🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

I like how Jordan reacted to their hostage who was killed.

Not the point. Censorship is wrong and Un-American. How can an ignorant Citizenry properly comprehend and respond? The People need to be informed. They can't rely solely on Government/Corporate Media propaganda.

These videos should be made available to all adult Citizens who want to view them. Censorship is getting out of control in this country. We have to get back to true American values.

I didn't have any trouble finding it.
Horrible stuff

Most haven't seen it. It's pretty difficult to find. Most of the Government/Corporate Media has chosen censorship. And that's very sad. It's not the American way.

Extremely Graphic Video

Move cursor to 17:45

WARNING EXTREMELY GRAPHIC VIDEO ISIS burns hostage alive Latest News Videos Fox News

Thanks, but most of the Government/Corporate Media has still chosen censorship. It should be made available to all adult citizens of this Nation.
It's easy to Google and find.
The problem in America is people electing liberal progressive politically correct puke again and again and again, ad nauseum.

film,jordanian pilot,execution - AOL Search Results

That could have something to do with it. But i tend to think it's more about controlling the propaganda message. The Government/Corporate Media has a vested interest in censoring anything that contradicts their own propaganda message. It really is Un-American. There is no reason why adult Americans shouldn't be allowed access to these videos. Period, end of story.
 
Pauli wants to tell a business how to runs its business.

Not very libertarian of him at all. :lol:
 
So, let's do a quick comparison.

Radical Islamists claim that their interpretation of scripture is the only valid interpretation. All other interpretations are heresy and should be purged.

Radical Conservatives believe that their interpretation of the constitution is the only valid interpretation. All other interpretations and political ideas are heresy, treason, communist or otherwise evil and should be purged.

Radical Islamists easily resort to barbarity to further their cause.

Conservatives are easily persuaded that barbarity is an even form of justice when dealing with their opponents.

Radical Islamists are motivated by their sense of righteousness.

Conservatives are motivated by their sense of righteousness.

Radical Islamists claim they respect women while subjugating them to strict codes of dress and comportment.

Conservatives claim they respect women by refusing them their reproductive freedom and refusing to pay them equal pay as men for the same work.

Radical Islamists would roll back societal mores to what they think is a simpler time.

Conservatives have been complaining about the effects of popular culture since, well, ever.

Does a Conservative mindset in either the Middle East or modern America lead to such thoughts, or do such thoughts comprise a Conservative mindset?

I have no idea how you got the idea that conservatives disrespect women by refusing to pay them equal pay as men for the same work. Actually, there has been an Equal Pay Act on the books sine 1963 and there is no need for another one. Apparently Obama and his supporters have never never heard of the following:

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA)

“This law makes it illegal to pay different wages to men and women if they perform equal work in the same workplace. The law also makes it illegal to retaliate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.”

Laws Enforced by EEOC

“The Equal Pay Act requires that men and women in the same workplace be given equal pay for equal work. The jobs need not be identical, but they must be substantially equal. Job content (not job titles) determines whether jobs are substantially equal. All forms of pay are covered by this law, including salary, overtime pay, bonuses, stock options, profit sharing and bonus plans, life insurance, vacation and holiday pay, cleaning or gasoline allowances, hotel accommodations, reimbursement for travel expenses, and benefits. If there is an inequality in wages between men and women, employers may not reduce the wages of either sex to equalize their pay.”

Equal Pay and Compensation Discrimination
If Obama were nearly as intelligent as the media keeps trying to portray he would have know about this very old law (I knew about it and so did lots of other people). He would also know that any “gender pay gap” is not the result of sexual discrimination but rather a host of other non-discriminatory factors.

Sadly, many people will give him credit which he clearly does not deserve. I consider Obama's acts to be an insult to all the good men and women of both parties who fought a long time ago to pass laws that protected women in the work place. By taking credit for the work of others he has demonstrated that he cares only about himself.

Conclusion: There are already laws on the book that prohibit discrimination against woman in pay and other job benefits. If there were any type of employment discrimination against women they should have been remedied by lawsuits a long time ago. If discrimination in wages really exists I will let Obama's supporters explain why HIS various administrative agencies did nothing to prosecute employers under the very old law.

By the way, when it comes to the Equal Pay of of 1963, not one republican voted against it. Here is how the vote broke down in the congress:

YEA:
Democrats: 201
Republicans: 160

NAY:
Democrats: 9
Republicans: 0

Present (but not voting)
Democrats: 45
Republicans: 17

H.R. 6060. EQUAL PAY ACT RE QUIRING THAT EQUAL WORK BE COMPENSATED WITH EQUAL PAY R EGARDLESS OF THE SEX OF THE WORKERS. OPEN RULE H. RES. 362 FOR DEBATE ON THE BILL. -- GovTrack.us
Frankly, I'm amazed that the one point you took umbrage with was pay equality.
 
So, let's do a quick comparison.

Radical Islamists claim that their interpretation of scripture is the only valid interpretation. All other interpretations are heresy and should be purged.

Radical Conservatives believe that their interpretation of the constitution is the only valid interpretation. All other interpretations and political ideas are heresy, treason, communist or otherwise evil and should be purged.

Radical Islamists easily resort to barbarity to further their cause.

Conservatives are easily persuaded that barbarity is an even form of justice when dealing with their opponents.

Radical Islamists are motivated by their sense of righteousness.

Conservatives are motivated by their sense of righteousness.

Radical Islamists claim they respect women while subjugating them to strict codes of dress and comportment.

Conservatives claim they respect women by refusing them their reproductive freedom and refusing to pay them equal pay as men for the same work.

Radical Islamists would roll back societal mores to what they think is a simpler time.

Conservatives have been complaining about the effects of popular culture since, well, ever.

Does a Conservative mindset in either the Middle East or modern America lead to such thoughts, or do such thoughts comprise a Conservative mindset?

I have no idea how you got the idea that conservatives disrespect women by refusing to pay them equal pay as men for the same work. Actually, there has been an Equal Pay Act on the books sine 1963 and there is no need for another one. Apparently Obama and his supporters have never never heard of the following:

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA)

“This law makes it illegal to pay different wages to men and women if they perform equal work in the same workplace. The law also makes it illegal to retaliate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.”

Laws Enforced by EEOC

“The Equal Pay Act requires that men and women in the same workplace be given equal pay for equal work. The jobs need not be identical, but they must be substantially equal. Job content (not job titles) determines whether jobs are substantially equal. All forms of pay are covered by this law, including salary, overtime pay, bonuses, stock options, profit sharing and bonus plans, life insurance, vacation and holiday pay, cleaning or gasoline allowances, hotel accommodations, reimbursement for travel expenses, and benefits. If there is an inequality in wages between men and women, employers may not reduce the wages of either sex to equalize their pay.”

Equal Pay and Compensation Discrimination
If Obama were nearly as intelligent as the media keeps trying to portray he would have know about this very old law (I knew about it and so did lots of other people). He would also know that any “gender pay gap” is not the result of sexual discrimination but rather a host of other non-discriminatory factors.

Sadly, many people will give him credit which he clearly does not deserve. I consider Obama's acts to be an insult to all the good men and women of both parties who fought a long time ago to pass laws that protected women in the work place. By taking credit for the work of others he has demonstrated that he cares only about himself.

Conclusion: There are already laws on the book that prohibit discrimination against woman in pay and other job benefits. If there were any type of employment discrimination against women they should have been remedied by lawsuits a long time ago. If discrimination in wages really exists I will let Obama's supporters explain why HIS various administrative agencies did nothing to prosecute employers under the very old law.

By the way, when it comes to the Equal Pay of of 1963, not one republican voted against it. Here is how the vote broke down in the congress:

YEA:
Democrats: 201
Republicans: 160

NAY:
Democrats: 9
Republicans: 0

Present (but not voting)
Democrats: 45
Republicans: 17

H.R. 6060. EQUAL PAY ACT RE QUIRING THAT EQUAL WORK BE COMPENSATED WITH EQUAL PAY R EGARDLESS OF THE SEX OF THE WORKERS. OPEN RULE H. RES. 362 FOR DEBATE ON THE BILL. -- GovTrack.us
Frankly, I'm amazed that the one point you took umbrage with was pay equality.

Also pretty amazing that his "evidence" is from 1963, when the GOP filibustered a measure to help women actually ENFORCE that previous act in what ... 2011 or 2012?

(correction: It was September of 2014.)
 
All morally blind people do. But hey, bin Laden got what he wanted thanks to people like you. Congrats on that.
I claim no moral ground in the war against terrorists.

Fuck em. I say execute every single one caught ON THE SPOT. Maybe toss you in there for good measure

You should hear how my (stand by this is complicated) sister's brother-in-law talks about them. This is a very cultured guy, MIT educated engineer, married to an Irish born English prof, worked and lived in YEMEN for years, as well as various and assorted other lovely domiciles in the Middle East.

He calls them animals and thinks they should all be slaughtered, along with anybody else stupid enough to be in their vicinity when the slaughtering takes place, if it will ensure their eradication from the face of the earth.
 
We execute American criminals. Does a fucking terrorist deserve better?

This is the problem with liberals. They're too damn soft.

They aren't soft. They're cowardly, stupid, and evil.

They have zero problem with killing babies and standing by while women are abused, murdered, violated...they will support the right of people to engage in those actions against women and children!

But dare to threaten the people who actually inflict atrocities upon innocents...listen to them roar! Safely, of course, from their comfy townhouses and sechlike.
 
All morally blind people do. But hey, bin Laden got what he wanted thanks to people like you. Congrats on that.
I claim no moral ground in the war against terrorists.

Fuck em. I say execute every single one caught ON THE SPOT. Maybe toss you in there for good measure

You should hear how my (stand by this is complicated) sister's brother-in-law talks about them. This is a very cultured guy, MIT educated engineer, married to an Irish born English prof, worked and lived in YEMEN for years, as well as various and assorted other lovely domiciles in the Middle East.

He calls them animals and thinks they should all be slaughtered, along with anybody else stupid enough to be in their vicinity when the slaughtering takes place, if it will ensure their eradication from the face of the earth.
An educated monster then? So be it. So are the ISIS planners for the most part.
 
All morally blind people do. But hey, bin Laden got what he wanted thanks to people like you. Congrats on that.
I claim no moral ground in the war against terrorists.

Fuck em. I say execute every single one caught ON THE SPOT. Maybe toss you in there for good measure

You should hear how my (stand by this is complicated) sister's brother-in-law talks about them. This is a very cultured guy, MIT educated engineer, married to an Irish born English prof, worked and lived in YEMEN for years, as well as various and assorted other lovely domiciles in the Middle East.

He calls them animals and thinks they should all be slaughtered, along with anybody else stupid enough to be in their vicinity when the slaughtering takes place, if it will ensure their eradication from the face of the earth.
An educated monster then? So be it. So are the ISIS planners for the most part.

Sure, he probably went to school with some of them, and most likely worked with them as well.

Hence his personal experience of them, and his understanding that they're animals who deserve to die.
 
We are justly outraged by the barbarity of ISIS.

Do we then resort to barbarity in order to prove we cannot be defeated?

Does barbarity win in the end?

Can we claim outrage if we adopt their tactics?
I hear what you are saying and where it comes from. Truth is the King of Jordan gets what we don't: They understand the language and actions they give. Anything less is an excuse to exploit.
 
We are justly outraged by the barbarity of ISIS.

Do we then resort to barbarity in order to prove we cannot be defeated?

Does barbarity win in the end?

Can we claim outrage if we adopt their tactics?
I hear what you are saying and where it comes from. Truth is the King of Jordan gets what we don't: They understand the language and actions they give. Anything less is an excuse to exploit.

I also think it is important to remember that the people Jordan executed were killed under the rule of law. They had already been tried, convicted, and sentenced to death. They just essentially had their execution date moved up.
 
All morally blind people do. But hey, bin Laden got what he wanted thanks to people like you. Congrats on that.
I claim no moral ground in the war against terrorists.

Fuck em. I say execute every single one caught ON THE SPOT. Maybe toss you in there for good measure

You should hear how my (stand by this is complicated) sister's brother-in-law talks about them. This is a very cultured guy, MIT educated engineer, married to an Irish born English prof, worked and lived in YEMEN for years, as well as various and assorted other lovely domiciles in the Middle East.

He calls them animals and thinks they should all be slaughtered, along with anybody else stupid enough to be in their vicinity when the slaughtering takes place, if it will ensure their eradication from the face of the earth.
An educated monster then? So be it. So are the ISIS planners for the most part.

Sure, he probably went to school with some of them, and most likely worked with them as well.

Hence his personal experience of them, and his understanding that they're animals who deserve to die.
Congrats on no longer being a Christian. Now you are just an apologist for evil.
 
We execute American criminals. Does a fucking terrorist deserve better?

This is the problem with liberals. They're too damn soft.
Unless you are handicapped or still in the womb. Then you must be eliminated.
Such a stupid statement by a concrete mind.
I agreed with her............add me to the list.
Another stupid, concrete mind.

You support the jihadists.
 
We execute American criminals. Does a fucking terrorist deserve better?

This is the problem with liberals. They're too damn soft.
Unless you are handicapped or still in the womb. Then you must be eliminated.
Such a stupid statement by a concrete mind.
I agreed with her............add me to the list.
Another stupid, concrete mind.

You support the jihadists.
Coming from you I'll take that as a compliment................ALEC I'll take Murdering Unborn babies for a 1000 please.
 

Forum List

Back
Top