I wonder if the American Jews that vote 80% democrat realize they have always been on the wrong side

[Theowl32]

I doubt it, since most American Jews (who like blacks who chant racism every chance they get chant persecution every chance they get) do not in any real way identify as Jews. No, they are clearly liberals long before Jews. Let me clarify too for those of us who use the term "liberal." They are clear commies, and most American Jews are descendants of the Jews that emigrated here from old mother land Russia. They identified with the marxist revolution going on and they certainly supported the overthrow of the Czar.

They all came here and most of which carried that ideology. People like Emma Goldman who profoundly influenced the likes of Roger Baldwin and founder of the beloved ACLU.

That is how most American Jews see themselves. Oh, they chant loudly about persecution and all of that crap. They sure do. The Anti-defamation league won't let us forget about the holocaust. No, they won't. Never again.

Ironic, how ALL of this time they were loud and proud fighting along with the actual anti-semites. Most of them could not care less.

Bottom line is the 80% of the Jews that identify as liberal, see themselves as liberal LONG before they see themselves as Jews. They are the wolves in sheeps clothing. They are not really Jews at all. They are enemies to their land of Canaan.

I wonder if they are realizing who the true anti-semites are, or do they care?

 

[LaDexter]

Einstein warned us....


Einstein Letter Warning Of
Zionist Facism In Israel
Letter That Albert Einstein Sent to the New York Times
1948, Protesting the Visit of Menachem Begin
11-1-4

Letters to the Editor
New York Times
December 4, 1948
TO THE EDITORS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES:
Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.

The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughoutthe world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin's political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.
Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public manifestations in Begin's behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement. The public avowals of Begin's party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.
Attack on Arab Village
A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants ? 240men, women, and children - and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin. The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party.
Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model. During the last years of sporadic anti-British violence, the IZL and Stern groups inaugurated a reign of terror in the Palestine Jewish community. Teachers were beaten up for speaking against them, adults were shot for not letting their children join them. By gangster methods, beatings, window-smashing, and wide-spread robberies, the terrorists intimidated the population and exacted a heavy tribute.
The people of the Freedom Party have had no part in the constructive achievements in Palestine. They have reclaimed no land, built no settlements, and only detracted from the Jewish defense activity. Their much-publicized immigration endeavors were minute, and devoted mainly to bringing in Fascist compatriots.
Discrepancies Seen
The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a "Leader State" is the goal.
In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign against Begin's efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to Israel from support to Begin.
The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism.
ISIDORE ABRAMOWITZ
HANNAH ARENDT
ABRAHAM BRICK
RABBI JESSURUN CARDOZO
ALBERT EINSTEIN
HERMAN EISEN, M.D.
HAYIM FINEMAN
M. GALLEN, M.D.
H.H. HARRIS
ZELIG S. HARRIS
SIDNEY HOOK
FRED KARUSH
BRURIA KAUFMAN
IRMA L. LINDHEIM
NACHMAN MAISEL
SEYMOUR MELMAN
MYER D. MENDELSON
M.D., HARRY M. OSLINSKY
SAMUEL PITLICK
FRITZ ROHRLICH
LOUIS P. ROCKER
RUTH SAGIS
ITZHAK SANKOWSKY
I.J. SHOENBERG
SAMUEL SHUMAN
M. SINGER
IRMA WOLFE
STEFAN WOLF.
New York, Dec. 2, 1948

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Jews think that the more diverse a nation is, the more likely they will be just another group and left alone. Unfortunately, diversity means accepting islam as a group, putting Jews right back in the cross hairs.

 

[Norman]

What does Israel have...?

BIG WALLS, and permanent travel bans from the gay executing nations.

But Trump is racist though.

 

[Natural Citizen]

As has been said many times, the term liberal is the most misused term in the American political paradox. And the op is a shining example of the shortcoming.

 

[Sunni Man]

Read my signature below.

It was written by a famous jew. .....

 

[Natural Citizen]

Let me clarify too for those of us who use the term "liberal."

Here. Learn, dummy.

Real Meaning of Liberalism

 

[LaDexter]

Liberal (current American definition) a closed minded idiot and parrot who spews out hate and lies to support a kleptocratic racket called the Democrat Party

 

[DOTR]

Tipsycatlover is right. Jews see multiculturalism as a means of control. They fear a united culture with themselves as a minority. It is why they support walls in Israel but not the US (except around their mansions).

 

[bodecea]

Sure don't understand why, with posts and posters like those above, American Jews don't FLOCK to the GOP.

 

[Theowl32]

Let me clarify too for those of us who use the term "liberal."

Here. Learn, dummy.

Real Meaning of Liberalism

I covered in my op you fuck.

 

[LaDexter]

Tipsycatlover is right. Jews see multiculturalism as a means of control. They fear a united culture with themselves as a minority. It is why they support walls in Israel but not the US (except around their mansions).

It is called DIVIDE and CONQUER

and in America, it is working for Zionism, which supports

Black race baiters
FemiNazis
Radical Homos

anyone and everyone who hates heterosexual non-Jewish white men

 

[Natural Citizen]

Let me clarify too for those of us who use the term "liberal."

Here. Learn, dummy.

Real Meaning of Liberalism

I covered in my op you fuck.

No, you didn't. I had to do it for you. Though, not for your benefit, but for those who might want to understand liberalism correctly should they come across your horse puckey.

You're welcome. And keep your mouth shut about such things if you're not qualified to speak on them, please. You do more damage than good to the casual passer-by who might be misled by your shortcomings and people like me have to come behind you and pick up the slack.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I have had countless Jewish friends over the years, and most have been well-educated and liberal in the modern sense, but far from raging snowflakes.

If there is one thing for which I would criticize the Jewish community at large, however, it would be in their unwillingness to abandon the outdated paradigms and learn to recognize the new. Too many Jewish people insist on holding on to the notion that the greatest threat to their safety comes from the same old sources as 70 years ago -- Nazis -- so when they look around today, they focus too much on the far right. Yes, there are neo Nazis today, yes they are repulsive as always, and yes, they pose a danger, but there just aren't that many of them. They are marginalized and impotent these days, and do not pose an existential threat. The threat does not come from the right.

The threat to Jewish people now comes from the left, and while few Jews were really paying attention, the growth in antisemitism in the world left has now come to define it. Heck, just look at this board and you will find precious few on the left who AREN'T anti-Semitic. Sure, there are also some on the right, but various threads of anti-Semitism have infected leftist discourse as to make it almost universal.

The reason the left has become so anti-Semitic has to do with at least two factors, the first being the abandonment of liberalism as its guiding principle and the embrace of multiculturalism and identity politics. Along with that, has come the solidarity with Islam, since it is seen as arising from brown skinned people and so must be supported. Since Islam is so viciously anti-Semitic, all the Islamic strains of anti-Semitism have infected the left as well.

The other main reason the left has become antisemitic is economic. Jews are portrayed as rich and powerful and conniving and as the ultimate "man". Joos be da Man, and so any right, proper leftist must assail the man and support all others who do.

I agree in part with the op in that Jewish people are not acting in their best interests when they vote in certain ways. I mean, Obama tried to sneak millions of dollars to Pallywood on his last day in office and nobody blinked an eye. I think the reasons for this have more to do with tradition than current reality, however. Like any other group of people, Jews can have blinders and the connection to the left in response to the old threat from the right is one of them.

 

[Theowl32]

Let me clarify too for those of us who use the term "liberal."

Here. Learn, dummy.

Real Meaning of Liberalism

I covered in my op you fuck.

No, you didn't. I had to do it for you. Though, not for your benefit, but for those who might want to understand liberalism correctly should they come across your horse puckey.

You're welcome. And keep your mouth shut about such things if you're not qualified to speak on them, please. You do more damage than good to the casual passer-by who might be misled by your shortcomings and people like me have to come behind you and pick up the slack.

Horse puckey?

 

[Hossfly]

 

[DOTR]

Let me clarify too for those of us who use the term "liberal."

Here. Learn, dummy.

Real Meaning of Liberalism

I covered in my op you fuck.

No, you didn't. I had to do it for you. Though, not for your benefit, but for those who might want to understand liberalism correctly shouldthey come across your horse puckey.

You're welcome. And keep your mouth shut about such things if you're not qualified to speak to such things, please. You do more damage than good to the casual passer-by who might be misled by your shortcomings and people like me have to come behind you and pick up the slack.

There is a rule of liberalism which goes like this..."if you cant defend something then tie the argument up in definitions...take away the words damaging to liberalism"
I understood exactly what he meant by "liberal"...which is of course the problem for you. But you dont get to define words and disrupt their function in communication. English is a contextual language and words have different meanings based on context.
Just liberal wordplay. Or Newspeak as Orwell called it. One of the purposes of Newspeak was to strip away secondary meanings of words and thus render them useless for heretical, non party (Marxist) approved, thinking.

"The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought ...should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words...every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings...This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever.
Newspeak was designed not to extend but to diminish the range of thought..."
George Orwell

 

[Theowl32]

Let me clarify too for those of us who use the term "liberal."

Here. Learn, dummy.

Real Meaning of Liberalism

I covered in my op you fuck.

No, you didn't. I had to do it for you. Though, not for your benefit, but for those who might want to understand liberalism correctly shouldthey come across your horse puckey.

You're welcome. And keep your mouth shut about such things if you're not qualified to speak to such things, please. You do more damage than good to the casual passer-by who might be misled by your shortcomings and people like me have to come behind you and pick up the slack.

There is a rule of liberalism which goes like this..."if you cant defend something then tie the argument up in definitions...take away the words damaging to liberalism"
I understood exactly what he meant by "liberal"...which is of course the problem for you. But you dont get to define words and disrupt their function in communication. English is a contextual language and words have different meanings based on context.
Just liberal wordplay. Or Newspeak as Orwell called it. One of the purposes of Newspeak was to strip away secondary meanings of words and thus render them useless for heretical, non party (Marxist) approved, thinking.

"The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought ...should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words...every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings...This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever.
Newspeak was designed not to extend but to diminish the range of thought..."
George Orwell

He said horse puckey

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Let me clarify too for those of us who use the term "liberal."

Here. Learn, dummy.

Real Meaning of Liberalism

I covered in my op you fuck.

No, you didn't. I had to do it for you. Though, not for your benefit, but for those who might want to understand liberalism correctly should they come across your horse puckey.

You're welcome. And keep your mouth shut about such things if you're not qualified to speak on them, please. You do more damage than good to the casual passer-by who might be misled by your shortcomings and people like me have to come behind you and pick up the slack.

Interestingly enough, it isn't just the hard core right wing ultra-partisans who don't have a clue, as the leftists on this board are just as clueless.

 

[Natural Citizen]

He said horse puckey

But he defined liberalism right.

I'll tell you why people like you can't define it right. It's because you're just as statist as those whom you call statists. Except you're too stupid to realize that you're a statist.