Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I never claimed he didn't help garner support for the radical Republicans that eventually helped give black people equal rights, only that he's not a positive role model. He did help change the US for the better.You might be right. But perception is what's really important. Isn't it? And like I said. He was a very effective agent of positive change.That "Civil Disobedience" was because he would incite the riots, but wasn't actually in them. A famous quote from MLK was "A riot is the language of the unheard". He also once made a speech about his support of riots: Here's what Martin Luther King Jr. really thought about urban riotsReally? Do you have any credible evidence to support that? He did engage in civil disobedience, which was the correct thing to do, under the circumstances. But inciting riots? Give me a break.MLK used to incite extremely destructive and violent riots, then scream "Police brutality!" when police showed up to stop said riots. I don't view him as a positive role model.
http://www.martinlutherking.org/articles/the_king_holiday.pdf
Well DUH. I'm the most politically incorrect person you'll ever meet.Infraction of political correctness!And proud of it.
You might be right. But perception is what's really important. Isn't it? And like I said. He was a very effective agent of positive change.That "Civil Disobedience" was because he would incite the riots, but wasn't actually in them. A famous quote from MLK was "A riot is the language of the unheard". He also once made a speech about his support of riots: Here's what Martin Luther King Jr. really thought about urban riotsReally? Do you have any credible evidence to support that? He did engage in civil disobedience, which was the correct thing to do, under the circumstances. But inciting riots? Give me a break.MLK used to incite extremely destructive and violent riots, then scream "Police brutality!" when police showed up to stop said riots. I don't view him as a positive role model.
http://www.martinlutherking.org/articles/the_king_holiday.pdf
Why are you bringing up ancient history? Blacks have the same opportunities as everyone else. The fact that they are living in ghetto's is because they refuse to take responsibility for themselves. Our government has given them a lot of "help", but it has only fostered dependency on the government. Millions of them are still in gangs. Still living in single parent homes because their daddies refuse to take care of them...etc. I would say that institutional racism is a thing of the past, but the democrats refuse to let it die. They got all them nigga's on the plantation, for sure.Martin Luther King was a positive role model for blacks. Blacks made great strides while he was alive. He was a great role model. He was a man of conscience. He did not believe that violence was the answer. Who do blacks have as a role model today? Jessie Jackson? Al Sharpton? Obama? There are a few black leaders that they could turn to. Clarence Thomas and Ben Carson, to name a few. Unfortunately, most blacks would call them traitors to the black race, or Uncle Tom's. The problems they suffer from...poverty, gang violence, drugs and single parent homes are problem that they created themselves. Yet many of them blame whitey. Isn't it about time you people quit your bellyaching and took responsibility for your own lives? No one can lift you out of the hole you're in. Only you can do that. Just saying.
You absolutely no idea of what black Americans are like. They don't need 'role models'. They are mostly successful, law abiding people. YOur attitude was pitifully inaccruate back in the 1960s...nowadays it's totally idiotic.
And BTW - even before the 1960s black people were more than earning a substantial and decent standard of living. The problem is the rich white people wouldn't pay them fairly.
Why do you think that the Confederates wouldn't free the slaves - it's because slavery was the foundation of the economy of the southern states. In other words black people were doing all the work that created all the wealth, but white people were taking all the money.
how about restaurants?...Yea but Malcomb X preached doing for themselves rather than trying to get along with whitey. Black people need to start their own grocery stores.I never said he was perfect. But he was against violence. And that is the reason he was so effective.MLK used to incite extremely destructive and violent riots, then scream "Police brutality!" when police showed up to stop said riots. I don't view him as a positive role model.
Even jackie kennedy said he was a phoney. The only reason he was embraced way back when was because he advocated non-violence.
It was mainly white liberals that were bamboozled by MLK.
No one cares what you think. Take a hike.Well DUH. I'm the most politically incorrect person you'll ever meet.Infraction of political correctness!
How are you politically incorrect? I've heard your schtick on Fux News and talk radio hundreds of times, it's a common meme.
I'm no racist, and calling me one for not considering MLK a role model makes no sense. While calling anyone who criticizes a black man racist is typical of Liberals, you should at least only do so when you at least have a credible excuse. I support the results of his 'protests', I do not support his methods. His riots destroyed the property of others, and destroyed police credibility.You might be right. But perception is what's really important. Isn't it? And like I said. He was a very effective agent of positive change.That "Civil Disobedience" was because he would incite the riots, but wasn't actually in them. A famous quote from MLK was "A riot is the language of the unheard". He also once made a speech about his support of riots: Here's what Martin Luther King Jr. really thought about urban riotsReally? Do you have any credible evidence to support that? He did engage in civil disobedience, which was the correct thing to do, under the circumstances. But inciting riots? Give me a break.MLK used to incite extremely destructive and violent riots, then scream "Police brutality!" when police showed up to stop said riots. I don't view him as a positive role model.
http://www.martinlutherking.org/articles/the_king_holiday.pdf
'A riot is the language of the unheard' was not King endorsing riots. To say so is taking him completely out of context. Lutroo, don't give into this powder puff racist, figure it out for yourself.
MLK: A riot is the language of the unheard
I'm no racist, and calling me one for not considering MLK a role model makes no sense. While calling anyone who criticizes a black man racist is typical of Liberals, you should at least only do so when you at least have a credible excuse. I support the results of his 'protests', I do not support his methods. His riots destroyed the property of others, and destroyed police credibility.You might be right. But perception is what's really important. Isn't it? And like I said. He was a very effective agent of positive change.That "Civil Disobedience" was because he would incite the riots, but wasn't actually in them. A famous quote from MLK was "A riot is the language of the unheard". He also once made a speech about his support of riots: Here's what Martin Luther King Jr. really thought about urban riotsReally? Do you have any credible evidence to support that? He did engage in civil disobedience, which was the correct thing to do, under the circumstances. But inciting riots? Give me a break.MLK used to incite extremely destructive and violent riots, then scream "Police brutality!" when police showed up to stop said riots. I don't view him as a positive role model.
http://www.martinlutherking.org/articles/the_king_holiday.pdf
'A riot is the language of the unheard' was not King endorsing riots. To say so is taking him completely out of context. Lutroo, don't give into this powder puff racist, figure it out for yourself.
MLK: A riot is the language of the unheard
Sounds like you can't justify his inciting of riots, so you just call me a racist. You can't even really call me a racist, for all you know, I could be black. Being black doesn't mean you condone the actions of everyone who happens to be the same color. As I explained, despite his methods, I do support the eventual results that he assisted with.I'm no racist, and calling me one for not considering MLK a role model makes no sense. While calling anyone who criticizes a black man racist is typical of Liberals, you should at least only do so when you at least have a credible excuse. I support the results of his 'protests', I do not support his methods. His riots destroyed the property of others, and destroyed police credibility.You might be right. But perception is what's really important. Isn't it? And like I said. He was a very effective agent of positive change.That "Civil Disobedience" was because he would incite the riots, but wasn't actually in them. A famous quote from MLK was "A riot is the language of the unheard". He also once made a speech about his support of riots: Here's what Martin Luther King Jr. really thought about urban riotsReally? Do you have any credible evidence to support that? He did engage in civil disobedience, which was the correct thing to do, under the circumstances. But inciting riots? Give me a break.
http://www.martinlutherking.org/articles/the_king_holiday.pdf
'A riot is the language of the unheard' was not King endorsing riots. To say so is taking him completely out of context. Lutroo, don't give into this powder puff racist, figure it out for yourself.
MLK: A riot is the language of the unheard
There are few absolutes in life, one of those is that white people who denounce and malign MLK are racists.
Which black civil rights leader do you admire?
Sounds like you can't justify his inciting of riots, so you just call me a racist. You can't even really call me a racist, for all you know, I could be black. Being black doesn't mean you condone the actions of everyone who happens to be the same color. As I explained, despite his methods, I do support the eventual results that he assisted with.I'm no racist, and calling me one for not considering MLK a role model makes no sense. While calling anyone who criticizes a black man racist is typical of Liberals, you should at least only do so when you at least have a credible excuse. I support the results of his 'protests', I do not support his methods. His riots destroyed the property of others, and destroyed police credibility.You might be right. But perception is what's really important. Isn't it? And like I said. He was a very effective agent of positive change.That "Civil Disobedience" was because he would incite the riots, but wasn't actually in them. A famous quote from MLK was "A riot is the language of the unheard". He also once made a speech about his support of riots: Here's what Martin Luther King Jr. really thought about urban riots
http://www.martinlutherking.org/articles/the_king_holiday.pdf
'A riot is the language of the unheard' was not King endorsing riots. To say so is taking him completely out of context. Lutroo, don't give into this powder puff racist, figure it out for yourself.
MLK: A riot is the language of the unheard
There are few absolutes in life, one of those is that white people who denounce and malign MLK are racists.
Which black civil rights leader do you admire?
I don't really admire any human being in general.
Prove that I'm not black~Sounds like you can't justify his inciting of riots, so you just call me a racist. You can't even really call me a racist, for all you know, I could be black. Being black doesn't mean you condone the actions of everyone who happens to be the same color. As I explained, despite his methods, I do support the eventual results that he assisted with.I'm no racist, and calling me one for not considering MLK a role model makes no sense. While calling anyone who criticizes a black man racist is typical of Liberals, you should at least only do so when you at least have a credible excuse. I support the results of his 'protests', I do not support his methods. His riots destroyed the property of others, and destroyed police credibility.You might be right. But perception is what's really important. Isn't it? And like I said. He was a very effective agent of positive change.
'A riot is the language of the unheard' was not King endorsing riots. To say so is taking him completely out of context. Lutroo, don't give into this powder puff racist, figure it out for yourself.
MLK: A riot is the language of the unheard
There are few absolutes in life, one of those is that white people who denounce and malign MLK are racists.
Which black civil rights leader do you admire?
I don't really admire any human being in general.
You're not black, stop being ridiculous.
MLK didn't incite riots.
Answer my question, can you name a black civil rights leader that you admire?
Prove that I'm not black~Sounds like you can't justify his inciting of riots, so you just call me a racist. You can't even really call me a racist, for all you know, I could be black. Being black doesn't mean you condone the actions of everyone who happens to be the same color. As I explained, despite his methods, I do support the eventual results that he assisted with.I'm no racist, and calling me one for not considering MLK a role model makes no sense. While calling anyone who criticizes a black man racist is typical of Liberals, you should at least only do so when you at least have a credible excuse. I support the results of his 'protests', I do not support his methods. His riots destroyed the property of others, and destroyed police credibility.'A riot is the language of the unheard' was not King endorsing riots. To say so is taking him completely out of context. Lutroo, don't give into this powder puff racist, figure it out for yourself.
MLK: A riot is the language of the unheard
There are few absolutes in life, one of those is that white people who denounce and malign MLK are racists.
Which black civil rights leader do you admire?
I don't really admire any human being in general.
You're not black, stop being ridiculous.
MLK didn't incite riots.
Answer my question, can you name a black civil rights leader that you admire?
He did, he even made speeches supporting riots.
I can't name any human being that I admire.
We yield to you on this matter. The PC police are the arbitrators on these matters.Well DUH. I'm the most politically incorrect person you'll ever meet.Infraction of political correctness!
How are you politically incorrect? I've heard your schtick on Fux News and talk radio hundreds of times, it's a common meme.
Ask a fair question: Can you name a black you admire?Answer my question, can you name a black civil rights leader that you admire?
MLK supported all kinds of violence, he incited riots~Prove that I'm not black~Sounds like you can't justify his inciting of riots, so you just call me a racist. You can't even really call me a racist, for all you know, I could be black. Being black doesn't mean you condone the actions of everyone who happens to be the same color. As I explained, despite his methods, I do support the eventual results that he assisted with.I'm no racist, and calling me one for not considering MLK a role model makes no sense. While calling anyone who criticizes a black man racist is typical of Liberals, you should at least only do so when you at least have a credible excuse. I support the results of his 'protests', I do not support his methods. His riots destroyed the property of others, and destroyed police credibility.
There are few absolutes in life, one of those is that white people who denounce and malign MLK are racists.
Which black civil rights leader do you admire?
I don't really admire any human being in general.
You're not black, stop being ridiculous.
MLK didn't incite riots.
Answer my question, can you name a black civil rights leader that you admire?
He did, he even made speeches supporting riots.
I can't name any human being that I admire.
I don't need to prove that you're not black.
MLK did not support violence.
You can't what?
Ask a fair question: Can you name a black you admire?Answer my question, can you name a black civil rights leader that you admire?
Bill Cosby?
Tiger Woods?
Charlie Rangal?
Barack Obama?
...and so it goes.
Really? Do you have any credible evidence to support that? He did engage in civil disobedience, which was the correct thing to do, under the circumstances. But inciting riots? Give me a break.MLK used to incite extremely destructive and violent riots, then scream "Police brutality!" when police showed up to stop said riots. I don't view him as a positive role model.
Martin Luther King was a positive role model for blacks. Blacks made great strides while he was alive. He was a great role model.
MLK supported all kinds of violence, he incited riots~Prove that I'm not black~Sounds like you can't justify his inciting of riots, so you just call me a racist. You can't even really call me a racist, for all you know, I could be black. Being black doesn't mean you condone the actions of everyone who happens to be the same color. As I explained, despite his methods, I do support the eventual results that he assisted with.There are few absolutes in life, one of those is that white people who denounce and malign MLK are racists.
Which black civil rights leader do you admire?
I don't really admire any human being in general.
You're not black, stop being ridiculous.
MLK didn't incite riots.
Answer my question, can you name a black civil rights leader that you admire?
He did, he even made speeches supporting riots.
I can't name any human being that I admire.
I don't need to prove that you're not black.
MLK did not support violence.
You can't what?
Maybe I am black, and maybe I think you're a racist for trying to take away my membership of my own race~
All human beings are horribly flawed, and while some eventually do great things, they also do horrible things, most of which they likely hide. Though, the fact is that you can't stand someone criticizing your hero, because you've been indoctrinated into thinking anyone is great simply because you were told so.
Letter from a Birmingham Jail [King, Jr.]
The fact is that he incited violence so that it would be stopped with violence, getting their movement more recognition. They were intentionally inviting people to stop them for more publicity.
MLK supported all kinds of violence, he incited riots~Prove that I'm not black~Sounds like you can't justify his inciting of riots, so you just call me a racist. You can't even really call me a racist, for all you know, I could be black. Being black doesn't mean you condone the actions of everyone who happens to be the same color. As I explained, despite his methods, I do support the eventual results that he assisted with.There are few absolutes in life, one of those is that white people who denounce and malign MLK are racists.
Which black civil rights leader do you admire?
I don't really admire any human being in general.
You're not black, stop being ridiculous.
MLK didn't incite riots.
Answer my question, can you name a black civil rights leader that you admire?
He did, he even made speeches supporting riots.
I can't name any human being that I admire.
I don't need to prove that you're not black.
MLK did not support violence.
You can't what?
Maybe I am black, and maybe I think you're a racist for trying to take away my membership of my own race~
All human beings are horribly flawed, and while some eventually do great things, they also do horrible things, most of which they likely hide. Though, the fact is that you can't stand someone criticizing your hero, because you've been indoctrinated into thinking anyone is great simply because you were told so.
Letter from a Birmingham Jail [King, Jr.]
The fact is that he incited violence so that it would be stopped with violence, getting their movement more recognition. They were intentionally inviting people to stop them for more publicity.
