- Feb 22, 2017
- 108,995
- 37,845
- 2,290
I am not against it.
But congress doesn't get to enforce it. That would be a direct violation of the separation of powers.
Then who would enforce it? It has to have some teeth to it or it is meaningless.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I am not against it.
But congress doesn't get to enforce it. That would be a direct violation of the separation of powers.
Absolutely. So where is the problem?
Yep.The state LEGISLATORS
Not the voters
not everywhere, the previous governor of Virginia was pushing for abortion (murder) after birth. Under those ideas, why not allow killing the kid up to 2 years old if he/she is inconvenient for the mother? Cal legislators were pushing similar ideas.Viability was where we were at with Roe.
why do you fear the will of the voters? Why do you want the federal government to dictate what is right and wrong?Yep.
they are losing on every front and don't have anything left but to whine.Sure a lot of it going on this month
The losing is just beginningthey are losing on every front and don't have anything left but to whine.
its not fake news fancy boi, its the truth.not everywhere, the previous governor of Virginia was pushing for abortion (murder) after birth. Under those ideas, why not allow killing the kid up to 2 years old if he/she is inconvenient for the mother? Cal legislators were pushing similar ideas.
Can you discuss the context of when that would be applicable or are you strawmaning about Democrats trying to make it legal for doctors to end the lives of perfectly viable and healthy babies even after they're born?not everywhere, the previous governor of Virginia was pushing for abortion (murder) after birth. Under those ideas, why not allow killing the kid up to 2 years old if he/she is inconvenient for the mother? Cal legislators were pushing similar ideas.
the SC has its own ethics code,
There is, for all Federal judges on the bench BUT SCOTUS.I'm not sure why anyone would be against an ethics code. It's pretty sad that there isn't one already.
Irrelevant. The question is who is going to determine ethics under this proposal from the idiot president?
the previous governor of Virginia as I said. "keep the child comfortable until the mother and doctor decide if it should live" not an accurate quote but that was his intent.Can you discuss the context of when that would be applicable or are you strawmaning about Democrats trying to make it legal for doctors to end the lives of perfectly viable and healthy babies even after they're born?
When you have to resort to stupid claims like that… you losenot everywhere, the previous governor of Virginia was pushing for abortion (murder) after birth. Under those ideas, why not allow killing the kid up to 2 years old if he/she is inconvenient for the mother? Cal legislators were pushing similar ideas.
because the SC is self regulating, you can object to that but you cannot change it without congressional vote and presidential signature.There is, for all Federal judges on the bench BUT SCOTUS.
WTF?why do you fear the will of the voters? Why do you want the federal government to dictate what is right and wrong?
The state LEGISLATORS
Not the voters
the previous governor of Virginia as I said. "keep the child comfortable until the mother and doctor decide if it should live" not an accurate quote but that was his intent.
then there is no reason for you to object to a state by state vote is there? Let the people vote and settle this once and for all time. I will accept the will of the people, will you?![]()
Public Opinion on Abortion
While public support for legal abortion has fluctuated some in two decades of polling, it has remained relatively stable over the past five years.www.pewresearch.org
63% of America favors a woman’s right to choose in all or most cases
Biden want's term limits for the SCOTUS. How long has Biden been in politics? Communists do what communists do to eliminate the opposition and get the system to work in their favour.I'm not sure why anyone would be against an ethics code. It's pretty sad that there isn't one already.