If we banned all guns

[Missourian]

My dad's volunteering at a gun show in a few days and I gave him my shotgun to sell because he wants to get me a good revolver. I can't freakin wait

You'll shoot yer eye out.

 

[007]

It is almost laughable to think that criminals could be disarmed. They are criminals. By definition they will have all the guns they want. If no other way, they will make them.

It is almost laughable to think that criminals could be disarmed. They are criminals. By definition they will have all the guns they want. If no other way, they will make them.

This simple, obvious truth seems unavailable to liberals, who live in a fantasy land of government control solving problems.

They are a product of pure liberal indoctrination from recent decades of leftist controlled public schools. This twisted way of thinking has been drilled into their heads. They are incapable of having an original, intelligent, logical thought. They must lie to others and themselves to maintain their politically correct liberal image.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It is almost laughable to think that criminals could be disarmed. They are criminals. By definition they will have all the guns they want. If no other way, they will make them.

This simple, obvious truth seems unavailable to liberals, who live in a fantasy land of government control solving problems.

When we ban guns, anyone with a gun is a criminal, and we shoot you. Is that obvious enough for you?

 

[007]

It is almost laughable to think that criminals could be disarmed. They are criminals. By definition they will have all the guns they want. If no other way, they will make them.

This simple, obvious truth seems unavailable to liberals, who live in a fantasy land of government control solving problems.

When we ban guns, anyone with a gun is a criminal, and we shoot you. Is that obvious enough for you?

Well... you're just out in outer space somewhere, skippy. You're bat shit crazy.

Are you under any sort of mental health care? If not, you should be.

I'm going to report this post to the FBI since you're threatening to SHOOT PEOPLE.

 

[Jughead]

If we banned all guns

This would never happen, by let's say hypothetically it does, then those who'd turn in their guns would be the law abiding citizens. Those left with guns would be the police and criminals. Criminals would start coming out of the woodwork. They'd know that they can commit crimes at will since the only resistance they'll encounter will be from the police. Crime rates will skyrocket.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

This simple, obvious truth seems unavailable to liberals, who live in a fantasy land of government control solving problems.

When we ban guns, anyone with a gun is a criminal, and we shoot you. Is that obvious enough for you?

Well... you're just out in outer space somewhere, skippy. You're bat shit crazy.

Are you under any sort of mental health care? If not, you should be.

I'm going to report this post to the FBI since you're threatening to SHOOT PEOPLE.

Feel free. They will understand what you don't. When we change the rules, carrying a gun, for most people, will be a death sentence.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If we banned all guns

This would never happen, by let's say hypothetically it does, then those who'd turn in their guns would be the law abiding citizens. Those left with guns would be the police and criminals. Criminals would start coming out of the woodwork. They'd know that they can commit crimes at will since the only resistance they'll encounter will be from the police. Crime rates will skyrocket.

Not after we shoot a few thousand of them, for not being in uniform and just having a gun. See how that works now, Skippy?

 

[flacaltenn]

It is almost laughable to think that criminals could be disarmed. They are criminals. By definition they will have all the guns they want. If no other way, they will make them.

This simple, obvious truth seems unavailable to liberals, who live in a fantasy land of government control solving problems.

When we ban guns, anyone with a gun is a criminal, and we shoot you. Is that obvious enough for you?

Very interesting... Do we shoot all people now who are in criminal possession of a weapon? What country is this you are describing? We don't shoot people for criminal possession, we shoot them because they stole a purse from Macy's or because the no-knock search had the wrong address. ...

 

[Katzndogz]

It is almost laughable to think that criminals could be disarmed. They are criminals. By definition they will have all the guns they want. If no other way, they will make them.

This simple, obvious truth seems unavailable to liberals, who live in a fantasy land of government control solving problems.

When we ban guns, anyone with a gun is a criminal, and we shoot you. Is that obvious enough for you?

If guns are banned you won't have one unless you are a criminal. That means your head gets blown off on sight. Yes it is true. Liberals have no logic.


Look at it realistically. More people have been violently killed before the gun was invented than since the gun was invented. If guns weren't banned but disappeared from the whole world by magic nothing would change. Instead of gun control we would be discussing bow control.

 

[Katzndogz]

If we banned all guns

This would never happen, by let's say hypothetically it does, then those who'd turn in their guns would be the law abiding citizens. Those left with guns would be the police and criminals. Criminals would start coming out of the woodwork. They'd know that they can commit crimes at will since the only resistance they'll encounter will be from the police. Crime rates will skyrocket.

Not after we shoot a few thousand of them, for not being in uniform and just having a gun. See how that works now, Skippy?

How is that working in mexico? Or maybe Syria?

 

[dr.d]

No one wants to "ban all guns" fool...out of respect for their lethal potential however, there should be reasonable provisions and regs to reduce irresponsible, insane and reckless use of them...
Personally, I feel that all guns must be registered and their owners licensed...
prospective gun owners should undergo training in gun safety and use to qualify for licensure...with gun licenses renewable every two years or so, based on a record clean of criminality, craziness and reckless maintenance and use...including leaving guns around for little kids to get killed with playing...
I don't know any progressive that's against responsible and regulated gun ownership...just the irresponsible and reckless kind that results in senseless death. Only paranoid and insecure numbnuts who substitute gun worship for healthy relationships and respect for the rights of others believe otherwise.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Apparently ‘banning all guns’ is the new conservative lie to be repeated often enough in the hope it's perceived to be true.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

This would never happen, by let's say hypothetically it does, then those who'd turn in their guns would be the law abiding citizens. Those left with guns would be the police and criminals. Criminals would start coming out of the woodwork. They'd know that they can commit crimes at will since the only resistance they'll encounter will be from the police. Crime rates will skyrocket.

Not after we shoot a few thousand of them, for not being in uniform and just having a gun. See how that works now, Skippy?

How is that working in mexico? Or maybe Syria?

Just because they aren't doing it right doesn't mean it can't be done. You know that US soldier that brought three guns into Mexico? Done right, he wouldn't be in prison, he'd be in a shallow grave by the side of the road. Got it now?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If guns are banned you won't have one unless you are a criminal. That means your head gets blown off on sight. Yes it is true. Liberals have no logic.

When guns are banned that will mean banned for the common people. They will still be necessary, and used as required. The police are not going to be required to tickle you to death. Soldiers will not go to war armed with swords.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

This simple, obvious truth seems unavailable to liberals, who live in a fantasy land of government control solving problems.

When we ban guns, anyone with a gun is a criminal, and we shoot you. Is that obvious enough for you?

Very interesting... Do we shoot all people now who are in criminal possession of a weapon? What country is this you are describing? We don't shoot people for criminal possession, we shoot them because they stole a purse from Macy's or because the no-knock search had the wrong address. ...

We shoot them when they are carrying a gun, and are not allowed to.

 

[Katzndogz]

If police have guns criminals will have guns. See the gun laws in England for how it works.

 

[The Rabbi]

It is almost laughable to think that criminals could be disarmed. They are criminals. By definition they will have all the guns they want. If no other way, they will make them.

This simple, obvious truth seems unavailable to liberals, who live in a fantasy land of government control solving problems.

When we ban guns, anyone with a gun is a criminal, and we shoot you. Is that obvious enough for you?

What's obvious is you are an ignorant moron. Is that clear?

 

[The Rabbi]

No one wants to "ban all guns" fool...out of respect for their lethal potential however, there should be reasonable provisions and regs to reduce irresponsible, insane and reckless use of them...
Personally, I feel that all guns must be registered and their owners licensed...
prospective gun owners should undergo training in gun safety and use to qualify for licensure...with gun licenses renewable every two years or so, based on a record clean of criminality, craziness and reckless maintenance and use...including leaving guns around for little kids to get killed with playing...
I don't know any progressive that's against responsible and regulated gun ownership...just the irresponsible and reckless kind that results in senseless death. Only paranoid and insecure numbnuts who substitute gun worship for healthy relationships and respect for the rights of others believe otherwise.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I already posted the vid of Feinstein saying she wanted exactly that. SO you're not the sharpest tool in the shed.
I personally think anyone with a knife should be registered and trained in its use.
Hey,. I dont give a shit what you think. Your plan will do exactly NOTHING to reduce any sort of gun violence. Exactly NOTHING.
Criminals aren't going to go through training or register their guns. Ergo all it does is inconvenience gun owners and make things tough for honest citizens.
Gun control has a 100yr history in this country. And it has failed in every single case to reduce gun violence. That is a record of failure only liberals could love.

 

[The Rabbi]

Apparently ‘banning all guns’ is the new conservative lie to be repeated often enough in the hope it's perceived to be true.

Except it isn't a lie, skippy.
Apparently "no one wants to ban all guns" is the liberal lie. We see it repeated here endlessly, despite obvious evidence it isn't true.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Apparently ‘banning all guns’ is the new conservative lie to be repeated often enough in the hope it's perceived to be true.

Except it isn't a lie, skippy.
Apparently "no one wants to ban all guns" is the liberal lie. We see it repeated here endlessly, despite obvious evidence it isn't true.

What is the national support for banning all guns? As in public opinion. Do you have any evidence it's more than 1%?

More than 5%?

More than 10%?