emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
- Jan 21, 2010
- 23,669
- 4,181
Emily I know you have good intentions and all, but you're wasting a lot of time making posts that are a complete misread of whats going in.
I'm not ignoring md's points because he's a dick
I'm seeing and reading his points quite clearly.
TAG is a logical fallacy.
You cannot.prove god.by asserting god in the premise.
So when you say things like 'maybe tag fits in somewhere...."
No, it doesn't. You're wasting time be even saying something like that.
And last point: tag is not md's. Its been around and debunked as a fallacy but by fundies for.centurie .
It is still serving as a the base ground
around which to organize ideas to explain and correct points that come up.
So it is still part of the greater process of resolving these issues.
It's a matter of whether we use it successfully or not.
I believe it can still lead to effective points being made
and appreciate your contributions to that end. So it still has value and purpose
toward resolving things in teh spirit of truth to be consistent and to get all the kinks out, thanks!