There is no double standard at all , they are going after a criminal with enough information to show there is cause to go after that criminal.the problem people have is the blatant double standard .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no double standard at all , they are going after a criminal with enough information to show there is cause to go after that criminal.the problem people have is the blatant double standard .
Nobody said that.so you admit that the insurrection claim is a joke
proof he didnt support the violence on jan 6th ...Nobody said that.
It was still an insurrection.
An insurrection of confused losers.
Trump even called them losers while he was watching on TV.
He is quoted as saying "Look at these people. They don't look like MY people. They look like losers."
Wrong.proof he didnt support the violence on jan 6th ...
Actually that should be, what Federal law did Biden break? But sure, investigate him too, and all the Bidens, and all the Clintons, and ALL the TRUMPS.
Uh.....
you guys kinda suck at "Civil War."
Remember?
First you lost the BIG ONE in 1865.
And more recently your latest attempted incursion (aka...coup/takeover) kinda crashed and burned.
Remember your moon-bat general in the Buffalo robe and horns?
Lmao!
No....a "well regulated militia" you ARE NOT!
Better just stick to the armchair warrior thing.
I think there are some pretty good X-Box games out there that might give you all something like a "real" feel of "combat"
but without all the scrapes and bruises and stuff.
Heck, there might even be one that gives you the opportunity to take over your guv-ment by force!
You should check it out.
that article isn’t about president trump.So now we know exactly how Trump breaks the law and dodges paying his fair share of taxes
Trump Organization's CFO Pleads Guilty In New York Tax Fraud Case
Allen Weisselberg admitted to 15 counts he was charged with, but did not agree to disclose any information on Trump himself.www.huffpost.com
15-year tax fraud scheme that saw him receive “off the books” compensation that amounted to around $1.76 million
Sorry but Trump is the boss. He had to know that he was paying his CFO illegally.
The compensation included rent, private school tuition expenses for some of Weisselberg’s family members and lease payments on Mercedes cars for Weisselberg and his wife
The charges W
“The scheme was intended to allow certain employees to substantially understate their compensation from the Trump Organization, so that they could and did pay federal, state, and local taxes in amounts that were significantly less than the amounts that should have been paid,” it continued.
The Trump Organization was also charged as part of the scheme but is not expected to be part of the plea agreement announced Thursday.'
eisselberg faced included scheme conspiracy, grand larceny, criminal tax fraud and falsifying business records.
“The purpose of the scheme was to compensate Weisselberg and other Trump Organization executives in a manner that was ‘off the books’: the beneficiaries of the scheme received substantial portions of their income through indirect and disguised means, with compensation that was unreported or misreported by [the Trump Organization]
This is one reason Republicans want to make corporations people. So instead of Trump being guilty, it's "the Trump Organization" that's guilty. It's bullshit.
The former president appeared before a separate — parallel — civil investigation by New York Attorney General Letitia James into his business dealings. During his testimony, Trump reportedly pleaded the Fifth Amendment over 400 times
And even Trump knows, only guilty people plead the 5th.
Nobody is talking about 1863 here are we.You do realize that the Democrats lost the Civil War? lol
Ya wacko hate party proof , that is on the edge of psychopathic. There is no correlation between the two unless you use MAGA Maggot logic.proof he didnt support the violence on jan 6th ...
No we thought Hunter Biden did. You are a idiot.You do realize that the Democrats lost the Civil War? lol
Yes it is, shows what kind of scum he is, direct relationship between this fact and Trump.that article isn’t about president trump.
Ya as best described by the fact that Lincoln was a classic liberal at the time. Literally, the two party's swapped party line between then and now. Dems. Where Rep. and Rep. were Dems. Back then. So in the only way possible that a right-winger tells the truth, he did it by accident thinking it meant something other than what it did.Nobody is talking about 1863 here are we.
And you should educate yourself on what the two parties were back then.
It's a mistake to leave out of FBI operations the CIA in Ukraine and in the White House. We noticed that most duped Americans thought the Clinton crime family was FBI linked rather than CIA linked.
'Sorry to disagree. But the November 2022 elections will be won by the Democrats in both houses. I'm not saying fairly. But they will be won by the Democrats.'
"....to point to Stupidity, and transfix it."
(Foucault, Theatrum Philosophicum)
so telling people to peacefully protest is instigating violence ? if the left had anything they would have brought charges long ago ..Ya wacko hate party proof , that is on the edge of psychopathic. There is no correlation between the two unless you use MAGA Maggot logic.
Ya as best described by the fact that Lincoln was a classic liberal at the time. Literally, the two party's swapped party line between then and now. Dems. Where Rep. and Rep. were Dems. Back then. So in the only way possible that a right-winger tells the truth, he did it by accident thinking it meant something other than what it did.
Ya as best described by the fact that Lincoln was a classic liberal at the time. Literally, the two party's swapped party line between then and now. Dems. Where Rep. and Rep. were Dems. Back then. So in the only way possible that a right-winger tells the truth, he did it by accident thinking it meant something other than what it did.