Roudy
Diamond Member
- Mar 16, 2012
- 59,599
- 17,907
- 2,250
Coyote, et al,
It is a form of political leverage.
(COMMENT)Or is this just another form of collective punishment where the innocent get punished?
Just as sanctions and embargoes, which ultimately adversely impact all citizens, is political leverage (not collective punishment), so it is with Area "C" expansion.
Economic sanctions (as a tool of foreign policy) can be used for achieving political gains; or to apply political pressure to effect change. The two key supranational bodies to adopt sanctions measures are the United Nations (“UN”) and the European Union (“EU”). But in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the objectives are localized and impact observable. The State of Israel appears to be expanding settlements (in Area "C") in the absence of good faith negotiations and progress relative to the "permanent status of negotiations" issues found in Article V of the Oslo Accords:
Sanctions tend to take the form of restrictive/coercive measures. Measures that may be economic, diplomatic or cultural (sometimes military). The objective of Area "C" expansion is a non-violent way to demonstrate that the longer the Arab Palestinians, the greater the impact will be in terms of territorial control. They concept and applications are the same.
- Jerusalem,
- Refugees,
- Settlements,
- Security arrangements,
- Borders,
- Relations and cooperation with other neighbors, and
- Other issues of common interest.
These pressures are an attempt to:
- The freezing of Palestinian funds.
- The withdrawal of externally provided financial services.
- Bans or restrictions on trade traffic.
- Bans or restrictions on internal travel and checkpoints.
- The expansion of Settlements.
UN and EU Sanctions are very similar in nature to the objective of Israeli Settlement Expansion. Historically, the use of economic sanctions alone have a poor track record. Between 1914 and 1990, various countries imposed economic sanctions in 116 cases. They failed to achieve their stated objectives in 66 percent of those cases and were at best only partially successful in most of the rest. The Israeli approach is slightly different, with the ratchet gradually taking more and more territory, effectively reducing the nation building potential. If the expansion has no impact on the Palestinians --- than it merely adds to the capital infrastructure of Israel. If it does have an impact, the hopefully the Palestinians will be eventually persuaded to come back to the negotiating table with a mind to actually craft a workable treaty of peace on the "permanent status of negotiations" issues.
- Effect a change in the conduct of the Palestinian Government and leadership.
- To place pressure on the general population of the State of Palestine, so that they population transfers that pressure onto the regime or leadership, to seriously address the "permanent status of negotiations" issues --- .
- To deter, prevent and suppress the financing of Jihadist and Fedayeen activities through a variety of Palestinian Terrorist.
Most Respectfully,
R
" in the absence of good faith negotiations"
Bullshit as usual from Rocco. The Jews have never had any intention of negotiating in good faith. The Jews, since the 1920s, stated clearly that they intended to dispossess the non-Jews in the entire area of Palestine and in the more recent negotiations have never included the establishment of a Palestinian state as a possible outcome of the negotiations. This was confirmed publicly by the prime minister of Israel just a few weeks ago. The Jews are in the process of taking all the land and either continuing to rule over non-Jews in a manner similar to how the whites ruled non-whites in South Africa or force the expulsion of the non-Jews from the entire area of Palestine.
How about you produce some evidence then, as your last 100 attempts failed completely ?
Failed what? Facts don't pass or fail. They are just facts.
Not our fault you are delusional.