Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
- May 3, 2011
- 102,527
- 36,389
Why does the CEO allow it?
I guess it's hard not to follow the crowd.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why does the CEO allow it?
The government used taxpayer money to bail out the banks last time. Bad! Bad!
Yep. They made bad loans, should have been let to fail, now you got the government in bed with Bank of America and playing the landlord and housing game, too. That's a decent part of why housing prices are so high now. What the government should have done is semi-bailed out people with mortgages and totally bailed out Bank of America depositors and liquidated the rest, paying employees off from the bottom up.Really? Just handed them dollars?
I have presented far more support for my position than you have with your blather, moron. Try again.
To be honest, what did the banks stand to lose?Really? Just handed them dollars?
My TRUE, personal anecdotal evidence is far more than you have presented with your baseless attacks. ^^^^You have presented nothing but your words. Those mean nothing.
You obviously did not read my post, dumbass! Most of the taxpayer dollars were paid back by the banks!Yep. They made bad loans, should have been let to fail, now you got the government in bed with Bank of America and playing the landlord and housing game, too. That's a decent part of why housing prices are so high now. What the government should have done is semi-bailed out people with mortgages and totally bailed out Bank of America depositors and liquidated the rest, paying employees off from the bottom up.
![]()
Bank of America getting extra $20B in bailout funds
abcnews.go.com
Yep. They made bad loans, should have been let to fail, now you got the government in bed with Bank of America and playing the landlord and housing game, too. That's a decent part of why housing prices are so high now. What the government should have done is semi-bailed out people with mortgages and totally bailed out Bank of America depositors and liquidated the rest, paying employees off from the bottom up.
![]()
Bank of America getting extra $20B in bailout funds
abcnews.go.com
To be honest, what did the banks stand to lose?
The banks probably had enough assets to hedge against the loans.
I am truly interested in how this works.
What happened to the other $18 billion. Last I checked, something isn't repaid until it is ALL repaid. I wonder what would happen if I just paid back 94% of what I borrowed---LOL. I guess that other six percent wasn't really tax payer money, eh?You obviously did not read my post, dumbass! Most of the taxpayer dollars were paid back by the banks!
Post #114 I stated:
"You do realize that the money used to bail out the financial institutions that 295 billion out of 313 billion were repaid to the federal government."
They sure seemed to be bigger and better after being bailed out!To be honest, what did the banks stand to lose?
The banks lost hundereds of billions in 2007-2010.
Wrong. Those lenders were bailed out by the tax payers. Some of them even got to double dip. They got tax payer money and was able to get the properties back on foreclosures.
Just ask Trumps treasury secretary banker Steve Munchin that did exactly that.
Wrong. What happened in 2008 was the result of repeal of banking regulations allowing the loans to be made, and the ensuing debt sold.
That Democrats have tried to undo, and Tepublicans have blocked at every turn.
But no doubt, with that reply, you are in full agreement with all of the regulations, including the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall right?
I mean there’s no way anyone could be so big of a hypocrite, they would make a statement like you just made, and not support the return of those regulations? Am I right?
What happened to the other $18 billion. Last I checked, something isn't repaid until it is ALL repaid. I wonder what would happen if I just paid back 94% of what I borrowed---LOL. I guess that other six percent wasn't really tax payer money, eh?
They sure seemed to be bigger and better after being bailed out!
How much real estate did they gain, hmm?
BoA is a crappy bank.
These race based loans that are doomed to fail are just the democrat's latest attempt to dismantle the US economy and relegate this once-great nation to third world status.What happened in 2008 was the result of repeal of banking regulations allowing the loans to be made, and the ensuing debt sold.
Banks have always been able to write and sell mortgages.
But no doubt, with that reply, you are in full agreement with all of the regulations, including the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall right?
Glass-Steagall wouldn't have prevented banks from writing and buying crappy mortgages.
And cutting out competition is good, huh?Yes, a lot bigger.
Small banks can't afford the expensive regulations that were added after 2008.
Do you have a link that shows that other 6% plus interest? Forget about preferred stock sales--the US treasury does not delve into the stock market--that one doesn't fly.With interest, dividends and preferred stock sales, the US Treasury made a huge profiit.
It's more of the Cloward-Piven strategy. They have that tactic downpat, so do the RINOs.These race based loans that are doomed to fail are just the democrat's latest attempt to dismantle the US economy and relegate this once-great nation to third world status.
And cutting out competition is good, huh?