It's time to review, once again, the cosmological argument for God's existence

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

"Because, magic!"

Very childish.

 

[Ringtone]

At least cockring is now admitting that he’s a syphilitic moron.

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

 

[BackAgain]

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

Zzz. Zzzzz. So you’re finally owning up to being a pussy. You haven’t answered my question. Nor Indeependent’s. You get no answer to your question until you find your missing balls, sack up and answer.

 

[Ringtone]

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

 

[BackAgain]

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

It's time to review, once again, the cosmological argument for God's existence

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy? "Because, magic!" Very childish.

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Ringtone]

It's time to review, once again, the cosmological argument for God's existence

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy? "Because, magic!" Very childish.

www.usmessageboard.com

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

 

[BackAgain]

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

It's time to review, once again, the cosmological argument for God's existence

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy? "Because, magic!" Very childish.

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Ringtone]

It's time to review, once again, the cosmological argument for God's existence

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy? "Because, magic!" Very childish.

www.usmessageboard.com

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

 

[BackAgain]

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

It's time to review, once again, the cosmological argument for God's existence

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy? "Because, magic!" Very childish.

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Ringtone]

It's time to review, once again, the cosmological argument for God's existence

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy? "Because, magic!" Very childish.

www.usmessageboard.com

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

 

[BackAgain]

So you're saying that it's sensible to believe that nonexistence can cause existence?

crickets chirping

Are you insane?

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

It's time to review, once again, the cosmological argument for God's existence

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy? "Because, magic!" Very childish.

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Ringtone]

You need to answer my question, first. And stop ducking Indeependent’s question, you pussy.

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

 

[Blues Man]

Blues Man: You said everything has a cause didn't you?​

No. I've never said any such stupid thing in my life, and the cosmological argument asserts no such stupid thing.

Whatever.

Just more mystical nonsense huh?

 

[BackAgain]

So you're finally conceding that the First Law of Thermodynamics does not and cannot prohibit God the Creator from creating or destroying matter/energy?

Without a lot of double speak, see if you can answer that simple question with a yes or no.

Thanks.

Post 143.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Whatever.

Just more mystical nonsense huh?

Correct.

"Nothing can come from nothing, except my sky daddy"

"Everything has a beginning, except my sky daddy"

 

[Ringtone]

Whatever.

Just more mystical nonsense huh?

The mystical nonsense would be yours, nature worrier, apparently, if you believe that everything that exists had to have a cause for its existence.

How exactly would that work, dummy? Are you saying that nonexistence caused existence?! Are you a 'tard?

 

[Ringtone]

Post 143.

Post #152.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Notice the circular fallacy.

Assuming an eternal God creator as a first premise...

...to argue for an eternal god creator.


Truly embarrassing pap.

 

[BackAgain]

Post #152.

143

 

[Ringtone]

143

LOL!