Issa is working hard for you! Wants to name US-waters after Reagan!

Ronald The Socialist Reagan was the most corrupt president in U.S. history. His administration was the most corrupt in U.S. history. They lied to Congress over and over. Reagan used the Constitution to wipe his ass. He is a criminal and should have spent the last years of his life in jail.

All this is documented.

Conservatives worship a traitor and criminal.
 
Ronald The Socialist Reagan was the most corrupt president in U.S. history. His administration was the most corrupt in U.S. history. They lied to Congress over and over. Reagan used the Constitution to wipe his ass. He is a criminal and should have spent the last years of his life in jail.

All this is documented.

Conservatives worship a traitor and criminal.
Kid, ask somebody of age to wipe your nose. What the heck are you doing on the internet without adult supervision?
No sane person would write shit like that. Check your facts, bolster your thesis with sources to make it credible. Slinging shit around without rhyme and reason is very childish hence the recommendation to have an adult change your diapers, otherwise you will smear shit all over yourself.
 
Ronald The Socialist Reagan was the most corrupt president in U.S. history. His administration was the most corrupt in U.S. history. They lied to Congress over and over. Reagan used the Constitution to wipe his ass. He is a criminal and should have spent the last years of his life in jail.

All this is documented.

Conservatives worship a traitor and criminal.
Kid, ask somebody of age to wipe your nose. What the heck are you doing on the internet without adult supervision?
No sane person would write shit like that. Check your facts, bolster your thesis with sources to make it credible. Slinging shit around without rhyme and reason is very childish hence the recommendation to have an adult change your diapers, otherwise you will smear shit all over yourself.

Glad you asked little boy.

By the end of his term, 138 Reagan administration officials had been convicted, had been indicted, or had been the subject of official investigations for official misconduct and/or criminal violations. In terms of number of officials involved, the record of his administration was the worst ever.

1. Lyn Nofziger--White House Press Secretary - Convicted on charges of illegal lobbying of White House in Wedtech scandal. The lobbying would not have been illegal had he not been White House Press Secretary.

2. Michael Deaver, Reagan's Chief of Staff, received three years' probation and was fined one hundred thousand dollars after being convicted for lying to a congressional subcommittee and a federal grand jury about his lobbying activities after leaving the White House. Same as with Lyn Nofziger.

3. James Watt, Reagan's Secretary of the Interior was indicted on 41 felony counts for using connections at the Department of Housing and Urban Development to help his private clients seek federal funds for housing projects in Maryland, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Watt conceded that he had received $500,000 from clients who were granted very favorable housing contracts after he had intervened on their behalf. Watt was eventually sentenced to five years in prison and 500 hours of community service.

4. John Poindexter, Reagan's national security advisor, guilty of five criminal counts involving conspiracy to mislead Congress, obstructing congressional inquiries, lying to lawmakers, used "high national security" to mask deceit and wrong-doing...

5. Richard Secord pleaded guilty to a felony charge of lying to Congress over Iran-Contra. Appointed by William Casey to assist Oliver North.

6. Elliott Abrams was appointed by President Reagan in 1985 to head the State Department's Latin American Bureau. He was closely linked with ex-White House aide Lt. Col. Oliver North's covert movement to aid the Contras. Working for North, Abrams coordinated inter-agency support for the contras and helped solicit illegal funding from foreign powers as well as domestic contributors. Abrams agreed to cooperate with Iran-Contra investigators and pled guilty to two charges reduced to misdemeanors. He was sentenced in 1991 to two years probation and 100 hours of community service but was pardoned by President George Bush...

7. Robert C. McFarlane, Reagan's National Security Advisor, pled guilty to four misdemeanors and was sentenced to two years probation and 200 hours of community service. He was also fined $20,000. He received a blanket pardon from President George Bush...

8. Alan D. Fiers was the Chief of the Central Intelligence Agency's Central American Task Force. Fiers pled guilty in 1991 to two counts of withholding information from congress about Oliver North's activities and the diversion of Iran arms sale money to aid the Contras. He was sentenced to one year of probation and 100 hours of community service. Alan Fiers received a blanket pardon for his crimes from President Bush...

  1. Thomas G. Clines: convicted of four counts of tax-related offenses for failing to report income from the operations;
2. Carl R. Channel - Office of Public Diplomacy , partner in International Business- first person convicted in the Iran/Contra scandal, pleaded guilty of one count of defrauding the United States
  1. Richard R. Miller - Partner with Oliver North in IBC, a Office of Public Diplomacy front group, convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States.
  1. Clair George was Chief of the CIA's Division of Covert Operations under President Reagan. George was convicted of lying to two congressional committees in 1986. George faced a maximum five year federal prison sentence and a $20,000 fine for each of the two convictions. Jurors cleared George of five other charges including two counts of lying to a federal grand jury. Clair George received a blanket pardon for his crimes from President George Bush...

  2. Rita Lavelle was indicted, tried and convicted of lying to Congress and served three months of a six-month prison sentence.

  3. Philip Winn - Assistant HUD Secretary. Pleaded guilty to one count of scheming to give illegal gratuities.

  4. Thomas Demery - Assistand HUD Secretary - pleaded guilty to steering HUD subsidies to politically connected donors.
The list goes on and on and on.......

Nixon was impeached and only 8 people in his administration were convicted. One person in Clinton's administration was ever convicted of something.

Reagan is the worst president and one of the most notorious criminals to never serve time in prison the U.S. has ever known.

R%20dumbass%202_zps72eb2acc.jpg
 
Ronald The Socialist Reagan was the most corrupt president in U.S. history. His administration was the most corrupt in U.S. history. They lied to Congress over and over. Reagan used the Constitution to wipe his ass. He is a criminal and should have spent the last years of his life in jail.

All this is documented.

Conservatives worship a traitor and criminal.
Kid, ask somebody of age to wipe your nose. What the heck are you doing on the internet without adult supervision?
No sane person would write shit like that. Check your facts, bolster your thesis with sources to make it credible. Slinging shit around without rhyme and reason is very childish hence the recommendation to have an adult change your diapers, otherwise you will smear shit all over yourself.

Glad you asked little boy.

By the end of his term, 138 Reagan administration officials had been convicted, had been indicted, or had been the subject of official investigations for official misconduct and/or criminal violations. In terms of number of officials involved, the record of his administration was the worst ever.

1. Lyn Nofziger--White House Press Secretary - Convicted on charges of illegal lobbying of White House in Wedtech scandal. The lobbying would not have been illegal had he not been White House Press Secretary.

2. Michael Deaver, Reagan's Chief of Staff, received three years' probation and was fined one hundred thousand dollars after being convicted for lying to a congressional subcommittee and a federal grand jury about his lobbying activities after leaving the White House. Same as with Lyn Nofziger.

3. James Watt, Reagan's Secretary of the Interior was indicted on 41 felony counts for using connections at the Department of Housing and Urban Development to help his private clients seek federal funds for housing projects in Maryland, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Watt conceded that he had received $500,000 from clients who were granted very favorable housing contracts after he had intervened on their behalf. Watt was eventually sentenced to five years in prison and 500 hours of community service.

4. John Poindexter, Reagan's national security advisor, guilty of five criminal counts involving conspiracy to mislead Congress, obstructing congressional inquiries, lying to lawmakers, used "high national security" to mask deceit and wrong-doing...

5. Richard Secord pleaded guilty to a felony charge of lying to Congress over Iran-Contra. Appointed by William Casey to assist Oliver North.

6. Elliott Abrams was appointed by President Reagan in 1985 to head the State Department's Latin American Bureau. He was closely linked with ex-White House aide Lt. Col. Oliver North's covert movement to aid the Contras. Working for North, Abrams coordinated inter-agency support for the contras and helped solicit illegal funding from foreign powers as well as domestic contributors. Abrams agreed to cooperate with Iran-Contra investigators and pled guilty to two charges reduced to misdemeanors. He was sentenced in 1991 to two years probation and 100 hours of community service but was pardoned by President George Bush...

7. Robert C. McFarlane, Reagan's National Security Advisor, pled guilty to four misdemeanors and was sentenced to two years probation and 200 hours of community service. He was also fined $20,000. He received a blanket pardon from President George Bush...

8. Alan D. Fiers was the Chief of the Central Intelligence Agency's Central American Task Force. Fiers pled guilty in 1991 to two counts of withholding information from congress about Oliver North's activities and the diversion of Iran arms sale money to aid the Contras. He was sentenced to one year of probation and 100 hours of community service. Alan Fiers received a blanket pardon for his crimes from President Bush...

  1. Thomas G. Clines: convicted of four counts of tax-related offenses for failing to report income from the operations;
2. Carl R. Channel - Office of Public Diplomacy , partner in International Business- first person convicted in the Iran/Contra scandal, pleaded guilty of one count of defrauding the United States
  1. Richard R. Miller - Partner with Oliver North in IBC, a Office of Public Diplomacy front group, convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States.
  1. Clair George was Chief of the CIA's Division of Covert Operations under President Reagan. George was convicted of lying to two congressional committees in 1986. George faced a maximum five year federal prison sentence and a $20,000 fine for each of the two convictions. Jurors cleared George of five other charges including two counts of lying to a federal grand jury. Clair George received a blanket pardon for his crimes from President George Bush...

  2. Rita Lavelle was indicted, tried and convicted of lying to Congress and served three months of a six-month prison sentence.

  3. Philip Winn - Assistant HUD Secretary. Pleaded guilty to one count of scheming to give illegal gratuities.

  4. Thomas Demery - Assistand HUD Secretary - pleaded guilty to steering HUD subsidies to politically connected donors.
The list goes on and on and on.......

Nixon was impeached and only 8 people in his administration were convicted. One person in Clinton's administration was ever convicted of something.

Reagan is the worst president and one of the most notorious criminals to never serve time in prison the U.S. has ever known.

R%20dumbass%202_zps72eb2acc.jpg
You have just demonstrated that the DOJ actually did their job without presidential interference. Great, thank you!!! Now, again.. did you make this shit up for demo purposes?
 
Ronald The Socialist Reagan was the most corrupt president in U.S. history. His administration was the most corrupt in U.S. history. They lied to Congress over and over. Reagan used the Constitution to wipe his ass. He is a criminal and should have spent the last years of his life in jail.

All this is documented.

Conservatives worship a traitor and criminal.
Kid, ask somebody of age to wipe your nose. What the heck are you doing on the internet without adult supervision?
No sane person would write shit like that. Check your facts, bolster your thesis with sources to make it credible. Slinging shit around without rhyme and reason is very childish hence the recommendation to have an adult change your diapers, otherwise you will smear shit all over yourself.

Glad you asked little boy.

By the end of his term, 138 Reagan administration officials had been convicted, had been indicted, or had been the subject of official investigations for official misconduct and/or criminal violations. In terms of number of officials involved, the record of his administration was the worst ever.

1. Lyn Nofziger--White House Press Secretary - Convicted on charges of illegal lobbying of White House in Wedtech scandal. The lobbying would not have been illegal had he not been White House Press Secretary.

2. Michael Deaver, Reagan's Chief of Staff, received three years' probation and was fined one hundred thousand dollars after being convicted for lying to a congressional subcommittee and a federal grand jury about his lobbying activities after leaving the White House. Same as with Lyn Nofziger.

3. James Watt, Reagan's Secretary of the Interior was indicted on 41 felony counts for using connections at the Department of Housing and Urban Development to help his private clients seek federal funds for housing projects in Maryland, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Watt conceded that he had received $500,000 from clients who were granted very favorable housing contracts after he had intervened on their behalf. Watt was eventually sentenced to five years in prison and 500 hours of community service.

4. John Poindexter, Reagan's national security advisor, guilty of five criminal counts involving conspiracy to mislead Congress, obstructing congressional inquiries, lying to lawmakers, used "high national security" to mask deceit and wrong-doing...

5. Richard Secord pleaded guilty to a felony charge of lying to Congress over Iran-Contra. Appointed by William Casey to assist Oliver North.

6. Elliott Abrams was appointed by President Reagan in 1985 to head the State Department's Latin American Bureau. He was closely linked with ex-White House aide Lt. Col. Oliver North's covert movement to aid the Contras. Working for North, Abrams coordinated inter-agency support for the contras and helped solicit illegal funding from foreign powers as well as domestic contributors. Abrams agreed to cooperate with Iran-Contra investigators and pled guilty to two charges reduced to misdemeanors. He was sentenced in 1991 to two years probation and 100 hours of community service but was pardoned by President George Bush...

7. Robert C. McFarlane, Reagan's National Security Advisor, pled guilty to four misdemeanors and was sentenced to two years probation and 200 hours of community service. He was also fined $20,000. He received a blanket pardon from President George Bush...

8. Alan D. Fiers was the Chief of the Central Intelligence Agency's Central American Task Force. Fiers pled guilty in 1991 to two counts of withholding information from congress about Oliver North's activities and the diversion of Iran arms sale money to aid the Contras. He was sentenced to one year of probation and 100 hours of community service. Alan Fiers received a blanket pardon for his crimes from President Bush...

  1. Thomas G. Clines: convicted of four counts of tax-related offenses for failing to report income from the operations;
2. Carl R. Channel - Office of Public Diplomacy , partner in International Business- first person convicted in the Iran/Contra scandal, pleaded guilty of one count of defrauding the United States
  1. Richard R. Miller - Partner with Oliver North in IBC, a Office of Public Diplomacy front group, convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States.
  1. Clair George was Chief of the CIA's Division of Covert Operations under President Reagan. George was convicted of lying to two congressional committees in 1986. George faced a maximum five year federal prison sentence and a $20,000 fine for each of the two convictions. Jurors cleared George of five other charges including two counts of lying to a federal grand jury. Clair George received a blanket pardon for his crimes from President George Bush...

  2. Rita Lavelle was indicted, tried and convicted of lying to Congress and served three months of a six-month prison sentence.

  3. Philip Winn - Assistant HUD Secretary. Pleaded guilty to one count of scheming to give illegal gratuities.

  4. Thomas Demery - Assistand HUD Secretary - pleaded guilty to steering HUD subsidies to politically connected donors.
The list goes on and on and on.......

Nixon was impeached and only 8 people in his administration were convicted. One person in Clinton's administration was ever convicted of something.

Reagan is the worst president and one of the most notorious criminals to never serve time in prison the U.S. has ever known.

R%20dumbass%202_zps72eb2acc.jpg
You have just demonstrated that the DOJ actually did their job without presidential interference. Great, thank you!!! Now, again.. did you make this shit up for demo purposes?


LOL Your a Raygun butt sniffer so facts aren't allowed to enter your mind. I'm sorry history has already been written and Reagan's crimes are in black and white for all eternity.

He's your surrogate grandpappy so you can never think ill of him, but that doesn't matter does it.

He is a criminal. For all time.
 
Darrell Issa is a terrific Congressman and a true Prince. He isnt afraid of the Democratic shitheads.
Ah Prince Issa of the failed Benghazi witch hunt :rofl:
…. with non-cooperation from the Administration, sanitized private server….
Oh please. Have you noticed the GOP only raises a stink about the Benghazi fabrication during election season?
One of the reasons Romney lost because he didn't. Another reason is that Reid lied on the Senate floor, concerning Romney's taxes, in order for being protected and he couldn't get sued for lying thus constituting defamation.
332-206.

Nuff said.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
 
Darrell Issa is a terrific Congressman and a true Prince. He isnt afraid of the Democratic shitheads.
Ah Prince Issa of the failed Benghazi witch hunt :rofl:
…. with non-cooperation from the Administration, sanitized private server….
Oh please. Have you noticed the GOP only raises a stink about the Benghazi fabrication during election season?
One of the reasons Romney lost because he didn't. Another reason is that Reid lied on the Senate floor, concerning Romney's taxes, in order for being protected and he couldn't get sued for lying thus constituting defamation.
332-206.

Nuff said.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
It's 246 to 188. That's the GOP majority in the House, increased in the last election over their previous majority. Democrats have lost every national office except President for 8 years. And next year they'll lose that as well since the GOP has a trainload of bright qualified candidates and the Democrats have 2 old rich white people.
 
Ah Prince Issa of the failed Benghazi witch hunt :rofl:
…. with non-cooperation from the Administration, sanitized private server….
Oh please. Have you noticed the GOP only raises a stink about the Benghazi fabrication during election season?
One of the reasons Romney lost because he didn't. Another reason is that Reid lied on the Senate floor, concerning Romney's taxes, in order for being protected and he couldn't get sued for lying thus constituting defamation.
332-206.

Nuff said.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
It's 246 to 188. That's the GOP majority in the House, increased in the last election over their previous majority. Democrats have lost every national office except President for 8 years. And next year they'll lose that as well since the GOP has a trainload of bright qualified candidates and the Democrats have 2 old rich white people.
Well, aren't you stupid and quite apparently you cannot follow a train of thought, Rübe. 332-206 refers to 2012, you full idiot.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
 
…. with non-cooperation from the Administration, sanitized private server….
Oh please. Have you noticed the GOP only raises a stink about the Benghazi fabrication during election season?
One of the reasons Romney lost because he didn't. Another reason is that Reid lied on the Senate floor, concerning Romney's taxes, in order for being protected and he couldn't get sued for lying thus constituting defamation.
332-206.

Nuff said.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
It's 246 to 188. That's the GOP majority in the House, increased in the last election over their previous majority. Democrats have lost every national office except President for 8 years. And next year they'll lose that as well since the GOP has a trainload of bright qualified candidates and the Democrats have 2 old rich white people.
Well, aren't you stupid and quite apparently you cannot follow a train of thought, Rübe. 332-206 refers to 2012, you full idiot.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
I was awaer of that, Herr Gruenschnabel. BUt you obviously are not up to date on the Democrats' record in national elections since then.
Here's a hint: Democrats are losing almost every battle. Because their policies are failures and they are corrupt turds.
 
…. with non-cooperation from the Administration, sanitized private server….
Oh please. Have you noticed the GOP only raises a stink about the Benghazi fabrication during election season?
One of the reasons Romney lost because he didn't. Another reason is that Reid lied on the Senate floor, concerning Romney's taxes, in order for being protected and he couldn't get sued for lying thus constituting defamation.
332-206.

Nuff said.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
It's 246 to 188. That's the GOP majority in the House, increased in the last election over their previous majority. Democrats have lost every national office except President for 8 years. And next year they'll lose that as well since the GOP has a trainload of bright qualified candidates and the Democrats have 2 old rich white people.
Well, aren't you stupid and quite apparently you cannot follow a train of thought, Rübe. 332-206 refers to 2012, you full idiot.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
I could have sworn that was a phone number you gave for…. nevermind.
 
Oh please. Have you noticed the GOP only raises a stink about the Benghazi fabrication during election season?
One of the reasons Romney lost because he didn't. Another reason is that Reid lied on the Senate floor, concerning Romney's taxes, in order for being protected and he couldn't get sued for lying thus constituting defamation.
332-206.

Nuff said.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
It's 246 to 188. That's the GOP majority in the House, increased in the last election over their previous majority. Democrats have lost every national office except President for 8 years. And next year they'll lose that as well since the GOP has a trainload of bright qualified candidates and the Democrats have 2 old rich white people.
Well, aren't you stupid and quite apparently you cannot follow a train of thought, Rübe. 332-206 refers to 2012, you full idiot.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
I was awaer of that, Herr Gruenschnabel. BUt you obviously are not up to date on the Democrats' record in national elections since then.
Here's a hint: Democrats are losing almost every battle. Because their policies are failures and they are corrupt turds.


This is clearly why Hillary Clinton is mopping up the floor with any and all GOP comers.
 
One of the reasons Romney lost because he didn't. Another reason is that Reid lied on the Senate floor, concerning Romney's taxes, in order for being protected and he couldn't get sued for lying thus constituting defamation.
332-206.

Nuff said.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
It's 246 to 188. That's the GOP majority in the House, increased in the last election over their previous majority. Democrats have lost every national office except President for 8 years. And next year they'll lose that as well since the GOP has a trainload of bright qualified candidates and the Democrats have 2 old rich white people.
Well, aren't you stupid and quite apparently you cannot follow a train of thought, Rübe. 332-206 refers to 2012, you full idiot.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
I was awaer of that, Herr Gruenschnabel. BUt you obviously are not up to date on the Democrats' record in national elections since then.
Here's a hint: Democrats are losing almost every battle. Because their policies are failures and they are corrupt turds.


This is clearly why Hillary Clinton is mopping up the floor with any and all GOP comers.
Yawn, how often does this have to be posted, moron? Polls now are measures of name recognition. Hillary has 100% name recognition and under 50% approval. Of course she will poll better at this stage. But most people arent even aware the presidential election is next year.
Why do you think Trump shot up in the polls after his remarks on Mexicans? Because he has name recognition and was in the news. Let Bobby Jindal have the kind of exposure Trump has had and I guarantee Bobby Jindal would be beating Hillary.
The fact is the Democrats have been losing elections right and left and will continue to do so in 2016. The press is not going to cover for Hillary the way they did for Obama.
 
Issa Name US waters after Reagan TheHill

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is floating legislation that would name most U.S. coastal waters after former President Ronald Reagan.

Issa reintroduced his bill Wednesday to rename the country’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), which generally extends from three miles to 200 miles offshore, as the Ronald Wilson Reagan Exclusive Economic Zone.


Important stuff, you know.

The only body of water that should be named after Reagan would be a sewage treatment plant. It could deal with all the "trickle down ".
 
332-206.

Nuff said.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
It's 246 to 188. That's the GOP majority in the House, increased in the last election over their previous majority. Democrats have lost every national office except President for 8 years. And next year they'll lose that as well since the GOP has a trainload of bright qualified candidates and the Democrats have 2 old rich white people.
Well, aren't you stupid and quite apparently you cannot follow a train of thought, Rübe. 332-206 refers to 2012, you full idiot.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
I was awaer of that, Herr Gruenschnabel. BUt you obviously are not up to date on the Democrats' record in national elections since then.
Here's a hint: Democrats are losing almost every battle. Because their policies are failures and they are corrupt turds.


This is clearly why Hillary Clinton is mopping up the floor with any and all GOP comers.
Yawn, how often does this have to be posted, moron? Polls now are measures of name recognition. Hillary has 100% name recognition and under 50% approval. Of course she will poll better at this stage. But most people arent even aware the presidential election is next year.
Why do you think Trump shot up in the polls after his remarks on Mexicans? Because he has name recognition and was in the news. Let Bobby Jindal have the kind of exposure Trump has had and I guarantee Bobby Jindal would be beating Hillary.
The fact is the Democrats have been losing elections right and left and will continue to do so in 2016. The press is not going to cover for Hillary the way they did for Obama.


Well, let's put that to rest for once and for all, Herr Arschlochlecker:

Polls are more than measures of name recognition.

Early polls are far more predictive than people want to admit.

Not only Hillary has close to 100% name recognition. Most of the GOP field does, too, but it's in even far worse shape. Must suck to be a Rightie these days.

Bobby Jindal HAS been pitted against Hillary, and she crushes him.

This is the longest data-stream of early polling in our nation's history. By mid-year of the year BEFORE the presidential election, already there have been almost 350 polls and over 1,400 matchups, of which Hillary has won over 97% of national matchups and over 80% of all matchups total, including matchups in a bevy of red states. You see, you think you can say this shit over just one poll, but I watch ALL of them, and there are eery similarities between mid-2015 and mid-2011 to be found: in mid-2011, Obama was already consistently leading every possible Republican in Ohio and Virginia, North Carolina and Florida were tossups. In 2015, same story for Clinton, excepting Kasich in Ohio, whom she then crushes in Florida, and Florida is much less of a toss-up this year. North Carolina has been one of the most polled states in the Union and it ranges from Hillary +7 to a GOPer +3 - and that is a state that the GOP should have put away a long time ago were the data pointing to the GOP having the upper hand. But Hillary clearly and demonstrably has the upper hand, because she is romping in the black vote, the Latino vote, the Jewish vote (69-30) and most importantly, the female vote.

Useful idiots like you who were sooooooo sure that Obama was going to lose, poo-pooed all those early polls, all of which pointed toward a win for Obama. Only, this time around, the numbers are even stronger for Hillary at this point in the game than they were for Obama, because it's not about the "Obama coalition". It's about the new Democratic coalition that will just as willingly come out for Hillary as it did for Obama, only with a much stronger Latino vote for her, thanks to the Trumpians of the world.

So, scream all you want, Herr Schwanzlecker, it's all you've got. Meanwhile, I've got hard data from MANY sources.
 
It's 246 to 188. That's the GOP majority in the House, increased in the last election over their previous majority. Democrats have lost every national office except President for 8 years. And next year they'll lose that as well since the GOP has a trainload of bright qualified candidates and the Democrats have 2 old rich white people.
Well, aren't you stupid and quite apparently you cannot follow a train of thought, Rübe. 332-206 refers to 2012, you full idiot.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
I was awaer of that, Herr Gruenschnabel. BUt you obviously are not up to date on the Democrats' record in national elections since then.
Here's a hint: Democrats are losing almost every battle. Because their policies are failures and they are corrupt turds.


This is clearly why Hillary Clinton is mopping up the floor with any and all GOP comers.
Yawn, how often does this have to be posted, moron? Polls now are measures of name recognition. Hillary has 100% name recognition and under 50% approval. Of course she will poll better at this stage. But most people arent even aware the presidential election is next year.
Why do you think Trump shot up in the polls after his remarks on Mexicans? Because he has name recognition and was in the news. Let Bobby Jindal have the kind of exposure Trump has had and I guarantee Bobby Jindal would be beating Hillary.
The fact is the Democrats have been losing elections right and left and will continue to do so in 2016. The press is not going to cover for Hillary the way they did for Obama.


Well, let's put that to rest for once and for all, Herr Arschlochlecker:

Polls are more than measures of name recognition.

Early polls are far more predictive than people want to admit.

Not only Hillary has close to 100% name recognition. Most of the GOP field does, too, but it's in even far worse shape. Must suck to be a Rightie these days.

Bobby Jindal HAS been pitted against Hillary, and she crushes him.

This is the longest data-stream of early polling in our nation's history. By mid-year of the year BEFORE the presidential election, already there have been almost 350 polls and over 1,400 matchups, of which Hillary has won over 97% of national matchups and over 80% of all matchups total, including matchups in a bevy of red states. You see, you think you can say this shit over just one poll, but I watch ALL of them, and there are eery similarities between mid-2015 and mid-2011 to be found: in mid-2011, Obama was already consistently leading every possible Republican in Ohio and Virginia, North Carolina and Florida were tossups. In 2015, same story for Clinton, excepting Kasich in Ohio, whom she then crushes in Florida, and Florida is much less of a toss-up this year. North Carolina has been one of the most polled states in the Union and it ranges from Hillary +7 to a GOPer +3 - and that is a state that the GOP should have put away a long time ago were the data pointing to the GOP having the upper hand. But Hillary clearly and demonstrably has the upper hand, because she is romping in the black vote, the Latino vote, the Jewish vote (69-30) and most importantly, the female vote.

Useful idiots like you who were sooooooo sure that Obama was going to lose, poo-pooed all those early polls, all of which pointed toward a win for Obama. Only, this time around, the numbers are even stronger for Hillary at this point in the game than they were for Obama, because it's not about the "Obama coalition". It's about the new Democratic coalition that will just as willingly come out for Hillary as it did for Obama, only with a much stronger Latino vote for her, thanks to the Trumpians of the world.

So, scream all you want, Herr Schwanzlecker, it's all you've got. Meanwhile, I've got hard data from MANY sources.
At this point polls had Hillary beating either Giuliani or McCain,back in 2007.
Yeah tell me about data, Herr Horsesass.
BNo president had ever won with the economic numbers Obama had. BUt no one counted on the outpouring of black votes i inner cities, both real and faked.
 
Well, aren't you stupid and quite apparently you cannot follow a train of thought, Rübe. 332-206 refers to 2012, you full idiot.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
I was awaer of that, Herr Gruenschnabel. BUt you obviously are not up to date on the Democrats' record in national elections since then.
Here's a hint: Democrats are losing almost every battle. Because their policies are failures and they are corrupt turds.


This is clearly why Hillary Clinton is mopping up the floor with any and all GOP comers.
Yawn, how often does this have to be posted, moron? Polls now are measures of name recognition. Hillary has 100% name recognition and under 50% approval. Of course she will poll better at this stage. But most people arent even aware the presidential election is next year.
Why do you think Trump shot up in the polls after his remarks on Mexicans? Because he has name recognition and was in the news. Let Bobby Jindal have the kind of exposure Trump has had and I guarantee Bobby Jindal would be beating Hillary.
The fact is the Democrats have been losing elections right and left and will continue to do so in 2016. The press is not going to cover for Hillary the way they did for Obama.


Well, let's put that to rest for once and for all, Herr Arschlochlecker:

Polls are more than measures of name recognition.

Early polls are far more predictive than people want to admit.

Not only Hillary has close to 100% name recognition. Most of the GOP field does, too, but it's in even far worse shape. Must suck to be a Rightie these days.

Bobby Jindal HAS been pitted against Hillary, and she crushes him.

This is the longest data-stream of early polling in our nation's history. By mid-year of the year BEFORE the presidential election, already there have been almost 350 polls and over 1,400 matchups, of which Hillary has won over 97% of national matchups and over 80% of all matchups total, including matchups in a bevy of red states. You see, you think you can say this shit over just one poll, but I watch ALL of them, and there are eery similarities between mid-2015 and mid-2011 to be found: in mid-2011, Obama was already consistently leading every possible Republican in Ohio and Virginia, North Carolina and Florida were tossups. In 2015, same story for Clinton, excepting Kasich in Ohio, whom she then crushes in Florida, and Florida is much less of a toss-up this year. North Carolina has been one of the most polled states in the Union and it ranges from Hillary +7 to a GOPer +3 - and that is a state that the GOP should have put away a long time ago were the data pointing to the GOP having the upper hand. But Hillary clearly and demonstrably has the upper hand, because she is romping in the black vote, the Latino vote, the Jewish vote (69-30) and most importantly, the female vote.

Useful idiots like you who were sooooooo sure that Obama was going to lose, poo-pooed all those early polls, all of which pointed toward a win for Obama. Only, this time around, the numbers are even stronger for Hillary at this point in the game than they were for Obama, because it's not about the "Obama coalition". It's about the new Democratic coalition that will just as willingly come out for Hillary as it did for Obama, only with a much stronger Latino vote for her, thanks to the Trumpians of the world.

So, scream all you want, Herr Schwanzlecker, it's all you've got. Meanwhile, I've got hard data from MANY sources.
At this point polls had Hillary beating either Giuliani or McCain,back in 2007.
Yeah tell me about data, Herr Horsesass.
BNo president had ever won with the economic numbers Obama had. BUt no one counted on the outpouring of black votes i inner cities, both real and faked.

No, Hillary did not win the nomination, but the Democratic Party scored an impressive victory in 2008. And you, poor fool, think it was because of "faked" black votes.

Yepp, yer a racist Rightie, alright.

And you are no Jew. Jews are not racists.
 
I was awaer of that, Herr Gruenschnabel. BUt you obviously are not up to date on the Democrats' record in national elections since then.
Here's a hint: Democrats are losing almost every battle. Because their policies are failures and they are corrupt turds.


This is clearly why Hillary Clinton is mopping up the floor with any and all GOP comers.
Yawn, how often does this have to be posted, moron? Polls now are measures of name recognition. Hillary has 100% name recognition and under 50% approval. Of course she will poll better at this stage. But most people arent even aware the presidential election is next year.
Why do you think Trump shot up in the polls after his remarks on Mexicans? Because he has name recognition and was in the news. Let Bobby Jindal have the kind of exposure Trump has had and I guarantee Bobby Jindal would be beating Hillary.
The fact is the Democrats have been losing elections right and left and will continue to do so in 2016. The press is not going to cover for Hillary the way they did for Obama.


Well, let's put that to rest for once and for all, Herr Arschlochlecker:

Polls are more than measures of name recognition.

Early polls are far more predictive than people want to admit.

Not only Hillary has close to 100% name recognition. Most of the GOP field does, too, but it's in even far worse shape. Must suck to be a Rightie these days.

Bobby Jindal HAS been pitted against Hillary, and she crushes him.

This is the longest data-stream of early polling in our nation's history. By mid-year of the year BEFORE the presidential election, already there have been almost 350 polls and over 1,400 matchups, of which Hillary has won over 97% of national matchups and over 80% of all matchups total, including matchups in a bevy of red states. You see, you think you can say this shit over just one poll, but I watch ALL of them, and there are eery similarities between mid-2015 and mid-2011 to be found: in mid-2011, Obama was already consistently leading every possible Republican in Ohio and Virginia, North Carolina and Florida were tossups. In 2015, same story for Clinton, excepting Kasich in Ohio, whom she then crushes in Florida, and Florida is much less of a toss-up this year. North Carolina has been one of the most polled states in the Union and it ranges from Hillary +7 to a GOPer +3 - and that is a state that the GOP should have put away a long time ago were the data pointing to the GOP having the upper hand. But Hillary clearly and demonstrably has the upper hand, because she is romping in the black vote, the Latino vote, the Jewish vote (69-30) and most importantly, the female vote.

Useful idiots like you who were sooooooo sure that Obama was going to lose, poo-pooed all those early polls, all of which pointed toward a win for Obama. Only, this time around, the numbers are even stronger for Hillary at this point in the game than they were for Obama, because it's not about the "Obama coalition". It's about the new Democratic coalition that will just as willingly come out for Hillary as it did for Obama, only with a much stronger Latino vote for her, thanks to the Trumpians of the world.

So, scream all you want, Herr Schwanzlecker, it's all you've got. Meanwhile, I've got hard data from MANY sources.
At this point polls had Hillary beating either Giuliani or McCain,back in 2007.
Yeah tell me about data, Herr Horsesass.
BNo president had ever won with the economic numbers Obama had. BUt no one counted on the outpouring of black votes i inner cities, both real and faked.

No, Hillary did not win the nomination, but the Democratic Party scored an impressive victory in 2008. And you, poor fool, think it was because of "faked" black votes.

Yepp, yer a racist Rightie, alright.

And you are no Jew. Jews are not racists.
Yes Hillary dd not win, despite polls that showed she would be the nominee.
Shows that polls at this stage are worthless. Like you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top