James Comey defends Strzok, disputes 'treason' accusation in fiery op-ed: 'Dumb lies

[Oldstyle]

I think Busy B just remembered she needs to reorganize her sock drawer! Funny how she can't answer simple questions.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I certainly will not accept anything a Republican says. The truth is the actual truth not what some lying Republican says. That includes crooked AGs like Barr.

The problem is, lil' deranged mentally unstable snowflake, is that you will not accept anything ANYONE says if it is negative against the Democrats, not even what a DEMOCRAT says!

For example:

(DOJ) Ohr is NOT a 'Republican', and he stated under oath before Congress (something Mueller refuses to do) that he, Steele, and MUELLER worked on the Russian-authored Dossier BEFORE an official investigation began and BEFORE MUELLER was appointed Special Counsel.

(DOJ) Ohr is NOT a 'Republican', and he stated under oath before Congress (something Mueller refuses to do) that he notified Obama's Deputy US AG Rosenstein, Obama's NIA Director Clapper, Obama's CIA Director Brennan, and Obama's FBI Director Comey that Steele - the Trump-hating foreign spy who had been working WITH the Russians and FOR the FBI - had a biased agenda against Trump and could not be considered credible and that the Dossier was unverified, unsubstantiated, and it's origin (Russian-authored) was in question and thus was unreliable and could NOT be used...and Ohr testified he told them all of this BEFORE they blew him off and chose to use the Dossier anyway to commit FISA Court abuses (1 initial and 2 in warrant renewals) and perjury before Congress.

FBI Director Comey is a 'Republican', but he has been proven to be at the heart of the exposed crimes / coup attempt, and HE HIMSELF admitted to leaking classified information to his professor pal in a successful attempt to get an OFFICIAL investigation of Trump opened and to get his mentor Mueller appointed Special Counsel.

Former FBI Agent Page, also not a 'Republican', testified under oath to several key admissions / facts:
1) The DOJ made it clear to her and Deputy FBI Director McCabe that they were NOT going to pursue a criminal case against Hillary Clinton.

2) The FBI, under Comey, had already conducted its own internal investigation of Trump before Comey leaked classified to get an official investigation opened with a Special Counsel appointed. She stated the results of that FBI investigation resulted in ZERO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME OF COLLUSION, ZERO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME OF COLLUSION INVOLVING TRUMP OR ANY MEMBER OF HIS TEAM, NO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME HAVING BEEN COMMITTED WARRANTING AN INVESTIGATION AT ALL, LET ALONE A SPECIAL COUNSEL BEIG APPOINTED.

Former Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice sure as hell was not a Republican yet she wrote an e-mail to herself to save the facts of what happened / what was going on, In that e-mail, Rice stated FBI Director Comey briefed President Obama in AUGUST of 2016 on the 'Russia Collusion Investigation' (The one Page said resulted in ZERO evidence of crime, especially involving Trump or his team).
-- Rice stated that meeting was attended by Obama, Sally Yates, herself, and VP Joe Biden, that in that meeting Obama demanded to be kept update on EVERYTHING that went on during the FBI's illegal investigation...and later Mueller's.
-- Rice stated these meetings were expanded to include Clapper, Brennan, and Secretary of State John Kerry...that when these meetings were held the WH TURNED OFF THE CAMERAS TO THE WH SITUATION ROOM SO THERE WOULD BE NO RECORD OF THE MEETINGS.
*** FBI Agent Strzok - who was just IDed in a US IG report as having illegally leaked classified information - spoke of these 'secret meetings' in his text messages to his FBI lover Page. He called the group the 'Secret Society', confirmed what Rice wrote in her e-mail - that they had already met, and confirmed what Rice said in her e-mail about how Obama demanded to be kept informed of everything going on.

So you have all these NON-Republican co-conspirators' e-mails, texts, and testimony confirming the contents and the statements made by the others, all evidence of collusion, collaboration, conspiracy, etc... that goes all the way to the top back to Obama....BUT YOU DECLARE YOU REFUSE T ACCEPT / ACKNOWLEDGE ANY OF IT BECAUSE 'REPUBLICANS' CAN NOT BE TRUSTED!

Oh, the irony...and the madness of a triggered TDS-suffering snowflake mind...



.

What triggered the initial investigation was a referral from the Australian government not the Steele dossier. Later McCain wanted the FBI to verify whether the dossier was true. That was after the election. It may have been intended as a campaign document but it was never used as Mother Jones published it a little less than a week before the election. There is no evidence Steele is a Trump hater. Steele is a solid investigator whose investigation found corruption in FIFA. Several sources have said that Steele became concerned about what his sources in Russia were telling him. The fact is that Comey confirmed some of it was verified. Since no one has seen the FISA application, you cannot say the application was the sole document used was the dossier. Mueller did not work on the dossier as he was not working for the FBI at that time. You are just giving us your spin.

Comey has not been proven to have committed any crimes and there was no coup. He did not admit to leaking classified information and there is no evidence that he did. Mueller and Comey were colleagues. Again there is no evidence they were especially close.

Lisa Page was in no position to make that claim. She was not the agent in charge and it was a ongoing investigation.
1) That was not a indefensible action. The espionage act should be used for people who commit espionage. They take classified information and willingly give it to a foreign power. That is espionage. The IG report got several things wrong but found no political bias in Comey's decision not to file charges.

2)Again she could only talk about the state of the investigation at the time. They did not conclude their investigation. THEY DID NOT STATE THEY FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION OR ANY OTHER CRIME. IT WAS A ONGOING INVESTIGATION.

It was not a illegal investigation. It was based on a referral from the Australian government. Again you take things out of context. Everything you stated was natural. Obama obviously would have wanted to be kept abreast of the investigation. Yates would have wanted a record so Trump could not bury it.

The so-called IG report that supposedly fingers Strzok is only known because a pro-Trump Republican says it is so. There is no independent confirmation. Just because the IG says it does not make it true. A IG accused McCabe of committing a crime but the DOJ has apparently found no evidence to support that.

The fact is that there is nothing to see. They have not provided any damaging information. The one who is providing the damaging information is YOU!! You put your own spin on things to try and make something that is not there. YOU ARE THE ONE SUFFERING FROM TDS!! YOU HAVE TO SPIN AND LIE TO PROTECT TRUMP. YOU SOUND STUPID AND PARANOID DOING IT. YOU ARE THE SNOWFLAKE!! YOU GIVE TRUMP A PASS ON THINGS YOU WOUKD DEMAND OBAMA BE PROSECUTED!!

 

[busybee01]

"There was no corruption. There was no treason. There was no attempted coup. Those are lies, and dumb lies at that. There were just good people trying to figure out what was true, under unprecedented circumstances,"

You fucking dimwits

A "good person" would mislead a FISA Court with the Steele "dossiers"? These were not "good" people...they were people who perverted the power of their office to attempt to spy on another political party's candidate and smear that candidate in a national election! Comey...Brennan...Clapper...McCabe...Page...Strozk...Lynch...Clinton...and Obama...those were all corrupt people trying to figure out how to steal an election.

More lying Republicans. There is no evidence the FISA court was misled. We know that the court was informed of the political nature of the document and Comey also verified that parts of the document was verified. No one spied on any political party's candidate and they did not smear anyone. The investigation into Trump was not leaked prior to the election and the investigation was re-opened into CLINTON'S e-mails the weekend before the election..

Bullshit! The FISA court was not informed that the dossiers were paid for by the Clinton campaign! The investigation into Trump WAS leaked before the election!

Bullshit. The court was informed of the political nature of the document. Nobody knew Trump's campaign was under investigation. You are a congenital liar.

The court was not informed that Hillary Clinton had paid for the dossiers to be compiled. Richard Steele was pushing the Trump being investigated story out through multiple media outlets prior to the election! Smearing Trump with that narrative prior to the election was the entire reason for his being hired in the first place!

The court was informed of the political nature of the document. It doesn't matter that Clinton and Republicans had paid for the dossier. Steele may have been pushing it but it played no role in the election.

 

[badger2]

We're also not buying BB's referral from the Australian government. Downer was at the Kensington Wine Rooms when he got the news. That's big-time MI6 territory.

 

[Oldstyle]

A "good person" would mislead a FISA Court with the Steele "dossiers"? These were not "good" people...they were people who perverted the power of their office to attempt to spy on another political party's candidate and smear that candidate in a national election! Comey...Brennan...Clapper...McCabe...Page...Strozk...Lynch...Clinton...and Obama...those were all corrupt people trying to figure out how to steal an election.

More lying Republicans. There is no evidence the FISA court was misled. We know that the court was informed of the political nature of the document and Comey also verified that parts of the document was verified. No one spied on any political party's candidate and they did not smear anyone. The investigation into Trump was not leaked prior to the election and the investigation was re-opened into CLINTON'S e-mails the weekend before the election..

Bullshit! The FISA court was not informed that the dossiers were paid for by the Clinton campaign! The investigation into Trump WAS leaked before the election!

Bullshit. The court was informed of the political nature of the document. Nobody knew Trump's campaign was under investigation. You are a congenital liar.

The court was not informed that Hillary Clinton had paid for the dossiers to be compiled. Richard Steele was pushing the Trump being investigated story out through multiple media outlets prior to the election! Smearing Trump with that narrative prior to the election was the entire reason for his being hired in the first place!

The court was informed of the political nature of the document. It doesn't matter that Clinton and Republicans had paid for the dossier. Steele may have been pushing it but it played no role in the election.

Was Steele pushing hard to have it released BEFORE the election? Yes or no?

Was it released BEFORE the election? Yes or no?

 

[Oldstyle]

Was the FISA court informed that the dossiers were paid for by the Clinton campaign? Yes or no?

 

[Wyatt earp]

I certainly will not accept anything a Republican says. The truth is the actual truth not what some lying Republican says. That includes crooked AGs like Barr.

The problem is, lil' deranged mentally unstable snowflake, is that you will not accept anything ANYONE says if it is negative against the Democrats, not even what a DEMOCRAT says!

For example:

(DOJ) Ohr is NOT a 'Republican', and he stated under oath before Congress (something Mueller refuses to do) that he, Steele, and MUELLER worked on the Russian-authored Dossier BEFORE an official investigation began and BEFORE MUELLER was appointed Special Counsel.

(DOJ) Ohr is NOT a 'Republican', and he stated under oath before Congress (something Mueller refuses to do) that he notified Obama's Deputy US AG Rosenstein, Obama's NIA Director Clapper, Obama's CIA Director Brennan, and Obama's FBI Director Comey that Steele - the Trump-hating foreign spy who had been working WITH the Russians and FOR the FBI - had a biased agenda against Trump and could not be considered credible and that the Dossier was unverified, unsubstantiated, and it's origin (Russian-authored) was in question and thus was unreliable and could NOT be used...and Ohr testified he told them all of this BEFORE they blew him off and chose to use the Dossier anyway to commit FISA Court abuses (1 initial and 2 in warrant renewals) and perjury before Congress.

FBI Director Comey is a 'Republican', but he has been proven to be at the heart of the exposed crimes / coup attempt, and HE HIMSELF admitted to leaking classified information to his professor pal in a successful attempt to get an OFFICIAL investigation of Trump opened and to get his mentor Mueller appointed Special Counsel.

Former FBI Agent Page, also not a 'Republican', testified under oath to several key admissions / facts:
1) The DOJ made it clear to her and Deputy FBI Director McCabe that they were NOT going to pursue a criminal case against Hillary Clinton.

2) The FBI, under Comey, had already conducted its own internal investigation of Trump before Comey leaked classified to get an official investigation opened with a Special Counsel appointed. She stated the results of that FBI investigation resulted in ZERO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME OF COLLUSION, ZERO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME OF COLLUSION INVOLVING TRUMP OR ANY MEMBER OF HIS TEAM, NO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME HAVING BEEN COMMITTED WARRANTING AN INVESTIGATION AT ALL, LET ALONE A SPECIAL COUNSEL BEIG APPOINTED.

Former Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice sure as hell was not a Republican yet she wrote an e-mail to herself to save the facts of what happened / what was going on, In that e-mail, Rice stated FBI Director Comey briefed President Obama in AUGUST of 2016 on the 'Russia Collusion Investigation' (The one Page said resulted in ZERO evidence of crime, especially involving Trump or his team).
-- Rice stated that meeting was attended by Obama, Sally Yates, herself, and VP Joe Biden, that in that meeting Obama demanded to be kept update on EVERYTHING that went on during the FBI's illegal investigation...and later Mueller's.
-- Rice stated these meetings were expanded to include Clapper, Brennan, and Secretary of State John Kerry...that when these meetings were held the WH TURNED OFF THE CAMERAS TO THE WH SITUATION ROOM SO THERE WOULD BE NO RECORD OF THE MEETINGS.
*** FBI Agent Strzok - who was just IDed in a US IG report as having illegally leaked classified information - spoke of these 'secret meetings' in his text messages to his FBI lover Page. He called the group the 'Secret Society', confirmed what Rice wrote in her e-mail - that they had already met, and confirmed what Rice said in her e-mail about how Obama demanded to be kept informed of everything going on.

So you have all these NON-Republican co-conspirators' e-mails, texts, and testimony confirming the contents and the statements made by the others, all evidence of collusion, collaboration, conspiracy, etc... that goes all the way to the top back to Obama....BUT YOU DECLARE YOU REFUSE T ACCEPT / ACKNOWLEDGE ANY OF IT BECAUSE 'REPUBLICANS' CAN NOT BE TRUSTED!

Oh, the irony...and the madness of a triggered TDS-suffering snowflake mind...



.

What triggered the initial investigation was a referral from the Australian government not the Steele dossier. Later McCain wanted the FBI to verify whether the dossier was true. That was after the election. It may have been intended as a campaign document but it was never used as Mother Jones published it a little less than a week before the election. There is no evidence Steele is a Trump hater. Steele is a solid investigator whose investigation found corruption in FIFA. Several sources have said that Steele became concerned about what his sources in Russia were telling him. The fact is that Comey confirmed some of it was verified. Since no one has seen the FISA application, you cannot say the application was the sole document used was the dossier. Mueller did not work on the dossier as he was not working for the FBI at that time. You are just giving us your spin.

Comey has not been proven to have committed any crimes and there was no coup. He did not admit to leaking classified information and there is no evidence that he did. Mueller and Comey were colleagues. Again there is no evidence they were especially close.

Lisa Page was in no position to make that claim. She was not the agent in charge and it was a ongoing investigation.
1) That was not a indefensible action. The espionage act should be used for people who commit espionage. They take classified information and willingly give it to a foreign power. That is espionage. The IG report got several things wrong but found no political bias in Comey's decision not to file charges.

2)Again she could only talk about the state of the investigation at the time. They did not conclude their investigation. THEY DID NOT STATE THEY FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION OR ANY OTHER CRIME. IT WAS A ONGOING INVESTIGATION.

It was not a illegal investigation. It was based on a referral from the Australian government. Again you take things out of context. Everything you stated was natural. Obama obviously would have wanted to be kept abreast of the investigation. Yates would have wanted a record so Trump could not bury it.

The so-called IG report that supposedly fingers Strzok is only known because a pro-Trump Republican says it is so. There is no independent confirmation. Just because the IG says it does not make it true. A IG accused McCabe of committing a crime but the DOJ has apparently found no evidence to support that.

The fact is that there is nothing to see. They have not provided any damaging information. The one who is providing the damaging information is YOU!! You put your own spin on things to try and make something that is not there. YOU ARE THE ONE SUFFERING FROM TDS!! YOU HAVE TO SPIN AND LIE TO PROTECT TRUMP. YOU SOUND STUPID AND PARANOID DOING IT. YOU ARE THE SNOWFLAKE!! YOU GIVE TRUMP A PASS ON THINGS YOU WOUKD DEMAND OBAMA BE PROSECUTED!!

View attachment 263796

 

[busybee01]

Blah, blah, blah... we've only had 4 instances where the EC didn't do what the popular vote said to do... and before 2000, it hadn't happened for such a long time, most people forgot the EC was a thing.

Point was, the people said "No".

More along the lines, most people just assumed that she'd win and didn't make an effort. Oh, yeah, and Russian hacking.... let's not forget that.

So the Russians hack an archaic system, the government doesn't really want to fully admit that it had been hacked, but they hope they can correct the mistake in another way. Trump didn't so much win as he was "allowed to happen".

Yeah, because what the voters said and what happened were two different things. Oh, and Trump likes to cover up names of ships because someone with the same name said bad stuff about him once. Then we are getting into Giaus Caligula territory here.

Oh, for God's sake! You're STILL trying to claim that the Russians hacked our election? Come on, Joey...wake up and smell the coffee! That train left the station a year ago! The Russians attempted to influence our election through the manipulation of social media...they didn't hack the voting process!

That may not be true. Apparently in 2016 at least 1 Florida county may have suffered a Russian intrusion into their voting systems. Marco Rubio was informed by the FBI of this.

May not be true? May have suffered...? Bullshit again! There has been ZERO proof given that Russia in any way hacked our election!

Even Republicans admit the Russians hacked our elections. They definitely hacked the Democrat servers and hacked Podesta's e-mails. Marco Rubio was far more definitive about it. That was in addition to Russian pro-Trump ads that ran on social media.

"In an interview on Friday, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida took it one step further, saying that Russian hackers not only accessed a Florida voting system, but were “in a position” to change voter roll data."

Russian hackers were "in a position" to alter Florida voter rolls, Rubio confirms - Hot Air

We don't know who hacked the DNC servers, BB! It very well may have been a Democrat disgusted with what was taking place between the DNC and the Clinton campaign! Someone who witnessed first hand how DNC leadership was screwing over Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton! That would explain why the DNC refused to let the FBI look at it's computer hard drives! It's the ONLY thing that would explain that!

We do know who hacked the DNC servers. The Russians. It was not a disgruntled employee. It is not unusual for entities that were hacked to seek a third party. The city of Atlanta did the same thing when they were hacked.

 

[Oldstyle]

The reason that Steele was pushing so hard to get that narrative released BEFORE the election is that he was paid to smear Trump BEFORE the election!

 

[busybee01]

Do you even have the faintest idea what you're talking about, Busy B?

We know you don't.

 

[Oldstyle]

Oh, for God's sake! You're STILL trying to claim that the Russians hacked our election? Come on, Joey...wake up and smell the coffee! That train left the station a year ago! The Russians attempted to influence our election through the manipulation of social media...they didn't hack the voting process!

That may not be true. Apparently in 2016 at least 1 Florida county may have suffered a Russian intrusion into their voting systems. Marco Rubio was informed by the FBI of this.

May not be true? May have suffered...? Bullshit again! There has been ZERO proof given that Russia in any way hacked our election!

Even Republicans admit the Russians hacked our elections. They definitely hacked the Democrat servers and hacked Podesta's e-mails. Marco Rubio was far more definitive about it. That was in addition to Russian pro-Trump ads that ran on social media.

"In an interview on Friday, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida took it one step further, saying that Russian hackers not only accessed a Florida voting system, but were “in a position” to change voter roll data."

Russian hackers were "in a position" to alter Florida voter rolls, Rubio confirms - Hot Air

We don't know who hacked the DNC servers, BB! It very well may have been a Democrat disgusted with what was taking place between the DNC and the Clinton campaign! Someone who witnessed first hand how DNC leadership was screwing over Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton! That would explain why the DNC refused to let the FBI look at it's computer hard drives! It's the ONLY thing that would explain that!

We do know who hacked the DNC servers. The Russians. It was not a disgruntled employee. It is not unusual for entities that were hacked to seek a third party. The city of Atlanta did the same thing when they were hacked.

We know this how? Because the FBI examined the hacked servers? Oh, wait the DNC refused to allow the FBI to examine them! Now why on earth would they do that, Busy B?

 

[easyt65]

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey?

The answers to both have already been provided:

Lynch's 'spontaneous' tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton to discuss 'grandkids' admittedly turned out to be a pre-schedule meeting, according to her own office. Former FBI Agent Page testified under oath that Lynch's DOJ mad it clear to her and McCabe that the DOJ would NOT pursue criminal charges Clinton BEFORE the 'investigation' of the Clinton 'MATTER' had been completed.

According to Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice's released e-mail, as well, Lynch was one of the very rare few Obama Cabinet members / Agency Directors he allowed to be in the WH Situation Room when Comey briefed Obama on the Trump-Russia 'Investigation and be a member of the 'team' that attended regular meetings on this during which Obama was kept updated on what was going on.

All documented, reported facts that prove inconvenient and contradictory to the let's false narrative...

 

[Oldstyle]

Do you even have the faintest idea what you're talking about, Busy B?

We know you don't.

I know that the dossier story was made public BEFORE the election! That seems to be news to you!

 

[busybee01]

Actually the US ig is undermining himself. The DOJ has found no evidence of the IG's assertion that McCabe should have been prosecuted. He also got material facts wrong.

THIS is where I call you on your constant fact-less, unsupported, unsubstantiated triggered, TDS-suffering, delusional lies / rants , which is all you ever post.

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the DOJ found no evidence of the IS's finding against McCabe(especially since the DOJ is STILL investigating Strzok).

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the US IG 'got material facts wrong'.

(** Your own opinionated rants do NOT count as 'evidence'.)

By being UNABLE to do these 2 things, which I have ZEROI doubt that you will NOT be able to do so, everyone will know you are a LIAR with NO credibility( not that they don't know this already... ).

Have any charges been filed against McCabe? It has been several years now. Surely if the IG recommended prosecution they would have found that evidence. Now that we have a dishonest AG, we should talk about whether any fake charges will be filed.

Both Rosenstein and the IG got it wrong. Comey was accused of insubordination because he stated that Clinton would not be prosecuted. They both said that was the DOJ's decision. However they failed to note that Lynch recused herself and said she would follow Comey's recommendation. Both the IG and Rosenstein failed to note that. They were both wrong on that.

You are the one who uses opinionated rants. That is all this talk about coups and treason are.You are the LIAR with NO CREDIBILITY.

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

 

[Oldstyle]

Actually the US ig is undermining himself. The DOJ has found no evidence of the IG's assertion that McCabe should have been prosecuted. He also got material facts wrong.

THIS is where I call you on your constant fact-less, unsupported, unsubstantiated triggered, TDS-suffering, delusional lies / rants , which is all you ever post.

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the DOJ found no evidence of the IS's finding against McCabe(especially since the DOJ is STILL investigating Strzok).

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the US IG 'got material facts wrong'.

(** Your own opinionated rants do NOT count as 'evidence'.)

By being UNABLE to do these 2 things, which I have ZEROI doubt that you will NOT be able to do so, everyone will know you are a LIAR with NO credibility( not that they don't know this already... ).

Have any charges been filed against McCabe? It has been several years now. Surely if the IG recommended prosecution they would have found that evidence. Now that we have a dishonest AG, we should talk about whether any fake charges will be filed.

Both Rosenstein and the IG got it wrong. Comey was accused of insubordination because he stated that Clinton would not be prosecuted. They both said that was the DOJ's decision. However they failed to note that Lynch recused herself and said she would follow Comey's recommendation. Both the IG and Rosenstein failed to note that. They were both wrong on that.

You are the one who uses opinionated rants. That is all this talk about coups and treason are.You are the LIAR with NO CREDIBILITY.

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

How do you have a "chance meeting" between two people flying on two different aircraft? A meeting that takes place at a remote area of the airport away from prying eyes? How naïve are you willing to be, Busy B?

 

[Oldstyle]

Actually the US ig is undermining himself. The DOJ has found no evidence of the IG's assertion that McCabe should have been prosecuted. He also got material facts wrong.

THIS is where I call you on your constant fact-less, unsupported, unsubstantiated triggered, TDS-suffering, delusional lies / rants , which is all you ever post.

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the DOJ found no evidence of the IS's finding against McCabe(especially since the DOJ is STILL investigating Strzok).

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the US IG 'got material facts wrong'.

(** Your own opinionated rants do NOT count as 'evidence'.)

By being UNABLE to do these 2 things, which I have ZEROI doubt that you will NOT be able to do so, everyone will know you are a LIAR with NO credibility( not that they don't know this already... ).

Have any charges been filed against McCabe? It has been several years now. Surely if the IG recommended prosecution they would have found that evidence. Now that we have a dishonest AG, we should talk about whether any fake charges will be filed.

Both Rosenstein and the IG got it wrong. Comey was accused of insubordination because he stated that Clinton would not be prosecuted. They both said that was the DOJ's decision. However they failed to note that Lynch recused herself and said she would follow Comey's recommendation. Both the IG and Rosenstein failed to note that. They were both wrong on that.

You are the one who uses opinionated rants. That is all this talk about coups and treason are.You are the LIAR with NO CREDIBILITY.

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

Why didn't Lynch leave that decision to someone else in the Justice Department? Why leave it to James Comey? That totally goes against how things normally take place.

 

[BS Filter]

Comey knows his credibility is shot. He's crying out while impaled. Sad pathetic creature.

 

[BS Filter]

Actually the US ig is undermining himself. The DOJ has found no evidence of the IG's assertion that McCabe should have been prosecuted. He also got material facts wrong.

THIS is where I call you on your constant fact-less, unsupported, unsubstantiated triggered, TDS-suffering, delusional lies / rants , which is all you ever post.

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the DOJ found no evidence of the IS's finding against McCabe(especially since the DOJ is STILL investigating Strzok).

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the US IG 'got material facts wrong'.

(** Your own opinionated rants do NOT count as 'evidence'.)

By being UNABLE to do these 2 things, which I have ZEROI doubt that you will NOT be able to do so, everyone will know you are a LIAR with NO credibility( not that they don't know this already... ).

Have any charges been filed against McCabe? It has been several years now. Surely if the IG recommended prosecution they would have found that evidence. Now that we have a dishonest AG, we should talk about whether any fake charges will be filed.

Both Rosenstein and the IG got it wrong. Comey was accused of insubordination because he stated that Clinton would not be prosecuted. They both said that was the DOJ's decision. However they failed to note that Lynch recused herself and said she would follow Comey's recommendation. Both the IG and Rosenstein failed to note that. They were both wrong on that.

You are the one who uses opinionated rants. That is all this talk about coups and treason are.You are the LIAR with NO CREDIBILITY.

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

You don't really believe it was a chance meeting and they were discussing the grandkids, but you think you can convince others it was??? How insulting.

 

[busybee01]

Do you even have the faintest idea what you're talking about, Busy B?

We know you don't.

I know that the dossier story was made public BEFORE the election! That seems to be news to you!

Around a week before the election. David Corn and Mother Jones.

 

[busybee01]

Actually the US ig is undermining himself. The DOJ has found no evidence of the IG's assertion that McCabe should have been prosecuted. He also got material facts wrong.

THIS is where I call you on your constant fact-less, unsupported, unsubstantiated triggered, TDS-suffering, delusional lies / rants , which is all you ever post.

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the DOJ found no evidence of the IS's finding against McCabe(especially since the DOJ is STILL investigating Strzok).

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the US IG 'got material facts wrong'.

(** Your own opinionated rants do NOT count as 'evidence'.)

By being UNABLE to do these 2 things, which I have ZEROI doubt that you will NOT be able to do so, everyone will know you are a LIAR with NO credibility( not that they don't know this already... ).

Have any charges been filed against McCabe? It has been several years now. Surely if the IG recommended prosecution they would have found that evidence. Now that we have a dishonest AG, we should talk about whether any fake charges will be filed.

Both Rosenstein and the IG got it wrong. Comey was accused of insubordination because he stated that Clinton would not be prosecuted. They both said that was the DOJ's decision. However they failed to note that Lynch recused herself and said she would follow Comey's recommendation. Both the IG and Rosenstein failed to note that. They were both wrong on that.

You are the one who uses opinionated rants. That is all this talk about coups and treason are.You are the LIAR with NO CREDIBILITY.

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

You don't really believe it was a chance meeting and they were discussing the grandkids, but you think you can convince others it was??? How insulting.

I don't see any evidence that it wasn't. It really doesn't matter.