Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 13,448
- 2,408
- 290
I can understand this. Really, I can. I don't think any of us are arguing FOR the moral worthiness of slaughtering innocents.I see little difference in killing a baby with a bomb or with a rifle, or a boot heel or by setting it on fire.
The principle I think both sides are arguing is that of acceptable incidental harm.