blackhawk
Diamond Member
I have a question for those who are so adamant that voter I.D. laws will suppress the minority vote what facts or evidence do you have to support that claim? Please keep in mind opinions are neither facts or evidence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and if the election was decided by 120 votes---------------------------?
And if the Captain of the football team were to rape your grand daughter?
![]()
I would probably kill him, but as usual you resort to stupid analogies rather than admit that your position on this is illogical and flawed.
If there was an election that was decided by 120 votes and there were 121 fraudulent votes------can you say Franken.
Widespread voter fraud not an issue in NC, data shows
In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast; of those, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office. (AP Photo/Kostas Tsironis)In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast; of those, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office. (AP Photo/Kostas Tsironis)
RALEIGH, N.C. -
One of the more compelling arguments for voter identification is the suppression of voter fraud. But for North Carolina, the number of cases of voter fraud reported by the state Board of Elections is minimal.
In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast in the general and two primary elections. Of those 6,947,317 ballots, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office.
That means of the nearly 7 million votes cast, voter fraud accounted for 0.00174 percent of the ballots.
Widespread voter fraud not an issue in NC, data shows - WNCN: News, Weather for Raleigh. Durham, Fayetteville
One Vote Can Make a Difference
Widespread voter fraud not an issue in NC, data shows
In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast; of those, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office. (AP Photo/Kostas Tsironis)In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast; of those, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office. (AP Photo/Kostas Tsironis)
RALEIGH, N.C. -
One of the more compelling arguments for voter identification is the suppression of voter fraud. But for North Carolina, the number of cases of voter fraud reported by the state Board of Elections is minimal.
In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast in the general and two primary elections. Of those 6,947,317 ballots, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office.
That means of the nearly 7 million votes cast, voter fraud accounted for 0.00174 percent of the ballots.
Widespread voter fraud not an issue in NC, data shows - WNCN: News, Weather for Raleigh. Durham, Fayetteville
Its never been about voter fraud.
Its about cheating to win and that's all the GObP has left.
Widespread voter fraud not an issue in NC, data shows
In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast; of those, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office. (AP Photo/Kostas Tsironis)In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast; of those, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office. (AP Photo/Kostas Tsironis)
RALEIGH, N.C. -
One of the more compelling arguments for voter identification is the suppression of voter fraud. But for North Carolina, the number of cases of voter fraud reported by the state Board of Elections is minimal.
In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast in the general and two primary elections. Of those 6,947,317 ballots, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office.
That means of the nearly 7 million votes cast, voter fraud accounted for 0.00174 percent of the ballots.
Widespread voter fraud not an issue in NC, data shows - WNCN: News, Weather for Raleigh. Durham, Fayetteville
I know you're going to struggle with understanding this but let's do some math. I will round the numbers off to make it easier to follow.
According to your article 7 million votes were cast.
The entire population of NC is 9.8 million. https://www.google.com/search?q=pop...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
The eligible voters in NC is 7.5 million. North Carolina State Board of Elections
The national average of voter turn out was 54% of eligible voters. National Voter Turnout in Federal Elections: 1960?2010 | Infoplease.com
That pretty much means NC must have had some crazy f*cking turn out in 2012. Like 94%!
So the votes registered equaled 94% of the eligible voters in the state when the national average tells us there should have only been 4.1 million votes to begin with.
Out of those 7 million votes only 121 were deemed fraudulent? What about the other 3 million that shouldn't be there? Where the f*ck did those votes come from?
No one has ever been dumb enough to try and steal an election by having the wrong people vote for registered voters. So stupid. Just a transparent power grab by scumbag Pubs.
Voter registration card? We should be trying to make voting as easy as possible, but scumbag Pubs are always trying to pull a fast one. They're great at it, eh, hater dupes?
Well the first two words of his post were "In 2012" so...
Widespread voter fraud not an issue in NC, data shows
In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast; of those, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office. (AP Photo/Kostas Tsironis)In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast; of those, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office. (AP Photo/Kostas Tsironis)
RALEIGH, N.C. -
One of the more compelling arguments for voter identification is the suppression of voter fraud. But for North Carolina, the number of cases of voter fraud reported by the state Board of Elections is minimal.
In 2012, nearly 7 million ballots were cast in the general and two primary elections. Of those 6,947,317 ballots, the state Board of Elections said 121 alleged cases of voter fraud were referred to the appropriate district attorney's office.
That means of the nearly 7 million votes cast, voter fraud accounted for 0.00174 percent of the ballots.
Widespread voter fraud not an issue in NC, data shows - WNCN: News, Weather for Raleigh. Durham, Fayetteville
I know you're going to struggle with understanding this but let's do some math. I will round the numbers off to make it easier to follow.
According to your article 7 million votes were cast.
The entire population of NC is 9.8 million. https://www.google.com/search?q=pop...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
The eligible voters in NC is 7.5 million. North Carolina State Board of Elections
The national average of voter turn out was 54% of eligible voters. National Voter Turnout in Federal Elections: 1960?2010 | Infoplease.com
That pretty much means NC must have had some crazy f*cking turn out in 2012. Like 94%!
So the votes registered equaled 94% of the eligible voters in the state when the national average tells us there should have only been 4.1 million votes to begin with.
Out of those 7 million votes only 121 were deemed fraudulent? What about the other 3 million that shouldn't be there? Where the f*ck did those votes come from?
Not sure if the OP is talking about the 2012 General Election but Wikipedia shows the amount of votes cast as 4,505,372 United States presidential election, 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well the first two words of his post were "In 2012" so...I know you're going to struggle with understanding this but let's do some math. I will round the numbers off to make it easier to follow.
According to your article 7 million votes were cast.
The entire population of NC is 9.8 million. https://www.google.com/search?q=pop...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
The eligible voters in NC is 7.5 million. North Carolina State Board of Elections
The national average of voter turn out was 54% of eligible voters. National Voter Turnout in Federal Elections: 1960?2010 | Infoplease.com
That pretty much means NC must have had some crazy f*cking turn out in 2012. Like 94%!
So the votes registered equaled 94% of the eligible voters in the state when the national average tells us there should have only been 4.1 million votes to begin with.
Out of those 7 million votes only 121 were deemed fraudulent? What about the other 3 million that shouldn't be there? Where the f*ck did those votes come from?
Not sure if the OP is talking about the 2012 General Election but Wikipedia shows the amount of votes cast as 4,505,372 United States presidential election, 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Even in your link we have 400k votes that never should have been there by my math. Where did those votes come from?
A0 Your math suqs.
Of course everyone has to register, but I've never heard of a registration card.
Well the first two words of his post were "In 2012" so...Not sure if the OP is talking about the 2012 General Election but Wikipedia shows the amount of votes cast as 4,505,372 United States presidential election, 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Even in your link we have 400k votes that never should have been there by my math. Where did those votes come from?
You should take into account that NC was one of the 11 or 12 states where campaigning took place. Your source goes back to 1960. Basically this hyper-targeting and sacrificing of large swaths of the country really only took root, maybe in 1992. Turnout should be higher in NC this year than it was in previous years since it was thought to be up for grabs. 400,000 votes out of a population of 9.5 million is what; about 4%. Not a huge number regardless.
If it were rigged, Obama didn't do a very good job (Romney won NC--his only victory).
If they do anything, it should be for future voters only. Old people who've been voting for years should have to do NOTHING. But this is all just Pub fear mongering hysteria and dupe ignorance, and a power grab to stop the poor, the elderly, and the young from voting. A-hole Pubs and silly dupes. Like the gerrymandering that won Pubs the house though they got less votes. First time ever. Pubs suq, period.