If Trump fired the special prosecutor, how would Trumpsters react?

[easyt65]

just to be clear factually, the Donald never made this statement:

Trump made the comment, 'I hope the Russians do hack Hillary's e-mails.

Dear snowflake dumbass, please provide the evidence that Trump colluded with Russians to make that happen.

The FACT is you can NOT do it. That's why you have to post Trump saying he hoped it happened.

Does Trump say, 'The Russians and I hacked Hillary's e-mails'? NO.

Does Trump say, "I colluded with the Russians'? NO

That is not called 'evidence'. That is called 'snowflake desperation'.

Your post is sad and pathetic...you still have NOTHING, are grasping at straws in desperation.

 

[jc456]

just to be clear factually, the Donald never made this statement:

Trump made the comment, 'I hope the Russians do hack Hillary's e-mails.

Dear snowflake dumbass, please provide the evidence that Trump colluded with Russians to make that happen.

The FACT is you can NOT do it. That's why you have to post Trump saying he hoped it happened.

Does Trump say, 'The Russians and I hacked Hillary's e-mails'? NO.

Does Trump say, "I colluded with the Russians'? NO

That is not called 'evidence'. That is called 'snowflake desperation'.

Your post is sad and pathetic...you still have NOTHING, are grasping at straws in desperation.

dude, did you pay attention to who posted that? I said your comment was in error, that Trump never made the statement you claimed he made.

I know there isn't a russia anything, it is called a figment.

 

[JonKoch]

You moron... that's exactly what the Benghazi hearings did.

According to you the GOP could still be investing Hillary - without condemnation from anyone - just as long as they say the words, "Although we have found nothing, THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL ON-GOING'.

THAT is what the Democrats are doing now.

UNLIKE WITH THE TRUMP WITCH HUNT - which has produced NO EVIDENCE, the Benghazi Hearings DID provide 'evidence' of incompetence / improper judgment / poor decision-making. Snowflakes such as yourself are just to Intellectually and Partisanly DISHONEST to admit it...

...unless you are claiming that leaving Americans in Benghazi after every other nation pulled their people out, after 2 terrorist attacks on the compound resulting in a 4 foot hole in the wall, after denying over 50 requests for more security, while knowing there is a pending terrorist attack coming on 9/11/12 (days away) was a completely acceptable course of action by the State Department. IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? That is what happened.

November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.

House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost


Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say
Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

 

[jc456]

You moron... that's exactly what the Benghazi hearings did.

According to you the GOP could still be investing Hillary - without condemnation from anyone - just as long as they say the words, "Although we have found nothing, THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL ON-GOING'.

THAT is what the Democrats are doing now.

UNLIKE WITH THE TRUMP WITCH HUNT - which has produced NO EVIDENCE, the Benghazi Hearings DID provide 'evidence' of incompetence / improper judgment / poor decision-making. Snowflakes such as yourself are just to Intellectually and Partisanly DISHONEST to admit it...

...unless you are claiming that leaving Americans in Benghazi after every other nation pulled their people out, after 2 terrorist attacks on the compound resulting in a 4 foot hole in the wall, after denying over 50 requests for more security, while knowing there is a pending terrorist attack coming on 9/11/12 (days away) was a completely acceptable course of action by the State Department. IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? That is what happened.

November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.

House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost


Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say
Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

33,000 emails deleted. ooops,

 

[easyt65]

debunked as spoken into by the exdirector of the FBI. sorry Cinderella.

Is that the same Former Director of the FBI that protected Hillary and kept her ass out of jail? Yeah, I thought so....

STOP SPREADING SNOWFLAKE LIES...

From the Pro-Hillary/Democratic Party New York Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

"At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

You want a Russia 'Connection' THERE YOU GO!

Stop painting the Clintons as 'above reproach'. One of her 2 FBI investigations during the election was over Influence Peddling, and just recently the news broke that evidence of just that was recovered from the Clinton e-mails Huma Abedin diverted to her personal laptop.

Nothing was debunked, and snowflakes are still trying to lie, deceive, and push their bullshit.

 

[JonKoch]

Mueller is thick as thieves with Comey, picked DONORS for his team, and just picked Hillary Clinton's Clinton Foundation Lawyer to be part of his 'UN-BIASED' 'inquisition;.

This whole thing is now 1 big OFFICIAL F*ing Witch Hunt, and the Democrats are not even trying to hide it any more after Comey destroyed every false accusation they had during his testimony. Their only hope now is this stacked deck.

The Asst US AG and / or President Trump needs to shut this shit down NOW!


CNN Cuts Feed After Senator Objects to Clinton Foundation Atty Joining 'Independent' Counsel - Breitbart

 

[JonKoch]

You moron... that's exactly what the Benghazi hearings did.

According to you the GOP could still be investing Hillary - without condemnation from anyone - just as long as they say the words, "Although we have found nothing, THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL ON-GOING'.

THAT is what the Democrats are doing now.

UNLIKE WITH THE TRUMP WITCH HUNT - which has produced NO EVIDENCE, the Benghazi Hearings DID provide 'evidence' of incompetence / improper judgment / poor decision-making. Snowflakes such as yourself are just to Intellectually and Partisanly DISHONEST to admit it...

...unless you are claiming that leaving Americans in Benghazi after every other nation pulled their people out, after 2 terrorist attacks on the compound resulting in a 4 foot hole in the wall, after denying over 50 requests for more security, while knowing there is a pending terrorist attack coming on 9/11/12 (days away) was a completely acceptable course of action by the State Department. IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? That is what happened.

November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.

House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost


Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say
Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

33,000 emails deleted. ooops,

 

[Faun]

And there's more coming...

Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known

1 problem, dumbass...

There is no connection between Trump and any Russian Hackers - NEVER HAS BEEN. Attempting to link Obama to these attacks is yet another sign of extreme snowflake DESPERATION!


There IS a connection between Russian Hackers and SPIES and Hillary Clinton, though. Her campaign manager's brother was working for the KGB Bank and the spy agency that reportedly hacked into the DNC's e-mail. Why don't you drag Hillary's and her Campaign manager's ass in front of Congress and ask THEM about it?!

Not yet, there's no connection. But who knows? After five or six investigations into the matter, maybe they will.

 

[easyt65]

You moron... that's exactly what the Benghazi hearings did.

According to you the GOP could still be investing Hillary - without condemnation from anyone - just as long as they say the words, "Although we have found nothing, THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL ON-GOING'.

THAT is what the Democrats are doing now.

UNLIKE WITH THE TRUMP WITCH HUNT - which has produced NO EVIDENCE, the Benghazi Hearings DID provide 'evidence' of incompetence / improper judgment / poor decision-making. Snowflakes such as yourself are just to Intellectually and Partisanly DISHONEST to admit it...

...unless you are claiming that leaving Americans in Benghazi after every other nation pulled their people out, after 2 terrorist attacks on the compound resulting in a 4 foot hole in the wall, after denying over 50 requests for more security, while knowing there is a pending terrorist attack coming on 9/11/12 (days away) was a completely acceptable course of action by the State Department. IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? That is what happened.

November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.

House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost


Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say
Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

That was a very amusing post.....THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT I POSTED. YOU IGNORED IT COMPLETELY.

WELL BEFORE THE NEEDED RESCUE OF THE AMERICANS LEFT IN BECNGHAZI, AFTER EVERY OTHER NATIONS HAD PULLED THEIR PEOPLE OUT BECAUSE IT WAS TOO DANGERSOUS TO STAY THERE,

ARE YOU TRYING TO CLAIM THAT IT WAS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE FOR HILLARY CLINTON AND BARAK OBAMA TO LEAVE AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI AFTER EVERY OTHER NATION PULLED THEIR PEOPLE OUT, AFTER 2 TERRORIST ATTACKS - THE LAST ONE LEAVING A 4 FOOT HOLE IN THE COMPOUND WALL, AFTER REJECTING OVER 50 PLEAS FOR ADDITIONAL SECURITY, WITH A MIDDLE EAST-WIDE TERRORIST ATTACK CALLED FOR DAYS LATER ON 9/11/12?

DON'T DANCE AROUND THE DAMN QUESTION - IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED AND THAT IS WHAT I AM SEEING / HEARING FROM YOU!


For all you F*ing snowflake retards who just hate - like Obama - to accept responsibility for anything...

Don't blame a 'lack of funding' for Obama and Hillary choosing to leave Americans in Benghazi to fend for themselves when every other nation pulled their people out. If you don't have the security to protect your people, which was proven to be the case in the 2 attacks prior to the one on 9/11/12 - especially when Stevens warned Hillary and Obama that if there was a 3rd attack HE WOULD DIE, you PULL THEM THE F* OUT, NOT LEAVE THEM THERE TO DIE!

Hillary and Obama left Americans to fend for themselves - they left them there to die....and that's what happened. 4 Americans died needlessly.


(Obama tacked on nearly $7 Trillion in DEBT his 1st 4 years in office, and he did not think adding a couple thousand more on to protect the lives of Americans who had already been attacked by terrorists twice before 9/11/12 was worth it? SERIOUSLY? is THAT What you people are saying?

You're trying to say Obama can pull billions of tax dollars on his own, without Republicans, and give it to Iran for hostages, to the UN for their new global initiatives, and to the PLO - Irael's enemy, but he could not come up with the money to provide adequate protection to Americans he refused to pull out of Benghazi after 2 terrorist attacks? REALLY?!

You people are so full of shit.)

 

[jc456]

debunked as spoken into by the exdirector of the FBI. sorry Cinderella.

Is that the same Former Director of the FBI that protected Hillary and kept her ass out of jail? Yeah, I thought so....

STOP SPREADING SNOWFLAKE LIES...

From the Pro-Hillary/Democratic Party New York Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

"At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

You want a Russia 'Connection' THERE YOU GO!

Stop painting the Clintons as 'above reproach'. One of her 2 FBI investigations during the election was over Influence Peddling, and just recently the news broke that evidence of just that was recovered from the Clinton e-mails Huma Abedin diverted to her personal laptop.

Nothing was debunked, and snowflakes are still trying to lie, deceive, and push their bullshit.

dude, why are you using this language at me. I'm on your fking side easy. WTF is wrong with you? That is now two posts off the wall at me. The exFBI director cleared Trump. You don't think so?

 

[easyt65]

debunked as spoken into by the exdirector of the FBI. sorry Cinderella.

Is that the same Former Director of the FBI that protected Hillary and kept her ass out of jail? Yeah, I thought so....

STOP SPREADING SNOWFLAKE LIES...

From the Pro-Hillary/Democratic Party New York Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

"At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

You want a Russia 'Connection' THERE YOU GO!

Stop painting the Clintons as 'above reproach'. One of her 2 FBI investigations during the election was over Influence Peddling, and just recently the news broke that evidence of just that was recovered from the Clinton e-mails Huma Abedin diverted to her personal laptop.

Nothing was debunked, and snowflakes are still trying to lie, deceive, and push their bullshit.

dude, why are you using this language at me. I'm on your fking side easy. WTF is wrong with you? That is now two posts off the wall at me. The exFBI director cleared Trump. You don't think so?

My apologies. I thought you were agreeing that the Clinton/Uranium issue had been debunked. I was wrong - misread it. I sincerely, humbly apologize.

 

[Faun]

debunked as spoken into by the exdirector of the FBI. sorry Cinderella.

Is that the same Former Director of the FBI that protected Hillary and kept her ass out of jail? Yeah, I thought so....

STOP SPREADING SNOWFLAKE LIES...

From the Pro-Hillary/Democratic Party New York Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

"At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

You want a Russia 'Connection' THERE YOU GO!

Stop painting the Clintons as 'above reproach'. One of her 2 FBI investigations during the election was over Influence Peddling, and just recently the news broke that evidence of just that was recovered from the Clinton e-mails Huma Abedin diverted to her personal laptop.

Nothing was debunked, and snowflakes are still trying to lie, deceive, and push their bullshit.

dude, why are you using this language at me. I'm on your fking side easy. WTF is wrong with you? That is now two posts off the wall at me. The exFBI director cleared Trump. You don't think so?

My apologies. I thought you were agreeing that the Clinton/Uranium issue had been debunked. I was wrong - misread it. I sincerely, humbly apologize.

It's been debunked to all except the most brain-dead rightards...

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

 

[JonKoch]

debunked as spoken into by the exdirector of the FBI. sorry Cinderella.

Is that the same Former Director of the FBI that protected Hillary and kept her ass out of jail? Yeah, I thought so....

STOP SPREADING SNOWFLAKE LIES...

From the Pro-Hillary/Democratic Party New York Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

"At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

You want a Russia 'Connection' THERE YOU GO!

Stop painting the Clintons as 'above reproach'. One of her 2 FBI investigations during the election was over Influence Peddling, and just recently the news broke that evidence of just that was recovered from the Clinton e-mails Huma Abedin diverted to her personal laptop.

Nothing was debunked, and snowflakes are still trying to lie, deceive, and push their bullshit.

LMAOROG

No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal

..The fact is, Clinton was one of nine voting members on the foreign investments committee, which also includes the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy, the attorney general, and representatives from two White House offices — the United States Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (Separately, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission needed to approve (and did approve) the transfer of two uranium recovery licenses as part of the sale.)

...The committee, which is known by its acronym CFIUS, can approve a sale, but it cannot stop a sale. Only the president can do that, and only if the committee recommends or “any member of CFIUS recommends suspension or prohibition of the transaction,”



Even the president cannot prohibit a transaction without “credible evidence” that the “foreign interest exercising control might take action that threatens to impair the national security,” according to the regulation.

No 'Veto Power' for Clinton on Uranium Deal - FactCheck.org

 

[easyt65]

It's been debunked to all except the most brain-dead rightards...

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Nice attempt to dance around the issue. I never said Hillary had a direct part in the Russian purchase of US Uranium. I pointed out that one of the Russians who benefitted from the deal in which Hillary's State Dept had to be a part of donated a lot of money to the Clinton Foundation. THAT has never been debunked.

 

[easyt65]

No 'Veto Power' for Clinton on Uranium Deal - FactCheck.org

Who gives a shit if she had veto power or not. She still had some measure of influence on the deal, and she received a lot of money from one of the Russian businessmen who benefitted from the deal going through.

Replace Hillary's name with Trump's name in this story and snowflakes would be screaming how they FINALLY had some evidence to prove a 'Trump-Russia Connection'...

...and even though you are not Intellectually honest enough to admit it you know that is true!

 

[JonKoch]

You moron... that's exactly what the Benghazi hearings did.

According to you the GOP could still be investing Hillary - without condemnation from anyone - just as long as they say the words, "Although we have found nothing, THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL ON-GOING'.

THAT is what the Democrats are doing now.

UNLIKE WITH THE TRUMP WITCH HUNT - which has produced NO EVIDENCE, the Benghazi Hearings DID provide 'evidence' of incompetence / improper judgment / poor decision-making. Snowflakes such as yourself are just to Intellectually and Partisanly DISHONEST to admit it...

...unless you are claiming that leaving Americans in Benghazi after every other nation pulled their people out, after 2 terrorist attacks on the compound resulting in a 4 foot hole in the wall, after denying over 50 requests for more security, while knowing there is a pending terrorist attack coming on 9/11/12 (days away) was a completely acceptable course of action by the State Department. IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? That is what happened.

November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.

House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost


Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say
Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

That was a very amusing post.....THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT I POSTED. YOU IGNORED IT COMPLETELY.

WELL BEFORE THE NEEDED RESCUE OF THE AMERICANS LEFT IN BECNGHAZI, AFTER EVERY OTHER NATIONS HAD PULLED THEIR PEOPLE OUT BECAUSE IT WAS TOO DANGERSOUS TO STAY THERE,

ARE YOU TRYING TO CLAIM THAT IT WAS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE FOR HILLARY CLINTON AND BARAK OBAMA TO LEAVE AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI AFTER EVERY OTHER NATION PULLED THEIR PEOPLE OUT, AFTER 2 TERRORIST ATTACKS - THE LAST ONE LEAVING A 4 FOOT HOLE IN THE COMPOUND WALL, AFTER REJECTING OVER 50 PLEAS FOR ADDITIONAL SECURITY, WITH A MIDDLE EAST-WIDE TERRORIST ATTACK CALLED FOR DAYS LATER ON 9/11/12?

DON'T DANCE AROUND THE DAMN QUESTION - IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED AND THAT IS WHAT I AM SEEING / HEARING FROM YOU!


For all you F*ing snowflake retards who just hate - like Obama - to accept responsibility for anything...

Don't blame a 'lack of funding' for Obama and Hillary choosing to leave Americans in Benghazi to fend for themselves when every other nation pulled their people out. If you don't have the security to protect your people, which was proven to be the case in the 2 attacks prior to the one on 9/11/12 - especially when Stevens warned Hillary and Obama that if there was a 3rd attack HE WOULD DIE, you PULL THEM THE F* OUT, NOT LEAVE THEM THERE TO DIE!

Hillary and Obama left Americans to fend for themselves - they left them there to die....and that's what happened. 4 Americans died needlessly.


(Obama tacked on nearly $7 Trillion in DEBT his 1st 4 years in office, and he did not think adding a couple thousand more on to protect the lives of Americans who had already been attacked by terrorists twice before 9/11/12 was worth it? SERIOUSLY? is THAT What you people are saying?

You're trying to say Obama can pull billions of tax dollars on his own, without Republicans, and give it to Iran for hostages, to the UN for their new global initiatives, and to the PLO - Irael's enemy, but he could not come up with the money to provide adequate protection to Americans he refused to pull out of Benghazi after 2 terrorist attacks? REALLY?!


You people are so full of shit.)

How many nations had diplomatic missions in Benghazi and when did they pull out?


The bipartisan report adopted by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence found that the U.S. was not the “last flag flying” in Benghazi. The U.S. presence—alongside the United Nations and the European Union—reflected Ambassador Stevens’ view that Benghazi was “critically important,” and he received significant deference as “one of, if not the premier expert” on Libyan matters, according to his colleagues.


HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM DEMOCRATIC STAFF REPORT

Multiple interviews by the Oversight and Government Reform Committee revealed that Ambassador Stevens championed the U.S. presence in Benghazi. “As one official said, ‘nobody knew Libya better than Chris,’ and ‘Chris strongly recommended that we maintain a presence in Benghazi.’” Another State Department official explained that Ambassador Stevens considered Benghazi and eastern Libya to be “critically important components to understanding Libya” on both a “symbolic level” and in order “to have a window into the Islamist extremism that was developing primarily in the east but in other parts of Libya, to have a window into the tribal dynamics, which are very important.”

http://askedandanswered-democrats.benghazi.house.gov/assets/answers/24.pdf#page=38



“In fact, there’s clear evidence that several other western nations had a presence in Benghazi immediately before and well after the attack on the U.S. compound. We rate the claim False.”

PolitiFact rated this claim as “False.”

Trey Gowdy said the United States was 'the last flag flying in Benghazi'

CHRIS STEVENS’S FAMILY: DON’T BLAME HILLARY CLINTON FOR BENGHAZI

Chris Stevens’s Family: Don’t Blame Hillary Clinton for Benghazi



ANYTHING ELSE CUPCAKE??

 

[JonKoch]

No 'Veto Power' for Clinton on Uranium Deal - FactCheck.org

Who gives a shit if she had veto power or not. She still had some measure of influence on the deal, and she received a lot of money from one of the Russian businessmen who benefitted from the deal going through.

Replace Hillary's name with Trump's name in this story and snowflakes would be screaming how they FINALLY had some evidence to prove a 'Trump-Russia Connection'...

...and even though you are not Intellectually honest enough to admit it you know that is true!

Sure Cupcake, sure

 

[JonKoch]

It's been debunked to all except the most brain-dead rightards...

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Nice attempt to dance around the issue. I never said Hillary had a direct part in the Russian purchase of US Uranium. I pointed out that one of the Russians who benefitted from the deal in which Hillary's State Dept had to be a part of donated a lot of money to the Clinton Foundation. THAT has never been debunked.

Clinton Foundation? Oh that non profit group that helped hundreds of thousands and the Clinton's made zero economic benefit from, unlike Cheeto's "charity"?

 

[JonKoch]

You moron... that's exactly what the Benghazi hearings did.

According to you the GOP could still be investing Hillary - without condemnation from anyone - just as long as they say the words, "Although we have found nothing, THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL ON-GOING'.

THAT is what the Democrats are doing now.

UNLIKE WITH THE TRUMP WITCH HUNT - which has produced NO EVIDENCE, the Benghazi Hearings DID provide 'evidence' of incompetence / improper judgment / poor decision-making. Snowflakes such as yourself are just to Intellectually and Partisanly DISHONEST to admit it...

...unless you are claiming that leaving Americans in Benghazi after every other nation pulled their people out, after 2 terrorist attacks on the compound resulting in a 4 foot hole in the wall, after denying over 50 requests for more security, while knowing there is a pending terrorist attack coming on 9/11/12 (days away) was a completely acceptable course of action by the State Department. IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? That is what happened.

November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.

House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost


Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say
Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

That was a very amusing post.....THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT I POSTED. YOU IGNORED IT COMPLETELY.

WELL BEFORE THE NEEDED RESCUE OF THE AMERICANS LEFT IN BECNGHAZI, AFTER EVERY OTHER NATIONS HAD PULLED THEIR PEOPLE OUT BECAUSE IT WAS TOO DANGERSOUS TO STAY THERE,

ARE YOU TRYING TO CLAIM THAT IT WAS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE FOR HILLARY CLINTON AND BARAK OBAMA TO LEAVE AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI AFTER EVERY OTHER NATION PULLED THEIR PEOPLE OUT, AFTER 2 TERRORIST ATTACKS - THE LAST ONE LEAVING A 4 FOOT HOLE IN THE COMPOUND WALL, AFTER REJECTING OVER 50 PLEAS FOR ADDITIONAL SECURITY, WITH A MIDDLE EAST-WIDE TERRORIST ATTACK CALLED FOR DAYS LATER ON 9/11/12?

DON'T DANCE AROUND THE DAMN QUESTION - IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED AND THAT IS WHAT I AM SEEING / HEARING FROM YOU!


For all you F*ing snowflake retards who just hate - like Obama - to accept responsibility for anything...

Don't blame a 'lack of funding' for Obama and Hillary choosing to leave Americans in Benghazi to fend for themselves when every other nation pulled their people out. If you don't have the security to protect your people, which was proven to be the case in the 2 attacks prior to the one on 9/11/12 - especially when Stevens warned Hillary and Obama that if there was a 3rd attack HE WOULD DIE, you PULL THEM THE F* OUT, NOT LEAVE THEM THERE TO DIE!

Hillary and Obama left Americans to fend for themselves - they left them there to die....and that's what happened. 4 Americans died needlessly.


(Obama tacked on nearly $7 Trillion in DEBT his 1st 4 years in office, and he did not think adding a couple thousand more on to protect the lives of Americans who had already been attacked by terrorists twice before 9/11/12 was worth it? SERIOUSLY? is THAT What you people are saying?

You're trying to say Obama can pull billions of tax dollars on his own, without Republicans, and give it to Iran for hostages, to the UN for their new global initiatives, and to the PLO - Irael's enemy, but he could not come up with the money to provide adequate protection to Americans he refused to pull out of Benghazi after 2 terrorist attacks? REALLY?!

You people are so full of shit.)

 

[Faun]

It's been debunked to all except the most brain-dead rightards...

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Nice attempt to dance around the issue. I never said Hillary had a direct part in the Russian purchase of US Uranium. I pointed out that one of the Russians who benefitted from the deal in which Hillary's State Dept had to sign off on donated a lot of money to the Clinton Foundation. THAT has never been debunked.

LOLOL

You're so fucking brain-dead, you can't even comprehend my linked debunked the rightard myth that the Clinton Foundation took money from Russia in exchange for Uranium.

And if you had even the slightest ounce of common sense, which being a conservative, you don't, you'd realize no one was going to pay her a dime when she was but one Department head among many who had to agree to the deal. Why would anyone bribe her when the deal falls through if any one of the other eight people who had a say in the deal, can say, "no deal?"

You're allergic to critical thinking.