Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The economy is doing well right now and the OP says it's not. So there definition on of a good economy is flexible.
What if all goes as expected and the DOW stays over 19,000. First time apps for unemployment keeps dropping, we start creating 250,000 to 300,000 jobs a month, the debt/deficit finally starts to go in reverse. By March/April, actual unemployment is closer to 15% {well, being its about 25% now !!!!!!} yah,right! Is it really 5% ??
Should be interesting to see what Pelosi will come up with this time!
Queen Nancy can't say that when President Trump took office that we were losing 500 Million jobs a month this time around!
All this economic expansion, and yet the Dems lost for economic reasons?84 months of economic expansion.
We are overdue for a recession, so start compiling your excuses when it hits on Trump's watch.
Go figure.
Stock Market more than doubled, $50 trillion added to national wealth, GDP up $4.5 trillion. unemployment rate dropped 4%
Lets see Trump match that
All this economic expansion, and yet the Dems lost for economic reasons?84 months of economic expansion.
We are overdue for a recession, so start compiling your excuses when it hits on Trump's watch.
Go figure.
Stock Market more than doubled, $50 trillion added to national wealth, GDP up $4.5 trillion. unemployment rate dropped 4%
Lets see Trump match that
Really, you want to rant about the gains in the stock market and credit BO for that. Absurd, silly and without basis. But I'll let you do it any way. Because now you have to blame BO for the expansion of the wealth gap. Yep, he let the rich get richer, while the bottom 50%, those folks the Libs claim to represent, got a another $1 or 2 per hour added to their min wage job. All hail BO!
It's not that people do not have jobs
They have stagnet wages, where they have not seen the benefit of the good economy like those salaries and incomes at the very top.
Trumps answer if he follows the RNC, is give these people at the top EVEN MORE than they've benefited, and give THEM more of the pie through tax cuts...
Exactly. Unemployment is at 4.9%. It may drop to the 4.5% range but can't drop much further
Problem is stagnant wages which Republicans love. They have the workforce right where they want them, why would they change anything?
Leave him alone. He's still waiting for the next Republican president to be born and upset because the economy is going to progress out of stagnation.It's not that people do not have jobs
They have stagnet wages, where they have not seen the benefit of the good economy like those salaries and incomes at the very top.
Trumps answer if he follows the RNC, is give these people at the top EVEN MORE than they've benefited, and give THEM more of the pie through tax cuts...
Exactly. Unemployment is at 4.9%. It may drop to the 4.5% range but can't drop much further
Problem is stagnant wages which Republicans love. They have the workforce right where they want them, why would they change anything?
So let me get this straight rightwinger, BO gets credit for doubling the stock market during his presidency and increasing overall wealth, but the Republicans are completely responsible for depressed wages. Congratulations, you have broken the record for the most partisan liberal in the history of the US.
It's not that people do not have jobs
They have stagnet wages, where they have not seen the benefit of the good economy like those salaries and incomes at the very top.
Trumps answer if he follows the RNC, is give these people at the top EVEN MORE than they've benefited, and give THEM more of the pie through tax cuts...
Exactly. Unemployment is at 4.9%. It may drop to the 4.5% range but can't drop much further
Problem is stagnant wages which Republicans love. They have the workforce right where they want them, why would they change anything?
So let me get this straight rightwinger, BO gets credit for doubling the stock market during his presidency and increasing overall wealth, but the Republicans are completely responsible for depressed wages. Congratulations, you have broken the record for the most partisan liberal in the history of the US.
You takers are fucking idiots.....The economy is doing well right now and the OP says it's not. So there definition on of a good economy is flexible.
Leave him alone. He's still waiting for the next Republican president to be born and upset because the economy is going to progress out of stagnation.It's not that people do not have jobs
They have stagnet wages, where they have not seen the benefit of the good economy like those salaries and incomes at the very top.
Trumps answer if he follows the RNC, is give these people at the top EVEN MORE than they've benefited, and give THEM more of the pie through tax cuts...
Exactly. Unemployment is at 4.9%. It may drop to the 4.5% range but can't drop much further
Problem is stagnant wages which Republicans love. They have the workforce right where they want them, why would they change anything?
So let me get this straight rightwinger, BO gets credit for doubling the stock market during his presidency and increasing overall wealth, but the Republicans are completely responsible for depressed wages. Congratulations, you have broken the record for the most partisan liberal in the history of the US.
Then why are there still record of people on welfare?The economy is doing well right now and the OP says it's not. So there definition on of a good economy is flexible.
It's a shame. You wasted 8 years of using a new word and soon it will be worthless unless recounting the Obama years.Stagnation....I like that word
Seems I will get to use it quite a bit over the next four years
All this economic expansion, and yet the Dems lost for economic reasons?84 months of economic expansion.
We are overdue for a recession, so start compiling your excuses when it hits on Trump's watch.
Go figure.
Stock Market more than doubled, $50 trillion added to national wealth, GDP up $4.5 trillion. unemployment rate dropped 4%
Lets see Trump match that
Really, you want to rant about the gains in the stock market and credit BO for that. Absurd, silly and without basis. But I'll let you do it any way. Because now you have to blame BO for the expansion of the wealth gap. Yep, he let the rich get richer, while the bottom 50%, those folks the Libs claim to represent, got a another $1 or 2 per hour added to their min wage job. All hail BO!
Then why are there still record of people on welfare?The economy is doing well right now and the OP says it's not. So there definition on of a good economy is flexible.
The economy isn't doing so well, if those numbers don't change.Then why are there still record of people on welfare?The economy is doing well right now and the OP says it's not. So there definition on of a good economy is flexible.
What does that have to do with what I said?
Then why are there still record of people on welfare?The economy is doing well right now and the OP says it's not. So there definition on of a good economy is flexible.
We've had Obama economics for eight years. Not so great, Trump will turn that around though.Then why are there still record of people on welfare?The economy is doing well right now and the OP says it's not. So there definition on of a good economy is flexible.
A failure of trickle down economics
It's not that people do not have jobs
They have stagnet wages, where they have not seen the benefit of the good economy like those salaries and incomes at the very top.
Trumps answer if he follows the RNC, is give these people at the top EVEN MORE than they've benefited, and give THEM more of the pie through tax cuts...
Exactly. Unemployment is at 4.9%. It may drop to the 4.5% range but can't drop much further
Problem is stagnant wages which Republicans love. They have the workforce right where they want them, why would they change anything?
So let me get this straight rightwinger, BO gets credit for doubling the stock market during his presidency and increasing overall wealth, but the Republicans are completely responsible for depressed wages. Congratulations, you have broken the record for the most partisan liberal in the history of the US.
Are our low wages the Republicans fault?
Hard to argue that they are not. We sold out to the supply side economic god of slashing taxes and deregulation. It was supposed to result in trickle down wealth. It didn't
The wealthy and corporations just kept the money
Which party has blocked minimum wage increases for the last 7 years?
Which party has been dismantling unions for the last 30 years?
Well, the main reason is that there is a record number of people.Then why are there still record of people on welfare?The economy is doing well right now and the OP says it's not. So there definition on of a good economy is flexible.
It's not that people do not have jobs
They have stagnet wages, where they have not seen the benefit of the good economy like those salaries and incomes at the very top.
Trumps answer if he follows the RNC, is give these people at the top EVEN MORE than they've benefited, and give THEM more of the pie through tax cuts...
Exactly. Unemployment is at 4.9%. It may drop to the 4.5% range but can't drop much further
Problem is stagnant wages which Republicans love. They have the workforce right where they want them, why would they change anything?
So let me get this straight rightwinger, BO gets credit for doubling the stock market during his presidency and increasing overall wealth, but the Republicans are completely responsible for depressed wages. Congratulations, you have broken the record for the most partisan liberal in the history of the US.
Are our low wages the Republicans fault?
Hard to argue that they are not. We sold out to the supply side economic god of slashing taxes and deregulation. It was supposed to result in trickle down wealth. It didn't
The wealthy and corporations just kept the money
Which party has blocked minimum wage increases for the last 7 years?
Which party has been dismantling unions for the last 30 years?
And there is the difference in leftist thinking and those on the right. The left thinks the way to spread the wealth is to demand higher pay for the lowest, non skilled labor; the right would prefer to create an opportunity for that person to move past minimum wage. I'm not saying they are successful at doing so, but if there was a common vision between the Dems and reps, success would be more likely. Sure, the Reps could say let's increase minimum wage so full time min worker makes $25k per year. But that doesn't do anything for the growing wealth gap. Min wage workers are a very small portion of the work force, less than 5%. Lets think bigger.
We've had Obama economics for eight years. Not so great, Trump will turn that around though.Then why are there still record of people on welfare?The economy is doing well right now and the OP says it's not. So there definition on of a good economy is flexible.
A failure of trickle down economics
