Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, we've looked at the sixty year old invasion of Tibet by Mao.
Got anything newer?
what does "new" have to do with filth?
Well, the best that most are managing to come up with is a sixty year old war, a war that lasted a few days in Vietnam, and a war with India that also lasted a few days. The latter being part of a border dispute where there is nothing to say which country is right.
In fact, China's military actions have been very limited, and far less that many other countries.
It's been 32 years since China was involved in any military action, and all have been very limited, one assisting North Korea as that country's fall would have left areas close to China's border infested with American forces.
Yes, we've looked at the sixty year old invasion of Tibet by Mao.
Got anything newer?
Yes, we've looked at the sixty year old invasion of Tibet by Mao.
Got anything newer?
I remember students crushed by tanks less than 50 years ago.
Maybe China's neighbors remember as well?
20 Nations China currently claims to own part of...
China has territorial claims to nearly 20 countries - English pravda.ru
My position is simple.
Whilst I make no secret of my distaste for US foreign policy, that does not mean I hate America, just their foreign policy.
The same goes for China. I condemn their invasion and occupation of Tibet, but that doesn't mean I have to accept all the propaganda posted about that country.
In this case, I believe the Chinese build up is a direct answer to US weapons sales to other countries in the region, and US forces being posted to the area.
As an example, US forces are trying to build a base in Vietnam, an America "partner" in the region. This is absolutely pathetic - and a real slap in the face for all the American soldiers who were killed before the US lost the Vietnam war.
Then we look at US interference in the area.
All the comment is about China's near seas, and how the US deliberately enters the area.
Given these sea are near China, what dog does the US have in the race?
The distances involved means China is operating in its home area, but the US forces are half a world away.
One has to ask who the aggressive force is.
You sir are a charlatan and liar. You hate the US and it's military...period..
You sir are a charlatan and liar. You hate the US and it's military...period..
As polite as it is inaccurate.
Nonsense. China wants to reunify Tibet and claims AP as a result of that. India doesn't covet any of China's territory.
Actually, they do.
India ready to let China keep Aksai Chin if neighbour country drops claim to Arunachal Pradesh Daily Mail Online
The bhai-bhai days may soon be reborn in bye-bye avatar along the India-China border.
Foreign ministry documents on border negotiations accessed by Mail Today reveal that India has signalled its readiness to let its Aksai Chin region remain in Chinese hands in exchange for recognition of Arunachal Pradesh as part of its territory.
In other words, India is willing to give up its claims to Aksai Chin if China does the same for Arunachal.
Sorry, I though India had no claims on Chinese lands - perhaps you could comment.
Denials are pointless when the sum total of one's posts have made excruciatingly clear an unambiguous bias and "hatred."
China quickly responded by claiming Chinese sovereignty over not just the hotly contested Spratly Islands, but the entirety of the South China Sea. In a fit of pique, Beijing even produced a centuries-old map that claimed the entirety of the South China Sea as Chinese territory.
The first ADIZ was established by the U.S. in 1950, when it created a joint North American ADIZ with Canada, citing the legal right of any nation to establish reasonable conditions of entry into its territory. More than 20 countries, including the U.S., Canada, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Australia, South Korea and Japan, have demarcated Air Defense Identification Zones in high seas or international waters. Japan, South Korea and China's Taiwan region have their ADIZs respectively in the East China Sea.
The quickest resolution to the Senkaku-Diaoyu quarrel, along with the overlapping air-defense zones, is to bring a territorial case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the world court that handles international boundary disputes at The Hague. The ICJ requires sovereign parties involved in the dispute to accept the court’s jurisdiction and abide by its ruling. Japan’s rejection of an ICJ case therefore indicates serious weaknesses in its territorial claims under existing international law.
The Chinese military has taken Mahanian Doctrine to heart. It's no big secret to anyone with eyes (and sense) in their head.
It is hard to justify Washington and Tokyo’s stance on the issue. The islands are much nearer to China’s mainland (250 miles) compared with Japan’s (600 miles). China claims that the islands were part of its territory for centuries until Japan annexed them in 1895 during its imperialist expansion, which eventually led to an all-out invasion and war of aggression on China.
Also, as Beijing points out, the US and its postwar Japanese ally both have declared their own air defense zones. It is indeed inconceivable that Chinese spy planes and bombers could encroach unannounced on the US West Coast without the Pentagon ordering fierce retaliation.
Furthermore, maps show that the American-backed air defense zone extending from Japan’s southern territory is way beyond any reasonable halfway limit between China and Japan. This American-backed arbitrary imposition on Chinese territorial sovereignty is thus seen as an arrogant convention, set up and maintained by Washington for decades.
The US and its controlled news media are absurdly presenting Beijing’s newly declared air defense zone as China “flexing its muscles and stoking tensions.” And Washington is claiming that it is nobly defending its Japanese and South Korea allies from Chinese expansionism.
However, it is the background move by China to ditch the US dollar that is most likely the real cause for Washington’s militarism towards Beijing. The apparent row over the air and sea territory, which China has sound rights to, is but the pretext for the US to mobilize its military and in effect threaten China with aggression.
In recent years, China has been incrementally moving away from US financial hegemony. This hegemony is predicated on the US dollar being the world reserve currency and, by convention, the standard means of payment for international trade and in particular trade in oil. That arrangement is obsolete given the bankrupt state of the US economy. But it allows the US to continue bingeing on credit.
20 Nations China currently claims to own part of...
China has territorial claims to nearly 20 countries - English pravda.ru
or 20 countries have claims against Chinese lands.
Sort of depends on what you want to believe.
