I propose a Zero-Fifths Compromise

If you were the least bit interested in mathematical facts, you wouldn't have invoked that stale, shopworn, and debunked liberoidal trope.
That doesnt make any sense. It's a mathematical fact. Which also makes it...a fact. Dude, you always fall on your face when you try to troll me and end up in a little hissy fit. Learn your lesson.
It makes sense when you consider population density, numbers of military and other federal installations, and the amount of land the feds own in many of those states.....But party man lemmings like you look straight past such factors in order to jump on the number that seems to prove your case.

Now go play out on the interstate.
 
It makes sense when you consider population density, numbers of military and other federal installations, and the amount of land the feds own in many of those states....
And when you consider that smarter and more successful people populate and flock to cities and blue states. Oops, ya left that out. But such stupidity is what we expect from a diehard , red state taker like you.
 
And when you consider that smarter and more successful people populate and flock to cities and blue states. Oops, ya left that out. But such stupidity is what we expect from a diehard , red state taker like you.
You can have all of those genius millionaires that crap on the sidewalks.
 
I said LA not California strawman creator
Which makes you even more wrong. LA generates 25%+ of federal income tax revenue of the entire State of California, depaite having only 10% of its population.

LA is a point of accounting.

"The federal government spends some $367.8 billion a year on California. That's an average of about $9,500 for every woman, man and child in the state." Political Road Map: There's a $368-billion reason why California depends on the federal government

California annual tax payments $227.5B Which States Pay the Most Federal Taxes?

The last source even shows that California is 6th in per capita tax receipts.

Free Cheese Free Cheese!!!!!
 
Illegals will count as Zero-Fifths of a person for the purpose of electoral votes.

Deal?

.

Dear Bootney Lee Farnsworth
What about this approach:
If people want to recognize Mexicans and other Latin/South Americans
as descendants of Native Americans having claim to the land,
WHY NOT CLAIM LAND ON THE MEXICAN SIDE OF THE BORDER.

Doesn't THAT make more sense if 12-20 MILLION
Mexican nationals are living undocumented in the US
who could legally be granted land by Mexico?

I see nothing wrong with AGREEMENTS on what lands
to grant to WORKERS willing to build their own towns,
just like the Natives built their own settlements and didn't expect
handouts from govt. Why can't Trump work out settlement plans
between US and Mexican govt to set aside land on the MEXICAN
side of the border for THEIR citizens to develop and own for
equal opportunity as other settlers had in building their own settlements?
What a silly idea. Their problem is bad infrastructure, crime, and jobs. So lets put them on a piece of desert land with no infrastructure, dominated by drug cartels, with no jobs. Come on. Get real.
It is NOT our problem to solve the miserable life people might have in Mexico or Central America, unless you support the US seizing those Countries and force ably making them the problem of the US Government.
 
It makes sense when you consider population density, numbers of military and other federal installations, and the amount of land the feds own in many of those states....
And when you consider that smarter and more successful people populate and flock to cities and blue states. Oops, ya left that out. But such stupidity is what we expect from a diehard , red state taker like you.
That depends on how you define "smart" and "successful".
 

Forum List

Back
Top