I Should Have an AR-15, but not YOU! Gun grabber speaks honestly

[Blues Man]

Ha ha. Fix News, the NRA, Trump and Wayne tell you how to dress in the morning. You’re a puppet.

Not a member of the NRA
Don't watch Fox News
Didn't vote for Trump

I'll stand back now and watch your tiny little brain explode

 

[Devils_Advocate]

The AR-15 can be moved to a restricted list like other firearms have moved to which mean you need to do more before you can obtain one and then that will limit who buys one.

It can be done on any firearm seeing we have already established it can be done on fully automatic weapons like the Uzi…

 

[Blues Man]

The AR-15 can be moved to a restricted list like other firearms have moved to which mean you need to do more before you can obtain one and then that will limit who buys one.

It can be done on any firearm seeing we have already established it can be done on fully automatic weapons like the Uzi…

Why?

It's just another semiautomatic rifle no different than any other semiautomatic rifle.

If you want to restrict one why not just go after all semiautomatic rifles?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Why?

It's just another semiautomatic rifle no different than any other semiautomatic rifle.

If you want to restrict one why not just go after all semiautomatic rifles?

That's the plan.

 

[Blues Man]

That's the plan.

I just want them to admit that. But they won't.

 

[Jarlaxle]

It’s intended use was as a military weapon. Stoner would be flabbergasted that they are now in the hands of civilians. We ought to start suing companies that knowingly make them so available, they ultimately get placed in the hands of mass murderer s and are the choice for those intent on killing children and shooting into crowds.

You are so full of shit your breath stinks.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Oh, so now you acknowledge it was designed for military purposes. Cause if you ever bothered to read anthing, that’s what the posts were about. One of your uninformed claimed it (AR15) was first designed as a civilian firearm. So you all are wrong. Stoner and company at Armorlite designed it specifically as a military firearm and as my later references dictated, a primary engineer thinks it should never have been put in the civilian market.

You are, again and still, full of shit.

News flash: LOTS of rifles began as military designs. (Offhand, the Garand.) They're little different than the ones that did not.

 

[Jarlaxle]

An AR 15 is not an "extremely powerful" rifle

I own 3 rifles that are more powerful than that small caliber varmint gun

I have three, plus a pistol. I think my uncle has...six? Seven? And two pistols.

You’re reaching.
Only because the military is facing more heavily body armored enemy . Sissy boys like you will not buy a heavier recoil firearm. The 5.56 will still dominate with you sissy boys, few of whom have ever served in the military or been under fire or been a cop facing mass shooters armed with AR15 platform rifles. Geesus, the AR10 didn’t make it because sissy boy draftees and Air force peoples didn’t have to carry and shoot a higher recoil firearm.

You are, again and still, full of shit.

The AR-10 "didn't make it" because it simply wasn't ready. The AR-10 that was tested, which was essentially a barely-complete prototype, had an untried composite (aluminum & steel) barrel, which failed. That, the fact it would be expensive to build, and the fact that ArmaLite had no production facility (it was essentially a prototype shop, with only nine employees) meant the Springfield T44 (and Springfield Armory's ability to start mass production immediately) was approved and became the M-14.

 

[Jarlaxle]

What I want is immaterial. I’m not a proponent of any ban. But then, I think everyone of you feckless sissy boys should serve our country with a national draft. Then, only those who do should be licensed to carry.

So...people who COULDN'T serve can't protect themselves? Great plan, you fucking idiot.

 

[Dagosa]

So...people who COULDN'T serve can't protect themselves? Great plan, you fucking idiot.

Everyone can serve in some capacity. Otherwise, fk em and you too. Nigeria, Germany, and Denmark have mandatory national service. Many others have national conscription. You lazy effin ass holes should no be able to get out of service in some capacity. If you can work, you can serve.

 

[Dagosa]

I have three, plus a pistol. I think my uncle has...six? Seven? And two pistols.



You are, again and still, full of shit.

The AR-10 "didn't make it" because it simply wasn't ready. The AR-10 that was tested, which was essentially a barely-complete prototype, had an untried composite (aluminum & steel) barrel, which failed. That, the fact it would be expensive to build, and the fact that ArmaLite had no production facility (it was essentially a prototype shop, with only nine employees) meant the Springfield T44 (and Springfield Armory's ability to start mass production immediately) was approved and became the M-14.

Obviously you’re FOS. You did no research did you. The military mandated a smaller caliber firearm then the A10. You’re ridiculous. You think gun makers determine what the mandatory performance capabilities are for service weapons and hardware. Geesus, you NEVER HAVE SERVED HAVE YOU ? Chicken shit.

 

[Dagosa]

have three, plus a pistol. I think my uncle has...six? Seven? And two pistols.

Im not impressed. Anyone can buy them on the street corner.

 

[Dagosa]

I have three, plus a pistol. I think my uncle has...six? Seven? And two pistols.



You are, again and still, full of shit.

The AR-10 "didn't make it" because it simply wasn't ready. The AR-10 that was tested, which was essentially a barely-complete prototype, had an untried composite (aluminum & steel) barrel, which failed. That, the fact it would be expensive to build, and the fact that ArmaLite had no production facility (it was essentially a prototype shop, with only nine employees) meant the Springfield T44 (and Springfield Armory's ability to start mass production immediately) was approved and became the M-14.

Both the M14 and the AR10 were .308, too powerful and heavy to be used for issued for sissy boy draftees at the time during the Vietnam war. The popularity of AR15 platform rifles now for civilian use lies in the light felt recoil and high capacity that you sissy boys can handle. None server military wannabes like the idea of being military, but are generally scared shitless of putting their own life on the line.

 

[Dagosa]

Offhand, the Garand.)

Ha ha
You’re hilarious. You’re ridiculous Garands aren’t used by topical low life sissy boy mass shooters. They’re too much firearm for them to handle.

 

[westwall]

Opinion: Here's the reason people tell me they want to buy an AR-15. And it's simply ludicrous | CNN

No weapon has been more in the public eye than the AR-15, in large part because of the tragic role it has played in some of this country's deadliest shootings, former DC police officer Michael Fanone writes. Fanone, who owns one of the weapons, writes that the AR-15 has the dubious distinction...

www.cnn.com

Here it is: the government elitist mentality spelled out baldly by a true believer:

The AR-15 has the dubious distinction of being America's most popular semi-automatic rifle. I'm more familiar with the gun than most people: I own one. And one thing I know for sure is that this weapon doesn't belong in the hands of the average civilian.

He is more familiar with the gun than most people because he owns one? The AR15, as he mentions, is the most popular rifle in the United States. It is also a civilian version of the weapon that nearly all U.S. military veterans trained with. He's not exactly in a tiny minority for being familiar with it.

He goes on:

I purchased my AR-15 because I was assigned one as part of my police duties. But officers weren't allowed to take our department-issued weapons home. I felt it was my responsibility to become proficient with any weapon I'd been assigned, so I bought one. And I've spent hundreds of hours training so that I could properly use it.

Bull! He could have had plenty of time on the po-lice range to become proficient. One of the benefits of that rifle is how easy it is to learn to use. We were trained and qualified for the M16A1 during my second week of basic training, when we barely knew how to march in a straight line. It wasn't hard, and nearly everyone qualified.

No, his reason for buying an AR15 is the same as the one that he ridicules others for: he wanted one.

First, though, he ridicules the most important reason that every free American should own a semi-auto rifle with detachable magazine:

Some members of the tinfoil hat brigade have come up with the reply, "We need these weapons because we want to be effective against the government if it becomes tyrannical. That's part of our Second Amendment right." Personally, I think that's ludicrous, but it has become an increasingly popular justification for purchasing a semi-automatic rifle.

That is not just "part" of our second amendment right, as his fictitious tinfoil hatters supposedly say. It is the stated purpose of our second amendment right. The second amendment is not for hunting birds, nor for biathlon training. It is to maintain a well-regulated militia as it explicitly states.

He goes to great lengths to explain why an AR15 is not the best weapon for home defense against an single intruder, not at all needed since I know of no one who thinks it is.

His enforcement solution is pretty optimistic:

And outlawing these AR-15s would not require confiscating them from people who already have them. Once you've made these weapons illegal, anyone found with one would be subject to arrest, since possession of these weapons would be a crime. I think it's likely that you would see a lot of people opting to turn them in.

So, it would be another law passed by the left, which would be unenforced or selectively enforced. People won't "turn them in," after having spent around a thousand dollars on rifle and ammo. The only people targeted for enforcement would be people at gun shows. Real criminals who use guns are now being released by liberal judges and liberal "prosecutors," so why are real criminals going to get an extra penalty if they use an AR in their crimes? Would that Ramos guy serve more than the several life sentences he has coming, if this proposed law were in effect? Nope. We will be lucky if he doesn't get found not guilty by reason of insanity, placed in a mental home for a few years and released.

Not to mention that of course, the law can't just say, "Models designated as 'AR15" by their manufacturer, because the manufacturers could just change the name. They will have to define "assault weapon," which the last two nominees for head of ATF have been at a loss to do. Here's what you get when liberals who know nothing about guns try to regulate them:

View attachment 659196


I feel safer already! /sarcasm

Fanone is a fraud, and a coward. He is an expert at play acting

 

[Dagosa]

Fanone is a fraud, and a coward. He is an expert at play acting

You must be talking about Wayne the criminal LaPierre.

 

[Dagosa]

So...people who COULDN'T serve can't protect themselves? Great plan, you fucking idiot.

Only you feckless sissy boys: .

 

[Dagosa]

The 5.56 round was not chosen because it was more lethal than the 7.62 round it replaced

I am not wrong about that

It was chosen for the exact reason the military stated in its requirements. Maybe you should read them instead of making up shit.

 

[Blues Man]

It was chosen for the exact reason the military stated in its requirements. Maybe you should read them instead of making up shit.

The fact are the facts.

The round was chosen as a compromise between power and weight but as I have stated there were politics involved as well

And don't forget you're the one who said it was chosen for its lethality and you are just wrong about that

 

[Dagosa]

And don't forget you're the one who said it was chosen for its lethality and you are just wrong about that

Thats a ridiculous exaggeration. Or course as usual, you can’t quote me so you just make up what you think or pretended I’ve said. It would be ridiculous to chose a cartridge that was not lethal, dah. It’s lethal enough for its intended purpose. Now make up done more shit and pretend.