Intolerant left attacks homeless woman guarding Trump's Hollywood star

[Coyote]

John McCain -

"He became a naval aviator, flying ground-attack aircraft from aircraft carriers. During the Vietnam War he was almost killed in the 1967 USS Forrestal fire. In October 1967, while on a bombing mission over Hanoi, he was shot down, seriously injured, and captured by the North Vietnamese. He was a prisoner of war until 1973. McCain experienced episodes of torture, and refused an out-of-sequence early repatriation offer. His war wounds left him with lifelong physical limitations."

To say this man isn't a war hero is to defile every person that has ever served and is serving the country in uniform right now. By Trump's own words, he doesn't like any of the current soldiers that were captured in war either.

Donald Trump is despicable to say the least.

. You see this is the problem here... When Trump say's something just like 100% of the people that are human do in the world when get angry at a specific person who attacks them, then as in the case with Trump it is construed to mean (for political purposes), that he was talking about everyone when we know better than that. It is a tactic that is way over used, but the Dems when get desperate will use it every single time. The race card has been their biggest weapon used, but they have alot of these false narratives they love to pull out of their toy box when they can't get their way.

The problem with Trump is his statements are not made in isolation - they are part of a reccuring pattern that his supporters continuously excuse.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Otherwise she was assaulted/bullied... Why you libs can't say that really speaks volumes.

Why can't you con's read? I just said she was bullied.

And bullied is to be assaulted whether it was verbally or physically. They damaged her property or attempted to in which is destruction of private property or the attempt to damage her private property. A list of charges can be filed in the case.

I don't disagree, though not sure it meets the legal definition of "assault" as Bripat pointed out.

Thing is, this sort of thing AND WORSE happens all the time to homeless people and no one gives a shit until it's in support of a candidate.

. No, it's this homeless woman who made herself known by her actions to gaurd the star. So your not being honest when you try an suggest that this woman is only cared for because of Trump ??? You act as if she is someone that is unrelated to the situation in which she created on her own, otherwise as if she was just strolling along when the attack happened, and then your trying to paint us a picture that suggest to us that just because say a Newt Gingrich walked up to offer her a helping hand, then everyone else would only jump in for that reason, (just because Newt stepped in), instead of it being about her with everyone who did step up ??? You don't believe that, but you pushing the angle that your pushing is pure partisanship and biased rhetoric I think.

Homeless people have made themselves known to Trump before. NYC has high rates of homelessness. It's impossible to ignore when it's in front of your eyes.

What's "biased partisan rhetoric" is those who insist that this incident is somehow "different" then the incident of the Trump supporter beating a homeless man.

2 people that got arrested vs a group of people, constantly harassing her and no arrests.

 

[beagle9]

Trump is going to give her a night over a sidewalk heat grate behind the closed Trump casino of her choice in Atlantic City for free!

It would be really cool if Trump gave a significant contribution towards the city's many homeless initiatives.

. If he could get corporations, politicians, and celebrities out of his face wanting donations to their causes, then he might be able to see the true needy out there to give to also. I'm sure he gives to charities that give to the poor either direct or indirect in certain ways.

You know what - he's had years to do something. What has he done for the homeless?

. You don't know, and neither do I.... I guarantee you that the donations he has given over the years, had to have made it's way to the lower levels in some forms or another, but your biased opinion against the rich (like you and your goddess Hillary & company has), won't allow you the open mindedness or the thinking that rich people do good things in society with the generation of that wealth along with the charitable giving that is a part of that just as well.

Speaking of biased....

You don't know how I feel about "the rich". My comments are related to Trump only. There are many rich people who are great philanthropists. I just see very little evidence that Trump is. Perhaps you're a Trump acolyte.

Secondly, I'm not particularly enamored of Hillary Clinton, even less so as time goes on, but she is still a better choice then Trump. You're confusing a lack of good choices with support.

Now, let's talk about open mindedness as your post is certainly not an example of that.

. You won't do well with Hillary then, because she loves making up blanketing statements, and laying it on the rich as an undefined elitists class for her political purposes when she does it, otherwise she is preaching to them while wishing that we were this Jim Jones audience , and with the same evilness involved if we drink her koolaid.