Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MOMS DEMAND ACTION FOR GUN SENSE IN AMERICA
WATCH: The Story Of Moms
Since its birth, Moms Demand Action has achieved unprecedented wins for gun sense in the voting booth, state legislatures, and the corporate sector. Together, we are creating a safer America for our children.
Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America
MOMS DEMAND ACTION FOR GUN SENSE IN AMERICA
WATCH: The Story Of Moms
Since its birth, Moms Demand Action has achieved unprecedented wins for gun sense in the voting booth, state legislatures, and the corporate sector. Together, we are creating a safer America for our children.
Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America
Funny, it seems to me they are losing.
Mark
This fails as a false comparison fallacy, an accidental shooting has nothing to do with the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment, nor does it serve as justification to preempt or restrict those rights."A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Toddler shoots kills mother at Walmart store in northern Idaho - ABC News Australian Broadcasting Corporation
That notion that the Second Amendment's intent was to 'protect' citizens from an 'abusive government' is ignorant, ridiculous, and not consistent with current Second Amendment jurisprudence."A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Toddler shoots kills mother at Walmart store in northern Idaho - ABC News Australian Broadcasting Corporation
No, James Madison did not envision a cretin such as yourself.
Laws need to relevant for the times we live in, not preserved in aspic. Americans have more to fear from guns falling into the wrong hands, be it children or nutcases, than from an abusive government.
This fails as a false comparison fallacy, an accidental shooting has nothing to do with the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment, nor does it serve as justification to preempt or restrict those rights."A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Toddler shoots kills mother at Walmart store in northern Idaho - ABC News Australian Broadcasting Corporation
The price for our guns involves a certain number of accidental or other types of killings and some of the killings will be children. Is that too high a price to pay so some adults might have guns?
what does one thing have to do with the other? could you be specific?"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Toddler shoots kills mother at Walmart store in northern Idaho - ABC News Australian Broadcasting Corporation
let's make the world accident proof?The price for our guns involves a certain number of accidental or other types of killings and some of the killings will be children. Is that too high a price to pay so some adults might have guns?
Accident proof would be pretty hard, but accident-reduction might be easier. Seat belts?let's make the world accident proof?The price for our guns involves a certain number of accidental or other types of killings and some of the killings will be children. Is that too high a price to pay so some adults might have guns?
Accident proof would be pretty hard, but accident-reduction might be easier. Seat belts?let's make the world accident proof?The price for our guns involves a certain number of accidental or other types of killings and some of the killings will be children. Is that too high a price to pay so some adults might have guns?
balance : costs to society. trade off with rights and freedom, and liberty. keeping anarchy at bayAccident proof would be pretty hard, but accident-reduction might be easier. Seat belts?let's make the world accident proof?The price for our guns involves a certain number of accidental or other types of killings and some of the killings will be children. Is that too high a price to pay so some adults might have guns?
criminals have rights too! why do you hate the 2nd amendment?Accident proof would be pretty hard, but accident-reduction might be easier. Seat belts?let's make the world accident proof?The price for our guns involves a certain number of accidental or other types of killings and some of the killings will be children. Is that too high a price to pay so some adults might have guns?
Mandatory sentences for criminals caught with guns.
Was it really intended ONLY for black people? Have you read the debates over the amendment?Let's say you're right for arguments sake and this is not what Madison intended. The reason(s) for passing the amendment do NOT change what they mean/do.
For example did the 14th amendment right now applies to anyone born in the US-including children of illegal immigrants. Was that the intention? Of course not, it was intended for black people. Does that mean that that amendment is no longer valid? Of course not.
Weeeellllll, what we have here is a modern interpretation of the concept of "militia", different from the concept of militia during Madison's time not to mention the complete absence of all pertinent documentation Madison wrote later on the subject.James Madison was the author of the militia clause in the Constitution and the Second Amendment. What was Madison’s thinking and how do we know it? Are Madison’s words undebatable?
The Second Amendment 8217 s History Consortiumnews
Weeeee! Do you believe we now have a modern interpretation of the concept of "privacy", different from the concept of militia during Madison's time?Weeeellllll, what we have here is a modern interpretation of the concept of "militia", different from the concept of militia during Madison's time...James Madison was the author of the militia clause in the Constitution and the Second Amendment. What was Madison’s thinking and how do we know it? Are Madison’s words undebatable?
The Second Amendment 8217 s History Consortiumnews
Now come on, you know the "militia" argument the anti-gunners use to heavily regulate, promote banning firearms. Is this ignorance or an intentional deflection on your part?Weeeee! Do you believe we now have a modern interpretation of the concept of "privacy", different from the concept of militia during Madison's time?Weeeellllll, what we have here is a modern interpretation of the concept of "militia", different from the concept of militia during Madison's time...James Madison was the author of the militia clause in the Constitution and the Second Amendment. What was Madison’s thinking and how do we know it? Are Madison’s words undebatable?
The Second Amendment 8217 s History Consortiumnews
Be true to your principles: claim there is NO right to privacy in the Constitution