HUH??? Dems SUE GOP over Trump's "election is rigged" complaint

[BluesLegend]

I told you people Democrats are filth this should be no surprise whatsoever.

 

[BluesLegend]

Dems are idiots. They didn't sue Obama when he claimed in 2008 that the election may be rigged due to voter fraud.

That's Different a Democrat said it.

 

[OKTexas]

Since I'm fully aware of your history of hypocrisy I'm very sure you'd be taking my position if the situation was reversed. I, on the other hand would say it was a bunch of shit no matter who filed it. The 1st amendment is all about political speech and courts have historically shied away form cases involving it, even speech that would be slanderous in any other circumstance. They're definitely not going to hold a nation party liable for anything an individual candidate might say. This is nothing but another diversion trying to draw attention away form all the bad things coming out about the hildabitch, it a weapon of mass distraction. Right by the Alinsky play book.

Feel free to try to point to where I got it wrong.

I guess you'll stay on Ignore until you've learned to read.

I questioned his legal basis. He hasn't seen the suit. None of us have seen the suit --- if there is one. All we have is a three-paragraph story. If you think that's grounds for "throwing out" an action then you know even less about Law than about reading.

There is no legal basis, you can't be held responsible for the speech of someone else, especially political speech. It will be summarily dismissed.

And you're gonna sit there and swallow everything that CNN says describing it without question, are ya?
SMFH

Are you saying the clinton news network would lie?

I'm saying you gullible asshats who automatically start drooling over any half-baked article you think presents something that helps your partisan bullshit without taking a nanosecond to vet what it's really about could be sold a cheese straightener.

First I wan't to know why you edited out the last line of my quote? You want to answer the question I asked, which was:

My only question is why did they file in NJ, do you think they were judge shopping?

Now, exactly how did I drool, I simply said it was BS and would go nowhere. I gave you my reasoning for why I said it was BS, wouldn't matter which side filed it. Oh I did make fun of one of the quotes about it being voter suppression, that's got to be the biggest fantasy in the whole thing. And thinking a court would seriously entertain it a close second. Justice would be the court fining the DNC lawyers for frivolous litigation.

 

[Clementine]

This really is incredible. The case should be thrown out but since it was filed in a federal court, i suspect it won't be

Democrats sue Republicans over Donald Trump's 'rigged' complaints - CNNPolitics.com

oct 26 2016 The Democratic National Committee is suing the Republican National Committee for aiding GOP nominee Donald Trump as he argues that the presidential election is "rigged," claiming that Trump's argument is designed to suppress the vote in minority communities.

The suit, filed Wednesday in US District Court in New Jersey, argues that the RNC has not sufficiently rebuked Trump for the line of attack, which he has used as a rallying cry and is assumed to be a way to explain away a potential loss on Election Day.

"Trump has falsely and repeatedly told his supporters that the November 8 election will be 'rigged' based upon fabricated claims of voter fraud in 'certain areas' or 'certain sections' of key states," the Democratic attorneys, including Hillary Clinton campaign counsel Marc Elias, wrote. "Unsurprisingly, those 'certain areas' are exclusively communities in which large minority voting populations reside."

Dems are idiots. They didn't sue Obama when he claimed in 2008 that the election may be rigged due to voter fraud.

They just don't want the issue of fraud even discussed because someone might dig and find evidence.

Recently, an illegal alien arrested for a serious crime was discovered to have voted in the last 3 elections. What that tells us is that it takes an intense investigation to even find the fraud going on. Most goes undetected because no one is looking too hard. Only cases that show up are those tagged by the computer, such as people voting twice. A more careful check often reveals dead people voting and some fraudulent registrations. No one is finding out whether voters are citizens or whether the voting machines are hacked. When complaints continue to come in, like they did in past elections, of the machines changing votes, you see that any computer can be hacked. If it was a glitch, as claimed, the votes could 'accidentally' switch either way. Only ones I've heard are those changing votes to Hillary. Rigged.

He wasn't an illegal alien, he was a resident alien, in the country legally.

Sorry, didn't remember that detail. Point is that he had no business voting and yet was never red flagged. I think many are voting illegally and since no one is looking close enough, it's going undetected.

 

[TNHarley]

Democrats ask judge to sanction Republicans over Trump

The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday asked a U.S. judge to hold the Republican National Committee in contempt of court over allegations that Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to intimidate minority voters.
The DNC accused Republicans in a court filing of violating a longstanding consent decree, which restricts Republicans' ability to question voters at the polls and prevent those people from casting a ballot.
During the presidential campaign, Republican nominee Trump has asked followers to "watch" for fraud in the Nov.8 presidential election in certain areas where minority voters reside, even though no evidence of fraud exists, the filing said. Some of Trump's followers have pledged to do just that, the filing said.
The RNC has supported Trump's "ballot security endeavors," Democrats said in the court filing.
The RNC said the filing was completely meritless.
"The RNC strictly abides by the consent decree and does not take part directly or indirectly in any efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud. Nor do we coordinate with the Trump campaign or any other campaign or party organization in any efforts they may make in this area," a RNC spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "The RNC remains focused on getting out the vote."
Representatives for the Trump campaign could not immediately be reached for comment.
The DNC asked a New Jersey federal judge to issue an injunction preventing the RNC from spending money on voter integrity efforts, and to instruct its field offices that no employee shall participate in any ballot security measures.

You have GOT to be kidding me!
"watch for fraud" ?!?!
These people are COMPLETE SCUM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-17/
According to Foval Group founder Scott Foval, “The campaign (Hillary Clinton campaign) pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.”
“So the Chicago Protest when they shut all that, that was us. It was more him (Bob Creamer, founder of Democracy Partners) than me,” said Aaron Minter, “but none of this was suppose to come back to us, because we want it coming from people, we don’t want it to come from the party.”

You fucking bedwetters are going to wake up in an ocean of piss. Soon.

 

[Eaglewings]

Democrats ask judge to sanction Republicans over Trump

The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday asked a U.S. judge to hold the Republican National Committee in contempt of court over allegations that Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to intimidate minority voters.
The DNC accused Republicans in a court filing of violating a longstanding consent decree, which restricts Republicans' ability to question voters at the polls and prevent those people from casting a ballot.
During the presidential campaign, Republican nominee Trump has asked followers to "watch" for fraud in the Nov.8 presidential election in certain areas where minority voters reside, even though no evidence of fraud exists, the filing said. Some of Trump's followers have pledged to do just that, the filing said.
The RNC has supported Trump's "ballot security endeavors," Democrats said in the court filing.
The RNC said the filing was completely meritless.
"The RNC strictly abides by the consent decree and does not take part directly or indirectly in any efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud. Nor do we coordinate with the Trump campaign or any other campaign or party organization in any efforts they may make in this area," a RNC spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "The RNC remains focused on getting out the vote."
Representatives for the Trump campaign could not immediately be reached for comment.
The DNC asked a New Jersey federal judge to issue an injunction preventing the RNC from spending money on voter integrity efforts, and to instruct its field offices that no employee shall participate in any ballot security measures.

You have GOT to be kidding me!
"watch for fraud" ?!?!
These people are COMPLETE SCUM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-17/
According to Foval Group founder Scott Foval, “The campaign (Hillary Clinton campaign) pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.”
“So the Chicago Protest when they shut all that, that was us. It was more him (Bob Creamer, founder of Democracy Partners) than me,” said Aaron Minter, “but none of this was suppose to come back to us, because we want it coming from people, we don’t want it to come from the party.”

You fucking bedwetters are going to wake up in an ocean of piss. Soon.

The DNC is ruthless , even if it could be a legal action. Makes me lose respect for both of these cheating parties. RNC, DNC
If someone is smart next election, they will distance themself away from either of these parties.

 

[TNHarley]

New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" | Zero Hedge
Crooked Dems are SLIME

 

[TNHarley]

Democrats ask judge to sanction Republicans over Trump

The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday asked a U.S. judge to hold the Republican National Committee in contempt of court over allegations that Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to intimidate minority voters.
The DNC accused Republicans in a court filing of violating a longstanding consent decree, which restricts Republicans' ability to question voters at the polls and prevent those people from casting a ballot.
During the presidential campaign, Republican nominee Trump has asked followers to "watch" for fraud in the Nov.8 presidential election in certain areas where minority voters reside, even though no evidence of fraud exists, the filing said. Some of Trump's followers have pledged to do just that, the filing said.
The RNC has supported Trump's "ballot security endeavors," Democrats said in the court filing.
The RNC said the filing was completely meritless.
"The RNC strictly abides by the consent decree and does not take part directly or indirectly in any efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud. Nor do we coordinate with the Trump campaign or any other campaign or party organization in any efforts they may make in this area," a RNC spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "The RNC remains focused on getting out the vote."
Representatives for the Trump campaign could not immediately be reached for comment.
The DNC asked a New Jersey federal judge to issue an injunction preventing the RNC from spending money on voter integrity efforts, and to instruct its field offices that no employee shall participate in any ballot security measures.

You have GOT to be kidding me!
"watch for fraud" ?!?!
These people are COMPLETE SCUM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-17/
According to Foval Group founder Scott Foval, “The campaign (Hillary Clinton campaign) pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.”
“So the Chicago Protest when they shut all that, that was us. It was more him (Bob Creamer, founder of Democracy Partners) than me,” said Aaron Minter, “but none of this was suppose to come back to us, because we want it coming from people, we don’t want it to come from the party.”

You fucking bedwetters are going to wake up in an ocean of piss. Soon.

The DNC is ruthless , even if it could be a legal action. Makes me lose respect for both of these cheating parties. RNC, DNC
If someone is smart next election, they will distance themself away from either of these parties.

The Duopoly is one of the biggest problems in our country. Seriously, if we sat here and discussed our countries problems, most of it would fall back on them.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Democrats ask judge to sanction Republicans over Trump

The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday asked a U.S. judge to hold the Republican National Committee in contempt of court over allegations that Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to intimidate minority voters.
The DNC accused Republicans in a court filing of violating a longstanding consent decree, which restricts Republicans' ability to question voters at the polls and prevent those people from casting a ballot.
During the presidential campaign, Republican nominee Trump has asked followers to "watch" for fraud in the Nov.8 presidential election in certain areas where minority voters reside, even though no evidence of fraud exists, the filing said. Some of Trump's followers have pledged to do just that, the filing said.
The RNC has supported Trump's "ballot security endeavors," Democrats said in the court filing.
The RNC said the filing was completely meritless.
"The RNC strictly abides by the consent decree and does not take part directly or indirectly in any efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud. Nor do we coordinate with the Trump campaign or any other campaign or party organization in any efforts they may make in this area," a RNC spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "The RNC remains focused on getting out the vote."
Representatives for the Trump campaign could not immediately be reached for comment.
The DNC asked a New Jersey federal judge to issue an injunction preventing the RNC from spending money on voter integrity efforts, and to instruct its field offices that no employee shall participate in any ballot security measures.

You have GOT to be kidding me!
"watch for fraud" ?!?!
These people are COMPLETE SCUM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-17/
According to Foval Group founder Scott Foval, “The campaign (Hillary Clinton campaign) pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.”
“So the Chicago Protest when they shut all that, that was us. It was more him (Bob Creamer, founder of Democracy Partners) than me,” said Aaron Minter, “but none of this was suppose to come back to us, because we want it coming from people, we don’t want it to come from the party.”

You fucking bedwetters are going to wake up in an ocean of piss. Soon.

lol, sometimes you get the bear, sometimes the bear gets you.

 

[OldLady]

Like I've mentioned before, where I vote we can't have "poll watchers" because the parking lot is too small. They'd be standing in the street. Or across the road in the ditch. But we are an open carry state, and I don't like the idea of snarling Trump supporters with AR-whatever's over their shoulders glaring at voters as they walk into the voting places elsewhere. It serves no purpose, except to intimidate voters. What is watching going to catch? Really?

There are bunches of official watchers in the polling place (and NO, TN, they aren't all Democrats!) to see things go according to the rules. Maybe the DNC is taking Trump's comment too seriously by bringing a suit, but maybe some of Trump's supporters have got the wrong end of the stick and think it's a good idea to go menace anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump.

Around here, they'd get decked for trying, at least I hope so. Trump will probably win around here, but it isn't even considered polite to ask a person who they voted for, so it wouldn't go over well having people messing about at the polling place.

 

[OldLady]

New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" | Zero Hedge
Crooked Dems are SLIME

Relax. Crooked Repubs are rigging the polls in their favor today. It'll all come out in the wash.

 

[TNHarley]

New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" | Zero Hedge
Crooked Dems are SLIME

Relax. Crooked Repubs are rigging the polls in their favor today. It'll all come out in the wash.

Ok Ms Shultz

 

[OldLady]

New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" | Zero Hedge
Crooked Dems are SLIME

Relax. Crooked Repubs are rigging the polls in their favor today. It'll all come out in the wash.

Ok Ms Shultz

?

 

[TNHarley]

Like I've mentioned before, where I vote we can't have "poll watchers" because the parking lot is too small. They'd be standing in the street. Or across the road in the ditch. But we are an open carry state, and I don't like the idea of snarling Trump supporters with AR-whatever's over their shoulders glaring at voters as they walk into the voting places elsewhere. It serves no purpose, except to intimidate voters. What is watching going to catch? Really?

There are bunches of official watchers in the polling place (and NO, TN, they aren't all Democrats!) to see things go according to the rules. Maybe the DNC is taking Trump's comment too seriously by bringing a suit, but maybe some of Trump's supporters have got the wrong end of the stick and think it's a good idea to go menace anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump.

Around here, they'd get decked for trying, at least I hope so. Trump will probably win around here, but it isn't even considered polite to ask a person who they voted for, so it wouldn't go over well having people messing about at the polling place.

How do you spin "watch for fraud" into voter intimidation? Especially coming from these slimy hypocritical hacks?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Democrats ask judge to sanction Republicans over Trump

The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday asked a U.S. judge to hold the Republican National Committee in contempt of court over allegations that Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to intimidate minority voters.
The DNC accused Republicans in a court filing of violating a longstanding consent decree, which restricts Republicans' ability to question voters at the polls and prevent those people from casting a ballot.
During the presidential campaign, Republican nominee Trump has asked followers to "watch" for fraud in the Nov.8 presidential election in certain areas where minority voters reside, even though no evidence of fraud exists, the filing said. Some of Trump's followers have pledged to do just that, the filing said.
The RNC has supported Trump's "ballot security endeavors," Democrats said in the court filing.
The RNC said the filing was completely meritless.
"The RNC strictly abides by the consent decree and does not take part directly or indirectly in any efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud. Nor do we coordinate with the Trump campaign or any other campaign or party organization in any efforts they may make in this area," a RNC spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "The RNC remains focused on getting out the vote."
Representatives for the Trump campaign could not immediately be reached for comment.
The DNC asked a New Jersey federal judge to issue an injunction preventing the RNC from spending money on voter integrity efforts, and to instruct its field offices that no employee shall participate in any ballot security measures.

You have GOT to be kidding me!
"watch for fraud" ?!?!
These people are COMPLETE SCUM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-17/
According to Foval Group founder Scott Foval, “The campaign (Hillary Clinton campaign) pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.”
“So the Chicago Protest when they shut all that, that was us. It was more him (Bob Creamer, founder of Democracy Partners) than me,” said Aaron Minter, “but none of this was suppose to come back to us, because we want it coming from people, we don’t want it to come from the party.”

You fucking bedwetters are going to wake up in an ocean of piss. Soon.

lol, sometimes you get the bear, sometimes the bear gets you.

Deplorable asswipe

Ever hear of the law? Apparently not.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Like I've mentioned before, where I vote we can't have "poll watchers" because the parking lot is too small. They'd be standing in the street. Or across the road in the ditch. But we are an open carry state, and I don't like the idea of snarling Trump supporters with AR-whatever's over their shoulders glaring at voters as they walk into the voting places elsewhere. It serves no purpose, except to intimidate voters. What is watching going to catch? Really?

There are bunches of official watchers in the polling place (and NO, TN, they aren't all Democrats!) to see things go according to the rules. Maybe the DNC is taking Trump's comment too seriously by bringing a suit, but maybe some of Trump's supporters have got the wrong end of the stick and think it's a good idea to go menace anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump.

Around here, they'd get decked for trying, at least I hope so. Trump will probably win around here, but it isn't even considered polite to ask a person who they voted for, so it wouldn't go over well having people messing about at the polling place.

How do you spin "watch for fraud" into voter intimidation? Especially coming from these slimy hypocritical hacks?

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

 

[TNHarley]

New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" | Zero Hedge
Crooked Dems are SLIME

Relax. Crooked Repubs are rigging the polls in their favor today. It'll all come out in the wash.

Ok Ms Shultz

?

Crooked Debbie Shultz

 

[TNHarley]

Like I've mentioned before, where I vote we can't have "poll watchers" because the parking lot is too small. They'd be standing in the street. Or across the road in the ditch. But we are an open carry state, and I don't like the idea of snarling Trump supporters with AR-whatever's over their shoulders glaring at voters as they walk into the voting places elsewhere. It serves no purpose, except to intimidate voters. What is watching going to catch? Really?

There are bunches of official watchers in the polling place (and NO, TN, they aren't all Democrats!) to see things go according to the rules. Maybe the DNC is taking Trump's comment too seriously by bringing a suit, but maybe some of Trump's supporters have got the wrong end of the stick and think it's a good idea to go menace anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump.

Around here, they'd get decked for trying, at least I hope so. Trump will probably win around here, but it isn't even considered polite to ask a person who they voted for, so it wouldn't go over well having people messing about at the polling place.

How do you spin "watch for fraud" into voter intimidation? Especially coming from these slimy hypocritical hacks?

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

 

[NYcarbineer]

Like I've mentioned before, where I vote we can't have "poll watchers" because the parking lot is too small. They'd be standing in the street. Or across the road in the ditch. But we are an open carry state, and I don't like the idea of snarling Trump supporters with AR-whatever's over their shoulders glaring at voters as they walk into the voting places elsewhere. It serves no purpose, except to intimidate voters. What is watching going to catch? Really?

There are bunches of official watchers in the polling place (and NO, TN, they aren't all Democrats!) to see things go according to the rules. Maybe the DNC is taking Trump's comment too seriously by bringing a suit, but maybe some of Trump's supporters have got the wrong end of the stick and think it's a good idea to go menace anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump.

Around here, they'd get decked for trying, at least I hope so. Trump will probably win around here, but it isn't even considered polite to ask a person who they voted for, so it wouldn't go over well having people messing about at the polling place.

How do you spin "watch for fraud" into voter intimidation? Especially coming from these slimy hypocritical hacks?

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

I like it when all a poster can do in reaction to the facts is emit some nervous laughter.

Yeah you lost, get over it.

 

[OldLady]

Like I've mentioned before, where I vote we can't have "poll watchers" because the parking lot is too small. They'd be standing in the street. Or across the road in the ditch. But we are an open carry state, and I don't like the idea of snarling Trump supporters with AR-whatever's over their shoulders glaring at voters as they walk into the voting places elsewhere. It serves no purpose, except to intimidate voters. What is watching going to catch? Really?

There are bunches of official watchers in the polling place (and NO, TN, they aren't all Democrats!) to see things go according to the rules. Maybe the DNC is taking Trump's comment too seriously by bringing a suit, but maybe some of Trump's supporters have got the wrong end of the stick and think it's a good idea to go menace anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump.

Around here, they'd get decked for trying, at least I hope so. Trump will probably win around here, but it isn't even considered polite to ask a person who they voted for, so it wouldn't go over well having people messing about at the polling place.

How do you spin "watch for fraud" into voter intimidation? Especially coming from these slimy hypocritical hacks?

I asked first, answer my question: What is "watching" going to catch? What do watchers do? They stand outside the polling place and look at people as they walk in and out. Did I get that wrong? So maybe they could watch the same person walking in twice, if they're very good watchers and actually remember every single face they see. Like I said, some zealot will take advantage of his open carry rights and .... armed people staring at me is twice as bad.
A bunch of people standing and staring at me as I walk into the polling place and as I walk back out is intimidating--and do you really think they'll be silent, these watchers?
It's a bad idea. And I really want to know what exactly these watchers will accomplish. Not generally, but specifically, TN.