Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 97,429
- 73,668
- 3,645
Neither, please re-read.And that's fine...that doesn't mean they would necessarily have caught this scam by the trumps. You see, the scam was specifically designed to skirt the tax laws.Yes, everyone is grateful that Trump has continued the upward economic swing that Obama started.
But if he's left to stay in the White House he will fuck it up just like he did all of his businesses, resulting in six bankruptcy filings.
He blew through $413M in money from his Daddy and ended up posting almost one trillion dollars in losses in his mid-1990s tax returns.
We really need to get him the fuck outta' D.C.
.
.
.
No doubt you have a link?
Oh absolutely.
""""The president has long sold himself as a self-made billionaire, but a Times investigation found that he received at least $413 million in today’s dollars from his father’s real estate empire, much of it through tax dodges in the 1990s.
The president’s parents, Fred and Mary Trump, transferred well over $1 billion in wealth to their children, which could have produced a tax bill of at least $550 million under the 55 percent tax rate then imposed on gifts and inheritances.
The Trumps paid a total of $52.2 million, or about 5 percent, tax records show."""""
This 11-page exposé of the Trump family real estate deals, NY state tax returns and filings was overshadowed by the Kavanaugh hearings.
Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes as He Reaped Riches From His Father
Took me a couple of runs through the article to assimilate all the data included as over 100,000 documents were analyzed over the last 2 years in order to produce the article.
,
Trump has kept his mouth shut about the article because HE KNOWS HE CAN'T SUE THEM since it's the truth!
.
But this is ONE reason he's campaigning so hard to keep control of Congress. This shit is going to come back on him from the Dems if they take the House.
.
Hmmm...the article bases opinion on todays dollars, yet uses taxes based on that time period. Just a wild guess but I would like to think the IRS did their job properly back then....dumbass.
Which is fine? The bogus numbers or trying to say the IRS was incompetent?