🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

If the GOP does NOT Impeach Joe Biden, is the GOP DEAD?? (Poll)

If the Republican House does NOT Impeach Joe Biden, is the GOP DEAD?

  • YES

    Votes: 14 53.8%
  • NO

    Votes: 12 46.2%

  • Total voters
    26
How is that abuse of power, since that's not a power the VP has. Biden was under the authority of Obama, who was in agreement with the EU that Shokin needed to go. That was the policy of the ambassadors to Ukraine months before Biden succeeded.
Biden flew to Ukraine and threatened to withhold $1b of approved aid if Shokin was not fired.
Shokin was fired. That is abuse of power. Probably extortion too, to protect his son's cash cow, and earned Joe a $5m bribe.
Don't lie. The Obama admin loved Shokin, that's why the $1b in aid was approved.
 
Do you have a citation on Obama's position. The only place i've seen that is from the New York post, citing a non-existent European Group paper.
Google it. The EU countries loved Shokin too.
Comer has the names of those in the Obama admin who supported Shokin before Biden had him fired.
Joe had no right to fire Shokin.
Like Obama said. "never underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up".
 
Last edited:
Impeachment requires a senate trial for guilt/innocence. The trial was after he left office. There was no need to "remove" him, duh.
Actually it was Mitch McConnell who refused to transfer the senate power to Chuck Schummer, and retained control so he could delay the senate trial until after Trump left office.

The House impeached Trump on Jan. 13 with a single charge: "incitement of insurrection" for allegedly encouraging the deadly Jan. 6 riot
 
Biden flew to Ukraine and threatened to withhold $1b of approved aid if Shokin was not fired.
Shokin was fired. That is abuse of power.
Actually the execution of Obama;s power. Since that was official US policy to fire Shokin.
Biden was just the executioner.
 
Actually it was Mitch McConnell who refused to transfer the senate power to Chuck Schumer, and retained control so he could delay the senate trial until after Trump left office.
The House impeached Trump on Jan. 13 with a single charge: "incitement of insurrection" for allegedly encouraging the deadly Jan. 6 riot
Trump was gone 1/21. No need to "remove" him.
 
Google it. The EU countries loved Shokin too.
Comer has the names of those in the Obama admin who supported Shokin before Biden had him fired.
Joe had no right to fire Shokin.
Like Obama said. "never underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up".
Wrong.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/wor...-ukraine-s-prosecutor-viktor-shokin-1.2591190
EU hails sacking of Ukraine’s prosecutor Viktor Shokin

https://www.rferl.org/a/why-was-ukraine-top-prosecutor- fired-viktor-shokin/30181445.html
But there is a long list of Western organizations, governments, and diplomats,
as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption groups, that wanted to see Shokin fired.

They include the International Monetary Fund, the European Union, the U.S.
government, foreign investors, and Ukrainian advocates of reform.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/new...orced-out-ukraines-top-prosecutor/3785620002/

But sources ranging from former Obama administration officials to an anti-
corruption advocate in Ukraine say the official, Viktor Shokin, was ousted for
the opposite reason Trump and his allies claim.
 
Actually the execution of Obama;s power. Since that was official US policy to fire Shokin.
Biden was just the executioner.
That is the bullshit story that Blinkin cooked up.
Comer has memos to the contrary. including that the $1b in aid was partly due to Shokin addressing corruption.
We'll see how the Impeachment Trial shakes out with evidence.
 
Wrong. EU hails sacking of Ukraine’s prosecutor Viktor Shokin. But there is a long list of Western organizations, governments, and diplomats,
as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption groups, that wanted to see Shokin fired. They include the International Monetary Fund, the European Union, the U.S.
government, foreign investors, and Ukrainian advocates of reform. But sources ranging from former Obama administration officials to an anti-
corruption advocate in Ukraine say the official, Viktor Shokin, was ousted for the opposite reason Trump and his allies claim.
Yep, after the firing Blinkin cover for Biden. Got rewarded with Secretary of State.
Blinkin also had those 51 traitors say Hunter's laptop was "Russian Disinformation"

Comer either has the goods on Biden or not. We'll see.
 
Yep, after the firing Blinkin cover for Biden. Got rewarded with Secretary of State.
Blinkin also had those 51 traitors say Hunter's laptop was "Russian Disinformation"

Comer either has the goods on Biden or not. We'll see.
So far Comer has NOT.
 
1. The Obama admin commended Shokin's investigation into Burisma.
It was the policy of the Obama administration and most Western gov't that Shokin was not being aggressive enough in ferreting out corruption.

2. Hillary's crimes were obvious, dumbass. It wasn't Comey's call whether to prosecute or not.
Prosecute no but it was his call whether to investigate or not. If it was decided no crime was committed there was nothing to turn over to the prosecutors.

3. Immigration Laws (open borders), even Nancy said he couldn't forgive any student loan debt, bribery, selling influence, money laundering, abuse of power, (articles don't have to break any laws, Trump's phone call to Z was perfectly legal)
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong. Well done.

4. Yes, if Trump is guilty AFTER all appeals, then he should be punished.

5. Do you agree that if Joe Biden is convicted of crimes that he should be punished like anyone else?
Yes of course.
 
Lying shit. Shokin was NOT investigating Burisma
Dumbass. Learn to read.
 
Dumbass. Learn to read.
“Shokin claims…”

Get real
 
Like you never saw the video. Liar.

The video where Biden brags about US POLICY in Getting the corrupt Shokin fired?

The policy that the IMF, the World Bank, the EU , and Ukrainian Parliament lauded?

That one?
 
The video where Biden brags about US POLICY in Getting the corrupt Shokin fired?
The policy that the IMF, the World Bank, the EU , and Ukrainian Parliament lauded? That one?
1. The ONLY reason Ukraine got the $1b in the first place is that Obama and the EU and the other orgs you reference all applauded Shokin's efforts to fight corruption.
2. Joe Biden took bribes from Burisma to fire Shokin who was investigating them when they were on the verge of going public.
3. Blinken got the IMF, world bank, et.al to cover Biden's tracks.

Think about it, why would Ukraine get $1b if Shokin was corrupt?
The obvious answer is the Obama admin liked what he was doing, and said so in memos, same for the EU, in memos, until Blinken strong-armed them to say Shokin was corrupt.

If you are correct, the $1b should have been withheld until the Ukraine cleaned up its corruption, and not approved.
Comer has the memos and testimony to prove Biden is corrupt, and took bribes.
 
1. The ONLY reason Ukraine got the $1b in the first place is that Obama and the EU and the other orgs you reference all applauded Shokin's efforts to fight corruption.
2. Joe Biden took bribes from Burisma to fire Shokin who was investigating them when they were on the verge of going public.
3. Blinken got the IMF, world bank, et.al to cover Biden's tracks.

Think about it, why would Ukraine get $1b if Shokin was corrupt?
The obvious answer is the Obama admin liked what he was doing, and said so in memos, same for the EU, in memos, until Blinken strong-armed them to say Shokin was corrupt.

If you are correct, the $1b should have been withheld until the Ukraine cleaned up its corruption, and not approved.
Comer has the memos and testimony to prove Biden is corrupt, and took bribes.
Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine! :rolleyes-41:
 
1. The ONLY reason Ukraine got the $1b in the first place is that Obama and the EU and the other orgs you reference all applauded Shokin's efforts to fight corruption.
2. Joe Biden took bribes from Burisma to fire Shokin who was investigating them when they were on the verge of going public.
3. Blinken got the IMF, world bank, et.al to cover Biden's tracks.

Think about it, why would Ukraine get $1b if Shokin was corrupt?
The obvious answer is the Obama admin liked what he was doing, and said so in memos, same for the EU, in memos, until Blinken strong-armed them to say Shokin was corrupt.

If you are correct, the $1b should have been withheld until the Ukraine cleaned up its corruption, and not approved.
Comer has the memos and testimony to prove Biden is corrupt, and took bribes.
1. Nonsense. Prove it

2.Shokin was not. Prove any of that shit

3.bullshit. They were in favor of removing Shokin BEFORE Biden got him fired
 

Forum List

Back
Top