Is NATO a Viable Military Organization?

In that case, you are a mentally retarded zombie who trusted leftist propaganda. No straight man in his right mind will support tolerance, because he understands that today he will support it, and tomorrow it will destroy his culture and seduce his children, his children will not be able to live in the forest and be isolated from depravity. And even if a person has deviation, he will simply cope with it or go to a psychologist, but he will not support it.
Just like a conscientious alcoholic will not promote alcoholism

My God, you ARE a closet case! My "children" are 37, 34, and 27 years of age. My youngest grandchild is already 13. I doubt their sexuality will be impacted by people they have never met not heard from.

I still think you are a closet case. No one is that radical in their condemnation of homosexuals unless you are one also! You may get need to get fucked by the biggest donkey dick around to satisfy these secret urges you are displaying. Studies have shown that almost all homophobes are closeted homosexuals themselves.

Your sex life has no impact on me. If you are happy taking it up the ass, that's fine with me. If sucking a cock is your pacifier, more power to you! If you want your boyfriend to rub diaper rash ointment on your balls before slipping you into a diaper and onesie, that's OK by me. It's none of my business.
 
Last edited:

It seems to me that this would be a good time for an American President (a real President) to approach our NATO "allies" and tell them that THEY have a problem here, and we are willing to HELP.

Remember that 2%of GDP that they promised to spend on mutual defense? There is no time like the present.

Of course that would require a President with balls.
Yeah pretty much no....they could barely walk to Bosnia

The only ones who can still slightly project in Africa are what's left of the frogs
 
It's also about support. For example, Russia, despite the Kremlin's Eurocentric policy, still remains a conservative country; among the masses, there is hardly anyone who dares to admit their tolerance at all. Left-wing crooks are clever at using these things. One such compromising photo is enough, and people will turn their backs on America, believing that this is a country of perverts. And this will mean that America will not be able to gain significant influence in Russia solely because of its reputation, and this, in turn, will mean that American policy will not be able to resist the Kremlin, because basically everything is decided not by war, but by politics.
So this is nonsense, America is just selling itself for next to nothing as a cheap whore. This is the point of this show. This is not a joke.

Nobody says that they should be imprisoned or shot, but this should not be put on display and it is unacceptable that they seduce children and dishonor the army in the eyes of foreigners. You just don't understand the cost of such idiotic antics.
What? Are you implying that the US should do their best to please the Russian public? What a nonsense. On the contrary, the more people in such autocratic backward shitholes condemn your actions, the more you should be sure you are doing the right thing.
 
Studies have shown that almost all homophobes are closeted homosexuals themselves.
This is a froud that specially designed for idiots like you.
You yourself have made sure that your head does not work, by the examples of your judgments, why do you continue to argue if you understand that your head is not intended for this?

If I condemn cannibalism am I a cannibal? Justify me moron, specifically, how is this different from this reasoning that was hammered into your stupid head?
 
What? Are you implying that the US should do their best to please the Russian public? What a nonsense. On the contrary, the more people in such autocratic backward shitholes condemn your actions, the more you should be sure you are doing the right thing.
Another idiotic judgment. The regime and the people are different things

On the contrary, any politician benefits from the support of the opposition in another country. This is how Reagan acted
 
Another idiotic judgment. The regime and the people are different things

On the contrary, any politician benefits from the support of the opposition in another country. This is how Reagan acted
Every society has a government what it deserves.
 
Every society has a government what it deserves.
No, any society is not homogeneous. So it would be if there was complete justice, everyone could be responsible for everyone, this is a typical leftist mistake. For a leftish, there is no personality, there is only a herd.

If what you say is true, then the whole of Europe is guilty of the crimes of the Inquisition? Do you propose to send all Europeans to the stake?
 
themselves
And even if some of the fighters against vices are themselves vicious, this does not make them equal with those who preach vices, or defend such Just like, for example, a saddist is innocent as long as he does not preach sadism and commit a crime.
 
No, any society is not homogeneous. So it would be if there was complete justice, everyone could be responsible for everyone, this is a typical leftist mistake. For a leftish, there is no personality, there is only a herd.

If what you say is true, then the whole of Europe is guilty of the crimes of the Inquisition? Do you propose to send all Europeans to the stake?
What the hell do the Inquisition have to do with the Putin regime?
 
You have to excuse Rupol. He is a Russian bot.

I think his intended name was Ru Paul. He is definitely a closet case.
I don't think he is actually a bot. Rather a college student who has read a lot of smart books barely understanding their meaning.
 
What the hell do the Inquisition have to do with the Putin regime?
Any regime that you do not like has no direct relation to the people.

Actually, I want to end the discussion. This level is too stupid for me.
 
Any regime that you do not like has no direct relation to the people.

Actually, I want to end the discussion. This level is too stupid for me.
I am fine with it. Actually, that is far not the first time when I notice you call your opponent or a discussion with them in derogatory terms. Maybe you should find a worthy opponent and start to talk with your mirror.
 
I am fine with it. Actually, that is far not the first time when I notice you call your opponent or a discussion with them in derogatory terms. Maybe you should find a worthy opponent and start to talk with your mirror.
You do not understand and misinterpret my epithets, we have no mutual understanding, this is a useless discussion.
Those who were enslaved or deceived by the regime cannot be responsible for the regime, and they do not always deserve it, as Europe did not deserve the Inquisition, the Hazaras of Afghanistan did not deserve the terror of the Taliban and the Uighurs of China did not deserve genocide.
It is obvious.
Conversation is over
 
You do not understand and misinterpret my epithets, we have no mutual understanding, this is a useless discussion.
Those who were enslaved or deceived by the regime cannot be responsible for the regime, and they do not always deserve it, as Europe did not deserve the Inquisition, the Hazaras of Afghanistan did not deserve the terror of the Taliban and the Uighurs of China did not deserve genocide.
It is obvious.
Conversation is over
Yeah, comparing the Hazar and Uighur minorities with the Russians who en masse cheered their leader is quite relevant, indeed. Try the mirror.
 
"The Pentagon, in response to Russia's statements about the creation by the US and NATO military group in the Black Sea, said it would conduct operations as it sees fit."

"The Pentagon calls on Russia to ensure transparency regarding the accumulation of forces near the border with Ukraine," a Pentagon spokesman said.
---
In what words you can describe the Pentagon?
Russia should ensure "transparency" on its own land, and the United States will act "as it sees fit" tens of thousands of miles from its shores...
 
"The Pentagon, in response to Russia's statements about the creation by the US and NATO military group in the Black Sea, said it would conduct operations as it sees fit."

"The Pentagon calls on Russia to ensure transparency regarding the accumulation of forces near the border with Ukraine," a Pentagon spokesman said.
---
In what words you can describe the Pentagon?
Russia should ensure "transparency" on its own land, and the United States will act "as it sees fit" tens of thousands of miles from its shores...

Ships don't invade countries, usually. I'll bet you didn't know we had to have Turkey's permission to transit the straits into the Black Sea and the Russians have to have permission for its ships to leave.

Once back in the 80s during the Cold War, my cruiser was one of the first ships to go into the Black Sea in decades and we had a Soviet escort at all times watching us. When the Soviet carrier Kiev left the Black Sea bound for the Mediterranean, we followed and "harassed" them all through the Med, observing their flight operations many times from under the Kiev's fantail.
 

Forum List

Back
Top