If Trump fired the special prosecutor, how would Trumpsters react?

[Faun]

No 'Veto Power' for Clinton on Uranium Deal - FactCheck.org

Who gives a shit if she had veto power or not. She still had some measure of influence on the deal, and she received a lot of money from one of the Russian businessmen who benefitted from the deal going through.

Replace Hillary's name with Trump's name in this story and snowflakes would be screaming how they FINALLY had some evidence to prove a 'Trump-Russia Connection'...

...and even though you are not Intellectually honest enough to admit it you know that is true!

You have no proof she received even one penny from that deal. Your only link doesn't even go that far as to levy such an unconfirmed accusation.

 

[The Derp]

debunked as spoken into by the exdirector of the FBI. sorry Cinderella.

Again, you can't say an investigation is concluded before it is, you know, concluded.

 

[JonKoch]

You moron... that's exactly what the Benghazi hearings did.

According to you the GOP could still be investing Hillary - without condemnation from anyone - just as long as they say the words, "Although we have found nothing, THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL ON-GOING'.

THAT is what the Democrats are doing now.

UNLIKE WITH THE TRUMP WITCH HUNT - which has produced NO EVIDENCE, the Benghazi Hearings DID provide 'evidence' of incompetence / improper judgment / poor decision-making. Snowflakes such as yourself are just to Intellectually and Partisanly DISHONEST to admit it...

...unless you are claiming that leaving Americans in Benghazi after every other nation pulled their people out, after 2 terrorist attacks on the compound resulting in a 4 foot hole in the wall, after denying over 50 requests for more security, while knowing there is a pending terrorist attack coming on 9/11/12 (days away) was a completely acceptable course of action by the State Department. IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? That is what happened.

November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.

House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost


Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say
Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

That was a very amusing post.....THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT I POSTED. YOU IGNORED IT COMPLETELY.

WELL BEFORE THE NEEDED RESCUE OF THE AMERICANS LEFT IN BECNGHAZI, AFTER EVERY OTHER NATIONS HAD PULLED THEIR PEOPLE OUT BECAUSE IT WAS TOO DANGERSOUS TO STAY THERE,

ARE YOU TRYING TO CLAIM THAT IT WAS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE FOR HILLARY CLINTON AND BARAK OBAMA TO LEAVE AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI AFTER EVERY OTHER NATION PULLED THEIR PEOPLE OUT, AFTER 2 TERRORIST ATTACKS - THE LAST ONE LEAVING A 4 FOOT HOLE IN THE COMPOUND WALL, AFTER REJECTING OVER 50 PLEAS FOR ADDITIONAL SECURITY, WITH A MIDDLE EAST-WIDE TERRORIST ATTACK CALLED FOR DAYS LATER ON 9/11/12?

DON'T DANCE AROUND THE DAMN QUESTION - IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED AND THAT IS WHAT I AM SEEING / HEARING FROM YOU!


For all you F*ing snowflake retards who just hate - like Obama - to accept responsibility for anything...

Don't blame a 'lack of funding' for Obama and Hillary choosing to leave Americans in Benghazi to fend for themselves when every other nation pulled their people out. If you don't have the security to protect your people, which was proven to be the case in the 2 attacks prior to the one on 9/11/12 - especially when Stevens warned Hillary and Obama that if there was a 3rd attack HE WOULD DIE, you PULL THEM THE F* OUT, NOT LEAVE THEM THERE TO DIE!

Hillary and Obama left Americans to fend for themselves - they left them there to die....and that's what happened. 4 Americans died needlessly.


(Obama tacked on nearly $7 Trillion in DEBT his 1st 4 years in office, and he did not think adding a couple thousand more on to protect the lives of Americans who had already been attacked by terrorists twice before 9/11/12 was worth it? SERIOUSLY? is THAT What you people are saying?

You're trying to say Obama can pull billions of tax dollars on his own, without Republicans, and give it to Iran for hostages, to the UN for their new global initiatives, and to the PLO - Irael's enemy, but he could not come up with the money to provide adequate protection to Americans he refused to pull out of Benghazi after 2 terrorist attacks? REALLY?!

You people are so full of shit.)

Yes Cupcake, you people ARE FULL OF SHIT



THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEW BOARD

“The Board found that Ambassador Stevens made the decision to travel to Benghazi independently of Washington, per standard practice. Timing for his trip was driven in part by commitments in Tripoli, as well as a staffing gap between principal officers in Benghazi … The Ambassador did not see a direct threat of an attack of this nature and scale on the U.S. Mission in the overall negative trendline of security incidents from spring to summer 2012. His status as the leading U.S. government advocate on Libya policy, and his expertise on Benghazi in particular, caused Washington to give unusual deference to his judgments.”

 

[Faun]

So has the mythical Russian/Trump collusion.

No, that hasn't been debunked. That's what the current investigations are about. How can you conclude there is nothing there before the investigations have concluded?

debunked as spoken into by the exdirector of the FBI. sorry Cinderella.

What's been debunked? Comey clarified with absolute confidence that Russia hacked our election. And several of Trump's associates, some of whom worked on his campaign, are under investigation for colluding with the Russians.

Just how brain-dead are you to think that's been debunked?

 

[jc456]

debunked as spoken into by the exdirector of the FBI. sorry Cinderella.

Again, you can't say an investigation is concluded before it is, you know, concluded.

Comey stated so, there is no investigation of the president. So no investigation means no investigation in my vocabulary. yours?

 

[JonKoch]

No 'Veto Power' for Clinton on Uranium Deal - FactCheck.org

Who gives a shit if she had veto power or not. She still had some measure of influence on the deal, and she received a lot of money from one of the Russian businessmen who benefitted from the deal going through.

Replace Hillary's name with Trump's name in this story and snowflakes would be screaming how they FINALLY had some evidence to prove a 'Trump-Russia Connection'...

...and even though you are not Intellectually honest enough to admit it you know that is true!

SOME MEASURE??? LOL


Even the president cannot prohibit a transaction without “credible evidence” that the “foreign interest exercising control might take action that threatens to impair the national security,” according to the regulation.

No 'Veto Power' for Clinton on Uranium Deal - FactCheck.org

 

[The Derp]

Comey stated so, there is no investigation of the president.

Not of Trump personally, but there is an investigation into his campaign. Also, Nixon wasn't under investigation until he was. So while, at the time, the investigation into Trump's campaign didn't involve Trump, it might down the line. We have to let the investigation run its course. You seem apprehensive to that, and I don't know why. If Trump did nothing wrong, then let the investigations proceed and vindicate him...but claiming he's vindicated before the investigations are concluded is willful ignorance.

 

[jc456]

Comey stated so, there is no investigation of the president.

Not of Trump personally, but there is an investigation into his campaign. Nixon wasn't under investigation until he, you know, was.

no there isn't. you just want there to be. but thirteen months and you got jack shit. the man said there was never an investigation. time to end the fairytale.

 

[easyt65]

ANYTHING ELSE CUPCAKE??

Of course....

'Soldiers' are dedicated to the mission. Stevens was dedicated. he also knew the people in Benghazi and did not feel threatened by them. He wasn't killed by the people he knew in Benghazi, though. He was killed by Al Qaeda. Stevens stayed because the mission was there.

Hillary Clinton and the State Department was in charge of protecting US Ambassadors. BOTTOM LINE: Hillary Clinton, as Sect of State, failed to do so.

SHE, not Stevens, was in charge of making that call. When every other nation began pulling their people out she should have done so, too. When the embassy was attacked twice before 9/11/12 she should have ordered them out, especially knowing they did not have enough security. She did not. She did not / could not / would not make the call. Leaders have to make tough choices - she failed. Instead she let Americans die.

Not only did she fail to prevent the deaths f Americans, she lied her ass off about it in an attempt to make sure her Presidential bid hopes were not damaged.

Had Obama just announced that 4 Americans had been killed in a terrorist attack on 9/11/12 there would have been no scandal at all. Americans would have accepted that. More Americans have been killed by terrorists since then. It has sadly become a fact of life. He and Hillary F*ed up, though, by trying to cover it up.

22 US Embassies throughout the Middle East on 9/11/12 - a fact the media kept extremely quiet because it did not support the false narrative that in Benghazi - and only in Benghazi - some obscure video cause a riot that resulted in the murder of 4 Americans.

The media was complicit in helping create that story because of if it was emphasized to the American people that 22 attacks throughout the ME that day they would have easily figured out Benghazi was an obvious part of the larger coordinated attacks. Much like with the ACA, Obama sought to mislead the American people with his BS about a video. If he had been honest we would have mourned the loss of 4 Americans WITH him instead of having to DRAG the truth out of him and Hillary.

Also, Snowflakes a few minutes ago tried to blame the GOP for the deaths of those in Benghazi over funding issues. Again, what a bunch of BS! That's an excuse for failing to prevent the deaths of 4 Americans who never should have died to begin with.

 

[The Derp]

no there isn't.

No there isn't, what? An investigation into Trump's campaign? There certainly is. Whether or not that investigation involves Trump may have, at the time, not been an issue. Of course, that could all change on a dime should the investigation uncover evidence showing he was involved. This is why investigations have to run their course before you can make a conclusion. Nixon wasn't originally under investigation in Watergate. Then he was. So why are you so eager to jump to conclusions before the investigation is complete?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The RW fuckwits are now in that zone where anyone who doesn't do something they agree with is, for all practical purposes,

Satan. Mueller is now Satan.

 

[Faun]

ANYTHING ELSE CUPCAKE??

Of course....

'Soldiers' are dedicated to the mission. Stevens was dedicated. he also knew the people in Benghazi and did not feel threatened by them. He wasn't killed by the people he knew in Benghazi, though. He was killed by Al Qaeda. Stevens stayed because the mission was there.

Hillary Clinton and the State Department was in charge of protecting US Ambassadors. BOTTOM LINE: Hillary Clinton, as Sect of State, failed to do so.

SHE, not Stevens, was in charge of making that call. When every other nation began pulling their people out she should have done so, too. When the embassy was attacked twice before 9/11/12 she should have ordered them out, especially knowing they did not have enough security. She did not. She did not / could not / would not make the call. Leaders have to make tough choices - she failed. Instead she let Americans die.

Not only did she fail to prevent the deaths f Americans, she lied her ass off about it in an attempt to make sure her Presidential bid hopes were not damaged.

Had Obama just announced that 4 Americans had been killed in a terrorist attack on 9/11/12 there would have been no scandal at all. Americans would have accepted that. More Americans have been killed by terrorists since then. It has sadly become a fact of life. He and Hillary F*ed up, though, by trying to cover it up.

22 US Embassies throughout the Middle East on 9/11/12 - a fact the media kept extremely quiet because it did not support the false narrative that in Benghazi - and only in Benghazi - some obscure video cause a riot that resulted in the murder of 4 Americans.

The media was complicit in helping create that story because of if it was emphasized to the American people that 22 attacks throughout the ME that day they would have easily figured out Benghazi was an obvious part of the larger coordinated attacks. Much like with the ACA, Obama sought to mislead the American people with his BS about a video. If he had been honest we would have mourned the loss of 4 Americans WITH him instead of having to DRAG the truth out of him and Hillary.

Also, Snowflakes a few minutes ago tried to blame the GOP for the deaths of those in Benghazi over funding issues. Again, what a bunch of BS! That's an excuse for failing to prevent the deaths of 4 Americans who never should have died to begin with.

You're still going on about this??

Eight investigations into Benghazi exonerated Obama, Hillary and Rice.

We're still only on our first investigation into Trump colluding with Russia to hack the election for him. Relax and enjoy the ride, we still have 7 more to go.

 

[jc456]

no there isn't.

No there isn't, what? An investigation into Trump's campaign? There certainly is. Whether or not that investigation involves Trump may have, at the time, not been an issue. Of course, that could all change on a dime should the investigation uncover evidence showing he was involved. This is why investigations have to run their course before you can make a conclusion. Nixon wasn't originally under investigation in Watergate. Then he was. So why are you so eager to jump to conclusions before the investigation is complete?

fk man, how long does it take to investigate a campaign? They were investigating before the elections, and there was nothing, still nothing. it's done fool. it's all over after thirteen months if you can't find something that is just poor investigating. are you saying the agencies are incompetent?

 

[JonKoch]

You moron... that's exactly what the Benghazi hearings did.

According to you the GOP could still be investing Hillary - without condemnation from anyone - just as long as they say the words, "Although we have found nothing, THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL ON-GOING'.

THAT is what the Democrats are doing now.

UNLIKE WITH THE TRUMP WITCH HUNT - which has produced NO EVIDENCE, the Benghazi Hearings DID provide 'evidence' of incompetence / improper judgment / poor decision-making. Snowflakes such as yourself are just to Intellectually and Partisanly DISHONEST to admit it...

...unless you are claiming that leaving Americans in Benghazi after every other nation pulled their people out, after 2 terrorist attacks on the compound resulting in a 4 foot hole in the wall, after denying over 50 requests for more security, while knowing there is a pending terrorist attack coming on 9/11/12 (days away) was a completely acceptable course of action by the State Department. IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? That is what happened.

November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.

House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost


Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say
Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

That was a very amusing post.....THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT I POSTED. YOU IGNORED IT COMPLETELY.

WELL BEFORE THE NEEDED RESCUE OF THE AMERICANS LEFT IN BECNGHAZI, AFTER EVERY OTHER NATIONS HAD PULLED THEIR PEOPLE OUT BECAUSE IT WAS TOO DANGERSOUS TO STAY THERE,

ARE YOU TRYING TO CLAIM THAT IT WAS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE FOR HILLARY CLINTON AND BARAK OBAMA TO LEAVE AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI AFTER EVERY OTHER NATION PULLED THEIR PEOPLE OUT, AFTER 2 TERRORIST ATTACKS - THE LAST ONE LEAVING A 4 FOOT HOLE IN THE COMPOUND WALL, AFTER REJECTING OVER 50 PLEAS FOR ADDITIONAL SECURITY, WITH A MIDDLE EAST-WIDE TERRORIST ATTACK CALLED FOR DAYS LATER ON 9/11/12?

DON'T DANCE AROUND THE DAMN QUESTION - IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED AND THAT IS WHAT I AM SEEING / HEARING FROM YOU!


For all you F*ing snowflake retards who just hate - like Obama - to accept responsibility for anything...

Don't blame a 'lack of funding' for Obama and Hillary choosing to leave Americans in Benghazi to fend for themselves when every other nation pulled their people out. If you don't have the security to protect your people, which was proven to be the case in the 2 attacks prior to the one on 9/11/12 - especially when Stevens warned Hillary and Obama that if there was a 3rd attack HE WOULD DIE, you PULL THEM THE F* OUT, NOT LEAVE THEM THERE TO DIE!

Hillary and Obama left Americans to fend for themselves - they left them there to die....and that's what happened. 4 Americans died needlessly.


(Obama tacked on nearly $7 Trillion in DEBT his 1st 4 years in office, and he did not think adding a couple thousand more on to protect the lives of Americans who had already been attacked by terrorists twice before 9/11/12 was worth it? SERIOUSLY? is THAT What you people are saying?

You're trying to say Obama can pull billions of tax dollars on his own, without Republicans, and give it to Iran for hostages, to the UN for their new global initiatives, and to the PLO - Irael's enemy, but he could not come up with the money to provide adequate protection to Americans he refused to pull out of Benghazi after 2 terrorist attacks? REALLY?!


You people are so full of shit.)

Senate Bipartisan Report
"[T]he United States maintained a diplomatic presence there similar to the UN, the European Union, and other Western countries such as Italy, France Turkey, and Malta."

"Some nations closed their diplomatic facilities in Benghazi as the security conditions deteriorated during the summer of 2012, but other nations stayed along with the United States, contrary to some public reports and statements that the U.S. was the last country represented in Benghazi."
http://askedandanswered-democrats.benghazi.house.gov/assets/answers/5.pdf#page=27



ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEW BOARD CHAIRMAN AMBASSADOR THOMAS PICKERING

In a deposition before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Ambassador Pickering testified that Ambassador Stevens “had been in Benghazi for a considerable period of time; knew many, if not most, of the leaders; was seen to be well thought of in Benghazi; and had—if not adulation, he had a status of high favorable profile in Benghazi. And it was the combination of his background and experience and his knowledge of Benghazi, which exceeded that of many others in the State Department at least, that had people turn to him for advice and counsel on Benghazi.” Ambassador Pickering also described that the series of security incidents in Benghazi did not provoke more of a reaction at the time because there was “a process of rationalization that went on,” where they considered each incident to be a “one-off, unlikely to happen again, not part of a buildup of activity.”

WHAT ELSE YOU GOT CUPCAKE

 

[Faun]

no there isn't.

No there isn't, what? An investigation into Trump's campaign? There certainly is. Whether or not that investigation involves Trump may have, at the time, not been an issue. Of course, that could all change on a dime should the investigation uncover evidence showing he was involved. This is why investigations have to run their course before you can make a conclusion. Nixon wasn't originally under investigation in Watergate. Then he was. So why are you so eager to jump to conclusions before the investigation is complete?

fk man, how long does it take to investigate a campaign? They were investigating before the elections, and there was nothing, still nothing. it's done fool. it's all over after thirteen months if you can't find something that is just poor investigating. are you saying the agencies are incompetent?

I can see this taking another 3 years. Through the 2018 election and maybe even into the 2020 election.

 

[easyt65]

Comey stated so, there is no investigation of the president.

Not of Trump personally...

Thank you for admitting there never was and is no investigation of Trump.

No one, except maybe his son-in-law, in the WH is being investigated anymore - No need for Mueller.

Comey Testified:
No crime was EVER detected.
No evidence of a crime was ever found.
No evidence of collusion was ever found.
No obstruction of justice occurred.
And, again, Trump is not under investigation.
NO NEED FOR MUELLER.

If libs want to continue investigating Flyn or anyone else, go for it ,but there is still no need for Mueller.

It's OVER....snowflakes just don't want to accept it.

 

[Doc1]

Friend says Trump is considering 'terminating' Mueller

I can predict the responses:

"Well, he's the president! He has that power!"

"There's nothing to investigate anyway!"

Right Trumpsters just think they know everything there is to know about the case.

1) How about Trump just let the investigation vindicate him if he has done no wrong doing?

2) Why aren't ANY congressional republicans backing him up on this?

Well since Mueller is stocking his team with Dem donors and a Hillary Lawyer I say it needs to be done.

 

[Seawytch]

Comey stated so, there is no investigation of the president.

Not of Trump personally...

Thank you for admitting there never was and is no investigation of Trump.

No one, except maybe his son-in-law, in the WH is being investigated anymore - No need for Mueller.

Comey Testified:
No crime was EVER detected.
No evidence of a crime was ever found.
No evidence of collusion was ever found.
No obstruction of justice occurred.
And, again, Trump is not under investigation.
NO NEED FOR MUELLER.

If libs want to continue investigating Flyn or anyone else, go for it ,but there is still no need for Mueller.

It's OVER....snowflakes just don't want to accept it.

Mueller is almost certainly looking into obstruction by Crooked Donnie Small Hands...now.

 

[JonKoch]

ANYTHING ELSE CUPCAKE??

Of course....

'Soldiers' are dedicated to the mission. Stevens was dedicated. he also knew the people in Benghazi and did not feel threatened by them. He wasn't killed by the people he knew in Benghazi, though. He was killed by Al Qaeda. Stevens stayed because the mission was there.

Hillary Clinton and the State Department was in charge of protecting US Ambassadors. BOTTOM LINE: Hillary Clinton, as Sect of State, failed to do so.

SHE, not Stevens, was in charge of making that call. When every other nation began pulling their people out she should have done so, too. When the embassy was attacked twice before 9/11/12 she should have ordered them out, especially knowing they did not have enough security. She did not. She did not / could not / would not make the call. Leaders have to make tough choices - she failed. Instead she let Americans die.

Not only did she fail to prevent the deaths f Americans, she lied her ass off about it in an attempt to make sure her Presidential bid hopes were not damaged.

Had Obama just announced that 4 Americans had been killed in a terrorist attack on 9/11/12 there would have been no scandal at all. Americans would have accepted that. More Americans have been killed by terrorists since then. It has sadly become a fact of life. He and Hillary F*ed up, though, by trying to cover it up.

22 US Embassies throughout the Middle East on 9/11/12 - a fact the media kept extremely quiet because it did not support the false narrative that in Benghazi - and only in Benghazi - some obscure video cause a riot that resulted in the murder of 4 Americans.

The media was complicit in helping create that story because of if it was emphasized to the American people that 22 attacks throughout the ME that day they would have easily figured out Benghazi was an obvious part of the larger coordinated attacks. Much like with the ACA, Obama sought to mislead the American people with his BS about a video. If he had been honest we would have mourned the loss of 4 Americans WITH him instead of having to DRAG the truth out of him and Hillary.

Also, Snowflakes a few minutes ago tried to blame the GOP for the deaths of those in Benghazi over funding issues. Again, what a bunch of BS! That's an excuse for failing to prevent the deaths of 4 Americans who never should have died to begin with.

WHAT DID ONE OF THE 8 GOP BENGAZZZZZZZZI COMMITTEE'S SAY AGAIN CUPCAKE?

November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.


Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.
House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories


THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEW BOARD


“The Board found that Ambassador Stevens made the decision to travel to Benghazi independently of Washington, per standard practice. Timing for his trip was driven in part by commitments in Tripoli, as well as a staffing gap between principal officers in Benghazi … The Ambassador did not see a direct threat of an attack of this nature and scale on the U.S. Mission in the overall negative trendline of security incidents from spring to summer 2012. His status as the leading U.S. government advocate on Libya policy, and his expertise on Benghazi in particular, caused Washington to give unusual deference to his judgments.”

 

[Faun]

Comey stated so, there is no investigation of the president.

Not of Trump personally...

Thank you for admitting there never was and is no investigation of Trump.

No one, except maybe his son-in-law, in the WH is being investigated anymore - No need for Mueller.

Comey Testified:
No crime was EVER detected.
No evidence of a crime was ever found.
No evidence of collusion was ever found.
No obstruction of justice occurred.
And, again, Trump is not under investigation.
NO NEED FOR MUELLER.

If libs want to continue investigating Flyn or anyone else, go for it ,but there is still no need for Mueller.

It's OVER....snowflakes just don't want to accept it.

Strawman.


Mueller was never installed to find a Trump/Russia connection. He was picked to search for connections between Russia and folks associated with Trump's campaign...