Is it ever acceptable to bomb a school or a hospital? (Poll)

Is it ever acceptable to bomb a school or a hospital?

  • Yes

    Votes: 18 62.1%
  • No

    Votes: 11 37.9%

  • Total voters
    29
Huh? who are you calling
deadly, unethical, murderous ?
for an enlightened perspective on ETHICS---read the koran. The muzzies went BY THE BOOK on Oct 7
I am calling Hamas deadly, unethical, murderous and I will continue to do so when they cease and desist from making war on Israel with the intent to murder as many Jews as possible and erase Israel from the face of the Earth. Anyone who does not understand how Israel has every ethical right to fight back however it must to protect its people has a screw loose or is hopelessly antisemitic.
 
Last edited:
I am calling Hamas deadly, unethical, murderous and I will continue to do so when they cease and desist from making war on Israel with the intent to murder as many Jews as possible and erase Israel from the face of the Earth. Anyone who does not understand how Israel has ever ethical right to fight back however it must to protect its people has a screw loose or is hopelessly antisemitic.
Israel is mass murdering children, but you have no concerns.

WTF! You are a cold blooded psychopath.
 
I am calling Hamas deadly, unethical, murderous and I will continue to do so when they cease and desist from making war on Israel with the intent to murder as many Jews as possible and erase Israel from the face of the Earth. Anyone who does not understand how Israel has ever ethical right to fight back however it must to protect its people has a screw loose or is hopelessly antisemitic.
however----believe it or not----it is a RELIGIOUS thing. The existence of Israel is ANTI-KORANIC. Today There is a celebration for INDIA DAY. There will be a big parade with "floats" ---I am not sure where---either Manhattan or Queens. A big PROBLEM. One of the planned floats celebrates the inauguration of a new HINDU TEMPLE in a city AYODTHIYA which for Hindus is the birth place of the GOD--RAMA.
The city had been overcome by muslims some few hundred years ago by a hero named BARBUR---he knocked the temple to RAMA apart and built a mosque on top-----well----the hindus got it BACK recently---by force and now---one could say---the HINDUS are rubbing it in the face of islam---OY lets see what happens. It's RELIGION
 
Israel is mass murdering children, but you have no concerns.

WTF! You are a cold blooded psychopath.
Call for Hamas to release the hostages, surrender, and give full human civil rights to women and homosexuals.

Problem solved you sick fuck.
 
The answer is "NO". I don't care if the enemy had their headquarters there. The answer is still "NO".

US-made munitions used in Israeli strike on Gaza school that killed 22, experts say​

The Ethics of Bombing Schools and Hospitals

Bombing schools or hospitals, particularly in conflict zones like Gaza, raises profound ethical and legal questions. Here are some key points to consider:

1. International Humanitarian Law:
- Under international humanitarian law, schools and hospitals are considered protected sites. Attacking these locations is generally deemed a violation of the laws of war, which aim to protect civilians and non-combatants during armed conflicts.
- The United Nations and various human rights organizations have condemned attacks on such facilities as crimes against humanity, emphasizing that these actions can lead to severe humanitarian crises and loss of innocent lives.

2. Civilian Safety:
- Schools and hospitals often serve as refugees for civilians seeking safety from conflict. Bombing these sites not only endangers lives but also undermines the very purpose of these institutions, which is to provide care and education.
- The presence of civilians in these locations, especially children and families, makes any attack particularly egregious. Reports indicate that many civilians flock to hospitals and schools believing they are safe havens from violence.

3. Claims of Military Necessity:
- While some military forces, including Israel, argue that they target these sites due to the presence of militant groups using civilian infrastructure for military purposes, such claims must be scrutinized. The principle of proportionality in warfare requires that any military advantage gained must outweigh the potential harm to civilians.
- The justification for such attacks is often contested, with critics arguing that the military's actions may not adhere to the necessary legal standards to protect civilian lives.

4. Long-term Consequences:
- The bombing of schools and hospitals can have long-lasting effects on the affected populations, including psychological trauma, loss of educational opportunities, and a breakdown of healthcare systems. This can perpetuate cycles of violence and instability in the region.

In conclusion, bombing schools or hospitals is generally considered unacceptable due to the legal protections afforded to these sites, the ethical implications of endangering civilian lives, and the long-term humanitarian consequences that arise from such actions. The focus should always be on protecting civilians and adhering to international laws designed to mitigate the horrors of war.

==>War is a racket, and Netanyahu knows it all too well. What he has done is politically motivated; he simply wants to remain in power for as long as possible. Corruption? Netanyahu should ask himself! lol. :)

Sources :










 
The Ethics of Bombing Schools and Hospitals

Bombing schools or hospitals, particularly in conflict zones like Gaza, raises profound ethical and legal questions. Here are some key points to consider:

1. International Humanitarian Law:
- Under international humanitarian law, schools and hospitals are considered protected sites. Attacking these locations is generally deemed a violation of the laws of war, which aim to protect civilians and non-combatants during armed conflicts.
- The United Nations and various human rights organizations have condemned attacks on such facilities as crimes against humanity, emphasizing that these actions can lead to severe humanitarian crises and loss of innocent lives.

2. Civilian Safety:
- Schools and hospitals often serve as refugees for civilians seeking safety from conflict. Bombing these sites not only endangers lives but also undermines the very purpose of these institutions, which is to provide care and education.
- The presence of civilians in these locations, especially children and families, makes any attack particularly egregious. Reports indicate that many civilians flock to hospitals and schools believing they are safe havens from violence.

3. Claims of Military Necessity:
- While some military forces, including Israel, argue that they target these sites due to the presence of militant groups using civilian infrastructure for military purposes, such claims must be scrutinized. The principle of proportionality in warfare requires that any military advantage gained must outweigh the potential harm to civilians.
- The justification for such attacks is often contested, with critics arguing that the military's actions may not adhere to the necessary legal standards to protect civilian lives.

4. Long-term Consequences:
- The bombing of schools and hospitals can have long-lasting effects on the affected populations, including psychological trauma, loss of educational opportunities, and a breakdown of healthcare systems. This can perpetuate cycles of violence and instability in the region.

In conclusion, bombing schools or hospitals is generally considered unacceptable due to the legal protections afforded to these sites, the ethical implications of endangering civilian lives, and the long-term humanitarian consequences that arise from such actions. The focus should always be on protecting civilians and adhering to international laws designed to mitigate the horrors of war.

==>War is a racket, and Netanyahu knows it all too well. What he has done is politically motivated; he simply wants to remain in power for as long as possible. Corruption? Netanyahu should ask himself! lol. :)

Sources :










When you defend Hamas, you defend murdering women who have raped women and the murder of homosexuals.

Typical democrat these days.
 
Yeah it was very likely a false flag. Anyone who has informed themselves on Gaza knows it is and has been the most surveilled area in the world. Israel knows everything that is happening there as it happens.
Who benefited from the attack? Bibi certainly benefited.
We know the Hannibal Directive was implemented and that many Israelis were killed by the IDF that day. We know the IDF was inconceivably slow in responding to the attack. We know the Israeli government and many western government controlled media outlets lied about Hamas atrocities committed that day.

There are so many clear signs that point to it being a false flag, that many here seem to be blissfully unaware of. Multiple warnings from multiple sources all of which were ignored, October 7 being very close to the 50th anniversary of the Yom Kippur war, which was also a "surprise" attack and as such should have been a time for heightened readiness, IDF troops being moved away from the border before it happened, the unusually slow response, a number of former IDF soldiers publicly stating that there's no way Israeli intelligence could have NOT known about the plan, which was said to be in the works for a year, just to name a few things.

Ben Swann brings up a number of other things in a video series he's been doing on the topic.

I think the problem is that too many here put tribalism and their staunch preconceived ideas first, above all else, instead of truth, logic and common sense.

That, and the fact that too many people get all their info from the MSM, which just so happens to be controlled by the same globalists who want all these wars, and have a track record of starting wars based on lies.
 
There are so many clear signs that point to it being a false flag, that many here seem to be blissfully unaware of. Multiple warnings coming from multiple sources all of which were ignored, October 7 being very close to the 50th anniversary of the Yom Kippur war, which was also a "surprise" attack and as such should have been a time for heightened readiness, IDF troops being moved away from the border before it happened, the unusually slow response, a number of former IDF soldiers publicly stating that there's no way Israeli intelligence could have NOT known about the plan, which was said to be in the works for a year, just to name a few things.

Ben Swann brings up a number of other things in a video series he's been doing on the topic.

I think the problem is that too many here put tribalism and their staunch preconceived ideas first, above all else, instead of truth, logic and common sense.

That, and the fact that too many people get all their info from the MSM, which just so happens to be controlled by the same globalists who want all these wars, and have a track record of starting wars based on lies.
You realize that actual hostages were released, right?

Tin foil hat much?
 

Forum List

Back
Top