thereisnospoon
Gold Member
Umm..,you know, cesspit, unlike the people you come in contact with in your daily life, most of us are not masochists. so you can keep your pretend sadist bit to yourself.
i have never needed to pretend to be anything. i am what i am. you have a problem with that, i'd suggest dialing 1-800-pissoff
as for the constitutional power to act for the general welfare being a mission statement., i look forward to seeing your case law authority for that contention.
tell you what... how about you don't post til you find it.
we'll miss you, i'm sure.
Um, she doesn't need to. Didn't you know she is the fountain of all knowledge...
lol.. a legend in her own mind.
however, in Helvering v Davis, justice cardozo, for the US Supreme Court, says she doesn't know what she's talking about.
I figure i'll go with good ole ben cardozo over cesspit.
I read the summary of Helvering v Davis
Helvering v. Davis
This is a case regarding Social Security or as it is referred to in this opinion "Federal Old Age Benefits"
The opinion also speaks to the federal government's taxing authority. It also refers to Old Age Benefits, the precursor to Social Security as a tax.
In one sentence this appears. "Congress may spend money in aid of the "general welfare"..
That's all it says....Please tell me you are not making that great leap to the welfare state of today. If so, you have cited the wrong case.
You libs believe you have some divine right to other people's money.
However, when YOUR money or income is in the cross hairs, suddenly you become capitalists and fiscal conservatives.