Biden started the lawfare campaign to stop Trump.

[konradv]

Biden owns the lawfare moves against Trump. Claims "we" have to use COTUS to prevent Trump from becoming president again. Why am I not surprised the left had to resort to this?

Breitbart warning

The Trigger – Biden’s Promise to Block Trump

In a November 9, 2022, press conference, one day after midterm elections and just days after Trump signaled an eminent announcement of his candidacy, Biden was asked about the prospects of Trump running against him in 2024.

Biden’s response shocked the room.

“We just have to demonstrate that he will not take power, if he does run, making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next president again [sic],” Biden said.

Biden’s astonishing pledge to use constitutional means to block Trump’s reelection and not defeat him at the ballot box appears to have set in motion efforts across the country. His vow directly predated a flurry of legal activity, with the three critical developments taking place on November 18 – only nine days after Biden’s call to block Trump’s reelection.

The significance of the three events alone and the timeline that followed strongly suggest a coordination of efforts by the Biden White House, which resulted in Trump being charged in Manhattan, Florida, DC, and Atlanta:

Events that day played a significant role in the revival of a seemingly dead business records investigation, the spawning of multiple federal investigations led by a rogue prosecutor, and the supercharging of an election interference case, resulting in indictment after indictment raining down on Trump, costing him millions in legal fees, preventing him from traveling to campaign, and resulting in conviction on 34 counts so far in a widely panned verdict in Manhattan.

Joe Biden's 2022 Vow to Block Trump's Reelection Sparked Eruption of Seemingly Coordinated Lawfare Against Trump

President Biden's 2022 vow to use the Cnstitution to prevent Donald Trump's reelection coincided with an eruption of legal assaults on Trump.

www.breitbart.com

Oh my God! The Constitution! How dare he?!

#JUSTICEPREVAILED

 

[Delldude]

lol....

They did.

 

[merrill]

The Judge explained how Donald Trump is disqualified from retaking the White House under the 14th Amendment, why the former president is not immune from prosecution, and what a second Trump term would mean for the country (spoiler alert: it wouldn't be good).

Jordan Rubin: Judge, you’ve been thinking a lot lately about this 14th Amendment issue. Why is it so important to democracy, in your view?

J. Michael Luttig: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment ... disqualifies any person who, having taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, thereafter engages in an insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution of the United States, disqualifying that person from holding high public office in the future, including the presidency.

So it’s more than just a proscription and disqualification for anti-democratic conduct by an individual, but, in this circumstance, it is that and it would apply in this instance to disqualify the former president from holding the presidency again, because of his effort, plan and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election, knowing that he had lost that election to then-candidate Joe Biden.

This is very, very important: Section 3 disqualifies one who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution of the United States, not an insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or the authority of the United States.

JR: What do you think of criticism that suggests it's wrong to keep Trump off the ballot using this process, as opposed to “letting the voters decide,” as a critic would say?

JML: I have seen that criticism, if you will, of applying Section 3 to the former president. And it concerned me because it’s a legitimate question to be asked. But I’ve responded publicly to that concern by explaining that the disqualification that’s provided for under Section 3 is not itself anti-democratic at all.

Rather, it’s the conduct that can result in disqualification under the 14th Amendment that the Constitution says is anti-democratic. So there’s no question whatsoever that disqualification of an individual who satisfies the conditions of disqualification in Section 3 is not anti-democratic.

Judge Luttig explains why Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency

The conservative retired jurist broke down the 14th Amendment, Trump's immunity argument, and what a second Trump term would mean.

www.msnbc.com

 

[BluesLegend]

Judge Luttig explains why Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency

The conservative retired jurist broke down the 14th Amendment, Trump's immunity argument, and what a second Trump term would mean.

www.msnbc.com

The American people disagree so the judge can shove it.