers..

Who has an interest in pushing a false theory? Of course it's easy to see why oil companies would be interested in burying such a theory.

Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam.

OK.Why is the government doing that. What is the purpose?

I just told you. What part of "Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam" didn't you understand?

I understand the words. It's your logic that is screwed up.

his logic is ten times more correct than anything you posted in the thread. So if you don't get his logic, it is obvious you don't get your own. You are one lost puppy to say the least. He posted why it is a scam and you have not yet refuted it.

 

[tigerred59]

Inside A Photographer's Mission To Capture The Human Face Of Climate Change

 

[depotoo]

False Numbers Used to Calculate 97% of Climate Scientists Are in Agreement About the Cause of Global Warming
http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf

Speaking of the fraud being exposed, why is this exposure not of value to you? Oh, that's right. It exposes the fraud you back up.

A poll was conducted amongst environmental scientists where they were asked whether or not they believed that global warming is due to human activity. According to the results of that poll, 97 percent agreed that it was caused by human activity. While this seems like a significant amount, the numbers are skewed. There were 10,257 scientists that were polled but only 77 of those actually replied to the poll. So, in actuality only 97 percent of those 77 respondents concluded that global warming was due to human activity, not 97 percent of the entire 10,000+ panel.

Actually that is the behavior (proven BTW) of the global warming alarmists. They have been perverting the peer review process for decades. They were finally caught. And you guys turn a blind eye to that unethical behavior. Why?

Believe any conspiracy theory you want. If you chose to ignore what is believed by most qualified scientists, there is nothing I might add to convince you.

Poor widdle Bulldog. Defending the indefensible to the bitter end. Here you go sweetheart... This was the famed Polar Bear study. Peer reviewed by the authors WIFE! No conspiricy theory, actual cold hard fact. A fact that makes you look like a complete 'tard.

Hello 'tard!



"Monnett, who currently works as a wildlife biologist for ID's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement, and who also manages 50 million in research studies there, is currently the primary target of the investigation. Disclosure of Monnett's "personal relationships and preparation of scope of work," is also of primary concern because the peer review process used in publishing his landmark polar bear study appears to have been fraudulent as well.

According to Human Events, Monnett's wife, Lisa Rotterman, as well as lead researcher of another questionable polar bear study, Andrew Derocher from the University of Alberta in Canada, both peer reviewed Monnett's polar bear study. Having one's wife review a study is, of course, an obvious conflict of interest. And Derocher, whose own polar bear study is currently under review, also happens to have been acquired by Monnett, which calls into question the integrity of his review as well.

Learn more: Global warming fraud: Iconic polar bear on melting ice cap a hoax

Perfect example of how peer review works. More than one peer looks at the research. Frauds and unscientific methods are soon exposed. The only ones who disagree with the consensus of man made global climate change are people paid by companies who have a vested interest in the outcome.

You have a link to this poll?

It is news to me.

 

[flacaltenn]

Lemme help out on the "conspiracy" biz.. Aint a conspiracy at all. It's in the WIDE OPEN. All those climate change conferences at the UN end in walk-outs and hissy fits about IMMEDIATE payouts from the "developed" to the "undeveloped".. They expect their big checks to start rolling in every year. AND IN FACT -- we are already "redistributing wealth" with the pretext of Climate Change in the actual Federal Budget.

NOW -- The UN wants a formal "Special Prosecutor" to ENFORCE world-wide redistribution using Climate Change as a pretext. Here's the draft document.

http://unfccc.int/files/adaptation/application/pdf/mechanical_light_editing.pdf

Look on Page 19.. They will enforce redistribution from the wealthy to the poor..


We are now responsible for education, sewage, technology transfers and BOATLOADS of guilt money to all these poor nations who will never develop because the UN and groups like GreenPeace and the Clinton Foundation are badgering them with "sustainability", social justice, and renewable energy. They have a disaster and we send them solar panels kind of thing.. That's economic Imperialism --- And now pirating funds from the developed countries on the WEAK ASS EXCUSE of "climate change" is gonna be a respectable and legal occupation...

THERE ---- is your motivation for the weak science and failed predictions that came out the UN Panel on CLimate Change. The bias is right in their mission statement. They are not studying CC, they are only studying the CC that "is relevant to study of MAN-MADE global warming"...

Because they have an entire planet to "level the playing field" and they need an excuse to do it..

 

[jc456]

Inside A Photographer's Mission To Capture The Human Face Of Climate Change

and the titanic hit an iceberg, so?

 

[flacaltenn]

You said the science was settled and there was a consensus.. Well -- what IS the "consensus" on the temperature anomaly in 2050.. And what WAS IT -- when this circus hit the road in 1980?

Simple questions.. Probably a 5th grader could find those answers..

Who has an interest in pushing a false theory? Of course it's easy to see why oil companies would be interested in burying such a theory.

Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam.

OK.Why is the government doing that. What is the purpose?

I just told you. What part of "Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam" didn't you understand?

I understand the words. It's your logic that is screwed up.

Lemme translate. You wanna study tiny ocean slugs? No money for you..

You wanna study tiny ocean slugs that MIGHT be threaten by Man-Made GW? How much ya want?

 

[Wyatt earp]

You said the science was settled and there was a consensus.. Well -- what IS the "consensus" on the temperature anomaly in 2050.. And what WAS IT -- when this circus hit the road in 1980?

Simple questions.. Probably a 5th grader could find those answers..

Who has an interest in pushing a false theory? Of course it's easy to see why oil companies would be interested in burying such a theory.

Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam.

OK.Why is the government doing that. What is the purpose?

I just told you. What part of "Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam" didn't you understand?

I understand the words. It's your logic that is screwed up.

Nah it's your logic that is screwed up, Do you remember that list you posted and groups like the American pediatics were on it and support the man made climate change cult?

Why would they say that? When it's not even their field?

Think dude, think real hard

 

[BULLDOG]

Who has an interest in pushing a false theory? Of course it's easy to see why oil companies would be interested in burying such a theory.

Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam.

OK.Why is the government doing that. What is the purpose?

I just told you. What part of "Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam" didn't you understand?

I understand the words. It's your logic that is screwed up.

Lemme translate. You wanna study tiny ocean slugs? No money for you..

You wanna study tiny ocean slugs that MIGHT be threaten by Man-Made GW? How much ya want?

You got a link for that, or is it just something that popped into your head?

 

[bripat9643]

You said the science was settled and there was a consensus.. Well -- what IS the "consensus" on the temperature anomaly in 2050.. And what WAS IT -- when this circus hit the road in 1980?

Simple questions.. Probably a 5th grader could find those answers..

Who has an interest in pushing a false theory? Of course it's easy to see why oil companies would be interested in burying such a theory.

Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam.

OK.Why is the government doing that. What is the purpose?

I just told you. What part of "Every Climate scientist who gets money from the government, every bureaucrat and government employee and anyone sucking on the government tit has a financial interest in promoting the AGW scam" didn't you understand?

I understand the words. It's your logic that is screwed up.

You mean parasites on the government payroll aren't defending the AGW scam?

 

[tigerred59]

Why don't we all do this....why don't we just do nothing and wait and see? Revelations talk about the world ending with fire, the planet is getting warmer and idiots are still denying. So lets just wait and see.

 

[jc456]

Why don't we all do this....why don't we just do nothing and wait and see? Revelations talk about the world ending with fire, the planet is getting warmer and idiots are still denying. So lets just wait and see.

who's denying the planet isn't warming? Whoa there bubba, it's time for you to go read through some threads on here before we reach into the wayback machine. Scam is the topic, and scam is about temperature fudging by NASA.

 

[Vigilante]

Isn't it ODD that EVERYTHING ILLEGAL and attached to OBUMA, and the left's subversive agenda's are ALWAYS STONEWALLED by the regime? One starts to get the feeling that this regime is HIDING EVERYTHING from the public!

The New American ^ | November 5, 2015 | William F. Jasper
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is under investigation for suspicion of fudging its data to support global warming alarmism — again. NOAA is refusing to hand over data, including e-mail communications, subpoenaed by a congressional committee that is tasked with overseeing the multi-billion dollar agency. In July, Representative Lamar Smith (R-Texas; shown), chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, asked NOAA to provide his committee with the data. On October 13, because the agency had not been fully forthcoming, the committee issued a subpoena to NOAA Administrator Kathryn Sullivan. On November 4, Chairman Smith warned...

 

[thereisnospoon]

Isn't it ODD that EVERYTHING ILLEGAL and attached to OBUMA, and the left's subversive agenda's are ALWAYS STONEWALLED by the regime? One starts to get the feeling that this regime is HIDING EVERYTHING from the public!

The New American ^ | November 5, 2015 | William F. Jasper
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is under investigation for suspicion of fudging its data to support global warming alarmism — again. NOAA is refusing to hand over data, including e-mail communications, subpoenaed by a congressional committee that is tasked with overseeing the multi-billion dollar agency. In July, Representative Lamar Smith (R-Texas; shown), chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, asked NOAA to provide his committee with the data. On October 13, because the agency had not been fully forthcoming, the committee issued a subpoena to NOAA Administrator Kathryn Sullivan. On November 4, Chairman Smith warned...

NASA finished a study a few years ago. The study concluded that in the previous 100 years, the avg global temp rose 1.8C....The study also concluded that other than natural climate cycles, there was no other explanation for the slight rise.
So why ANOTHER study from another Federal agency?.....Could it be so that the "right" results were reported? That the Obama admin let NOAA know that it was "highly recommended" the results of this study coincide with the POTUS "green agenda"?....

 

[Kosh]

Hiding data is the process for the AGW cult, just like it is for the far left religion..

They do not want the truth to get out, because if the truth did get out they would loose their power..

 

[flacaltenn]

Thread Merge !! Ding Ding.. Round 2 !!!