It's Pretty Surprising How Little Your Average American Knows About The Facts Of Collusion

[mudwhistle]

This is a prime example of the way most Americans think and why they are so clueless:

 

[Billy_Bob]

This explains why left wing dupes think they can impeach on just the insinuation of collusion.. The shear idiocy and ignorance of the left is stunning to behold...

 

[cutter]

Trump could be guilty of collusion if..... he broke some realestate law. That if the only law where collusion is a law. Trump is smart enough to stay legal in realestate transactions.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Trump could be guilty of collusion if..... he broke some realestate law. That if the only law where collusion is a law. Trump is smart enough to stay legal in realestate transactions.

collusion is not a crime. Selling Nuke material overseas is, getting money from a Overseas Nation for services render is. Destroying evidence is. But Hilly Clinton is a special person and cane break the laws that we have to live with.

In 2009, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton directed then-FBI Director Mueller to deliver a sample of Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to Russia Director Mueller personally makes the transfer himself even though the State Department has no authority or supervisory role over the FBI. Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation S;he sent her Bag Man Slick Willie to pick up the money by Giving a 33 min speach.Amid Russian Uranium Deal-The New York Times Hillary Clinton sided with Russia on sanctions. Later Obama mentioned to Putin that "We can be more fexible after the elections". Just how much Law Breaking does it take to get in Jail.?

 

[leecross]

Trump could be guilty of collusion if..... he broke some realestate law. That if the only law where collusion is a law. Trump is smart enough to stay legal in realestate transactions.

There is no reason for the President and his supporters to be embroiled in all this nonsense EXCEPT because of this:

From, “The Russia Hoax”

Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7

Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8

Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.

When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9

Indeed, it surely was classified.

Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.

Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.

This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.

If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.

It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10

But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.

They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.


Footnotes
8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.
9. Ibid.
10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.
11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump could be guilty of collusion if..... he broke some realestate law. That if the only law where collusion is a law. Trump is smart enough to stay legal in realestate transactions.

There is no reason for the President and his supporters to be embroiled in all this nonsense EXCEPT because of this:

From, “The Russia Hoax”

Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7

Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8

Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.

When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9

Indeed, it surely was classified.

Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.

Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.

This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.

If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.

It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10

But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.

They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.


Footnotes
8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.
9. Ibid.
10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.
11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Give me a break. Trump's phone has no security features, and he calls and receives calls all the time.

 

[leecross]

Trump could be guilty of collusion if..... he broke some realestate law. That if the only law where collusion is a law. Trump is smart enough to stay legal in realestate transactions.

There is no reason for the President and his supporters to be embroiled in all this nonsense EXCEPT because of this:

From, “The Russia Hoax”

Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7

Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8

Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.

When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9

Indeed, it surely was classified.

Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.

Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.

This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.

If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.

It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10

But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.

They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.


Footnotes
8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.
9. Ibid.
10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.
11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Give me a break. Trump's phone has no security features, and he calls and receives calls all the time.

"Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton."

 

[bullwinkle]

This explains why left wing dupes think they can impeach on just the insinuation of collusion.. The shear idiocy and ignorance of the left is stunning to behold...

Obstruction IS collusion!

 

[Billy_Bob]

This explains why left wing dupes think they can impeach on just the insinuation of collusion.. The shear idiocy and ignorance of the left is stunning to behold...

Obstruction IS collusion!

ahhhhh... In a word. NO!

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump could be guilty of collusion if..... he broke some realestate law. That if the only law where collusion is a law. Trump is smart enough to stay legal in realestate transactions.

There is no reason for the President and his supporters to be embroiled in all this nonsense EXCEPT because of this:

From, “The Russia Hoax”

Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7

Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8

Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.

When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9

Indeed, it surely was classified.

Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.

Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.

This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.

If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.

It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10

But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.

They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.


Footnotes
8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.
9. Ibid.
10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.
11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Give me a break. Trump's phone has no security features, and he calls and receives calls all the time.

"Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton."

Write a letter to the editor. Nobody else cares about your conspiracy theory crap.

 

[leecross]

Trump could be guilty of collusion if..... he broke some realestate law. That if the only law where collusion is a law. Trump is smart enough to stay legal in realestate transactions.

There is no reason for the President and his supporters to be embroiled in all this nonsense EXCEPT because of this:

From, “The Russia Hoax”

Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7

Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8

Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.

When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9

Indeed, it surely was classified.

Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.

Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.

This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.

If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.

It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10

But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.

They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.


Footnotes
8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.
9. Ibid.
10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.
11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Give me a break. Trump's phone has no security features, and he calls and receives calls all the time.

"Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton."

Write a letter to the editor. Nobody else cares about your conspiracy theory crap.

I was just giving you a "heads-up" on what is in store for you.

But it appears you already have a head's up.

A head's up your arse.

Yours and your (bad) fellows.

 

[Anathema]

This is a prime example of the way most Americans think and why they are so clueless:

What you folks miss is that most of us don’t care about “collusion”. Unless someone can show us additions, deletions, or edits to ballots during the 2016 election we don’t really give a crap.

 

[sparky]

It's Pretty Surprising How Little Your Average American Knows About The Facts Of Collusion

It's because we don't have to know the details Mud dude, most of us have long accepted our entire political system is lousy with collusion, corruption ,cronyism and conflict

~S~

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump could be guilty of collusion if..... he broke some realestate law. That if the only law where collusion is a law. Trump is smart enough to stay legal in realestate transactions.

There is no reason for the President and his supporters to be embroiled in all this nonsense EXCEPT because of this:

From, “The Russia Hoax”

Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7

Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8

Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.

When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9

Indeed, it surely was classified.

Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.

Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.

This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.

If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.

It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10

But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.

They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.


Footnotes
8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.
9. Ibid.
10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.
11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Give me a break. Trump's phone has no security features, and he calls and receives calls all the time.

"Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton."

Write a letter to the editor. Nobody else cares about your conspiracy theory crap.

I was just giving you a "heads-up" on what is in store for you.

But it appears you already have a head's up.

A head's up your arse.

Yours and your (bad) fellows.

Are those voices in your head predicting the future again? You know they haven't been right yet.

 

[sparky]

I predict i'll have another reading all this......~S~

 

[BULLDOG]

This is a prime example of the way most Americans think and why they are so clueless:

What you folks miss is that most of us don’t care about “collusion”. Unless someone can show us additions, deletions, or edits to ballots during the 2016 election we don’t really give a crap.

Doesn't matter if you care. Our laws do.

 

[Anathema]

Doesn't matter if you care. Our laws do.

That’s interesting coming from the Keft, which has never actually found a law it wanted enforced at any level until Trump got into office.

The Democrats are shooting their 2020 load on Mueller’s investigations, when in reality the outcome will have little affect on the 2020 election unless Trump is actually removed from office prior to the election.