Really?Good. We should be intolerant to bigots.
I think we should be intolerant to people who try to destroy our culture.
Maybe we should burn out their businesses just like the lefties do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really?Good. We should be intolerant to bigots.
Go ahead and try, soy boy.Really?
I think we should be intolerant to people who try to destroy our culture.
Maybe we should burn out their businesses just like the lefties do.
lolGo ahead and try, soy boy.![]()
This is another episode of homofascism. Homonazis.
There is no such thing as homophobia. Only homofascism and those who resist homofascism.
We know this behavior as "projection"....The left does it a lot, primarily from a pathologial lack of self-awareness.I mostly agree with you. I just don't recall ever hearing a conservative accuse someone of being "bigoted" for not wearing or displaying an American flag on their clothes or at their house. I might, in some cases, call them unpatriotic, but it would never cross my mind to accuse them of bigotry or hatred.
But in the larger picture, the self-awareness is moot because communists believe that the end always justifies the means.We know this behavior as "projection"....The left does it a lot, primarily from a pathologial lack of self-awareness.
Unfortunately, I can’t avoid them, patch or no patch, because they constitute about 95% of my friends, neighbors and workmates.I'm all for gays and supporters wearing a patch, easier to avoid them
No, they’d be blown up by Muslim terrorists.Since it is the Democratic party that has embraced the idea of "pride," which goes far beyond equal rights for gay persons, suppose a player opted to wear the logo of the Log Cabin Republicans, who fight against anti-gay laws in the middle east, instead of focusing on Hollywood and Manhattan?
View attachment 659420
Would they still be a bigot?
It's just sad, but not surprising, that so far not a single liberal has said, "Well, I'm all for gay rights, but, no, I would not call anyone 'bigoted' just because they didn't want to wear a gay pride patch." That would be the "liberal," tolerant, open-minded thing to say, but more and more liberals are becoming increasingly intolerant and closed-minded.
Two weeks ago, when some Tampa Bay Rays players declined to wear LGBT Pride Month rainbow patches on their uniforms, ESPN's Sarah Spain said they were "bigoted" and called their religious exemption "BS." Really? So now you're a bigot just for declining to wear a gay pride symbol on your work clothes? Really? Has this girl ever heard of the First Amendment? How about phrases like "freedom of expression" and "freedom of speech"? Or, how about "my body, my choice"?
Imagine if there were a Straight/Normal Pride Month and some players declined to wear a heterosexual symbol on their uniforms, and imagine what liberals would say if a conservative commentator accused those players of being "bigoted"? Of course, no conservative commentator would make such an intolerant statement.
This is the only patch I'll ever wear, job or no job.Two weeks ago, when some Tampa Bay Rays players declined to wear LGBT Pride Month rainbow patches on their uniforms, ESPN's Sarah Spain said they were "bigoted" and called their religious exemption "BS." Really? So now you're a bigot just for declining to wear a gay pride symbol on your work clothes? Really? Has this girl ever heard of the First Amendment? How about phrases like "freedom of expression" and "freedom of speech"? Or, how about "my body, my choice"?
Imagine if there were a Straight/Normal Pride Month and some players declined to wear a heterosexual symbol on their uniforms, and imagine what liberals would say if a conservative commentator accused those players of being "bigoted"? Of course, no conservative commentator would make such an intolerant statement.