Is there such thing as "universal morality"?

[alang1216]

Will useable energy increase?

Yes.

 

[alang1216]

Space time can be locally warped but you don't know if it is completely warped into a closed 4D 'sphere'.

Why wouldn’t it be?

Where did you get the idea it is a sphere?

You can ask either question but not both.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Hypocrisy is a universal moral
Law not to break without penalty

Many of these laws are pre wired into humans at creation


But only the high logic ability people can be correct In knowing who are the hypocrites to then put our natural anger on

 

[alang1216]

As a scientist one must follow the evidence

The evidence Flew followed led him to believe in a God but to reject all religions. Will you be following him?

 

[Taz]

Where does dark energy come from? Inside or outside this universe? If outside the universe is obviously not closed.

Inside. Why do you believe it exists outside of the universe?

If you don't know what it is how do you know where it comes from? If inside, doesn't it violate thermodynamics?

Because space time is warped. You can’t reach a boundary. Anything outside of our space and time has no effect on our universe.

You really do believe you've discovered that.

How can you not know that space time is warped by mass and energy?

Re-read your post, you claimed something science doesn't know for sure. Again!

 

[GreenAndBlue]

As a scientist one must follow the evidence

The evidence Flew followed led him to believe in a God but to reject all religions. Will you be following him?

Flew did not understand how the immune system worked

If he did he would say it's foolish to cut ones throat with a no hope view point

The penalty for that view was pre wired into all humans at creation

And also prewired to go find God

Flew needed to understand cause and effect

Also he should have understood that humans were created different than all creations

Only humans were pre wired to keep advancing and increasing their dominance over every single creature

Once he saw the evidence for all that he would be a big believer in how the bible people could know the future like they did

Him and Einstein knew there was a GOD. But because of no free will the rewards and punishments did not make good logic sense

Other theories may be correct and does include the seemingly hypocritical parts

Like if GOD loves us why all the pain

The pain is to prepare to feel the opposite in paradise and all people goes even the murderers who were made to bring humanity that type pain

One cannot feel happiness as well unless having pains and struggles and INJUSTICE !!

And we know this is true by how we are prewired to feel pain from injustice

So this looks to be the PLAN

And all humans has a forever name

Even humans at conception

The DNA code is all peoples forever code and may be used in paradise to help our happiness there in many ways

 

[ding]

Atheists had to try to recover when science proves all this had a beginning

So they brought out multi universes there never ends or begins

The only real science is this universe which science has proven to have a beginning which proves a creator

There is much we don't know about the universe and it may be that it has a creator (on this I'm agnostic)

There is much we don't know about God and it may be that he was created too.

The universe had a beginning that's the key science finding

The top atheist scientist of 50 yrs Anthony Flew changed his view simply because of the evidence

He said any modern scientist that's now an atheist is simply dishonest .. As a scientist one must follow the evidence As he did

But the dishonest atheists would not change and brought multi universes with no beginning or ending but without EVIDENCE. As Grest Britains Anthony FLew says

He was upset wit Dawkins who did not change because of the evidence and saw Dawkins as simply dishonest !!

Plus why would atheists cut their own throat with a no hope view point as their immune system brings them misery and pain and death for that view

Every universe in the multiverse model has a beginning. If there are other universes, I don’t see anything inconsistent as they each had to have a beginning.

 

[ding]

Inside. Why do you believe it exists outside of the universe?

If you don't know what it is how do you know where it comes from? If inside, doesn't it violate thermodynamics?

Because space time is warped. You can’t reach a boundary. Anything outside of our space and time has no effect on our universe.

You really do believe you've discovered that.

How can you not know that space time is warped by mass and energy?

Re-read your post, you claimed something science doesn't know for sure. Again!

I don’t see it. Space and time being warped is a product of relativity. It is literally the foundation of our understanding of the universe.

 

[ding]

Will useable energy increase?

Yes.

Not possible. What is adding energy to the universe?

 

[ding]

Space time can be locally warped but you don't know if it is completely warped into a closed 4D 'sphere'.

Why wouldn’t it be?

Where did you get the idea it is a sphere?

You can ask either question but not both.

Why not? They are two unrelated questions.

 

[alang1216]

Will useable energy increase?

Yes.

Not possible. What is adding energy to the universe?

In a closed system maybe. So what is powering the increasing expansion?

 

[alang1216]

Space time can be locally warped but you don't know if it is completely warped into a closed 4D 'sphere'.

Why wouldn’t it be?

Where did you get the idea it is a sphere?

You can ask either question but not both.

Why not? They are two unrelated questions.

Why wouldn't it be a sphere and such an idea is absurd? Does not compute.

 

[Likkmee]

Naw

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why wouldn't it be a sphere

The observable universe, from any point in the universe, is, indeed, a sphere. That sphere delinieates our cosmic horizon. That's in the 4 dimensions of space time.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Atheists had to try to recover when science proves all this had a beginning

So they brought out multi universes there never ends or begins

The only real science is this universe which science has proven to have a beginning which proves a creator

There is much we don't know about the universe and it may be that it has a creator (on this I'm agnostic)

There is much we don't know about God and it may be that he was created too.

The universe had a beginning that's the key science finding

The top atheist scientist of 50 yrs Anthony Flew changed his view simply because of the evidence

He said any modern scientist that's now an atheist is simply dishonest .. As a scientist one must follow the evidence As he did

But the dishonest atheists would not change and brought multi universes with no beginning or ending but without EVIDENCE. As Grest Britains Anthony FLew says

He was upset wit Dawkins who did not change because of the evidence and saw Dawkins as simply dishonest !!

Plus why would atheists cut their own throat with a no hope view point as their immune system brings them misery and pain and death for that view

Every universe in the multiverse model has a beginning. If there are other universes, I don’t see anything inconsistent as they each had to have a beginning.

Many houses are in one universe

many different houses does not mean many universes

No evidence or logic supports many universes

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Atheists had to try to recover when science proves all this had a beginning

So they brought out multi universes there never ends or begins

The only real science is this universe which science has proven to have a beginning which proves a creator

There is much we don't know about the universe and it may be that it has a creator (on this I'm agnostic)

There is much we don't know about God and it may be that he was created too.

The universe had a beginning that's the key science finding

The top atheist scientist of 50 yrs Anthony Flew changed his view simply because of the evidence

He said any modern scientist that's now an atheist is simply dishonest .. As a scientist one must follow the evidence As he did

But the dishonest atheists would not change and brought multi universes with no beginning or ending but without EVIDENCE. As Grest Britains Anthony FLew says

He was upset wit Dawkins who did not change because of the evidence and saw Dawkins as simply dishonest !!

Plus why would atheists cut their own throat with a no hope view point as their immune system brings them misery and pain and death for that view

Every universe in the multiverse model has a beginning. If there are other universes, I don’t see anything inconsistent as they each had to have a beginning.

With no evidence or logic put on evidence and data ... That is nothing more than a possibility based on nothing

This universe has data to apply logic to

 

[ding]

Will useable energy increase?

Yes.

Not possible. What is adding energy to the universe?

In a closed system maybe. So what is powering the increasing expansion?

It isn’t accelerating towards something if that is what you are trying to get at. Everything is moving away from everything else.

 

[ding]

Atheists had to try to recover when science proves all this had a beginning

So they brought out multi universes there never ends or begins

The only real science is this universe which science has proven to have a beginning which proves a creator

There is much we don't know about the universe and it may be that it has a creator (on this I'm agnostic)

There is much we don't know about God and it may be that he was created too.

The universe had a beginning that's the key science finding

The top atheist scientist of 50 yrs Anthony Flew changed his view simply because of the evidence

He said any modern scientist that's now an atheist is simply dishonest .. As a scientist one must follow the evidence As he did

But the dishonest atheists would not change and brought multi universes with no beginning or ending but without EVIDENCE. As Grest Britains Anthony FLew says

He was upset wit Dawkins who did not change because of the evidence and saw Dawkins as simply dishonest !!

Plus why would atheists cut their own throat with a no hope view point as their immune system brings them misery and pain and death for that view

Every universe in the multiverse model has a beginning. If there are other universes, I don’t see anything inconsistent as they each had to have a beginning.

Many houses are in one universe

many different houses does not mean many universes

No evidence or logic supports many universes

No one knows if there are multiple universes. They only postulated that because they extrapolated from the creation of ours.

But if there are I don’t have a problem with it.

 

[ding]

Atheists had to try to recover when science proves all this had a beginning

So they brought out multi universes there never ends or begins

The only real science is this universe which science has proven to have a beginning which proves a creator

There is much we don't know about the universe and it may be that it has a creator (on this I'm agnostic)

There is much we don't know about God and it may be that he was created too.

The universe had a beginning that's the key science finding

The top atheist scientist of 50 yrs Anthony Flew changed his view simply because of the evidence

He said any modern scientist that's now an atheist is simply dishonest .. As a scientist one must follow the evidence As he did

But the dishonest atheists would not change and brought multi universes with no beginning or ending but without EVIDENCE. As Grest Britains Anthony FLew says

He was upset wit Dawkins who did not change because of the evidence and saw Dawkins as simply dishonest !!

Plus why would atheists cut their own throat with a no hope view point as their immune system brings them misery and pain and death for that view

Every universe in the multiverse model has a beginning. If there are other universes, I don’t see anything inconsistent as they each had to have a beginning.

With no evidence or logic put on evidence and data ... That is nothing more than a possibility based on nothing

This universe has data to apply logic to

The logic is the same logic that was applied to the creation of our universe.

 

[ding]

Space time can be locally warped but you don't know if it is completely warped into a closed 4D 'sphere'.

Why wouldn’t it be?

Where did you get the idea it is a sphere?

You can ask either question but not both.

Why not? They are two unrelated questions.

Why wouldn't it be a sphere and such an idea is absurd? Does not compute.

It’s more like a disk than a sphere. The flatness of the universe is one of the validations for inflation theory.

What is the Shape of the Universe?