Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have a feeling I could suggest Elvis is still alive and doing tours with Andy Kaufmann, and you'd buy it.
Jim Hoft.
Jim Fucking Hoft.
SMH...
Answer the question and I might.
Do you believe ISIS is murdering people in mass?
I have a feeling I could suggest Elvis is still alive and doing tours with Andy Kaufmann, and you'd buy it.
Jim Hoft.
Jim Fucking Hoft.
SMH...
Answer the question and I might.
Do you believe ISIS is murdering people in mass?
No. I have no reliable information to that effect. And neither do you.
How 'bout that bridge though? You could charge tolls.
Someone has to be the winner....Oh but what if ISIS is the good guys?
Does anyone here feel like Pogo? Is the press lying about ISIS?
Like it or not, Isis are Muslims. Calling them ‘monsters’ lets us off the hook
By the way I don’t think it’s even helpful for him to describe the unfortunate Mr Haines as a ‘British hero’. Even if he hadn’t been an aid worker, but an inoffensive businessman, his murder would still be barbarous. Somehow, I don’t think we need a hierarchy of victimhood.
Like it or not Isis are Muslims. Calling them monsters lets us off the hook Spectator Blogs
Like it or not, Isis are Muslims. Calling them ‘monsters’ lets us off the hook
By the way I don’t think it’s even helpful for him to describe the unfortunate Mr Haines as a ‘British hero’. Even if he hadn’t been an aid worker, but an inoffensive businessman, his murder would still be barbarous. Somehow, I don’t think we need a hierarchy of victimhood.
Like it or not Isis are Muslims. Calling them monsters lets us off the hook Spectator Blogs
Composition Fallacy
Hasty Generalization Fallacy
Like it or not, Isis are Muslims. Calling them ‘monsters’ lets us off the hook
By the way I don’t think it’s even helpful for him to describe the unfortunate Mr Haines as a ‘British hero’. Even if he hadn’t been an aid worker, but an inoffensive businessman, his murder would still be barbarous. Somehow, I don’t think we need a hierarchy of victimhood.
Like it or not Isis are Muslims. Calling them monsters lets us off the hook Spectator Blogs
Composition Fallacy
Hasty Generalization Fallacy
That does't apply, as far as I see it.
I got what the writer meant.
Like it or not, Isis are Muslims. Calling them ‘monsters’ lets us off the hook
By the way I don’t think it’s even helpful for him to describe the unfortunate Mr Haines as a ‘British hero’. Even if he hadn’t been an aid worker, but an inoffensive businessman, his murder would still be barbarous. Somehow, I don’t think we need a hierarchy of victimhood.
Like it or not Isis are Muslims. Calling them monsters lets us off the hook Spectator Blogs
Composition Fallacy
Hasty Generalization Fallacy
That does't apply, as far as I see it.
I got what the writer meant.
And the writer commits the fallacies.
By the same logic, the Eric Rudolphs and Scott Roeders and Tim McVeighs are Christians.
....So what?
We're concerned with their political activities in both cases -- not their religious ones. Subsuming them into the set of "those who share their politics" is useful; subsuming them into the set of "those who share their religion" is not. In both cases.
They may all have brown eyes too -- that's irrelevant.
Get what I mean?
Like it or not, Isis are Muslims. Calling them ‘monsters’ lets us off the hook
By the way I don’t think it’s even helpful for him to describe the unfortunate Mr Haines as a ‘British hero’. Even if he hadn’t been an aid worker, but an inoffensive businessman, his murder would still be barbarous. Somehow, I don’t think we need a hierarchy of victimhood.
Like it or not Isis are Muslims. Calling them monsters lets us off the hook Spectator Blogs
Composition Fallacy
Hasty Generalization Fallacy
That does't apply, as far as I see it.
I got what the writer meant.
And the writer commits the fallacies.
By the same logic, the Eric Rudolphs and Scott Roeders and Tim McVeighs are Christians.
....So what?
We're concerned with their political activities in both cases -- not their religious ones. Subsuming them into the set of "those who share their politics" is useful; subsuming them into the set of "those who share their religion" is not. In both cases.
They may all have brown eyes too -- that's irrelevant.
Get what I mean?
Religion is their politics.
Convert or die.
Haven't you been reading the newspapers? Jihadi John never shuts up about Islam.
They would care more if they were white Christian children...But it seems more will die when a rwer gets elected and nukes the entire region...
I'm not the OP, Opie.
I can't believe you were gullible enough to post this crapola. This is an all-timer.
They would care more if they were white Christian children...But it seems more will die when a rwer gets elected and nukes the entire region...
There may not be any left by the time Obama gets done bombing the hell out of everything.