I Hate to Say It, But the January 6 Committee Has Proved that Trump Committed a Serious Crime on January 6, 2021

[struth]

You mean why did McConnell? Contray to the lies of Jon Solomon/justthenews, Chuck Schumer was not Majority leader until January 20th, well after the insurection/riot.

he was the one that got the warning according to the OP

 

[rightwinger]

You mean why did McConnell? Contray to the lies of Jon Solomon/justthenews, Chuck Schumer was not Majority leader until January 20th, well after the insurection/riot.

In that case, it was not McConnells fault

 

[rightwinger]

he was the one that got the warning according to the OP

What is a minority leader supposed to do?

 

[struth]

What is a minority leader supposed to do?

um tell somebody…geez

 

[Burgermeister]

Well what was the intention of the attack?

1. Stop Congress from certifying the election
2. Force Mike Pence to overrule the States EVs
3. Capture Pence and Members of Congress

Insurrection

I have to put you in the idiot column. I think you really believe it.

 

[Care4all]

he was the one that got the warning according to the OP

He got a warning from Capitol Police that Democrats were going to be targeted in the morning of January 6th trying to enter the Capitol thru their tunnel network and were in Danger!

The Dc Capitol Police received a warning from the FBI, and then sent an email late night on January 5th, after work hours, at 9:45pm to an aide of Schumer to warn them about their possible danger.

Schumer and democrats were the target, of the danger.

I don't know and no one said if McConnell received a warning as well, or if Pelosi and McCarthy received a warning as well, the Jon Solomon article didn't report on that, so imo, they WERE likely warned as well.

Solomon's article is where I got the info on Capitol police sending email to Schumer aide.

 

[struth]

He got a warning from Capitol Police that Democrats were going to be targeted in the morning of January 6th trying to enter the Capitol thru their tunnel network and were in Danger!

The Dc Capitol Police received a warning from the FBI, and then sent an email late night on January 5th, after work hours, at 9:45pm to an aide of Schumer to warn them about their possible danger.

Schumer and democrats were the target, of the danger.

I don't know and no one said if McConnell received a warning as well, or if Pelosi and McCarthy received a warning as well, the Jon Solomon article didn't report on that, so imo, they WERE likely warned as well.

Solomon's article is where I got the info on Capitol police sending email to Schumer aide.

why didn’t he warn anyone or ask for more security? your post doesn’t answer my question….why did he sit on this?

 

[2aguy]

I really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter, but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

This is a two-edged sword that cuts at both sides. Chuck Schumer sat on vital intel about plans to storm the Capitol, and Nancy Pelosi twice turned down requests to use National Guard troops to guard the Capitol on January 6, even though Trump had approved their use. However, the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the riot to continue, that he purposely delayed telling his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

Trump clearly acted as an accessory to the riot after it began. He never called for violence before it occurred; in fact, he urged his supporters to protest peacefully, and he authorized 20,000 NG troops to guard the Capitol. But once the riot began, he acted as an accessory to a felony by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to cease and desist. This was a serious criminal action, and the GOP should repudiate Trump and expel him from the party over it.

At the other end, Schumer's failure to act on the FBI intel, or even to ensure that the capitol police received the intel, is inexcusable and suggests that he wanted the riot to occur so he could use it for propaganda purposes against the Republicans. The Democrats should force Schumer to resign over his failure to act on the FBI intel.

Similarly, Nancy Pelosi's inexplicable failure to allow NG troops to help guard the Capitol on January 6 suggests that she, too, wanted the riot to occur so it could be used for propaganda purposes. The claim that she refused to use the troops because this would have been "bad optics" is lame, given that she had no problem forcing the troops to guard the Capitol for five months after the riot, long after there was any credible need for them to be there. Pelosi should be forced to resign because of her refusal to allow NG troops to guard the Capitol on January 6.

From John Solomon's second blockbuster article based on newly obtained documents:

FBI intelligence warning that Jan. 6 protesters might violently storm the Capitol, target lawmakers and blockade Democrats in tunnels was never sent to frontline police commanders and officers, but was quietly emailed the night before to a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to documents that raise new concern that politics trumped security preparedness in the fateful hours before the riot.

Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed top Schumer aide Kelly Fado, now the Senate's deputy sergeant of arms, at about 9:40 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021 saying he wanted to "provide you visibility" to new intelligence that an FBI threat analysis center had received from a website owner, according to documents obtained by Just the News.

The information explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs and they were plotting to create a "perimeter" for potential violence and to find "Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol." One point of entry the rioters were targeting was the Library of Congress, he warned.(Jan. 6 Bombshell: Schumer team received FBI intel about possible violence, frontline cops didn't)

Wrong......sorry......he didn't call for the violence, so he has no culpability to the action...Schumer actually called for action against the Justices...Trump didn't do anything like it...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Wrong......sorry......he didn't call for the violence, so he has no culpability to the action...Schumer actually called for action against the Justices...Trump didn't do anything like it...

He absolutely did, as every single insurrectionist will happily tell you.

 

[2aguy]

He absolutely did, as every single insurrectionist will happily tell you.

Nope....go and peacefully assemble.......vs. You have reaped the whirlwind Kavanaugh........

Schumer should be arrested for inciting an assassination attempt.

 

[2aguy]

He got a warning from Capitol Police that Democrats were going to be targeted in the morning of January 6th trying to enter the Capitol thru their tunnel network and were in Danger!

The Dc Capitol Police received a warning from the FBI, and then sent an email late night on January 5th, after work hours, at 9:45pm to an aide of Schumer to warn them about their possible danger.

Schumer and democrats were the target, of the danger.

I don't know and no one said if McConnell received a warning as well, or if Pelosi and McCarthy received a warning as well, the Jon Solomon article didn't report on that, so imo, they WERE likely warned as well.

Solomon's article is where I got the info on Capitol police sending email to Schumer aide.

After work hours? So, the D.C. police shut down at 5? Didn't know that.....And Schumer and his staff can't be reached after office hours? By the D.C. police chief?

Good to know...

Also good to know? You idiots will swallow anything...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nope..

And yet every insurrectionist insists otherwise. It's mighty kind of you to do pro Bono lawyer work for the orange pile of shit, but you aren't in a court. So you are just barrassing yourself for him.

 

[miketx]

I really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter, but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

This is a two-edged sword that cuts at both sides. Chuck Schumer sat on vital intel about plans to storm the Capitol, and Nancy Pelosi twice turned down requests to use National Guard troops to guard the Capitol on January 6, even though Trump had approved their use. However, the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the riot to continue, that he purposely delayed telling his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

Trump clearly acted as an accessory to the riot after it began. He never called for violence before it occurred; in fact, he urged his supporters to protest peacefully, and he authorized 20,000 NG troops to guard the Capitol. But once the riot began, he acted as an accessory to a felony by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to cease and desist. This was a serious criminal action, and the GOP should repudiate Trump and expel him from the party over it.

At the other end, Schumer's failure to act on the FBI intel, or even to ensure that the capitol police received the intel, is inexcusable and suggests that he wanted the riot to occur so he could use it for propaganda purposes against the Republicans. The Democrats should force Schumer to resign over his failure to act on the FBI intel.

Similarly, Nancy Pelosi's inexplicable failure to allow NG troops to help guard the Capitol on January 6 suggests that she, too, wanted the riot to occur so it could be used for propaganda purposes. The claim that she refused to use the troops because this would have been "bad optics" is lame, given that she had no problem forcing the troops to guard the Capitol for five months after the riot, long after there was any credible need for them to be there. Pelosi should be forced to resign because of her refusal to allow NG troops to guard the Capitol on January 6.

From John Solomon's second blockbuster article based on newly obtained documents:

FBI intelligence warning that Jan. 6 protesters might violently storm the Capitol, target lawmakers and blockade Democrats in tunnels was never sent to frontline police commanders and officers, but was quietly emailed the night before to a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to documents that raise new concern that politics trumped security preparedness in the fateful hours before the riot.

Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed top Schumer aide Kelly Fado, now the Senate's deputy sergeant of arms, at about 9:40 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021 saying he wanted to "provide you visibility" to new intelligence that an FBI threat analysis center had received from a website owner, according to documents obtained by Just the News.

The information explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs and they were plotting to create a "perimeter" for potential violence and to find "Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol." One point of entry the rioters were targeting was the Library of Congress, he warned.(Jan. 6 Bombshell: Schumer team received FBI intel about possible violence, frontline cops didn't)

Conclusion: media fed know nothing.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Conclusion: media fed know nothing.

Yes, the path to knowing things is never to read anything, like you do.

 

[DudleySmith]

I really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter, but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

This is a two-edged sword that cuts at both sides. Chuck Schumer sat on vital intel about plans to storm the Capitol, and Nancy Pelosi twice turned down requests to use National Guard troops to guard the Capitol on January 6, even though Trump had approved their use. However, the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the riot to continue, that he purposely delayed telling his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

Trump clearly acted as an accessory to the riot after it began. He never called for violence before it occurred; in fact, he urged his supporters to protest peacefully, and he authorized 20,000 NG troops to guard the Capitol. But once the riot began, he acted as an accessory to a felony by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to cease and desist. This was a serious criminal action, and the GOP should repudiate Trump and expel him from the party over it.

At the other end, Schumer's failure to act on the FBI intel, or even to ensure that the capitol police received the intel, is inexcusable and suggests that he wanted the riot to occur so he could use it for propaganda purposes against the Republicans. The Democrats should force Schumer to resign over his failure to act on the FBI intel.

Similarly, Nancy Pelosi's inexplicable failure to allow NG troops to help guard the Capitol on January 6 suggests that she, too, wanted the riot to occur so it could be used for propaganda purposes. The claim that she refused to use the troops because this would have been "bad optics" is lame, given that she had no problem forcing the troops to guard the Capitol for five months after the riot, long after there was any credible need for them to be there. Pelosi should be forced to resign because of her refusal to allow NG troops to guard the Capitol on January 6.

From John Solomon's second blockbuster article based on newly obtained documents:

FBI intelligence warning that Jan. 6 protesters might violently storm the Capitol, target lawmakers and blockade Democrats in tunnels was never sent to frontline police commanders and officers, but was quietly emailed the night before to a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to documents that raise new concern that politics trumped security preparedness in the fateful hours before the riot.

Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed top Schumer aide Kelly Fado, now the Senate's deputy sergeant of arms, at about 9:40 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021 saying he wanted to "provide you visibility" to new intelligence that an FBI threat analysis center had received from a website owner, according to documents obtained by Just the News.

The information explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs and they were plotting to create a "perimeter" for potential violence and to find "Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol." One point of entry the rioters were targeting was the Library of Congress, he warned.(Jan. 6 Bombshell: Schumer team received FBI intel about possible violence, frontline cops didn't)

You also think FDR is still alive and stealing your lunch money.

 

[2aguy]

And yet every insurrectionist insists otherwise. It's mighty kind of you to do pro Bono lawyer work for the orange pile of shit, but you aren't in a court. So you are just barrassing yourself for him.

Nope......we have Trump actually stating.....peacefully do your thing.....he doesn't have a mind meld with each Trump supporter...

Meanwhile...you have schumer calling for violence against Kavanaugh and the other conservative Justices.....the assassination attempt on Kavanaugh and his family are all on schumer.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nope......we have Trump actually stating.....peacefully do your thing.....he doesn't have a mind meld with each Trump supporter...

Meanwhile...you have schumer calling for violence against Kavanaugh and the other conservative Justices.....the assassination attempt on Kavanaugh and his family are all on schumer.

Haha , yeah, and we know he is a grade A conman and liar. That's why the insurrectionists claim he asked them to do it. They saw the con. They understood the orange pile of shit was taking a split second to cover himself.

And so do you. Your dishonesty and cultism bores the shit out of me.


-zzzzzzzzzzz

 

[Care4all]

um tell somebody…geez

Tell who? He was being warned by Capitol Police it was going to take place so to warn his caucus of the threat since they were the target.

Why are y'all so susceptible and gullible with your right wing faux news and people like Jon Solomon who wrote the article and is TRYING to make you hate or blame Democrats?

First Solomon opens with the FBI warned Scumer,

But


The next paragraph he says the Capitol Deputy Chief warned Schumer aide...


What the hell? Then he says the police were not warned but it was the Deputy Capitol Police Chief that warned him??


But a report from John Solomon at Just the News describes as a “bombshell” the confirmation that FBI intelligence warned Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, through an aide, that protesters the next day, Jan. 6, 2021, might be violent,

The warning, in an email sent to a Schumer aide before the riot, raises “new concern that politics trump security preparedness” at the time.

The report explains it was Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher who told Schumer aide Kelly Fado at about 9:40 p.m. on that Jan. 5 that he wanted to “provide you visibility” on intelligence obtained by an FBI threat analysis center.

 

[2aguy]

Tell who? He was being warned by Capitol Police it was going to take place so to warn his caucus of the threat since they were the target.

Why are y'all so susceptible and gullible with your right wing faux news and people like Jon Solomon who wrote the article and is TRYING to make you hate or blame Democrats?

First Solomon opens with the FBI warned Scumer,

But


The next paragraph he says the Capitol Deputy Chief warned Schumer aide...


What the hell? Then he says the police were not warned but it was the Deputy Capitol Police Chief that warned him??


But a report from John Solomon at Just the News describes as a “bombshell” the confirmation that FBI intelligence warned Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, through an aide, that protesters the next day, Jan. 6, 2021, might be violent,

The warning, in an email sent to a Schumer aide before the riot, raises “new concern that politics trump security preparedness” at the time.

The report explains it was Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher who told Schumer aide Kelly Fado at about 9:40 p.m. on that Jan. 5 that he wanted to “provide you visibility” on intelligence obtained by an FBI threat analysis center.

And schumer and pelosi turned down the National Guard help that Trump offered them.....

So...we are led to believe that Trump, planning on an insurrection......asked them to use more National Guard at the site of his planned insurrection...

You people really are fucking stupid...

 

[Care4all]

Nope......we have Trump actually stating.....peacefully do your thing.....he doesn't have a mind meld with each Trump supporter...

Meanwhile...you have schumer calling for violence against Kavanaugh and the other conservative Justices.....the assassination attempt on Kavanaugh and his family are all on schumer.

4.5 seconds of a near one hour incendiary speech, he mentions to walk down to the Capitol peacefully.....