Dale Smith
Platinum Member
No, the DNC friendly web security company CloudStrike made that claim and the other 17 agencies were not allowed to examine the server....remember? One other huge thing is that the amount of data that was taken had to of been an inside source because trying to download that much data from that far away would have set off warnings via the firewall. It is one thing to hack into a server and see the data but something entirely to download it. We already know that it was Seth Rich that provided the information. I guess your lamestream media forgot to mention that to ya.
Read the FBI and DHS joint statement linking Russia to the DNC hacking
That report is based on evidence provided by CrowdStrike, no credible investigation would rely on third party evidence like that.
So you believe Putin over our own intelligence community?
What does Putin have to do with this? Not believing our IC doesn't mean "believes Putin"
And if there is anything we know for sure , it's that Obama's IC had no qualms about lying to the American people, and even Congress if it suited them to do so.
Our IC says Russia did it. Putin says they didn't. Who do you believe?
I believe Putin but I didn't need him to say it. This isn't about believing someone, this is about the preponderance of the evidence. Seth Rich was the key to the whole thing. He was murdered for doing what he did and the bought and paid for D.C police upper brass were in the cover-up and the stalling of the release of Seth Rich's laptop....now, if it was just a botched robbery attempt like they claimed from the very onset? Why did they need to confiscate his laptop? He was alive and speaking coherently when he was loaded into the ambulance and the EMTs were very surprised that he died and then we have this......