If you had a choice of owning a gun or owning a car, what would you choose

[SassyIrishLass]

I’d shoot you

Nerf bullets don't hurt

 

[ElmerMudd]

Would you require registration for firearms?

Yes.
I am not concerned with the government confiscating my car because it is licensed. I would not worry about the government taking my guns, either.

There are 400,000,000 guns in the US. Do people really think the government could effectively confiscate citizens guns. No fricking way.

 

[easyt65]

If you had a choice of owning a gun or owning a car, what would you choose. A car provides more freedom, for me, than any gun.
I would be more concerned with the government taking away everyone's vehicles than everyone's guns.

The government should allow cars and guns.
Put the same regulations on guns as you do cars for the same reason, the safety of all citizens.

The Batmobile

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

So you do not think the government mandates features on cars for safety?
The car regulations are another example of government over reach?

much better than if a gun was involved.

You really think the government wants auto kill switches on your car (or gun) for safety purposes?

You're so precious.

I have a fucking bridge to sell you.

 

[MisterBeale]

No cars around in the 1700's.
No semi-automatic weapons in the 1700's. It would be interesting if the Founding Fathers would have addressed semi-automatic weapons if they were around in the 1700's.

They knew. That is no argument. They knew technology was going to advance.

If you are really going to have this argument, and want to advance the notion that none of our rights are contingent on advanced technology? Then you need to write down your arguments to me on parchment, with a quill and ink, deliver them to me with a pony, or shut the fuck up, hence forth.

 

[MisterBeale]

Will you please move to Canada?

More than likely, this guy doesn't even live in the US.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Blacks are extremely happy the Constitution is not absolute. Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3. Section 2 of the Constitution any person who was not free would be counted as three-fifths of a free individual for the purposes of determining congressional representation.
Basically legitimizing slavery.

 

[MisterBeale]

Yes.
I am not concerned with the government confiscating my car because it is licensed. I would not worry about the government taking my guns, either.

There are 400,000,000 guns in the US. Do people really think the government could effectively confiscate citizens guns. No fricking way.

 

[Moonglow]

If you had a choice of owning a gun or owning a car, what would you choose. A car provides more freedom, for me, than any gun.
I would be more concerned with the government taking away everyone's vehicles than everyone's guns.

The government should allow cars and guns.
Put the same regulations on guns as you do cars for the same reason, the safety of all citizens.

I have both.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Yee

I am not concerned with the government confiscating my car because it is licensed. I would not worry about the government taking my guns, either.

Why?

Earlier you said this:

Put the same regulations on guns as you do cars for the same reason, the safety of all citizens.

How does me registering my firearms make all citizens safer?

 

[Moonglow]

The guy who is going to carjack you probably is going to get his gun off of somebody and bypass the gun control laws.

That is the best way.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Why?

Earlier you said this:


How does me registering my firearms make all citizens safer?

so they can confiscate

 

[ElmerMudd]

They knew. That is no argument. They knew technology was going to advance.

If you are really going to have this argument, and want to advance the notion that none of our rights are contingent on advanced technology? Then you need to write down your arguments to me on parchment, with a quill and ink, deliver them to me with a pony, or shut the fuck up, hence forth.

Waco was horrific but the Branch Davidians had an arsenal of guns.
How did that work out against the government fire power.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Meh....I think I'll keep both of them.

 

[MisterBeale]

Blacks are extremely happy the Constitution is not absolute. Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3. Section 2 of the Constitution any person who was not free would be counted as three-fifths of a free individual for the purposes of determining congressional representation.
Basically legitimizing slavery.

You do know, that was rectified by the sixteenth Amendment, do you not?

 

[Canon Shooter]

so they can confiscate

Well, you and I know that.

I can't wait to see the reason ElmerMudd comes up with...

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Waco was horrific but the Branch Davidians had an arsenal of guns.

which is NOT ILLEGAL!!!!!

The ATF had NO REASON to even be there!!!

How did that work out against the government fire power.

It was a pretty long standoff. Better than nothing.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Waco was horrific but the Branch Davidians had an arsenal of guns.
How did that work out against the government fire power.

Your government murdered them

Children

 

[Canon Shooter]

Waco was horrific but the Branch Davidians had an arsenal of guns.
How did that work out against the government fire power.

Plus their leader thought he was Jesus Christ...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Waco was horrific but the Branch Davidians had an arsenal of guns.
How did that work out against the government fire power.

See when 500,000 armed People March peacefully on DC