Mr Natural
Platinum Member
- Aug 23, 2009
- 23,407
- 11,208
- 950
Seems like China is the right wing Boogie Man dujour.
Used to be the Russians. Times do change.
Used to be the Russians. Times do change.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems like China is the right wing Boogie Man dujour.
Used to be the Russians. Times do change.
no I do not overestimate their damage ......a few hundred-----that's ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????? hahahahahhahawho said they won't hit the big cities?2. nukes???!!!......just a few nuke hits in the US will make Covid look like child's play
Doesn't that depend on where they hit? With apologies to the residents there, I don't think it would be the end of the world for the U.S. if Minot, North Dakota (an absolutely vital target for an enemy hitting the U.S.) and its 12,000 residents were destroyed.
Because nuclear weapons are rare enough in this modern age (China only has a few hundred) that you can't waste them targeting cities "just for the hell of it". You have to limit your nuclear targeting to military targets that are most vital. For example Minot is one of the primary storage areas for U.S. nuclear weapons and obviously a target in any kind of conflict.
it doesn't matter where they land
they have 290? that's over 5--per STATE!!!!!!!
You vastly overestimate the damage they can do. And not all of them are going to work right anyway. IIRC the estimated failure rates for Soviet nuclear weapons (which were more sophisticated than anything the Chinese have) was at least 30%.
about 10 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb--single warhead with MIRVa few hundred-----that's ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????? hahahahahhahawho said they won't hit the big cities?2. nukes???!!!......just a few nuke hits in the US will make Covid look like child's play
Doesn't that depend on where they hit? With apologies to the residents there, I don't think it would be the end of the world for the U.S. if Minot, North Dakota (an absolutely vital target for an enemy hitting the U.S.) and its 12,000 residents were destroyed.
Because nuclear weapons are rare enough in this modern age (China only has a few hundred) that you can't waste them targeting cities "just for the hell of it". You have to limit your nuclear targeting to military targets that are most vital. For example Minot is one of the primary storage areas for U.S. nuclear weapons and obviously a target in any kind of conflict.
it doesn't matter where they land
they have 290? that's over 5--per STATE!!!!!!!
You vastly overestimate the damage they can do. And not all of them are going to work right anyway. IIRC the estimated failure rates for Soviet nuclear weapons (which were more sophisticated than anything the Chinese have) was at least 30%.
Meh. It's so-so. They're workers rather than fighters.China fielding a world class military
Walmart, Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, Huawei --- they're all big multinational corporations with CEOs --- the Dems want to go to war to keep the workers in line, but Biden has no intention of allowing us to build economic independence in the United States.economic strength and the international political appeal of their "prosperous autocracy" model
The United States is slowly but surely being strangled to death in its own worker safety, environmental, gun control, and other U.S. Code and CFR regulations --- bombing the heck out of China won't stop that problem --- because the intent of such laws to punish Republicans out of business, and beat small businesses out of existence, in order to foster our dependency on imports.detrimental to both the short and long term interests of the United States.
I have to agree to disagree regarding regulations. The Rich are still getting richer regardless of all of the regulations right wingers like to complain about. Business could be coming up with market friendly business solutions to regulatory issues instead of having nothing but repeal of regulation with no Pareto Optimal solutions.The United States is slowly but surely being strangled to death in its own worker safety, environmental, gun control, and other U.S. Code and CFR regulations --- bombing the heck out of China won't stop that problem --- because the intent of such laws to punish Republicans out of business, and beat small businesses out of existence, in order to foster our dependency on imports.
about 10 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb--single warhead with MIRVa few hundred-----that's ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????? hahahahahhahawho said they won't hit the big cities?2. nukes???!!!......just a few nuke hits in the US will make Covid look like child's play
Doesn't that depend on where they hit? With apologies to the residents there, I don't think it would be the end of the world for the U.S. if Minot, North Dakota (an absolutely vital target for an enemy hitting the U.S.) and its 12,000 residents were destroyed.
Because nuclear weapons are rare enough in this modern age (China only has a few hundred) that you can't waste them targeting cities "just for the hell of it". You have to limit your nuclear targeting to military targets that are most vital. For example Minot is one of the primary storage areas for U.S. nuclear weapons and obviously a target in any kind of conflict.
it doesn't matter where they land
they have 290? that's over 5--per STATE!!!!!!!
You vastly overestimate the damage they can do. And not all of them are going to work right anyway. IIRC the estimated failure rates for Soviet nuclear weapons (which were more sophisticated than anything the Chinese have) was at least 30%.
DF-41 (Dong Feng-41 / CSS-X-20) | Missile Threat
The DF-41 (Dong Feng [East Wind]-41, CSS-20) is Chinese road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). It has an operational range of up to 15,000 km, making it China’s longest-range missile, and is reportedly capable of loading multiple independently-targeted warheads (MIRV). DF-41...missilethreat.csis.org
And yes, many of them will be intercepted by our ABD.about 10 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb--single warhead with MIRVa few hundred-----that's ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????? hahahahahhahawho said they won't hit the big cities?2. nukes???!!!......just a few nuke hits in the US will make Covid look like child's play
Doesn't that depend on where they hit? With apologies to the residents there, I don't think it would be the end of the world for the U.S. if Minot, North Dakota (an absolutely vital target for an enemy hitting the U.S.) and its 12,000 residents were destroyed.
Because nuclear weapons are rare enough in this modern age (China only has a few hundred) that you can't waste them targeting cities "just for the hell of it". You have to limit your nuclear targeting to military targets that are most vital. For example Minot is one of the primary storage areas for U.S. nuclear weapons and obviously a target in any kind of conflict.
it doesn't matter where they land
they have 290? that's over 5--per STATE!!!!!!!
You vastly overestimate the damage they can do. And not all of them are going to work right anyway. IIRC the estimated failure rates for Soviet nuclear weapons (which were more sophisticated than anything the Chinese have) was at least 30%.
DF-41 (Dong Feng-41 / CSS-X-20) | Missile Threat
The DF-41 (Dong Feng [East Wind]-41, CSS-20) is Chinese road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). It has an operational range of up to 15,000 km, making it China’s longest-range missile, and is reportedly capable of loading multiple independently-targeted warheads (MIRV). DF-41...missilethreat.csis.org
150 kiloton warhead is not large enough to destroy most major cities.
hahahahhahaAnd yes, many of them will be intercepted by our ABD.about 10 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb--single warhead with MIRVa few hundred-----that's ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????? hahahahahhahawho said they won't hit the big cities?2. nukes???!!!......just a few nuke hits in the US will make Covid look like child's play
Doesn't that depend on where they hit? With apologies to the residents there, I don't think it would be the end of the world for the U.S. if Minot, North Dakota (an absolutely vital target for an enemy hitting the U.S.) and its 12,000 residents were destroyed.
Because nuclear weapons are rare enough in this modern age (China only has a few hundred) that you can't waste them targeting cities "just for the hell of it". You have to limit your nuclear targeting to military targets that are most vital. For example Minot is one of the primary storage areas for U.S. nuclear weapons and obviously a target in any kind of conflict.
it doesn't matter where they land
they have 290? that's over 5--per STATE!!!!!!!
You vastly overestimate the damage they can do. And not all of them are going to work right anyway. IIRC the estimated failure rates for Soviet nuclear weapons (which were more sophisticated than anything the Chinese have) was at least 30%.
DF-41 (Dong Feng-41 / CSS-X-20) | Missile Threat
The DF-41 (Dong Feng [East Wind]-41, CSS-20) is Chinese road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). It has an operational range of up to 15,000 km, making it China’s longest-range missile, and is reportedly capable of loading multiple independently-targeted warheads (MIRV). DF-41...missilethreat.csis.org
150 kiloton warhead is not large enough to destroy most major cities.
And anyway, if there is a choice between "to lose a few million of filthy Democrats" and "to lose the USA" - ok, there is no choice.
....OMG----so, a nuke hits a city and the city goes back to normal in a --ahhhh--few hours??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..they'll be in their cars going to McDonald's!!!!!!!about 10 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb--single warhead with MIRVa few hundred-----that's ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????? hahahahahhahawho said they won't hit the big cities?2. nukes???!!!......just a few nuke hits in the US will make Covid look like child's play
Doesn't that depend on where they hit? With apologies to the residents there, I don't think it would be the end of the world for the U.S. if Minot, North Dakota (an absolutely vital target for an enemy hitting the U.S.) and its 12,000 residents were destroyed.
Because nuclear weapons are rare enough in this modern age (China only has a few hundred) that you can't waste them targeting cities "just for the hell of it". You have to limit your nuclear targeting to military targets that are most vital. For example Minot is one of the primary storage areas for U.S. nuclear weapons and obviously a target in any kind of conflict.
it doesn't matter where they land
they have 290? that's over 5--per STATE!!!!!!!
You vastly overestimate the damage they can do. And not all of them are going to work right anyway. IIRC the estimated failure rates for Soviet nuclear weapons (which were more sophisticated than anything the Chinese have) was at least 30%.
DF-41 (Dong Feng-41 / CSS-X-20) | Missile Threat
The DF-41 (Dong Feng [East Wind]-41, CSS-20) is Chinese road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). It has an operational range of up to 15,000 km, making it China’s longest-range missile, and is reportedly capable of loading multiple independently-targeted warheads (MIRV). DF-41...missilethreat.csis.org
150 kiloton warhead is not large enough to destroy most major cities.
????????!!!!!!!!!!!AHAHAHHAHAHAHAabout 10 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb--single warhead with MIRVa few hundred-----that's ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????? hahahahahhahawho said they won't hit the big cities?2. nukes???!!!......just a few nuke hits in the US will make Covid look like child's play
Doesn't that depend on where they hit? With apologies to the residents there, I don't think it would be the end of the world for the U.S. if Minot, North Dakota (an absolutely vital target for an enemy hitting the U.S.) and its 12,000 residents were destroyed.
Because nuclear weapons are rare enough in this modern age (China only has a few hundred) that you can't waste them targeting cities "just for the hell of it". You have to limit your nuclear targeting to military targets that are most vital. For example Minot is one of the primary storage areas for U.S. nuclear weapons and obviously a target in any kind of conflict.
it doesn't matter where they land
they have 290? that's over 5--per STATE!!!!!!!
You vastly overestimate the damage they can do. And not all of them are going to work right anyway. IIRC the estimated failure rates for Soviet nuclear weapons (which were more sophisticated than anything the Chinese have) was at least 30%.
DF-41 (Dong Feng-41 / CSS-X-20) | Missile Threat
The DF-41 (Dong Feng [East Wind]-41, CSS-20) is Chinese road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). It has an operational range of up to 15,000 km, making it China’s longest-range missile, and is reportedly capable of loading multiple independently-targeted warheads (MIRV). DF-41...missilethreat.csis.org
150 kiloton warhead is not large enough to destroy most major cities.
According to National Defense Magazine (NationalDefenseMagazine.org) China plans to field a "world class military" by 2049. This cannot be allowed to happen. China fielding a world class military combined with their economic strength and the international political appeal of their "prosperous autocracy" model will be detrimental to both the short and long term interests of the United States.
....OMG----so, a nuke hits a city and the city goes back to normal in a --ahhhh--few hours??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..they'll be in their cars going to McDonald's!!!!!!!about 10 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb--single warhead with MIRVa few hundred-----that's ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????? hahahahahhahawho said they won't hit the big cities?2. nukes???!!!......just a few nuke hits in the US will make Covid look like child's play
Doesn't that depend on where they hit? With apologies to the residents there, I don't think it would be the end of the world for the U.S. if Minot, North Dakota (an absolutely vital target for an enemy hitting the U.S.) and its 12,000 residents were destroyed.
Because nuclear weapons are rare enough in this modern age (China only has a few hundred) that you can't waste them targeting cities "just for the hell of it". You have to limit your nuclear targeting to military targets that are most vital. For example Minot is one of the primary storage areas for U.S. nuclear weapons and obviously a target in any kind of conflict.
it doesn't matter where they land
they have 290? that's over 5--per STATE!!!!!!!
You vastly overestimate the damage they can do. And not all of them are going to work right anyway. IIRC the estimated failure rates for Soviet nuclear weapons (which were more sophisticated than anything the Chinese have) was at least 30%.
DF-41 (Dong Feng-41 / CSS-X-20) | Missile Threat
The DF-41 (Dong Feng [East Wind]-41, CSS-20) is Chinese road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). It has an operational range of up to 15,000 km, making it China’s longest-range missile, and is reportedly capable of loading multiple independently-targeted warheads (MIRV). DF-41...missilethreat.csis.org
150 kiloton warhead is not large enough to destroy most major cities.
hundreds of thousands DEAD.....radiation.......
YOU also are playing Missile Command------the economy/etc is DESTROYED!!!....
Seems like China is the right wing Boogie Man dujour.
Used to be the Russians. Times do change.
We have to eliminate Russia as well but it isn't as time urgent. They're a slowly dying nation so we can deal with them at our leisure.
China first. Then Russia. Because in real life you always take care of business.
Before pleasure.
..from your OP it looks like you want us to start an illegal war--....OMG----so, a nuke hits a city and the city goes back to normal in a --ahhhh--few hours??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..they'll be in their cars going to McDonald's!!!!!!!about 10 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb--single warhead with MIRVa few hundred-----that's ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????? hahahahahhahawho said they won't hit the big cities?2. nukes???!!!......just a few nuke hits in the US will make Covid look like child's play
Doesn't that depend on where they hit? With apologies to the residents there, I don't think it would be the end of the world for the U.S. if Minot, North Dakota (an absolutely vital target for an enemy hitting the U.S.) and its 12,000 residents were destroyed.
Because nuclear weapons are rare enough in this modern age (China only has a few hundred) that you can't waste them targeting cities "just for the hell of it". You have to limit your nuclear targeting to military targets that are most vital. For example Minot is one of the primary storage areas for U.S. nuclear weapons and obviously a target in any kind of conflict.
it doesn't matter where they land
they have 290? that's over 5--per STATE!!!!!!!
You vastly overestimate the damage they can do. And not all of them are going to work right anyway. IIRC the estimated failure rates for Soviet nuclear weapons (which were more sophisticated than anything the Chinese have) was at least 30%.
DF-41 (Dong Feng-41 / CSS-X-20) | Missile Threat
The DF-41 (Dong Feng [East Wind]-41, CSS-20) is Chinese road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). It has an operational range of up to 15,000 km, making it China’s longest-range missile, and is reportedly capable of loading multiple independently-targeted warheads (MIRV). DF-41...missilethreat.csis.org
150 kiloton warhead is not large enough to destroy most major cities.
hundreds of thousands DEAD.....radiation.......
YOU also are playing Missile Command------the economy/etc is DESTROYED!!!....
I never said that.
No problem. Here is reality:hahahahhahaAnd yes, many of them will be intercepted by our ABD.about 10 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb--single warhead with MIRVa few hundred-----that's ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????? hahahahahhahawho said they won't hit the big cities?2. nukes???!!!......just a few nuke hits in the US will make Covid look like child's play
Doesn't that depend on where they hit? With apologies to the residents there, I don't think it would be the end of the world for the U.S. if Minot, North Dakota (an absolutely vital target for an enemy hitting the U.S.) and its 12,000 residents were destroyed.
Because nuclear weapons are rare enough in this modern age (China only has a few hundred) that you can't waste them targeting cities "just for the hell of it". You have to limit your nuclear targeting to military targets that are most vital. For example Minot is one of the primary storage areas for U.S. nuclear weapons and obviously a target in any kind of conflict.
it doesn't matter where they land
they have 290? that's over 5--per STATE!!!!!!!
You vastly overestimate the damage they can do. And not all of them are going to work right anyway. IIRC the estimated failure rates for Soviet nuclear weapons (which were more sophisticated than anything the Chinese have) was at least 30%.
DF-41 (Dong Feng-41 / CSS-X-20) | Missile Threat
The DF-41 (Dong Feng [East Wind]-41, CSS-20) is Chinese road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). It has an operational range of up to 15,000 km, making it China’s longest-range missile, and is reportedly capable of loading multiple independently-targeted warheads (MIRV). DF-41...missilethreat.csis.org
150 kiloton warhead is not large enough to destroy most major cities.
And anyway, if there is a choice between "to lose a few million of filthy Democrats" and "to lose the USA" - ok, there is no choice.
YOU also are playing Missile Command
''''''And yes, many of them will be intercepted by our ABD'''''
get with reality .