It's The National Motto, Idiots

[Auld Phart]

And that leaves the citizen the right to be let alone by the State about it.

the right of citizens to be free from faith.

There is no such right, as such a right would interfere with the free expression clause in the 1st. Your "right" to be free of religion extends only to your own beliefs.

Horseshit. Actually read your First Amendment. There's the right right there. The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

There's the right right there. The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

No, it states :Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Exactly. And that leaves the citizen the right to be let alone by the State about it. Makes it strictly a personal choice, which is what it must be.

NO...

it prevents Congress from implementing a State Religion.

 

[Pogo]

And that leaves the citizen the right to be let alone by the State about it.

the right of citizens to be free from faith.

There is no such right, as such a right would interfere with the free expression clause in the 1st. Your "right" to be free of religion extends only to your own beliefs.

Horseshit. Actually read your First Amendment. There's the right right there. The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

There's the right right there. The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

No, it states :Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Exactly. And that leaves the citizen the right to be let alone by the State about it. Makes it strictly a personal choice, which is what it must be.

NO...

it prevents Congress from implementing a State Religion.

--- or, more specifically, any laws controlling religion. Whether we have a "state religion" is kind of irrelevant -- whether we pass laws about it is a lot more. And being free from that imposition -- which is what the Amendment guarantees -- is being free from having a religion imposed on you.

 

[Auld Phart]

And that leaves the citizen the right to be let alone by the State about it.

There is no such right, as such a right would interfere with the free expression clause in the 1st. Your "right" to be free of religion extends only to your own beliefs.

Horseshit. Actually read your First Amendment. There's the right right there. The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

There's the right right there. The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

No, it states :Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Exactly. And that leaves the citizen the right to be let alone by the State about it. Makes it strictly a personal choice, which is what it must be.

NO...

it prevents Congress from implementing a State Religion.

--- or, more specifically, any laws controlling religion. Whether we have a "state religion" is kind of irrelevant -- whether we pass laws about it is a lot more. And being free from that imposition -- which is what the Amendment guarantees -- is being free from having a religion imposed on you.

And being free from that imposition -- which is what the Amendment guarantees

It only 'frees' you from having Congress imposing a religion.

" or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" totally screws the rest of your rant.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I think anyone who believes in imaginary Gods is stupid. Very stupid

People like... Obama? Hillary?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

the right of citizens to be free from faith.

There is no such right, as such a right would interfere with the free expression clause in the 1st. Your "right" to be free of religion extends only to your own beliefs.

Horseshit. Actually read your First Amendment. There's the right right there.

So post the text.

The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

How silly. No one is imposing anything. Just because kimche is on the table doesn't mean you have to eat it.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

the right of citizens to be free from faith.

There is no such right, as such a right would interfere with the free expression clause in the 1st. Your "right" to be free of religion extends only to your own beliefs.

Horseshit. Actually read your First Amendment. There's the right right there. The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

There's the right right there. The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

No, it states :Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Exactly. And that leaves the citizen the right to be let alone by the State about it. Makes it strictly a personal choice, which is what it must be.

Indeed, but that doesn't mean that you have the right to interfere with the free expression by individuals simply because it annoys you. There is no restriction placed upon such individual free expression because of position or place of employment.

 

[Pogo]

the right of citizens to be free from faith.

There is no such right, as such a right would interfere with the free expression clause in the 1st. Your "right" to be free of religion extends only to your own beliefs.

Horseshit. Actually read your First Amendment. There's the right right there.

So post the text.

The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

How silly. No one is imposing anything. Just because kimche is on the table doesn't mean you have to eat it.

You just got done saying there's no such thing as the right to be free from faith. Now you do a 180 and claim there IS a right not to eat "kimche", whatever that is.

Pick one.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

the right of citizens to be free from faith.

There is no such right, as such a right would interfere with the free expression clause in the 1st. Your "right" to be free of religion extends only to your own beliefs.

Horseshit. Actually read your First Amendment. There's the right right there.

So post the text.

The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

How silly. No one is imposing anything. Just because kimche is on the table doesn't mean you have to eat it.

You just got done saying there's no such thing as the right to be free from faith. Now you do a 180 and claim there IS a right not to eat "kimche", whatever that is.

Pick one.

I'm sorry you can't follow basic English.

Your not liking kimche does not ban it from the table.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Send these FFR goons a two-word response - "Fuck You"

Law Enforcement Defies Critics - Displays 'In God We Trust'

Law enforcement swears an oath to uphold our "secular" Godless Constitution. Also, the dumbasses can't provide any proof of the imaginary God they trust in.

God is not imaginary and why do you assume that they cant prove God? Why do you think the ancient Greek philosophers known as Platonists went from believing in polytheistic gods born in time and space, in favor of a Creator God who created time and space?

Lol Lakhota, Asclepias, and C_Clayton_Jones would have laughed at Plato, lololol

 

[Pogo]

the right of citizens to be free from faith.

There is no such right, as such a right would interfere with the free expression clause in the 1st. Your "right" to be free of religion extends only to your own beliefs.

Horseshit. Actually read your First Amendment. There's the right right there.

So post the text.

The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

How silly. No one is imposing anything. Just because kimche is on the table doesn't mean you have to eat it.

You just got done saying there's no such thing as the right to be free from faith. Now you do a 180 and claim there IS a right not to eat "kimche", whatever that is.

Pick one.

I'm sorry you can't follow basic English.

Your not liking kimche does not ban it from the table.

I don't even know what the fuck it is. I'm just noting that you took one position on religion and then the polar opposite position on this kimche. How convenient to have it both ways.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

There is no such right, as such a right would interfere with the free expression clause in the 1st. Your "right" to be free of religion extends only to your own beliefs.

Horseshit. Actually read your First Amendment. There's the right right there.

So post the text.

The "right to be free from faith" means you can't have it imposed involuntarily.

How silly. No one is imposing anything. Just because kimche is on the table doesn't mean you have to eat it.

You just got done saying there's no such thing as the right to be free from faith. Now you do a 180 and claim there IS a right not to eat "kimche", whatever that is.

Pick one.

I'm sorry you can't follow basic English.

Your not liking kimche does not ban it from the table.

I don't even know what the fuck it is.

Of course you don't. You're Pogo.

I'm just noting that you took one position on religion and then the polar opposite position on this kimche. How convenient to have it both ways.

Of course I didn't, but you are free to explain your misunderstanding.

 

[RodISHI]

If there is a God - it sure as hell isn't that vicious baby-killing narcissistic bastard depicted in the Old Testament.

And that is a lie perpetrated by leftist, atheist and the immoral. Just because you do not understand does not make God a "baby killer" if you actually searched it all out you may come to understand that. The Lord did not set Ten Commandments and then say they do not apply to Himself. You think in the flesh. Those children are spiritual hosts that you will personally have to deal with, within yourself. The Bible could possibly teach you how to do that but it can't when you deny your own spiritual existence that was made to be established in the image of the Son of God, you are unwilling to recognize sin and repent of it or if you desire to live in sin.

 

[EverCurious]

Kimchi is a fermented dish made of vegetables and spiced, usually cabbage if I recall. It used to be stored underground in jars to keep cool during the summer months and unfrozen during the winter months. Its kind of along the lines of sourkraut from the Germans, but it's less sour and more spicy as I've heard. (I've actually never tried either personally, can't get past the smell.)

AH yea, I couldn't remember what Asian it was, it's Korean. Makes sense, my father was stationed in Korea for many years which is why he had a taste for it heh