- Jan 22, 2020
- 13,981
- 12,667
Not according to a jury
Juries, just another thing on the long list of what leftists and their blue shitholes have destroyed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not according to a jury
Yeah straight, straight to the bank to pay women for sex.Don’t project MiddledDick.
He was wrong. It’s what a jury says that counts.
Ah. You figured that out? Good little feller.
I’d feel violated. And it would be sex abuse, not rape. But of course, that’s just silly. I’m not like you. Only a proctologist is sticking a finger up my ass, you quiff.
It would matter lot to me either way.
But Trump also isn’t like you. He’s straight.
Damn boi, you're one sad victimized fuckup.Juries, just another thing on the long list of what leftists and their blue shitholes have destroyed.
1994 Dress was not even made in 1994. LolWhat new evidence?
It’s another thing in a long list of the norms you Trumpers have attackedJuries, just another thing on the long list of what leftists and their blue shitholes have destroyed.
I keep asking for her actually saying that. Can’t find it.1994 Dress was not even made in 1994. Lol
It's in the testimony.I keep asking for her actually saying that. Can’t find it.
Do you have a quote (of her) and link?
Damn boi, you're one sad victimized fuckup.
Really? A quote and link should be easy then. I couldn’t find itIt's in the testimony.
That's because you're retarded!Really? A quote and link should be easy then. I couldn’t find it
Ok. And I assume you’re not. You should be able to post that quote and link thenThat's because you're retarded!
HilariousPointing out facts regarding the evils of leftism is not victimization.
So he couldn’t be convicted or acquitted, you dipshit.
I keep asking for her actually saying that. Can’t find it.
Do you have a quote (of her) and link?
The jury did’t find him liable for rape.
She was right.
He wasn’t acquitted. Not could he have been. And he wasn’t even found civilly liable for any rape.THEREFORE, a claim that he was aquited is made up bullshit exactly as I've said.
Apreciate your support dummy.
Trump was acquitted of that.
He wasn’t acquitted.
What was trump "aquited" of?
No. He wasn’t acquitted of anything. Nor could he have been. Similarly, he wasn’t convicted of anything. Nor could he have been. Learn punctuation, too.NOTHING is the correct answer and thats why the poster was wrong.
No. A civil jury bought that claim. But that doesn’t mean he did it. Her story was completely implausible.Trump stuck his fingers in Caroll's vagina
Wrong. Denying that one ever engaged in a criminal act isn’t defamation. And you don’t know if he lied. Youre just guessing. Stupidly.and defamed her by lying about it.
Partly correct. He was found liable for defamation. But the defamation wasn’t just a denial of her claim. Try to smarten up.Thats what he was found liable for.
I’m not. I don’t believe it happened. And it wouldn’t be rape even if he had done it.If you weren't such a damn Trump tool you wouldn't be spending time parsing out if fingers in vagina is rape make,
He hasn’t been found liable for any subsequent defamation.but wondering why the fuck your Dear Leader immediately resumes defamation after losing a 5 million dollar defamation case...what the hell is wrong with him?
He wasn’t acquitted. He wasn’t convicted. Neither of those things was even an available option for the jury.You really can't make this comedy up.
He hasn’t been found liable for any subsequent defamation.