Yes, I could, but reducing my insults to a child would directly relate to a level that Trump and his cult could understand. BIGLY.Do you have anything aside from these childish insults?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I could, but reducing my insults to a child would directly relate to a level that Trump and his cult could understand. BIGLY.Do you have anything aside from these childish insults?
More childish insults. Progs are all the same. They are like children throwing a tantrum.Yes, I could, but reducing my insults to a child would directly relate to a level that Trump and his cult could understand. BIGLY.
Spending contributes far more, especially Dim social programs, which never go away.Of course it does.
So do tax cuts.
More childish insults. Progs are all the same. They are like children throwing a tantrum.
Nothing like Trump and his cult.
So, what is your point?Spending contributes far more, especially Dim social programs, which never go away.
Being against welfare means you want to "fuck people?" You're such a dumbass prog.So, what is your point?
FUCK people?
WTF, retard.Being against welfare means you want to "fuck people?" You're such a dumbass prog.
You are free to help people all you want, just don't do it with my money.WTF, retard.
'Dim social programs'?
Trumptards and teabaggers have always been against the government helping their country's citizens.
Hilarious you Leftards really think a few dozen unarmed protesters can topple the US government.
If they support Trump?
YES.
Grifters too, just like Trump
Sure, we aren't the idiots supporting Trump the fascist, traitor.
What you don't understand is that you're a lying douchebag.Yes, I could, but reducing my insults to a child would directly relate to a level that Trump and his cult could understand. BIGLY.
Am I going to stand in the way of you calling every other Leftard a liar?They were not trying to topple the government, that would be a rebellion, not an insurrection.
Are you people really this uneducated or do you just pretend for the internet?
Am I going to stand in the way of you calling every other Leftard a liar?
Translate the English into something you can understand.Could you repeat that in English and not partisan sheep talk?
An incumbent president would always be able to condemn the actions of a former president from a rival party and permit confidentiality to be broken to further political ends,” they wrote."
Is this a valid argument?
You have your world, the rest of us have ours. I'm surely not trying to convince you of anything.
You're very defensive, very emotional. Relax.
WikipediaTranslate the English into something you can understand.
Ebonics translator
ebonicstranslation.netlify.app
If they support Trump?
YES.
Grifters too, just like Trump
Sure, we aren't the idiots supporting Trump the fascist, traitor.
What you omitted was that Reagan did it by first driving up unemployment to levels levels not seen since the great depression for it's deflationary impact. Followed by Reagans tripling the national debt with huge government spending to increase government revenue.{When Reagan left office, real federal revenue was more than 19% higher than it was the day of his first inauguration. A major recession had been overcome, inflation had been broken, the tax code had been indexed to eliminate bracket creep, and the largest tax cut of the postwar era had been implemented
Wikipedia
An armed but limited rebellion is an insurrection, and if the established government does not recognize the rebels as belligerents then they are insurgents and the revolt is an insurgency. ... There are a number of terms that are associated with rebel and rebellion.
It shows that golfing gator was right in defining it as an insurrection instead of a rebellion.