Illegal Since 1952

[Never3ndr]

Obama/Clinton and Sanders are open violation of a law that went in to effect in 1952. That law states it IS ILLEGAL to import ANY group be it faith OR politics whose purpose is to overthrown the United States government.

It also covers ANY group be it faith OR politics to willfully immigrate for the purpose of subverting the United States Constitution. This LAW not only covers islam it covers ILLEGALS.

THIS law like I said passed in 1952 makes Obama AND Clinton GUILTY of one act of treason for EVERY illegal or islamic savage they let in.

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/...can-citizens-from-entering-the-united-states/

The key to democrats subversion CAN be found in the text of the law.

"The Immigration and Nationality Act, or INA, was created in 1952. Before the INA, a variety of statutes governed immigration law but were not organized in one location. The McCarran-Walter bill of 1952, Public Law No. 82-414, collected and codified many existing provisions and reorganized the structure of immigration law. The Act has been amended many times over the years, but is still the basic body of immigration law.

The INA is divided into titles, chapters, and sections. Although it stands alone as a body of law, the Act is also contained in the United States Code (U.S.C.). The code is a collection of all the laws of the United States. It is arranged in fifty subject titles by general alphabetic order. Title 8 of the U.S. Code is but one of the fifty titles and deals with "Aliens and Nationality". When browsing the INA or other statutes you will often see reference to the U.S. Code citation. For example, Section 208 of the INA deals with asylum, and is also contained in 8 U.S.C. 1158. Although it is correct to refer to a specific section by either its INA citation or its U.S. code, the INA citation is more commonly used."
Immigration and Nationality Act

The key would be in the findings of SCOTUS. That is why its SO important that we NOT let Obama tilt the court so he can BLAME the court later for HIS treason.

"Precedent decisions" are administrative decisions of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO), the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), and the Attorney General, which are selected and designated as precedent by the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the BIA, and the Attorney General, respectively. The Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) publishes precedent decisions in bound volumes entitled "Administrative Decisions Under Immigration and Nationality Laws of the United States."

Precedent decisions are legally binding on the DHS components responsible for enforcing immigration laws in all proceedings involving the same issue or issues. However, precedent decisions may be modified or overruled by:

• 
  
  
  • The Attorney General
  • Federal Courts
  • Later precedent decisions
  • Changes in the law

The AAO and the BIA are not Federal courts, but their decisions are subject to judicial review in the Federal courts. Federal courts give greater deference to precedent decisions as well as to unpublished decisions in which the same legal reasoning of a precedent decision was followed.

The AAO adjudicates appeals under authority delegated to the Director of USCIS by the Secretary of DHS. Prior to the AAO's formation in 1983, denied applications and petitions were appealed to one of four regional commissioners. For more information on the AAO, please visit the AAO's About Us page.

The BIA is part of EOIR - a separate federal agency that is a component of the Department of Justice. The BIA has jurisdiction to hear appeals from certain decisions rendered by Immigration Judges and by DHS component offices in a wide variety of proceedings.

You can view AAO and BIA precendent decisions online at the EOIR Virtual Law Library. If you are looking for information regarding the AAO's non-precedent decisions, click here."

The part of the law Obama and Clinton are TRYING to subvert is this section.

"Generally, any individual who is a member of a “terrorist organization” or who has engaged or engages in terrorism-related activity as defined by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is “inadmissible” (not allowed to enter) the United States and is ineligible for most immigration benefits.

The definition of terrorism-related activity is relatively broad and may apply to individuals and activities not commonly thought to be associated with terrorism. As a result, Congress created a statutory exemption provision through which the Secretaries of Homeland Security and State may exempt individuals from the grounds of inadmissibility."

That first paragraph is KEY to liberals. If they do NOT destroy it they CAN face treason charges. This is why they NEED that SCOTUS spot. Its the only thing that can cover their ass for treason. They strike that first paragraph and they can claim NOT to have committed a crime AFTER the fact.

Right now a President Trump WOULD have the legal ability to boot islamics AND illegals OUT of the country.

Fury

You seem to be a well-educated individual that certainly highlighted a law that I was unaware of and was even kind enough to post the direct text of that law.

Unfortunately, seeming to be well-educated and being well-educated are two separate issues. The fact that you have no clue what Islam is speaks pretty openly about how ignorant you are in general and about one of the world's major faiths in particular. You write a page or two about a law infraction when the group you target doesn't even fit the description of your violation.