I guess Bank of America is going to be begging for a taxpayer funded bailout after they give all these mortgages to people who can't afford to pay...

Do you have a link that shows that other 6% plus interest? Forget about preferred stock sales--the US treasury does not delve into the stock market--that one doesn't fly.

Do you have a link that shows that other 6% plus interest?
1662489363775.png


$109 billion profit to date!

That's a pretty cool site.
Lot's of detail.
Take a good long look. Some banks failed and never repaid, but net, TARP turned a profit.

Forget about preferred stock sales--the US treasury does not delve into the stock market--that one doesn't fly.

You don't know much about TARP. They got preferred stock and warrants.

These funds were not given as grants. Treasury received preferred stock or debt securities in exchange for these investments. Most financial institutions participating in the CPP pay Treasury a five percent dividend on preferred shares for the first five years and a nine percent rate thereafter. In addition, Treasury received warrants to purchase common shares or other securities from the banks at the time of the CPP investment. The purpose of the additional securities was to enable taxpayers to reap additional returns on their investments as banks recover.

 
Do you have a link that shows that other 6% plus interest?
View attachment 692496

$109 billion profit to date!

That's a pretty cool site.
Lot's of detail.
Take a good long look. Some banks failed and never repaid, but net, TARP turned a profit.

Forget about preferred stock sales--the US treasury does not delve into the stock market--that one doesn't fly.

You don't know much about TARP. They got preferred stock and warrants.

These funds were not given as grants. Treasury received preferred stock or debt securities in exchange for these investments. Most financial institutions participating in the CPP pay Treasury a five percent dividend on preferred shares for the first five years and a nine percent rate thereafter. In addition, Treasury received warrants to purchase common shares or other securities from the banks at the time of the CPP investment. The purpose of the additional securities was to enable taxpayers to reap additional returns on their investments as banks recover.

And in what way is that not a partial government takeover of damn near every mortgage that defaulted? No we don't need government housing, we need private property ownership.

Do you not see the conflict of interests there?
 
Republicans have NOTHING to do with the Cloward-Piven strategy. I doubt you could even explain what Cloward-Piven strategy is!

BTW, "downpat" is not a word. Learn to use spellcheck, please!
Fuck off, hosehead.

"the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse."

The goal is to overload the government financially and topple it, then institute that Communist Utopia. :auiqs.jpg:

You were saying?

So you're saying Mitt Romney wasn't involved with Fanny Mae, faggot?
 
Last edited:
And in what way is that not a partial government takeover of damn near every mortgage that defaulted? No we don't need government housing, we need private property ownership.

Do you not see the conflict of interests there?

We need a lot less government involvement in the mortgage market.
They only fuck things up.
 
The people lost more in 2007-2010.
You have no idea how many terrible stories I've heard from people. :(

Lost homes, jobs, some lost everything they had.

Many good businesses had to close down.

Some people lost. That's what happens when bubbles burst.
Banks lost too. Just awful.
 
I see no downside.

Loan people ALOT of money who cannot afford to save enough for a down payment.

Of course they can afford to maintain the home and all the payments. :rolleyes:

The bald fact is that they're already doing that. That's what rent and utility payments are.

As a former bank manager and mortgage specialist, I like this idea. They're loaning to people with good income, and a good payment history. What the borrowers don't have is savings and equity. They're loaning on income and character, not collateral. Most mortgage lending is based on collateral first, then income and character. the emphasis is important.

The greater concern here is employment stability. In a recession, hour rated low wage workers would be the first to be let go. Low wage workers are the first to be let go, the last to be hired back, and the ones to receive the least amount of public money to keep them going.

They also have little in the way of savings to fall back on, so any illness, unexpected addition to the family (now that abortion is a less likely option), or plant closure leaves them vulnerable. I would expect higher losses than for those with higher down payments, but only because these people have more resources available to them to get them through, but I don't expect the gloom and doom you're forecasting, given that they're working with borrowers of high character and stable employment.
 
Do you have a link that shows that other 6% plus interest?
View attachment 692496

$109 billion profit to date!

That's a pretty cool site.
Lot's of detail.
Take a good long look. Some banks failed and never repaid, but net, TARP turned a profit.

Forget about preferred stock sales--the US treasury does not delve into the stock market--that one doesn't fly.

You don't know much about TARP. They got preferred stock and warrants.

These funds were not given as grants. Treasury received preferred stock or debt securities in exchange for these investments. Most financial institutions participating in the CPP pay Treasury a five percent dividend on preferred shares for the first five years and a nine percent rate thereafter. In addition, Treasury received warrants to purchase common shares or other securities from the banks at the time of the CPP investment. The purpose of the additional securities was to enable taxpayers to reap additional returns on their investments as banks recover.

Your first cut and paste is not a link--it also says and I quote, "Recipients of aid through TARP's housing programs (such as mortgage servicers and state housing orgs) received subsidies that were never intended to be repaid, so we don't mark those as losses."
How kind of you to give away tax payer dollars and then deny the losses.
 
$109 billion profit to date!
You seem to have skipped over a bundle of negative outstanding bailouts--CIT Group, BofA/Countrywide Mtg., Nationstar, Florida Housing, First Horizon, CITI Mortgage, and a lot more. They count as well--not just what is highlighted in red. The taxpayers ended up paying much of that bill and no amount of partisan covering up is going to change that fact.
 

Forum List

Back
Top