Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
/----/ OK Pumpkin. As soon as you digest the 500 pages let us know your critical opinion./----/ Neither you nor I have the legal background not the understanding of how things work in DC on the level of understanding the implications. And don't pretend you do./----/ We'll wait for the CNN spin that it's a nothing burger then understand it's the complete opposite.Well, the report's out:
2016 Election Final Report 06-14-18 0 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | United States Government
Should I give you guys some time to hear from Hannity and Rush, and learn what your talking points are going to be?
Thinking for yourself is just too hard?
The report is written in plain English. It's not in a secret code.
And speak for yourself.
you should be pissed as hell. yet you blame trump for firing comey. funny shit to say the least.We now have OIG proof that Comey did in fact cost Hillary the election.
DOJ Watchdog Report Takeaway: FBI Hurt Hillary Clinton, Not Donald Trump
DOJ Watchdog Slams ‘Insubordinate’ Comey Over Clinton Email News Conference
DOJ Watchdog Finds James Comey Broke FBI Rules In Clinton Case, Report Says
/----/ OK Pumpkin. As soon as you digest the 500 pages let us know your critical opinion./----/ Neither you nor I have the legal background not the understanding of how things work in DC on the level of understanding the implications. And don't pretend you do./----/ We'll wait for the CNN spin that it's a nothing burger then understand it's the complete opposite.Well, the report's out:
2016 Election Final Report 06-14-18 0 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | United States Government
Should I give you guys some time to hear from Hannity and Rush, and learn what your talking points are going to be?
Thinking for yourself is just too hard?
The report is written in plain English. It's not in a secret code.
And speak for yourself.
View attachment 198558
/----/ But the Executive Summary is someone's opinion which can be manipulated. Can't you think for yourself?/----/ OK Pumpkin. As soon as you digest the 500 pages let us know your critical opinion./----/ Neither you nor I have the legal background not the understanding of how things work in DC on the level of understanding the implications. And don't pretend you do./----/ We'll wait for the CNN spin that it's a nothing burger then understand it's the complete opposite.
Thinking for yourself is just too hard?
The report is written in plain English. It's not in a secret code.
And speak for yourself.
View attachment 198558
There's a handy little executive summary, right at the beginning. It's only 15 or so pages long.
Like I said, many members of congress will disagree with you. Also, if you are correct then the house should go ahead and start impeachment proceeding....according to you there is no denying that firing Comey was Obstruction of justice which is an impeachable offense.Obstruction is a moot point unless congress attempts to impeach Trump because of it. Earlier I stated that the IG report supports Trumps firing of Comey.....insulates him against the obstruction charge. You disagree. Okay, fine!You take it up with congress. You and I don't have a vote in the impeachment process, if there is one.Much of the info in the report isn't new. There were many reasons to fire Comey. Many, like you will say it was obstruction; however, many disagree. Congress has the final say whether firing Comey was obstruction, and the IG report helps republicans in voting no if it ever comes to impeachment.
Trump stated, publicly, that he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation.
If you disagree, take it up with him.
Where did "impeachment" enter this discussion?
This thread is about the IG Report.
The report doesn't help Trump with the "obstruction" thing, because Trump himself went public and stated why he fired Comey. He can't change his mind retroactively, and say the report justified it.
But again, this thread isn't about "obstruction", it's about the report.
/----/ But the Executive Summary is someone's opinion which can be manipulated. Can't you think for yourself?/----/ OK Pumpkin. As soon as you digest the 500 pages let us know your critical opinion./----/ Neither you nor I have the legal background not the understanding of how things work in DC on the level of understanding the implications. And don't pretend you do.
Thinking for yourself is just too hard?
The report is written in plain English. It's not in a secret code.
And speak for yourself.
View attachment 198558
There's a handy little executive summary, right at the beginning. It's only 15 or so pages long.
An executive summary, or management summary, is a short document or section of a document, produced for business purposes, that summarizes a longer report or proposal or a group of related reports in such a way that readers can rapidly become acquainted with a large body of material without having to read it all.
I think Strozk's "we will stop Trump" does. That shows a level of bias that is WAY outside the law. And that SAME FBI was working with Fusion GPS?HEY...anyone got to where the list of referrals for prosecution recommended in any section of that report?
Where is the BEEF?
I read some place about a couple of folks in the FBI MAY have violated some FBI guidelines, not laws, and were referred for in-house review, but have there been referrals for violations of statutory LAW?
As far as I can see, no one was referred for prosecution.
I think Strozk's "we will stop Trump" does. That shows a level of bias that is WAY outside the law. And that SAME FBI was working with Fusion GPS?HEY...anyone got to where the list of referrals for prosecution recommended in any section of that report?
Where is the BEEF?
I read some place about a couple of folks in the FBI MAY have violated some FBI guidelines, not laws, and were referred for in-house review, but have there been referrals for violations of statutory LAW?
As far as I can see, no one was referred for prosecution.
Probably not going to get her. She destroyed evidence. Scrubbed server...smashed cell phones. She’s a bitch.Dumb...OK. I've been hearing that this report would be what finally gets Hillary locked up. Are they on the way to pick her up now?
Yes. This report getting Hillary locked up has been a dumb claim all along.
Link. I don’t recall it said that. I thought it said it cast a “cloud of doubt” over their integrity.I think Strozk's "we will stop Trump" does. That shows a level of bias that is WAY outside the law. And that SAME FBI was working with Fusion GPS?HEY...anyone got to where the list of referrals for prosecution recommended in any section of that report?
Where is the BEEF?
I read some place about a couple of folks in the FBI MAY have violated some FBI guidelines, not laws, and were referred for in-house review, but have there been referrals for violations of statutory LAW?
As far as I can see, no one was referred for prosecution.
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
/----/ I spent 18 years in Legal Publishing and understand what constitutes an executive summary. I've watched the Editors and Authors bicker over punctuation and single words delaying the release of the law book./----/ But the Executive Summary is someone's opinion which can be manipulated. Can't you think for yourself?/----/ OK Pumpkin. As soon as you digest the 500 pages let us know your critical opinion./----/ Neither you nor I have the legal background not the understanding of how things work in DC on the level of understanding the implications. And don't pretend you do.
The report is written in plain English. It's not in a secret code.
And speak for yourself.
View attachment 198558
There's a handy little executive summary, right at the beginning. It's only 15 or so pages long.
An executive summary, or management summary, is a short document or section of a document, produced for business purposes, that summarizes a longer report or proposal or a group of related reports in such a way that readers can rapidly become acquainted with a large body of material without having to read it all.
Do you not understand what the word "summary" means?
It's not "someone's opinion" - it's a summary of the findings of the report.
Wtf??I think Strozk's "we will stop Trump" does. That shows a level of bias that is WAY outside the law. And that SAME FBI was working with Fusion GPS?HEY...anyone got to where the list of referrals for prosecution recommended in any section of that report?
Where is the BEEF?
I read some place about a couple of folks in the FBI MAY have violated some FBI guidelines, not laws, and were referred for in-house review, but have there been referrals for violations of statutory LAW?
As far as I can see, no one was referred for prosecution.
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
Not when you are a public employee or spouse of public employee. Most states have same ethics laws.I didn't catch the "checking out who they and spouse are making political donations to" Are you sure that would be legal/ethical? Are we not a free country where we choose who to support?Did I miss something by reading the Conclusion/Recommendations? It seems to be all recommendations for the FBI to tighten up its texting protocols and not allowing for another Comey Moment of going around the AG to announce findings and decisions on prosecution.
I didn't see any suggestions for anything other than FBI policies.
Did I miss something?
No.
The FBI is going to do some spring cleaning, institute some political bias checks on investigators. I.E. check out who they (and spouse) are making political donations to.
That's my takeaway.
4-5 people's careers are over, though.
All in all, it's a step forward for integrity, that's a good thing.
/----/ Then there is this:I think Strozk's "we will stop Trump" does. That shows a level of bias that is WAY outside the law. And that SAME FBI was working with Fusion GPS?HEY...anyone got to where the list of referrals for prosecution recommended in any section of that report?
Where is the BEEF?
I read some place about a couple of folks in the FBI MAY have violated some FBI guidelines, not laws, and were referred for in-house review, but have there been referrals for violations of statutory LAW?
As far as I can see, no one was referred for prosecution.
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
They will divert to something else...............maybe find another porn star or hooker.............who knows.......
/----/ Then there is this:I think Strozk's "we will stop Trump" does. That shows a level of bias that is WAY outside the law. And that SAME FBI was working with Fusion GPS?HEY...anyone got to where the list of referrals for prosecution recommended in any section of that report?
Where is the BEEF?
I read some place about a couple of folks in the FBI MAY have violated some FBI guidelines, not laws, and were referred for in-house review, but have there been referrals for violations of statutory LAW?
As far as I can see, no one was referred for prosecution.
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
'Viva Le Resistance': Mueller attorney removed over anti-Trump texts...
I didn't read all of it - it's 568 pages long. That's why I asked you where it is, so I could look it up.
Why are you having such a hard time with this?
Link. I don’t recall it said that. I thought it said it cast a “cloud of doubt” over their integrity.I think Strozk's "we will stop Trump" does. That shows a level of bias that is WAY outside the law. And that SAME FBI was working with Fusion GPS?HEY...anyone got to where the list of referrals for prosecution recommended in any section of that report?
Where is the BEEF?
I read some place about a couple of folks in the FBI MAY have violated some FBI guidelines, not laws, and were referred for in-house review, but have there been referrals for violations of statutory LAW?
As far as I can see, no one was referred for prosecution.
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
I didn't read all of it - it's 568 pages long. That's why I asked you where it is, so I could look it up.
Why are you having such a hard time with this?
I'm not...... I'm reading and I recommend before you continue to speak on it you had better read it all...I'm guessing people could go to prison and I'm only 2/3 through it....
/----/ Then there is this:I think Strozk's "we will stop Trump" does. That shows a level of bias that is WAY outside the law. And that SAME FBI was working with Fusion GPS?HEY...anyone got to where the list of referrals for prosecution recommended in any section of that report?
Where is the BEEF?
I read some place about a couple of folks in the FBI MAY have violated some FBI guidelines, not laws, and were referred for in-house review, but have there been referrals for violations of statutory LAW?
As far as I can see, no one was referred for prosecution.
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
'Viva Le Resistance': Mueller attorney removed over anti-Trump texts...
There gonna have some serious problems there. He was the lead investigator.
