- Moderator
- #181
That is for YOU to do. That's YOUR job here. I posed the question (Notice the title ends in a QUESTION MARK ?)Then tell us what happens AFTERWARDS?
Are you going to round up Muslims who still attempt to worship in their homes or private enclaves? Are you going to arrest them if they keep a Koran? Are you going to need to find some way to clearly identify them so you can keep an eye on their secret activities? What are you going to do?
You set up a mythical situation where a religion could be banned. Surely you must have ideas - don't be shy now.
You want my answer? American's band together to restore the Constitution's protection of religion. We protest, allow Muslims to worship in our homes, hide them from arrest, join them and show solidarity with our fellow Americans and make sure every politician who voted for this is voted out.
Yes, well you're an idiot.
We don't arrest muslims for being muslims. The French did this shit, and look what it got them.
Thank goodness, the majority of the population in this country recognize what a stupid, and dangerous, thing it is to accommodate extremism.
Speaking of idiots - you didn't read what I posted did you? In his proposed scenario Mosques would be shut down and Korans banned. So are you going to arrest Muslims for having a Koran? For worshipping in other places? Where exactly is this scenario going?
Nobody is arresting Muslims for those things. And they won't.
It's a non issue.
Of course they aren't. But we're playing with Protectionists hypothetical situation (in the OP). It would never happen, not without destroying the Constitution.